By A.
Faizur Rahman
4 June 2023
(With
Permission from the author to publish this chapter ‘Muslimophobia in India:
Reasons and Remedy’ from the Book 'Politics of Hate -Religious Majoritarianism
in South Asia' Edited by Farahnaz Ispahani - Published by HarperCollins
Publishers India.)
-----
Muslim
Response
There can
be no doubt that the stridency of the accusatory onslaught has rattled the
Muslim community to such an extent that it has not been able to mount a
concerted intellectual response to overcome the climate of suspicion and
distrust that prevails against it. Muslim religious organizations such as the
All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) don’t look beyond religion, and
therefore, have shown little interest in engaging Hindutva ideologues in a
meaningful dialogue. Their public pronouncements have mostly been limited to
the Shariah-in-danger kind of theologically emotive issues such as triple Talaq
and the law that was enacted in July 2019 to criminalize this practice after
the Supreme Court invalidated it in August 2017.
The Muslim
intelligentsia, on the other hand, came up with two kinds of responses. One was
a dispassionate and balanced countering of the arguments in support of triple
talaq and citizenship laws, and a severe condemnation of the physical violence
against Muslims. The authors of these responses were Muslim reformers,
legal
experts, journalists and independent researchers who wanted to educate Muslims
about their constitutional rights and the legal options available to them,
while attempting to wean them away from such un-Islamic concepts as extremism,
misogyny and religious supremacism.
The second
kind of response came mostly from Muslim bureaucrats who tried to lay the blame
on the Muslims themselves. Although some of them did grudgingly acknowledge
that the community has cause to complain, they also accused ‘ordinary Muslims’
of having adopted an obsessive persecution complex, and derided them for making
victimhood their ‘favourite dope’ to get over the melancholic depression caused
by the historical disasters they endured.
Such
priggish self-flagellation from within the community consisted of ramblings
about the huge population of Muslims, their caste system, their aversion to
reform, the preponderance of mosques, madrasas and Maulvis in post-Independence
India, and the Islamist concepts of Dar-ul-Harb and Dar-ul-Islam. The idea was
to somehow establish a nexus between these overdramatized facts and the non-
existent ‘victim mentality’ of Muslims.
A
disturbing aspect that characterizes some of these sanctimonious commentators
is their reticence about the hate crimes perpetrated against the Muslims, which
do not find a mention in their one- sided narrative. This cold-hearted silence
on Islamophobia raises questions about their intellectual honesty and exposes
the artificiality of their bombastic moralizing which, in any case, is of no
use to the beleaguered community.
In a way,
the arrogant preconceptions of the Muslim religious and bureaucratic elite
about Indian Muslims validate Jean-Pierre Faye’s much-criticized horseshoe
theory which, in the context of political science, asserts that in certain
situations, the far left and the far right
bend like a
horseshoe and come within touching distance of each other to present an eerie
resemblance. Obviously, the far right and the far left ideologies have little
in common, but what Faye meant was that there are times when the combined
effect of these schools of extremist thought could have deleterious
consequences for the cause they seek to espouse.
In the same
way, the negative impact of the combined armchair philosophizing of Muslim
religious leaders and bureaucrats, and their failure to provide a way out of
the sustained demonization of Muslims, has pushed the community into the arms
of Muslim political parties.
The biggest
beneficiary of this shift has been Asaduddin Owaisi’s All India
Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (AIMIM), which made major gains even outside its
home state, Telangana, by winning five important seats in the November 2020
Bihar assembly elections. All seats came from the Muslim-dominated Seemanchal
region. In the 2015 assembly elections, the party had not won any seats in
Bihar.75 Spurred by this transformative success, AIMIM now plans to contest the
upcoming assembly elections in West Bengal76 and in Tamil Nadu.77 Even
provocative televangelist Zakir Naik tried to fish in troubled waters by asking
Muslims to form their own political party and migrate to the non-BJP state
Kerala to escape persecution.
Researcher
Asim Ali of the Delhi-based Centre for Policy Research attributes the new
Muslim upsurge to their political disempowerment caused by their plummeting
representation in the civil services, the police, the army and legislative
bodies. For instance, in 1980, Muslim members of Parliament were at 9 per cent.
Today, this figure is down to 5 per cent. Even India’s most populous state,
Uttar Pradesh, has just twenty-five Muslim members in a 404-member legislative
assembly, the lowest in twenty-five years.79
However,
political pundits have expressed their alarm at the sudden rise of a ‘Muslim
party’. Yogendra Yadav, a psephologist- turned-politician, believes that the
rise of ‘Muslim exclusive politics’ at the national stage could end up becoming
a catalyst for Hindu majoritarian politics as it would further polarize the
electorate and hinder efforts to bridge the Hindu–Muslim divide.80 Similar
concerns were echoed by social activist Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd, who wrote that
Owaisi’s rise as a visibly Muslim leader is as much BJP’s need as the AIMIM’s
and may lead to national disorientation and gradual disaster.
But Yadav
did recognize Muslim perturbations when he empathized with their fear of being
reduced to second-class citizens in their own country, with much worse to come.
This, he said, is bound to help politicians like Asaduddin Owaisi expand their
base. Yadav, for some reason, missed flagging the other two contributing
factors discussed above—the inadequacy of Muslim academic response and the
balefulness of Muslim bureaucratic slurs.
If the
Hindu right’s distrust of Muslims in India is summarized from the foregoing
arguments, it can be reduced to two broad, interlinked perceptions: one, the
belief that Hindus are the original inhabitants of India and others are
outsiders, and two, the worry that Muslims may numerically swamp the ‘original
dwellers’ if their population growth is not regulated. A subtle reference to
the doctrine of Hindu autochthony and Muslim alikeness can be seen in a recent
statement attributed to RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, wherein he said that Muslims
in India were the happiest people in the world because ‘the Hindus are tolerant
and believe in inclusiveness’.
Bhagwat was
also quoted as stating, ‘Hindustan was divided at that time so that Muslims
could live in Pakistan. According to the situation at that time, Hindus should
have had a sway in Bharat,
but our
Constitution never said that either you go to Pakistan or you would have to be
subservient to Hindus here.’ He went on to claim that India was the only
country in the world where a foreign religion that ruled over its people still
exists.
The fact is
that India was neither ruled by any ‘foreign religion’ nor was it divided to
send all Muslims to Pakistan. Besides, one wonders why the happiness of Muslims
should be dependent on Hindu tolerance, to say nothing about the fact that in
the eighth World Happiness Report of 2020, India is ranked 144 out of 153
countries.
----
Other Parts:
Muslimophobia in India: Reasons and Remedy (Part One)
Muslimophobia in India: Reasons and Remedy (Part Two)
Muslimophobia in India: Reasons and Remedy (Part
Three)
URL: https://newageislam.com/books-documents/muslimophobia-india-remedy-part-three/d/129919
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism