
By Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi, New Age Islam
11 October 2022
The Country’s Image Is Being Tarnished By Hate
Speech And This Needs To Be Immediately Stopped… Fringe
Elements Within The Majority And Minority Communities Are No Less Than Each
Other As Hate-Mongers
Main Points:
1.
The slogan 'Sar Tan Se Juda' was raised during
Miladun Nabi processions in different states by the radical Islamists who
misused this as an opportunity to create communal tensions.
2.
Prophet Muhammad's sacred birthday has
traditionally been held in all parts of the country with great religious
fervour in a peaceful manner…
3.
Threats are looming large to the syncretic
Indo-Islamic culture, a symbol of Ganga-Jamuni tehzeeb, pluralism and
toleration of Muslims in India….
4.
Theological legitimacy for beheading the blasphemers
comes from the Hanbali follower and pioneer of Salafism—Ibn Taymiyyah. But the
Hanafi Muslims in India wrongly act upon the Salafist injunction.
---------

On Monday, the Supreme Court has rightly
observed that hate speech is vitiating the nation's atmosphere, and ought to
stop. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Chief Justice U.U. Lalit were hearing an
appeal on the country's increasing hate speech against minority communities.
“No action was being taken by the administration to stop such comments”, said
the petitioner, Harpreet Mansukhani. In reply, the bench has stated that the
petitioner may be correct in asserting that the atmosphere is being sullied by
hate speech and that this needs to be immediately stopped.
While the usual majoritarian hate remarks
before the general elections in 2024, have indeed hurt the minority sentiments
especially Muslims in India, the fringe elements within the Muslim community
are no less hate-mongers. On Monday, the Uttar Pradesh Police has arrested
seven individuals who participated in Jashn-e-Eid Miladun Nabi (celebration of
12th Rabi ul Awwal i.e., Prophet Muhammad's birthday) for allegedly shouting
the anti-blasphemy slogan: "Gustakh-e-Rasool Ki Ek Hi Saza, Sar Tan Se
Juda" (Beheading is the only punishment for blasphemers of the holy
Prophet). A video of the procession on 12th Rabi ul Awwal, also called Barah
Wafat in Amethi, Uttar Pradesh, has gone viral in which some youths could
be seen shouting "Sar Tan See Juda" slogan. Two of the nine
individuals who were named in a FIR that was filed, were juveniles.
On Sunday, an entirely identical incident took
place in Rajasthan's Jodhpur. The same slogan 'Sar Tan Se Juda' was raised in a
Miladun Nabi procession. While the festival of celebrating Prophet Muhammad's
sacred birthday was being held in other parts of the country with great
religious fervour and in a peaceful manner, the fringe elements in the Muslim community
took this as an opportunity to create communal tensions. Thus, they have
brought great defamation not just to the particular Barelwi sect to which the
individuals subscribe, but also to all those who celebrate the Milad-un-Nabi
and take out processions (Julus) on this auspicious occasion.
In Amravati, Maharashtra on Monday, the same
case has been filed against 8 to 10 unidentified individuals for shouting
"Sar Tan Se Juda". During the Eid Milad-un-Nabi procession (Julus-e-Muhammadi)
in Amravati's rural neighbourhood, the controversial slogan was being raised
which is has been widely shared in an online video. In the virtually viral
footage, some participants in the Julus could be clearly heard shouting
"Sar Tan Se Juda." As a result, a case was filed in the
Paratwada police station of the Achalpur district of Amravati under sections
153A, 505 (2) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and 135 of the Mumbai Police Act.
Several complaints have now been lodged in
Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Maharashtra in which it has been alleged that some
radicalised individuals among Muslims have been trying to cause communal
disharmony through such anti-blasphemy sloganeering. Some influential observers
and community watchers, enraged by this fresh spate of incidents, warn of the
threats looming large to the syncretic Indo-Islamic culture, something which is
known as a symbol of Ganga-Jamuni Tahzeeb, pluralism and toleration of
Muslims in India.
Every year, a peaceful and multicultural
celebration of Milad-un-Nabi takes place across the country. But what has now
changed that we have seen with horror that some miscreants in the name of
Jashn-e-Eid Milad-un-Nabi were giving the nefarious war cry. Amethi which is
historically known for the shrine of famous Indian Sufi poet and Pir Malik
Muhammad Jaisi (1477– 1542) who penned down the first-known narrative of Rani
Padmavati in the Awadhi language, was never defamed like this. But this year, a
procession of Julus which was taken out to mark the holy Prophet's birthday
drawing hundreds of people together at the Sufi saint Jayasi's shrine had a
portion of the gathering which seemed to be in an aggressive mood. Slogan of
'Sir Tan Se Juda' was spelt out by a few in the procession.
This comes as a big surprise in the wake of
media reports telling us that a day before the Prophet Muhammad's birthday,
i.e. October 8, it was instructed by Muslim organizations that the slogan of
'Sir Tan Se Juda' should not be raised in the Milad-un-Nabi processions or any
other programs related to 12th Rabi ul Awwal. In fact, the All India Muslim
Jamaat, a socio-religious Indian organization led by Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi
of Bareilly, issued a timely instruction which was, by and large, followed in
most processions. But why was it wilfully ignored in Jodhpur, Amethi and
Amravati? Why was this communally sensitive slogan was raised especially when
the procession was passing through Nayapura Subhash Colony, a Hindu dominated
area in Rajasthan? Having become aware of the situation and its repercussions,
it becomes incumbent on us Muslims to call spade a spade.
Aggressive social media posts, hate speech
along with communally sensitive content and comments are underfoot to disturb
the volatile socio-religious atmosphere of harmony and inclusivity in India.
The reason? The Pakistan-origin slogan of "Sar Tan Se Juda"
coined by the extremist political-Islamist organisation, Tehreek-e-Labbaik
Pakistan (TLP) which emerged out of the Barelwi variant of South Asian Sunni
Islam. Khadim Hussain Rizvi—the late charismatic Barelwi cleric and TLP
leader--was the brain behind the growing popularity and ideology of the
notorious slogan. Rizvi made the slogan his key tactic for recruiting the young
gullible Barelwi youths mainly volunteering with the global Sunni Islamic outfit,
Dawat-e-Islami founded by Maulvi Ilyas Attar Qadri in 1981, in Karachi,
Pakistan.
Now Rizvi is no more. But his ideology is on
the rampage. Not just in Pakistan but also in India. The slogan of "Sar
Tan Se Juda" has snowballed from across the border into the mainland
India, particularly in the northern part, which has recently wreaked havoc in
Udaipur, Rajasthan. Now again it is gaining momentum in a section of the
misguided Barelwi youth, from Uttar Pradesh to Rajasthan to Maharashtra.
Rizvi's blind fathers and Barelwi supporters like Mumtaz Qadri--who
assassinated Punjab Governor Salman Taseer for calling for a review of
Pakistan's draconian blasphemy laws--have made their presence felt in different
states across the country. This widespread phenomenon should make it patently
clear that Barelwis are not a homogenous or monolith sect within Sunni Islam.
The long-held perception that the self-styled quasi-Sufi sect is inherently
peaceful ought to have been disabused. The Barelwi clergy, who are otherwise
tolerant and accommodative of various Indian cultural practices like shrine
visitation (Dargah Hazri) and Fatiha-O-Durud (traditional Sufi
salutations), are no less obscurantist and fundamentalist in many ways. But
when it comes to "defence of the Prophet's honour", they go haywire
and make the slogan of "Sar Tan Se Juda" a war cry. These
erratic and provocative clerical rants have adversely impacted the common
mindset of Sunni Muslim youth in India who look up to the Barelwi Ulema as
their legitimate leaders adhering to the Aqaid (beliefs) of "Ahl-i
Sunnat wa Jamàat". They wrongly derive their textual or theological
legitimacy from the treatises and books like Husām al-Haramayn written
by A'ala Hazrat Imam Ahmad Raza Khan (1856–1921) which declared the blasphemers
of the holy Prophet (pbuh) as heretics. But as for beheading them in a secular
and democratic country like India, he has not taken a violent extremist
position neither did he justify it in any way of his writings. However, A'ala
Hazrat was not soft on the founders and followers of the Wahhabi, Salafi [aka Ahl-e-Hadith],
Deobandi, Shia and Ahmadiyya sects. His staunchly sectarian and
anti-pluralistic theological stand is an open secret now. It is not difficult
to understand through the prism of his Fatwas against forging alliance with the
non-Muslims or non-Sunnis. In his eyes, Christians in the British India were
better than the Hindus as they are considered People of the Book. Nevertheless,
having been viewed as the Mujaddid or Reviver of the 21st Century, A'ala
Hazrat has been venerated as an established Islamic reformer in north India.
Since he wrote extensively in defence of the Prophet and popular Sufi
practices, he remains the chieftain of the Sunni-Sufi Muslims popularly known
as Barelwis.
Tellingly, but the calls for beheading
blasphemers of the Prophet were first given in Islamic theology by the
puritanical Salafist Islamist ideologue Taqiuddin Ibn Taymiyyah in his book on
Islamic creed "As-Sarim al-Maslul 'Ala Shatim ar-Rasool" (The Sword Against
the One Who Insults the Messenger). Ibn Taymiyyah in this book discusses in
detail his jurisprudential or Fiqhi position on those who slur or insult
Prophet Muhammad. "The one who insults the prophet whether Muslim or
disbeliever is to be killed.... They are to be killed even if they pay a
protective tax in a Muslim State", he enunciates in his book which he
wrote in response to the following incident:
In 1293, Ibn Taymiyyah was called by his state
authorities to issue a fatwa on Assaf al-Nasrani, a member of the Christian
clergy accused of insulting Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Only after the state's
intervention, Ibn Taymiyyah issued his fatwa ordering the execution of the
Christian cleric. However, the Governor of Syria persuaded Assaf to convert to Islam
in exchange for his life. It was in 1294 that Ibn Taymiyyah wrote his detailed
book in response to that incident. This background of the book gives a rider
for his followers that even Ibn Taymiyyah would not have been in favour of
non-state actors indulging in the killing of blasphemers.
Surprisingly enough, the theological
legitimacy for beheading the blasphemers comes from the Hanbali follower and
pioneer of Salafism—Ibn Taymiyyah. So, what has happened to the Hanafi Muslims
in India [read 'Barelwis' here] who have taken it upon themselves to act upon
the Salafist injunction? Even the Salafis in India (Ahl-e-Hadith) do not
indulge in acts of anti-blasphemy sloganeering or killing in India in the crazy
bid that has been lately shown by a few fanatics from the Barelwis. Despite the
fact that the Barelwi clergymen generally oppose and sometimes abhor Ibn
Taymiyyah, their stand on beheading someone for blasphemy and taking the law in
one’s hand is more erroneous and dangerous, as it derives its inspiration from
the organizations like the TLP and its leaders like Khadim Razvi, Pir Afzal
Qadri, Inayat Haq Shah and Farooqul Hassan who were all booked on charges of
sedition and terrorism in Pakistan.
------
Regular Columnist with Newageislam.com, Ghulam Rasool
Dehlvi is an Indo-Islamic scholar and English-Arabic-Urdu writer. He has
graduated from a leading Islamic seminary in India, and acquired Diploma in
Qur'anic sciences and a Certificate in Uloom ul Hadith from Al-Azhar Institute
of Islamic Studies. He has also participated in the 3-year “Madrasa Discourses”
program initiated by the University of Notre Dame, USA. Presently, he is
pursuing his PhD in Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi.
New Age
Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in
Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In
Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women
in West, Islam Women and Feminism