By Asad Mirza, New Age Islam
17 July 2023
The UCC as envisaged by the government will affect the
Muslim community, so it would be prudent for its leaders to at least once adopt
a careful, logical, farsighted and well though out strategy to counter the
move.
On 9th December 2022, Kirodi Lal Meena, a R.S. - M.P. of the
ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) introduced a private member bill on India’s
Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the Rajya Sabha that fuelled a fresh debate on an
issue, which saw no resolution even in pre-independence India and continues to
haunt the political climate of India even today.
The sensitive nature of the issue besides giving political
mileage to the BJP, affects various political parties, with respect to their
stand on the issue. Plus, it also puts various religious communities coming
under the purview of the UCC to give up their respective Personal Laws,
particularly the Muslims, which are the largest religious minority in the
country.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Read: Is The Political Climate Of The Country Conducive To
Enact A Uniform Civil Code?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let’s dissect the political motives first and then the
response of the affected communities.
First, the audacious move of tabling the Private Member Bill
in the Rajya Sabha came just one day after the BJP secured victory in the Gujarat
assembly polls in December last. It reinforced the BJP’s political manifesto of
enforcing Hindutva, which may also serve as the lynchpin of its political
strategy for the upcoming general elections in 2024, by polarising the public.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Read: In Case of a Uniform Civil Code, How Should Muslims
Respond?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the second move to seek public opinion on the
proposed UCC, in absence of any Draft of the proposed Bill, was a very astute
move by the BJP. As it came within a week of the opposition parties’ meeting in
Patna in June to formulate a united front and strategy to counter the BJP in
the upcoming 2024 elections. As expected the move sowed division within the
opposition’s ranks. Further, it saw an immediate half-baked response from the
so-called leaders of the religious minorities – particularly the Muslims.
Muslim religious and community leaders without batting an
eyelid immediately started opposing the UCC, and didn’t stopped to dwell on
what grounds they were protesting and we saw a plethora of sentimentally rich
and logically poor responses coming forth from them. The only common stand they
took was that they oppose any interference in the Muslim Personal Law.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Read: Demystifying The Uniform Civil Code
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
But I’m sure, neither the leaders nor their supporters know
which Muslim Personal Law they are talking about. The one codified by any
Muslim rulers like the Mughals, the Khiljis or the Tughlaqs or the ones before
them? The answer is NO. In fact, the British colonialists codified the
prevailing Muslim Personal Law, without any consultations from any Islamic
jurist or scholar.
Before 1937, Muslims of all denominations, all over India,
followed the uncodified local Hindu customs, practices and usages in addition
to their personal law as per the Sharia. So the British just concurred on
codifying the prevalent practices relevant to the marriage, divorce etc., but changed
the ones relating to succession and division of property, in the case of
Muslims.
It would be interesting to know at whose behest the colonial
rulers codified the Muslim Law of Succession and Inheritance. It was none other
than MA Jinnah, the leader of the Muslim League.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Read: Why Critics Of Uniform Civil Code Should Come Up With
Better Arguments
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Shariat Act of 1937 was imposed on Indian Muslims as a
win-win political deal between the British, keen to divide Hindus and Muslims,
and the Muslim League, keen to lure the Muslims away the Congress. In a manner
this also suited Jinnah’s political strategy on how to secure a separate
country for the Muslims, but it had an added personal angle also to it.
MA Jinnah’s daughter Dina married Nevile Wadia – a Parsi,
against his wishes, though he himself had married a Parsi lady, Rattanbai
Petit. To disown Dina and leave no inheritance for her, Jinnah made use of the
recently introduced Shariat Act 1937 and nominated his sister Fatima as his
successor. The Act, a joint strategy of the British and the League, contained
provisions to sabotage the Islamic Sharia, by secretly smuggling the Hindu
customs and usages into the 1937 Act to save the property rights of the Muslim
leaders, Jinnah and the Zamindars from harm by the Islamic Sharia. Did the
Shariat Act of 1937 - now acclaimed as the holy law of Islam - contain Hindu
law provisions to secure the property rights of the League leaders? Yes, it
does.
Historian, KK Abdul Rahiman in The History of the Evolution
of Muslim Personal Law in (1986) says the British gave strength to customs and
usage that had long been adhered to particularly in matters of succession by
sections of Indian Muslims.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Read: Why Arshad Madani is wrong on the Uniform Civil Code
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, we have to realise that the UCC would not only
affect Muslims but also Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jains, Jews, Parsis and
other minorities and scheduled tribes in the country. And at the moment it is
just a political gimmick of the government to polarise the electorate and also
sow seeds of discord amongst the unified opposition. Muslim leaders need to
bring other communities leaders at the same platform and also inform their
Hindu brethren that the UCC will abolish the HUF provisions for filing Income
Tax, thus it would increase the tax liability of Hindus also.
The UCC Bill has been introduced as a political reform by
the BJP, guided by principles of Hindutva, as a response to replace the
existing complicated set of personal laws. These personal laws are so
complicated that even the Britishers didn’t dare to interfere with them.
Further, the Constituent Assembly, besieged by two schools of thought, one
supporting the UCC argued that it provided for the emergence of a secular and
progressive nation, while the opponents felt it to be conflicting with the
ideas of inclusiveness and pluralism, deemed it fit to circumvent the issue and
leave it at the moment and thus chose to include it under the Directive
Principles of the constitution, under Article 44 of the Constitution, and
leaving it for the future generations to sort it out.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Read: The Constitution Envisages A Uniform Civil Code, Not
A Common Civil Code
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A realistic and practical understanding of how personal laws
operate will indicate that the state’s organs and the Indian society are yet
not ready, even after 73 years for the substantial revamp that such legislation
would bring. Instead of gunning for political gains we should try to reflect
the rich Indian diversity of traditions and their importance in common Indians’
daily life.
Lastly, the manner in which the Muslim leadership responded
to the government’s move, shows its complete immaturity and the set manner of
its traditional, out of touch with reality reactive response, completely bereft
of any political nuances and strategy, which was also evident during the Babri
Masjid movement, Triple Talaq issue etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Read: Will the Uniform Civil Code Be the Modern
Deen-e-Ilahi?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Though it is high time but still there is time for the
Muslim leaders to formulate a Unified Strategy and response to the UCC, in
consultation with leaders of other religious minorities and political parties,
so that this time they don’t get defeated by the government in its anti-Muslim
campaign, though the chances of any such endeavour seem very remote.
----
Asad Mirza is a Delhi-based senior political and
international affairs commentator
URL: https://newageislam.com/islam-politics/uniform-civil-code-ucc/d/130234
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic
Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism