By
Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi, New Age Islam
21 February
2023
Opinions
of Common Muslim Readers on the Fatwa against Suicide Attack
Main
Points
1. In 2005, 58
Ulama from various schools of thought unanimously agreed that suicide bombings
were prohibited by Islam in Pakistan.
2. It was also
declared in this fatwa that “suicide attacks in public areas within an Islamic
country are illegal and that anyone who does such an act in exchange for a
reward is outside of Islam.”
3. BBC Urdu
polled its audience on the significance of this fatwa and if it may reduce
incidents of terrorism and unlawful killings in Pakistan.
4. In response
to these questions, BBC Urdu published Urdu readers’ comments, which we have
translated into English in this post.
5. Why did this
fatwa state that suicide attacks are to be declared Haraam only in Islamic
countries? Why is this not prohibited in non-Muslim countries?
6. According to
some scholars, using suicide bombing as a tactic of war is acceptable in some
situations. This viewpoint is wholly incompatible with Islam.
------
In 2005, 58
experts from various schools of thought joined the unanimous conclusion of the
Ulama in Pakistan that suicide bombings were prohibited. It was officially
stated that people were being prepared for terrorism and suicide attacks in the
name of religion, so the scholars explained that the main goal of issuing
fatwas was to fulfil religious obligations. As a result, they issued this fatwa
declaring that it is forbidden to kill innocent people through suicide attacks,
bomb blasts, and remote control bombs. It is illegal [haraam], and anyone who
commits it declaring it lawful is outside of Islam.
During the
announcement of this fatwa, Mufti Muneebur Rehman stated that it was delivered
in the context of Pakistan, where there had been killings and suicide bombings
during the past fifteen years. Numerous suicide assaults in public areas,
mosques, and synagogues have resulted in hundreds of fatalities. This fatwa
declared that as Islam forbids the destruction of someone's property or life,
even murdering a non-Muslim person while they are a resident of a Muslim nation
is prohibited.
BBC Urdu
asked readers for their thoughts on the importance of this fatwa and whether it
may reduce incidents of terrorism and unlawful executions in Pakistan. How will
it affect Pakistan's reputation around the world?
Opinions
of Common Muslim Readers on the Fatwa against Suicide Attack
In response
to these questions, BBC Urdu gave its audience's feedback, which we have
translated into English below:
Shah
Khalid, Charsadda, Pakistan:
It is
prohibited in Islam as it is in all other religions as well. A new fatwa was
not necessary.
Abdul
Ghafoor, Toronto:
Finally,
these religious leaders have spoken about abstaining from violence and
practising nonviolence. In my perspective, this is an excellent beginning step.
This fatwa will emphasise the pacifism of Islam.
Ali Raza
Khan Buzdar, Hyderabad:
Islam is a religion
of peace, harmony, and love for one another, and this fatwa is entirely
accurate. These things were explained to us more than 1,400 years ago, but the
western media consistently portrays Muslims as bloodthirsty fanatics. I'm
hoping that the western media will now work to improve how Islam is seen by its
citizens.
Rumi
Akhtar, Torrance, USA:
Islam
forbids killing an innocent person in any situation; hence the fatwa is
unquestionably accurate. On the one hand, it is not even permitted to commit
suicide. But because these same people sparked the fire, who will listen to
them is the issue. Another question is why this news wasn't broadcast on the
BBC's English website.
Omar
Hayat Khan, Amsterdam, Holland:
Whether or
not one issues a fatwa, Islam is a peaceful religion. It is regrettable that
the ignorant Palestinian Afghans living among us believe the Mullahs'
propaganda. They visit BBC to read the news that is disparate from the
irrelevant fatwas of the Mullahs.
Ayaz
Mazari, Rahim Yar Khan:
What about
the soldier who goes to kill a Muslim in Baluchistan and Waziristan if suicide
is prohibited in Islam? Is this not a suicide attack if he is aware that it
could cost him his life? Is it not suicide when a soldier goes to battle
knowing that he may lose his life?
Abrar,
Washington DC, USA:
This fatwa
is absurd and a reflection of the official “gloss.” How is it possible that
something is prohibited in Pakistan while being permitted in other countries?
This play was produced by shady government muftis. Anyone who comprehends the
essence of Islam is aware that taking the life of an innocent person is a
serious offence, and the penalty is an eternity in hell. The Quran lays out a
precise sequence for doing this. The fatwa issued by the official mufti was not
necessary for this situation. The only controversy here is over Musharraf's
hat.
Mirza
Ashfaq, United Arab Emirates:
General Zia
started this entire fire, which is known as the fire of sectarianism. The
sectarian campaign was initiated by these clerics, and now they are issuing
fatwas. Their house has subjugated the religion.
Ahsan
Daanish:
Suicide is
not acceptable, regardless of the reason.
Saud
Farooq, New York, USA:
I do not
agree with this fatwa.
Fahar
Ali, Sargodha:
How does
the hue of the sky change?
Dr.
Naseer Ahmad Tahir, Bedouin Milli, Pakistan:
The truth
is that Islam has always been a religion of security and safety, but sadly,
those who cause explosions do so by stealing money from adversarial nations.
Abdul
Halim Sabir, Mansehra, Pakistan:
They deserve
praise for issuing this fatwa. The fatwa will be of great use.
Altaf
Hidayat, Mardan:
The sole
purpose of this fatwa is to appease America. These so-called muftis made no
mention of Afghanistan or Iraq. This is quite odd. All is fair in love and war,
as the English proverb goes, but it's crucial to distinguish between those who
start wars and those who are innocent.
Tanveer
Razzak, Pakistan:
The muftis
have issued this fatwa, despite the fact that our beloved Prophet (peace and
blessings of Allah be upon him) already stated that a Muslim cannot kill his
peaceful non-Muslim neighbour. This was fourteen thousand years ago.
Tanveer
Khokhar, United Arab Emirates:
Because it
is a reward for those who lose their lives in terrorist attacks, this fatwa has
no status.
Saad
Tariq, Rahim Yar Khan:
After the
pot is completely empty, the sound will begin to play. The modern Muslim
carries out this deed because they have endured enough suffering at the hands
of non-Muslims. Otherwise, who would want to take such a risk with their life?
Zaid
Ahmed, Karachi:
The
terrorists will not be affected by this edict. The fundamental concern is how
these suicide strikes may be practically avoided.
Arsalan
Ahmad Rasheed, Gujranwala, Pakistan:
All suicide
attacks in that country are the work of a secret agency of a country that wants
to defame Pakistan since people like Maulvi have never committed suicide.
Muhammad
Zafar, Toronto, Canada:
Since not
all experts concur with this fatwa, it will give America carte blanche now that
suicide bombings have been made illegal. According to the Islamic hierarchy of
jihad, suicide bombs are one type of jihad. Governmental Ulama cannot change
this.
Abdullah
Ahmed, Dubai:
Since it
has been declared what is halal and what is haraam in Islam, no one can
determine whether a suicide attack is prohibited. The next thing to consider is
what the assailant or suicide bomber is thinking.
Syed
Raza, Toronto, Canada:
Fatwas are
no longer relevant especially now. Now is the time to get to work and produce
results. The majority of these atrocities target defenceless religious people,
thus if the Ulama are concerned about Islam and Pakistan, they ought to make an
effort to stop them. Actually, these individuals are killing themselves.
Rahim
Duda, Incheon City, South Korea:
Thanks be
to Allah, finally the scholars did this too.
Sana
Khan, Karachi:
It is best
to arrive late than never. Scholars have done it expertly. This shows that not
all Maulanas are alike and that some Maulanas still place a high priority on
peace. This change is quite advantageous.
Farrukh
Siddiqui, Karachi:
Given the
facts, such a fatwa is unnecessary because it seems to have been derived by
plain clerics. There should be an instant end to Muslim persecution everywhere.
America, Great Britain, and its allies are cruel to Muslims in every way. Only
suicide bombings will put an end to them. There are currently no Islamic
countries.
Imran,
USA:
The issue
is that this fatwa will eventually expire if the clerics show up to build remote-control
bombs. The importance of highlighting the worth of human life is necessary.
Abdullah,
United Arab Emirates:
Why are
only Islamic nations subject to this prohibition? Why isn't it illegal
everywhere? Which prophet or branch of Islam has deemed suicide bombings
against civilian targets to be permissible?
Jibran
Hasnain, Karachi:
Is it
permissible to kidnap defenceless Pakistanis and turn them over to the United
States when suicide attacks are prohibited? Why don't the scholars declare a
fatwa on it as they are treated worse than animals there?
Hafeezullah
Khan, Bannu, Pakistan:
The Ulama,
who are the heirs of the Prophets, have issued a fatwa that reflects their
optimistic attitude. Of course, the government of the destination country is
responsible for protecting the lives and property of all non-Muslim visitors to
that country. It is also a terrible crime to remain silent and allow the tyrant
to continue his brutal actions. What will happen if there are suicide bombers
in Iraq or Afghanistan? In my opinion, this fatwa won't prevent suicide
attacks. When the oppressor is powerful and the oppressed are helpless, what
else can the downtrodden do to defend themselves?
Sagheer
Rajah, Saudi Arabia:
One could
wonder why a person would be willing to sacrifice his life. An act of sacrifice
is not life. When a person's only avenues for obtaining rights are closed, a
cycle of suicide attacks begins because he has no other option.
Mohammed
Salim, United Arab Emirates:
You don't
have the right to take someone's life if you can't give them life. If everyone
believed this, the necessity for clerics to issue fatwas would no longer exist.
Jahangir
Ahmed, Dubai:
We can all
agree that no religion condones suicide, but I wonder why someone would feel
compelled to end their life. We should look into these motives because it is
difficult to end one's life without a reason.
Abdul
Samad, Oslo, Norway:
By granting
privileges, you can take whatever fatwa you want from these experts. Suicide
bombers will carry out the orders given to them by their leaders. This fatwa is
worth as much as a blank sheet of paper with ink on it.
Shamim,
United Kingdom:
This
government is nothing more than a recipe for pleasing the times and that is the
only significance of this edict. There has been no change in Islamic teachings,
either. There have been such fatwas in the past, and Muslims do not view such
matters as valid or engage in such attacks. This fatwa is meaningless because
such attacks are accepted in Palestine and Kashmir, both of which are excluded
from its application. However, this endeavour of Ulama is admirable.
Shahrukh
Khan, Singapore:
In addition
to this fatwa, scholars should express sympathy to the surviving family members
and pray for the release of the deceased. These assaults have also damaged
Islam's image and caused many to lose their jobs unjustifiably. Is it
appropriate to exhort Muslims to engage in acts of jihad when they are acting
very dishonourably and are oblivious to their basic responsibilities? Muslim
Ulama should describe how contemporary Muslims are educated and trained using
current sciences and halal methods of subsistence.
Sohail
Iqbal, Germany:
This is a
wise choice; we must declare that suicide bombings are unacceptable.
Akhtar
Zaman Abbasi, Dubai:
Given that
America is the enemy of Muslims, I believe a suicide bombing against it would
be justified.
Zahid
Malik, Dubai:
This fatwa
is wrong because suicide attacks against non-Muslims are permissible.
Shahid
Ali, Houston, USA:
Better to
arrive late than never!
Fahad
Shabbir, Lahore:
It is
obvious from the fatwa that this has been sought by the government. A suicide
attack is the last resort of a helpless person. How many suicide attacks have
there been in Pakistan? An explosion caused by a bomb is different from a
suicide attack. Since there are no suicide bombings in Pakistan, this edict
will have no impact there.
Muhammad
Ijaz Kaleem Gujjar, Faisalabad:
When a
suicide assault is committed against another Muslim or against Islam, it is
forbidden; but, doing it in order to defend Islam should not be prohibited.
Mushtaq
Malik, United Arab Emirates:
I concur
with this fatwa because Islam forbids attacks of this nature, including
kidnapping.
Zeeshan
Abbasi, Montreal, Canada:
The
administration has done all of this as propaganda in an effort to appease
America. If a fatwa is to be issued, it ought to be issued for those whose
single bomb kills thousands of people. They are puppets, these mullahs.
Shahida
Akram, Abu Dhabi:
If this
fatwa is only offered in relation to Pakistan, it is because our nation is not
engaged in an independence war. In Pakistan, victims either prayed or were on
their way to pray. Do not believe that this will lessen terrorism or
extrajudicial killings; rather, strong laws and fatwas are required.
Ali
Tahir Syed, Karachi:
I wish all
Muslims understood that no one can enter heaven by murdering even an innocent
non-Muslim; as it stands, Muslims are far away from understanding that killing
someone by trickery is forbidden.
Nadeem
Farooq, Mississauga, Canada:
Currently,
it is believed that doing so is prohibited. This is too late now!
Shehla
Sohail, Toronto:
The
population remained silent until they declared that they remembered the fatwas
now that their passage into Europe is perceived to be closed.
Dr.
Ishaq Sisoli, Quetta:
This fatwa
strikes me as being excellent. The Quran states that there is no place for
sectarianism in Islam and that to kill a human is to kill all of humanity.
Unfortunately,
a specific political faction in our nation has promoted communalism for their
own ends, and whenever they need support during elections, they all yell “Bhai
Bhai.”
Javed
Raza, Lahore
This fatwa
will be crucial in the current scenario in putting an end to terrorism. I
totally support the intellectuals' endeavour, but I also strongly disagree with
the clergy who are rejecting this fatwa.
Ali
Imran Shaheen, Lahore:
The actual
winners from this fatwa will be the nations that murder Muslims, like America,
India, and Israel. Given the state of the Mujahideen and the current
circumstances, a fatwa is required to defend Islam. But it is unfortunate to
report that the same experts who are constantly made fun of by the government
also wish to appease them by issuing fatwas.
Javed
Iqbal, Japan:
Yes, this
fatwa was issued at the appropriate moment since suicide bombings were
slandering Islam.
Zafar
Khan, Toronto:
Although
the Fatwa is entirely accurate, it should be significantly adjusted to include
Iraq and Afghanistan, where foreigners have invaded and the government has fallen
under their control. This type of discussion ought to take place not just in
fatwas but also in every Pakistani street.
Ashfaq
Khan, Kassel, Germany:
This is the
proper course of action, and we must demonstrate that Islam is a peaceful
religion.
Imran
Nazir, Orlando, Florida:
This change
is for the better. I simply hope that this fatwa is taken seriously. I believe
that since Taqiuddin Usmani and Dr. Israr Ahmad have already discussed these
concepts in private lectures, their public speeches will be more impactful. You
should know that I did not find this story on the BBC English website.
Talat
Khan, Florida, USA:
I believe
it ought to have been done earlier. I appreciate the fatwa. Islam genuinely
forbids the murder of innocents and attacks on mosques.
Qasim
Sarvia, Sargodha, Pakistan:
Yes, it is
good that some religious leaders have emphasised a favourable understanding of
Islam. Islam bans putting one's life or the lives of others in peril without
cause. The opportunity for other nations to adopt Islam's virtues will arise,
and Pakistan's standing will also improve.
Afaf
Azhar, Toronto, Canada:
What fatwa
of the Ulama is this? People today are still fighting with one another. A fatwa
has been declared against them since it appears that Musharraf has not given
them anything this year.
Gibran
Khalil, Lahore:
Ask for a
fatwa on what the fatwa givers think about themselves. They set themselves on
fire and then walk away as angels of peace. The fire of sectarianism in
Pakistan is also lit by them. Now when this crop is bearing fruit, they are
issuing new fatwas.
Azhar
Sohail, Toronto, Canada:
They issued
a fatwa and the BBC obeyed. Wow, you forgot the history of these people so
quickly. If people are becoming more conscientious today, then they have turned
to fatwas as a last resort.
Kiran
Ahmed, Waterloo, Canada:
I believe
that unless this mullaiyyat is ended, Pakistan cannot have true peace. What
significance do their fatwas have? Additionally, they issued a fatwa to
Quaid-e-Azam and hung Mansoor for referring to Ana-al-Haq. Iqbal was also
imprisoned for writing Shikwah. How reliable are their fatwas?
AR
Qureshi, Toronto, Canada:
I believe
that is entirely correct. Islam is a peaceful faith. Islam does not encourage
suicide bombings.
Ehtisham
Faisal Chaudhary, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates:
To begin
with, it is important to realise that suicide bombers never launch their
attacks without first consulting the Ruyat Hilal Committee. This will not stop
them from doing so. The fact that suicide attacks are prohibited in Russia and
Pakistan but permitted elsewhere makes this fatwa questionable in my opinion.
It is obvious that this fatwa was issued by government clerics specifically for
Pakistan to help them with their problems at the request of Musharraf. Even so,
it is hardly significant.
Source: BBC
Urdu, Link:
https://www.bbc.com/urdu/interactivity/debate/story/2005/05/printable/050517_suicide-attack-haram-yourviews
Intellectuals
can learn a lot from reader comments on this fatwa, which was issued by the
Ulama in 2005 and condemned suicide bombings. Especially how many questions the
average population still has. What sort of mindset do they possess? Some people
may continue to have the same convictions even though the majority of people's
opinions have probably altered significantly over time. The most crucial point
is why this fatwa made it plain that suicide attacks are exclusively prohibited
in Islamic nations. Why weren't suicide bombers outlawed in nations where Islam
is not practised? Why weren't suicide bombings prohibited in Palestine and Kashmir
as well?
It is
evident from the teachings of the Quran and the Sunnah that suicide attacks are
prohibited in all circumstances, whether they occur during a war or not,
whether they occur in Pakistan, Kashmir, America, or Palestine.
Some Ulama
opine that suicide bombing can occasionally be used as a military tactic. This
perspective of view is completely at odds with Islam. A general application of
Qur'anic verse (2:195) and the hadith given by Hazrat Sahl completely refute
this idea. Suicide is forbidden in all circumstances, according to the Qur'an
(2:195), and similarly, according to the Hadith narrated by Hazrat Sahl, it is
forbidden even during Jihad. How then can suicide be permitted in a Fitna
condition?
Suicide
bombings are prohibited in all situations according to the Qur'an and the
Hadith. It is unquestionably important to issue a fatwa against suicide, but it
is also important to stress that suicide is forbidden everywhere and at all
times.
----
A regular Columnist with NewAgeIslam.com, Ghulam
Ghaus Siddiqi Dehlvi is a Classical Islamic scholar with a Sufi background and
English-Arabic-Urdu Translator.
URL: https://newageislam.com/the-war-within-islam/muslim-suicide-bombing-fatwa-pakistani-ulama/d/129158
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African
Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia
News, Indian Muslim
News, World Muslim
News, Women in Islam, Islamic
Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia
in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women
and Feminism