New Age Islam
Sat May 24 2025, 06:10 AM

Islamic Ideology ( 27 Jul 2024, NewAgeIslam.Com)

Comment | Comment

Reconciling Exclusivist and Inclusive Interpretations of Quranic Verses on Salvation

By V.A. Mohamad Ashrof, New Age Islam

27 July 2024

Beyond The Fact That in Principle Anyone Might Be Entitled to God’s Mercy, And That This Is Simply a Topic Not Appropriate for Human Speculation, The Quran Goes On to Give What It Describes as Good Tidings to Some People Who Are Not Necessarily Muslim. It States: "For Each Nation We Have Ordained A Way And Path So That They Will Mention The Name Of God For The Blessings He Has Given Them. Your God Is a Single God So Submit to God and Give Good Tidings to Those Who Bow Down Before God"

----

The Quranic verse, "If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter, he will be among those who have lost all spiritual good" (Q.3:85), is often cited by Muslim exclusivists to argue that Islam is the only acceptable religion to God. They claim that Quran 2:62, which promises God's reward to "any who believe in God and the Last Day, and act righteously," has been abrogated by subsequent revelations, including Q.3:85. Instead of reconciling these verses by contextualizing them within the Quranic text, many exegetes use the principle of abrogation as a blunt instrument, labelling hundreds of verses as "no longer relevant."

The exclusivists point to the possibility of abrogation of such verses by citing verse 2:106: "We abrogate no verse, nor do We cause to be forgotten, but that We bring one better than it or like it." However, some of the most influential commentators of the Quran, both in the Sunni and Shia communities, including the influential Sunni commentator Tabari (d. 923 CE), disagree. Tabari holds that the arguments for abrogation cannot apply to verses such as 2:62 or 5:69 where God makes promises of rewards to Jews, Christians, Sabians, and to any who believe in God, the Day of Judgment, and do righteous deeds. Tabari argues that abrogation applies only to legal rulings and not to reports (Shah-Kazemi, 2006, p.168).

A great deal hinges on the meaning attributed to Q.5:69. Its literal meaning is clear enough: all believers who act virtuously, in consequence of their faith, are promised that their reward is with their Lord, and "no fear shall come upon them, neither shall they grieve." But it is held by many of the traditional commentators, based on a report from Ibn Abbas, that this verse is abrogated by 3:85— "And whoso seeketh a religion other than Islam, it will not be accepted from him, and he will be a loser in the Hereafter." Among the classical commentators, however, it is noteworthy that Tabari rejects the idea that the verse can be subject to abrogation. In general, as regards the principle of abrogation (Naskh), Tabari writes, in his commentary on verse 2:106—"We abrogate no verse, nor do We cause it to be forgotten, but that We bring one better than it or like it": Thus, God transforms the lawful into the unlawful, and the unlawful into the lawful, and the permitted into the forbidden, and the forbidden into the permitted. This only pertains to such issues as commands and prohibitions, proscriptions and generalizations, preventions, and authorizations. But as for reports (Akhbar), they cannot abrogate nor be abrogated. (Jamiya Al-Bayan An- Tawilayatul Quran, Vol.1, p. 546). In regard to verse 2:62, he writes that the literal meaning of the verse should be upheld, without being restricted in its scope by reference to reports of its abrogation, "because, in respect of the bestowal of reward for virtuous action with faith, God has not singled out some of His creatures as opposed to others" (Ibid., Vol.1, p. 373) (quoted in Shah-Kazemi, 2002, p.181).

The Quran states that diversity among human beings and creation is divinely willed (Q.3:22) and serves the purpose of enabling them to know one another (Q.49:13). It is more challenging to understand that there is an essential unity in the messages of these revelations (Q.41:43; 4:163-65; 42:13). This unity pertains to the ultimate purpose or goal of each religion, which is God: "We never sent any apostle without having revealed to him that there is no deity save Me, (and that,) therefore, you shall worship Me (alone)" (Q.21:25).

In verse 2:111, the Quran warns against the chauvinism of the People of the Book: "They say: none entereth paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian. These are their vain desires." In verse 4:122, the Quran speaks of God rewarding believers with paradise without qualifying them as only the followers of Prophet Muhammad. The following verse warns that it will not be according to your desires or the desires of the People of the Book: "It is not your fancies, nor the fancies of the People of the Book. Whoever does evil shall be recompensed for it, and will not find for him, apart from God, a friend or helper." (Q.4:123)

The Quran also describes the sorcerers of Moses as having become Muslims after their defeat (Q.7:126). It portrays Moses asking the Children of Israel to become Muslims (Q.10:84). The Quran recounts that when Pharaoh was drowning, he declared that he had become a Muslim, but it was only at the moment of his imminent death that he recognized the true God (Q.10:90–92). When Solomon sends a message to the Queen of Sheba, he invites her and her people to become Muslims (Q.27:31, 27:42, 27:44). Lot’s household is also referred to as a Muslim household (Q.51:36). The Quran emphasizes that the religion of God calls for people to become Muslims, as everyone in the heavens and the earth is a Muslim, willingly or unwillingly (Q.3:83). Additionally, the Quran refers to all the prophets sent to the Children of Israel as Muslims (Q.5:44).

In light of the above discussion, we ought to understand the verse "truly the religion with God is Islam" (3:19). Exclusivist Muslims frequently quote this verse also to argue that Islam, with its specific doctrines, laws, and rituals, is the only religion accepted by God. However, the Quran uses the term 'Islam' and its verbal form to refer to 'submission to God,' which is also the central focus of the formal religion of Islam taught by Prophet Muhammad. Thus, Abraham and the disciples of Jesus see themselves as Muslims or those who have submitted to God (3:52; 6:163; 5:3).

In this context, many scholars have pointed out that "the word Mu’min (believer, faithful) is used 230 times in all 114 chapters, whereas the word Muslim, in its different forms, is used only 42 times." In many cases, Mu’min refers to one who believes in God (Man Amana Bi-Allah), be they Muslim, Christian, or Jew. Since the formal religion of Islam is a means for submission to God, and the Quran speaks of rewarding non-Muslims (2:62; 5:69), preserving the diversity of faiths (22:40), and opposing religious chauvinism, it is reasonable to suppose that verse 3:19 refers to submission to God in a universal sense. (Quadir, p.127-130)

As Khaled Abou El Fadl, the Omar and Azmeralda Alfi Distinguished Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law, correctly pointed out, even the jurists who, in principle, accepted the doctrine of abrogation still disagreed about whether verse 5:69, in particular, was abrogated. The issue, however, was much broader than verse 5:69. The real issue was the large number of Quranic verses that advocated tolerance and peaceful resolutions to conflict. For example, the message conveyed by 5:69 is reproduced verbatim in 2:62 and repeated in substance in several other verses. For example, 2:83; 2:256; 5:43, 5:47-8; 10:99; 15:85; 18:29. It is unfortunate, in my view, that some classical jurists were willing to declare all Quranic verses that advocated tolerance, peace, or forgiveness to be abrogated by verses that prompted Muslims to fight the unbelievers. These jurists assumed a largely opportunistic logic in the construction of the Quran. Advocacy of tolerance and peace, according to these jurists, reflected the weakness of Muslims in the earliest phases of Islam. After Muslims became strong, tolerance or peaceful co-existence was no longer needed. This position verged on the absurd when some jurists declared that a single Quranic verse, which advocated fighting the unbelievers, abrogated 124 verses which called for tolerance and peace. Despite its influence on the modern puritans of Islam, this view met with disfavour among most classical jurists, who rejected its opportunistic logic and did not declare 5:69, or any similar verse, to be abrogated. (El Fadl, 2002, p.11-12)

Beyond the fact that in principle anyone might be entitled to God’s mercy, and that this is simply a topic not appropriate for human speculation, the Quran goes on to give what it describes as good tidings to some people who are not necessarily Muslim. It states: "For each nation We have ordained a way and path so that they will mention the name of God for the blessings He has given them. Your God is a single God so submit to God and give good tidings to those who bow down before God" (Q.22:34). This verse implies that, as different as the pathways may be, they may still be directed toward God. Interestingly, the Quran acknowledges that those who worship God deserve to receive good tidings and that the core issue, regardless of the path, is submission to God. (El Fadl, 2005, p.216)

Bibliography:

El-Fadl, Khaled Abou, The Place of Tolerance in Islam, Boston: Beacon, 2002

El-Fadl, Khaled Abou, The Great Theft: Wrestling Islam from the Extremists, New York: Harper SanFrancisco, 2005

Quadir, Tarik, Multiculturalism in Britain on the Basis of the Quran, Rumi or the Traditionalist Vision, In Workshop Proceedings: Debating Multiculturalism 1, Editors: Max Farrar, Simon Robinson, Omer Sener, Loncon: Dialogue Society, 2012

Shah-Kazemi, Reza, The Metaphysics of Interfaith Dialogue, In Paths to the Heart: Sufism and the Christian East, ed. J. Cutsinger, Bloomington: World Wisdom Books, 2002

Shah-Kazemi, Reza, The Other in the Light of the One: The Universality of the Quran and Interfaith Dialogue, Cambridge, UK: The Islamic Texts Society, 2006

------

V.A. Mohamad Ashrof is an independent Islamic humanist scholar from India who regularly publishes articles and papers on Islam and contemporary affairs.

His recent books include "Al-Ghazali: An Enlightened Critique" available from Amazon through the link https://www.amazon.in/dp/B0D92XZQ96?&linkCode=sl1&tag=epublica0e-21&linkId=fbe81b6503a1f5b493edd55dbbc9aa47&language=en_IN&ref_=as_li_ss_tl

& “Beyond the Rib: Reframing the Creation Story for Equality" available from Amazon through the link https://www.amazon.in/dp/B0D9W59R93?&linkCode=sl1&tag=epublica0e-21&linkId=ba37608b2b7bab52ab5aa7ca3c0bff4f&language=en_IN&ref_=as_li_ss_tl

 

URL:      https://www.newageislam.com/islamic-ideology/exclusivist-inclusive-interpretations-quranic-verses-salvation/d/132801


New Age IslamIslam OnlineIslamic WebsiteAfrican Muslim NewsArab World NewsSouth Asia NewsIndian Muslim NewsWorld Muslim NewsWomen in IslamIslamic FeminismArab WomenWomen In ArabIslamophobia in AmericaMuslim Women in WestIslam Women and Feminism

Loading..

Loading..