By
Muhammad Amir Rana
June 28,
2020
THE Afghan Taliban surprised the world when they asserted that no organisation named Al Qaeda existed in Afghanistan. The statement will not affect the commitments they made to the US early this year as part of the peace deal. Although the Taliban have a history of employing ‘denial’ as a war tactic, their statement denying Al Qaeda’s presence in Afghanistan also hints at their increasing political compulsions. The two militant groups have a long history of cooperation and friendship which the Taliban now feel is harder to maintain.
Flag used by various al-Qaeda factions
----
The Taliban have been using the ‘denial strategy’, equally against friends and foes, since they first came to power during the late 1990s. It was the time when Afghanistan had become a haven for international jihadists, including Pakistani terrorists, who were involved in sectarian killings in Pakistan. It was an open secret that the terrorists of Lashkar-i-Jhangvi were running their training camps in Afghanistan. However, quite surprisingly, whenever Pakistan demanded the extradition of these terrorists, the Taliban denied their presence on Afghan soil. This may be a reference from their past but even now the Afghan Taliban do not publicly acknowledge their close bonds with Pakistani militant groups, mainly the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
Flags used by the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan
-----
A recent report by the UN’s Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team has indicated that Pakistani militant groups, mainly the TTP, are operating inside Afghanistan with the permission and support of the Afghan Taliban. In many instances, they remain reluctant to take action against the TTP and its affiliates despite Pakistan’s apprehensions. The same report claimed that the Afghan Taliban regularly consulted Al Qaeda during negotiations with the United States, and Al Qaeda gave a nod to the deal.
Afghan Taliban flag
-----
The US
adventure with the Taliban is new, and both have just sealed a deal. They should
be ready for more surprises. It was in a statement posted in Pashto language on
the Taliban’s Voice of Jihad website, that the Taliban claimed that Al Qaeda
did not have a presence inside Afghanistan. Reacting to the Taliban
statement, the US Central Command’s top general, Gen Kenneth F. McKenzie, had
warned that he would not recommend a full withdrawal of US troops from
Afghanistan unless the Taliban demonstrated they no longer supported Al Qaeda
forces there.
The Taliban
have also given the impression that severing ties with Al Qaeda is in process,
but there is no proof of it. The Taliban have no political compulsions to
continue their relationship with Al Qaeda; nor do they have any financial need
to do so as the Taliban have developed their independent sources of revenue and
funding. Five hundred to 600 members of Al Qaeda are known to still be in
Afghanistan, and have become a strategic burden for the Taliban, who believe
they have secured the best possible deal with the US. The deal would be considered
a unique phenomenon in contemporary counterinsurgency history as a world power
has agreed to a deal with insurgents on weaker terms.
Many
experts believed that the Taliban’s insistence — despite their public posturing
to the contrary — on continuing their ties with Al Qaeda could sabotage the
peace process. Three points need to be considered. If the Taliban have
consulted Al Qaeda during their talks with the US, it is not possible that the
US would not have been aware of it. If Al Qaeda guarantees that it has no
intention to launch terrorist assaults on NATO members, the US can tolerate the
group though it would be difficult to guarantee this. Insider stories of
negotiations between the Taliban and the American team have not been revealed
yet, but these may help to understand the context of such possibilities.
Second, the
Taliban were ousted from power in 2001 because of Al Qaeda, and it may be
considered against their political and ideological code to disconnect with the
group for whom they had sacrificed their government and fought a long war.
Breaking with Al Qaeda may cause an internal crisis within the rank and file of
the Taliban but the most important factor is that Al Qaeda is so entrenched
within the Taliban movement that it is somehow impossible to separate the two.
This is not only about joint training, fighting together shoulder by shoulder;
both have also built strong family bonds through inter-marriage.
In that
context, denial seems a good option for the Taliban, but a similar approach towards
the presence of the TTP and other Pakistani militant groups on Afghan soil may
have some other factors behind it as well. Apart from the prevailing theory
that the TTP is a strategic tool in the hands of the Afghan Taliban against
Pakistan, the Afghan Taliban have engaged the Pakistani Taliban in their war.
The fact that the TTP has carried out terrorist activities in Pakistan may cast
doubt on such observations. However, when it comes to power-sharing in
Afghanistan, the Pakistani Taliban might be seen as contenders too as they
served during the Taliban regime in the 1990s. If that happens, Afghanistan and
the Afghan Taliban will become prime attractions for madrasa graduates in
Pakistan, particularly in the country’s border regions.
Such
convergences will be a nightmare for Pakistan, which could push Pakistan deeper
into religious extremism and violent sectarianism. It could be simply
interpreted as the victory of Al Qaeda and the TTP as their ambitions have
always been to throw Pakistan and Afghanistan into deep chaos from where they
can rebuild a new system according to their vision.
Pakistan’s
strategic architects are not factoring in, at least at the moment, non-state
actors and phenomena such as extremism into their strategic designs, and their
prime focus is on the political calculus. Prime Minister Imran Khan’s statement
in parliament in which he declared Osama bin Laden a martyr might certainly be
explained away, but it was a reflection of the mindset of our hallucinating
power elites, who live in a utopian ideological world and have little idea
about the consequences of their ideas. What more could the Taliban and Al Qaeda
hope for if they see their worldview entrenched in the mindsets of the power
elites?
Muhammad
Amir Rana is a security analyst.
Original
Headline: Afghan Taliban’s strength
Source: The Dawn, Pakistan
URL: https://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-jihad/al-qaeda-tehrik-e-taliban/d/122249
New
Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African
Muslim News, Arab
World News, South
Asia News, Indian
Muslim News, World
Muslim News, Women
in Islam, Islamic
Feminism, Arab
Women, Women
In Arab, Islamophobia
in America, Muslim
Women in West, Islam
Women and Feminism