Middle East Press on: Trump, Israel, Gaza, Hamas, Hostage, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Refugee : New Age Islam's Selection, 15 November 2024
By New Age Islam Edit Desk
15 November 2024
Trump And Biden’s Influence On Israel: Netanyahu’s Trial And Right-Wing Appointments
I Am A Palestinian In Gaza. Hamas Must Cede Control And Release The Hostages
Time Frames Are Not Threats And Neither Are They ‘Time Frames’ When It Comes To US Support For Israel
The Truth About Egypt’s Entanglement In Supporting Israel
What The Gulf Wants From The Incoming Trump Administration
A Stairway To Stars For Turkish Brands: Turquality
Lebanon-Syria Refugee Crisis Risks Destabilizing The Region
-------
Trump And Biden’s Influence On Israel: Netanyahu’s Trial And Right-Wing Appointments
By Yaakov Katz
November 15, 2024
The appointments
It is like the dream team of the Israeli Right. A group of people who are not just pro-Israel in the basic sense but are vocal supporters of the more controversial aspects of the right-wing’s agenda.
Consider Mike Huckabee, the nominee for US ambassador to Israel. Huckabee doesn’t just support Israel in a vague sense; he’s on record saying he believes Israel has the right to annex significant parts of the West Bank.
Back in 2019, he boldly stated that there was no such thing as a “settlement” or even a “Palestinian” people, a view that starkly contrasts with traditional American policy. Such a stance indicates that, as ambassador, he won’t just advocate for Israel in the diplomatic sense; he’ll press for a strategic shift.
Then there’s Pete Hegseth, the nominee for secretary of defense.
Hegseth has visited Israel multiple times over the years, but these weren’t typical diplomatic visits.
On one occasion, he was guided by settler leaders to Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus, an area of the West Bank off limits to the United States government.
In a 2016 interview with The Jewish Press, Hegseth recounted his experience visiting the Muslim Quarter and a home there, that had been renovated by Jews.
“There were about 15 young boys, aged around 10-16, singing and dancing. They were hopeful, optimistic, unafraid, despite the challenges they faced in a difficult place. To me, this was a powerful thing to see,” he recalled.
Michael Waltz, the Florida congressman nominated for national security adviser, is another choice that signals a shift. Waltz has a hardline stance on Iran.
Just last month, following Iran’s latest attack on Israel, he called for the Israeli Air Force to target Iran’s oil and nuclear sites.
Waltz’s views on military intervention reveal a willingness to support Israel in a way not seen before on an issue that could redefine the Middle East.
The list goes on: Sen. Marco Rubio, the nominee for secretary of state, has publicly advocated for the “complete eradication” of Hamas, while Elise Stefanik is slated to represent the US at the United Nations.
These are not the kind of ambassadors and leaders who will issue statements of concern over Israeli actions. Instead, they are likely to be cheering from the sidelines, allowing Israel greater flexibility on the ground.
And perhaps most importantly for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, many of these appointees align ideologically with his cabinet’s policies.
They support not just giving Israel the weapons it needs to defend itself, but some advocate for Israel’s continued presence in Judea and Samaria.
Under this administration, Israel will face almost zero criticism over settlement expansion and is more likely to receive support for military action against Iranian targets.
BUT THIS doesn’t mean Israel will have complete freedom of action. While the atmosphere in Washington may be more accommodating, Israel will still need to tread carefully.
The administration’s support does not guarantee a carte blanche, nor does it mean Israel can do as it pleases.
If, for instance, the administration introduces a peace plan that recognizes Palestinian statehood without requiring settlement evacuation, the Israeli Right might find it more difficult to criticize this as being anti-Israel than it could have done under the Democrats.
In essence, while the environment may shift in Israel’s favor, this is not a free pass.
While the atmosphere will be more positive and the relationship closer, it does not mean that Israel will automatically get whatever it wants.
Will it have an easier time reaching understandings? Yes.
But will the pushback be less if Israel does not adhere to the administration’s requests? Not necessarily.
US to blame?
On Tuesday, former IDF general Giora Eiland made a controversial statement, accusing US President Joe Biden of effectively condemning the hostages in Gaza to death.
“The person who has prevented the return of the hostages is President Biden and his administration.
He forced Israel, after the first hostage deal, to allow 200 trucks a day [into Gaza] and sentenced the hostages to death. You can’t define it any other way, and you should say it to the Americans,” Eiland asserted.
The blunt accusation illustrates a narrative that has gained traction on the Israeli right – namely, that American pressure has hampered Israel’s ability to act against Hamas and has compromised its efforts to secure the release of the hostages.
When Israel paused its incursion into Rafah earlier this year, critics argued that it was due to American pressure. Likewise, when talk of a ceasefire came up at the beginning of the war, many people contended that it was Biden who would decide how long the war could last.
But this narrative distorts the reality of the US-Israel relationship.
WHILE WASHINGTON certainly influences Israeli decision-making, it doesn’t dictate it.
Does the US make its views known? Yes. Does it sometimes pressure Israel by hinting at consequences if those views aren’t taken seriously?
Also yes. Nevertheless, the ultimate decision is up to Israel. Biden can urge Israel to permit humanitarian aid into Gaza and even say that failure to comply could affect arms supplies. But the final call is Israel’s, based on its priorities.
What’s surprising is how figures like Eiland, seasoned veterans of the IDF and the government, seem to treat the US-Israel alliance as a one-sided relationship where Israel merely takes and makes demands.
What relationship is like that in life? None that I can think of.
Criticizing American policy is fair, but Israel is an independent nation.
What Eiland said makes it seem as if Israel is not and if it wants to be, it needs to act like one which means making decisions and standing behind them.
The reason Israel doesn’t do this is because it is convenient to have someone else to blame.
When Eiland blames Biden, he is essentially giving the government a pass. This is a mistake and Israelis should stop falling for it.
Bad decision
On Wednesday, the Jerusalem District Court dismissed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s request to delay his testimony in his ongoing criminal trial, rejecting his plea for a 10-week extension.
Netanyahu’s lawyers argued that the demands of the war hindered his ability to prepare for court.
Nevertheless, the court maintained that he had ample time, having already set the December date back in July.
There’s no doubt that Netanyahu needs to stand trial.
Indeed, there’s even room to question whether his decisions might be influenced by the charges he is facing.
However, insisting on a rigid adherence to the trial schedule, given the war, is irresponsible.
Israel is not just in the midst of a conflict; it’s fighting one of the most consequential wars in its history. Daily casualties mount, critical post-conflict plans for Gaza and Lebanon must be finalized, and the new US administration requires strategic alignment.
Netanyahu was indicted back in November 2019, nearly five years ago. His trial has proceeded for four-and-a-half years, and suddenly, there’s an urgency to conclude it?
The insistence on keeping his testimony now, while Israel’s military and political landscape is in a state of flux, seems oblivious to what is happening on the ground.
The court’s decision fails to recognize the extraordinary circumstances Israel currently faces.
The judges should correct their stance. It is a matter not only of practicality but also of respect for the country at a time when Israel’s future is very much on the line.
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-829201
-----
I Am A Palestinian In Gaza. Hamas Must Cede Control And Release The Hostages
By Basam Said/The Media Line
November 14, 2024
Gaza is disappearing from the world map with each passing day as its people face destruction. The world watches as the resilient people of Gaza stand stubbornly in front of cameras, but little changes. Gaza is in its worst state in history, and it is dying.
For more stories from The Media Line go to themedialine.org
For 400 days now, the people here have lived through what can only be described as Judgment Day horrors. People stagger as if intoxicated—wandering, scared, worried, and confused. They move aimlessly, carrying water on their backs and on the backs of their children, rushing after cars that sell what is called "suitable" drinking water at exorbitant prices. Then, they search for firewood or buy stolen scraps of furniture and door remnants, desperate to light a fire and cook whatever they can to satisfy their hunger.
Each morning, we wake up at dawn, exhausted, unable to withstand the bitter cold or the sweltering heat that comes after sunrise. Our first prayer is always for water—to use in the bathroom, to wash our faces—because the city’s water arrives only once every 10 days.
My family and I left Gaza City, where we lived for years, following an order from the IDF to move south. It was summer then, and we left hastily, packing only a few items, believing we would return in two weeks or a month. Instead, we were trapped—stuck outside of Gaza without winter clothes, wearing garments that soon tore apart, even our undergarments.
Five months later, my mother, who had refused to leave her home with one of my brothers, fell in the bathtub, breaking her back at 85 years old. She died two months later. And just a week ago, on October 17, 2024, my home—the house I spent my life building—was bombed and destroyed, taking with it all my family’s dreams. If we ever return to Gaza, I will surely carry the tent I live in now with me.
The suffering in Gaza
People here have suffered in their own bodies, their homes, their money, their sources of livelihood, their dignity, and even in providing food, drink, and education for their children. Gaza’s people are starving, barely clothed, living under cold, rain, and heat. There is no one to help—not even with a drop of clean water. They live worse than the most primitive conditions, beneath the standards of living afforded to many animals. They eat whatever they can find.
Bread flour is no longer available, nor is cooking gas, milk, cheese, meat, eggs, vegetables, or any other necessities in the markets—not even money or cash. Gaza’s banks are closed, and those who can withdraw money must pay 30% to intermediaries. People have eaten flour infested with weevils and worms, drank contaminated water, slept in the open air, and created primitive toilets in the open. They cannot afford tents, blankets, or any basic supplies; agents and spies have looted aid and now sell it at prices even the rich can barely afford.
Do not believe the liars who boast from hotel stages and appear on misleading satellite channels. Do not trust the pompous leaders, their assistants, the foolish drummers, or any spokesperson who lacks honor or piety. They are nothing but merchants of lies and fraud.
Believe us—the people of Gaza. We are the residents of worn-out tents, the living saints who see and witness everything. We alone know what has happened and what is happening. We feel the fire of war that was imposed upon us, on a morning we never could have imagined. It fell upon us like a day of reckoning, separating the industry of life from the game of death. We have become targets for bombings and displacement, with no one to protect or help us.
Do not believe the liars, and do not listen to those who invoke our name from afar. Do not call us heroes or steadfast. We are the unfortunate, displaced, exhausted, and suffering.
We have lost everything—everything, except our trust in our Lord to take revenge on those who brought this oppression upon us, who left us prey to be devoured by the occupation. We will also hold accountable those who kill, uproot, and rob us of our land, as well as those who profit from our pain.
This is our reality—plain and honest—not the lies of the deceitful or the claims of fools. Effective intervention must come from the Palestinian leadership led by President Mahmoud Abbas, recognized as the sole representative of the Palestinian people. Hamas must cede its control, allow a ceasefire, and facilitate the release of abductees in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. The leadership must bear full responsibility, working with the world and Israel to rebuild Gaza and address all issues, paving the way for the establishment of a Palestinian state living in peace and stability alongside Israel.
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-829209
-----
Time Frames Are Not Threats And Neither Are They ‘Time Frames’ When It Comes To Us Support For Israel
By Ramona Wadi
November 14, 2024
In yet another exercise of US hypocrisy, Israel will still qualify for weapons funding despite failing to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza within 30 days, as outlined in a letter stipulating several conditions, which included allowing the entry of 350 trucks per day through all of Gaza’s border crossings. Another condition was to revoke evacuation orders for Palestinians in areas not being bombed by the IDF.
White House National Security spokesperson, John Kirby, was swift to explain, “The letter was not meant as a threat”, but to impress the urgency of the need for humanitarian aid to Israel. As if Israel has no inkling of urgency, when it is determining the steps needed to do the exact opposite.
In a press briefing on Tuesday this week, the Department of State’s Principal Deputy spokesperson, Vedant Patel, altered the definition of a timeframe. “The 30-day time period was not about any particular day on a calendar, and it certainly wasn’t about electoral politics.” Patel elaborately avoided US accountability by then defining the time frame as “some progress” in “things that take time” and of course, “in a volatile region”.
When questioned about the 350 trucks per day (according to UN statistics an average of 47 trucks per day entered Gaza in October), Patel avoided mathematics in favour of rhetoric. “Our hope is that these kinds of changes have allowed for the operational adjustments to see an additional influx of trucks and to see if that metric can be met or not,” he stated.
In due course of the press briefing, the stipulations outlined in the letter that should have determined the continuation or halting of US weapons funding for Israel became “a suggestion of steps”. Meanwhile, Israel’s genocide is far from a suggestion but an implemented plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza completely of Palestinians.
Just a week prior to the press briefing, the Israeli military announced that Palestinians would not be allowed to return to their homes in northern Gaza and humanitarian aid would not be allowed to enter the area because there are “no more civilians left”. Israel’s settlements minister, Orit Strock, also asserted that land in Gaza must be seized by Israel “so Hamas understands that there is a price they are not willing to pay”. Again, the Hamas narrative to justify further colonial expansion, and the US sees no problem with distorting genocide, as long as the diplomatic focus stays on the Resistance movement.
Israel weaves a plan and the US stalls for time, for Israel’s benefit. Which is why Patel continued to waste time and Palestinian lives by expressing “hope and desire” for increased humanitarian assistance to Palestinians, despite clearly and premeditatedly staying several steps behind Israel’s genocidal plan and actions.
Palestinians civilians have been starved, rendered homeless and forced to remain displaced under threat of starvation – a tactic the US does not see as infringing on the weapons funding. Maybe the US is applying logic here, actually, because why would it fund Israel’s genocidal action if Israel was not killing Palestinians. Violence needs violence to sustain itself.
The US expects Israel to continue killing Palestinians, so it continues with its weapons provisions. The logic is simple, but deadly.
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20241114-time-frames-are-not-threats-and-neither-are-they-time-frames-when-it-comes-to-us-support-for-israel/
----
The Truth About Egypt’s Entanglement In Supporting Israel
By Mahmoud Hassan
November 14, 2024
The MV Kathrin incident has heavy political and strategic implications for the Egyptian regime, which is accused of allowing a German-owned ship transporting military arms to the Israeli army to dock at its ports at a time when Israel continues its war against the Gaza Strip for the second consecutive year. Cairo is facing a major predicament and embarrassment after the ship’s path was tracked by human rights and international organisations, who have evidence that its cargo of explosive materials, used to manufacture highly explosive bombs, was offloaded at the Port of Alexandria in the north of the country.
This remarkable development comes at a sensitive time, as military escalation in the Gaza Strip increases and the Israeli bombing of Lebanon continues. Meanwhile, Egypt appears to have played the role of a mediator in reaching a ceasefire agreement.
Conflicting official statements
The controversy was complicated by the conflicting official statements issued by Egyptian authorities, hinting at an implicit condemnation of Cairo. These contradictory statements have been met with the credibility of what Amnesty International and the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement announced regarding tracking the ship’s path, which several countries refused to receive. Egypt allowed the ship to enter dock No. 22 at the Port of Alexandria on 28 October, which is under the management of the Egyptian Navy, according to the Saheeh Masr independent fact-checking website.
Last month, Natasa Posel, head of Amnesty International Slovenia, warned: “The deadly cargo, believed to be on board the MV Katherin, must not reach Israel, as there is a clear risk that it will contribute to committing war crimes against Palestinian civilians.”
According to Reuters, the European Legal Support Centre (ELSC) confirmed that the shipment was headed to the Israeli Military Industries Company, a unit of Elbit Systems, which is the largest supplier of defence materials in Israel.
Marine Traffic, a website specialising in tracking ships, showed MV Katherin, registration number 9570620, docking at the Port of Alexandria carrying military goods (a total of 150 tonnes of explosives) before another ship was spotted setting off on the same day to the Israeli Port of Ashdod, according to a statement by the BDS movement.
The conflict of official statements was just a highlight of what was happening. At first, the Egyptian Ministry of Transport announced that MV Kathrin, Portuguese but flying the German flag, was allowed to dock at Alexandria Port to unload a shipment for the Ministry of Military Production.
Later, the Egyptian Army spokesperson rushed to deny it, stating: “The Egyptian Armed Forces categorically deny what has been circulated on social media and suspicious accounts and what is being promoted about assisting Israel in its military operations in general and in detail.”
Before Cairo could get its cards together, the controversy flared up again, with footage circulating showing an Israeli frigate crossing the Suez Canal, bearing both the Israeli and Egyptian flags.
With the escalation of criticism, the Suez Canal Authority confirmed: “Commitment to adhering to international agreements that guarantee freedom of maritime navigation for ships crossing the canal, whether commercial or military ships, without discrimination based on the ship’s nationality. It is doing so in line with the provisions of the Constantinople Convention, which constitutes a basic guarantee for preserving the canal’s status as the most important sea passage in the world.”
The Constantinople Convention, signed in 1888, stipulates in its first article: “The Suez Canal must be open to all ships, whether in time of war or peace, whether they are carrying commerce or military, regardless of their flag.”
Egyptian involvement
Opponents say that the possibility of Egyptian involvement in supporting the Israeli army has turned into a fact supported by strong evidence, confirming that Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi’s regime stands with Tel Aviv in its war against Gaza and Lebanon. It even shows that Egypt is participating in tightening the siege on the Palestinians after closing the Rafah Border Crossing and preventing the passage of humanitarian aid to the residents of the Strip.
They base their opinion on the fact that Egypt, which is using the Constantinople Agreement as a pretext, overlooked violations of the Camp David Peace Treaty and its security annexes when Israeli forces occupied the Salah Al-Din (Philadelphi) axis on the border with Egypt.
The provisions of the Constantinople Agreement grant Egypt the right to prevent the passage of ships belonging to a country in a state of direct war with it or threatening Egyptian national security. These provisions allow the Egyptian side to intervene to stop the Israeli frigate from passing through.
Well-known political activist Ahmed Douma posted on X that the authority is a partner in the genocide, not just a complicit or a traitor, but a direct partner. This led to his arrest for investigations on charges of spreading false news in case No. 5892 of 2024, Supreme State Security, before he was released on bail for 20,000 EGP (about $400).
Political positions followed one after the other. The Egyptian Conservative Party denounced in a statement: “Taking refuge in the articles of outdated international agreements at a time Israel is waging a war of genocide against our brothers in Gaza.”
Egyptian lawyers filed a report to the Attorney General against the Egyptian Prime Minister, Mostafa Madbouly, and others, demanding an investigation into the incident of the MV Katherin ship docking at the Port of Alexandria and investigating those responsible for allowing the ship to pass through territorial waters and dock in an Egyptian port.
According to Egyptian political expert Mohamed El-Sayed, allowing MV Kathrin to dock and letting Israeli Sa’ar 5 warship pass through will have heavy political repercussions, dissipating what remains of Egypt’s prestige in the Arab and Islamic worlds. It also affects Egypt’s integrity as a mediator in the ongoing ceasefire negotiations and strengthens the accusations of treason directed at Al-Sisi’s regime
Egyptian activists gathered outside the Journalists’ Syndicate headquarters in downtown Cairo to protest the incidents two days ago, chanting: “Egypt is sad. Egypt is sad, a ship has passed, if our brothers’ blood is cheap, then down with any president,” referring to the Egyptian president.
Disturbing questions
Logical questions have been raised regarding the incident. If the shipment was intended for the Egyptian Ministry of Military Production, why didn’t the ship head directly to one of the Egyptian ports without passing through other international ports? What was the fate of the explosives shipment after it was unloaded at the Port of Alexandria? What was the nature of the cargo carried by the second ship heading to the Israeli Port of Ashdod?
The authorities’ disregard for the reports filed to investigate the incident, the continued blackout in the Egyptian media regarding the fate of the explosives’ shipment, the absence of the ship’s data from the official website of the Port of Alexandria and the deliberate secrecy regarding the ship’s journey and its true destination all add to the ambiguity of the situation. These details cast a lot of doubts about the true official Egyptian position on the situation in Gaza and Lebanon and the extent to which the Egyptian vision aligns with the Israeli approach to eliminate the resistance there.
Earlier, navigation data by Al Jazeera showed that the Egyptian-flagged container ship PAN GG made 25 trips loaded with goods to the Port of Ashdod from Egyptian ports during the period from mid-February 2023 until 8 February, 2024, at a time when the Gaza Strip is facing a severe blockade by the Israeli occupation.
According to political researcher Hamdi Al-Masry, the official responses from the armed forces and the Ministry of Transport did not resolve the ambiguity regarding the vessel MV Katherin. They also were unable to withstand the counterpropaganda that uses any issue to expose and shame the July 2013 regime, which participated in the US and Israeli plans to blockade the Gaza Strip and demolish the tunnels. These measures showed Cairo as a supporter of Tel Aviv despite its rejection of the displacement of Palestinians.
Egyptian authorities prevent the organisation of protests in support of Gaza and Lebanon. They also impose strict restrictions on collecting donations to support the Palestinians. Authorities in Egypt have previously arrested dozens of those who showed solidarity with Palestine on fabricated charges such as involvement in terrorism, spreading false news or demonstrating without a permit, according to human rights organisations. These details may suggest the ruling circles in Egypt stand with Israel.
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20241114-the-truth-about-egypts-entanglement-in-supporting-israel/
----
What The Gulf Wants From The Incoming Trump Administration
Dr. Abdel Aziz Aluwaisheg
November 14, 2024
The speed with which Donald Trump is assembling his team indicates that he wants to hit the ground running come his inauguration on Jan. 20. Choosing Steve Witkoff, a close adviser and confidante, as special envoy to the Middle East could mean that the president plans to be hands-on when it comes to this region.
During Trump’s first term (2017-2021), the Gulf Cooperation Council, collectively and bilaterally through its member states, enjoyed a close and mutually beneficial relationship, ever since Trump broke with tradition by choosing Saudi Arabia for his first trip abroad and meeting with GCC, Arab and Muslim leaders in Riyadh in May 2017. Although at times there were differences of opinion between the two sides, especially on the Israel-Palestine conflict, their strategic partnership continued through Trump’s last days in office. Most likely, that spirit of cooperation will continue and strengthen over the next four years.
What the Gulf wants from Trump’s second term can be summarized under three main headings: political, economic and cultural. Trump’s motto of “ending all wars” is appealing and so is his prioritizing of economic objectives. We share an interest in combating illegal migration and predatory trading practices, although we may differ on the means. We would also like to join hands in combating hate and intolerance.
At the political and strategic levels, the GCC wants to dial back raging conflicts and return to diplomacy and the pacific resolution of disputes, as the UN Charter calls for. There is little doubt that the international system is broken because of the intense disagreements between the permanent members of the UN Security Council, which render the organization unable to play its key role in maintaining peace and security around the world, as is evident in its inability to stop Israel’s war on Gaza and Lebanon.
On Gaza and the underlying Israel-Palestine conflict, the GCC would like to work more closely with the US on ending the conflict. The international community has spoken clearly about the parameters of the solution, based on the UN Charter and resolutions. There are only a handful of countries that still tolerate Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza and its maximalist approach to the underlying conflict.
Last month, the Global Alliance for the Implementation of the Two-State Solution, of which the US is a member, together with about 90 other countries, articulated the global consensus on these issues. This includes an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, reunifying it with the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority and embarking on an irreversible path toward an independent and viable Palestinian state along the 1967 borders.
The extraordinary summit held in Riyadh last week expressed the unified voice of the Arab and Islamic worlds on the conflict and called for accountability for the unspeakable atrocities committed by Israel in both Gaza and the West Bank.
So, what is needed in the region is de-escalation and for the way to be prepared for sustainable solutions in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and elsewhere. Diplomacy should also be the starting point in dealing with Iran and its regional network of supporters and allies.
At the economic level, the GCC shares Trump’s interest in combating predatory economic practices but believes that this should be done by fixing the global trading system, which has pitted industrialized countries against developing countries. Because that system is dysfunctional, major trading nations have abandoned cooperation and engaged in a mutually destructive cycle of actions and retaliations. The first Trump administration imposed a long series of protectionist tariffs, including on GCC exports to the US. To go by Trump’s election rhetoric, his new administration may initiate additional punishing tariffs against China, which could spark another cycle of retaliation.
The best way to deal with trade disputes is through the World Trade Organization, by doubling efforts to reenergize the organization and strengthen its dispute resolution mechanism.
Finally, we want the new White House to lead on cultural reconciliation and mutual understanding. Cultural estrangement has led to a rise in hate speech and hate crimes in many parts of the world. Some of the pernicious outgrowths of this intolerance can be found in rising racist rhetoric, Islamophobia and antisemitism. The Trump administration would find ready partners in the GCC and the wider Arab and Islamic worlds to work together on toning down the rhetoric of cultural war and to reinforce cultural and religious tolerance.
Fortunately, there exists an extensive framework for cooperation under the GCC-US Strategic Partnership, which includes engagement at the heads of state level, as well as at the ministerial and technical levels. There are more than 10 working groups covering many aspects of this partnership, including political and defense issues, cyber threats, maritime security, air defense and counterterrorism. There are also working groups dedicated to specific issues, such as Iran and Yemen.
The GCC states and the US are active members of the US-led Combined Maritime Forces, a coalition of 46 nations that operates out of Bahrain through five task forces covering the Gulf, the Red Sea and areas in between.
The long-standing GCC-US Trade and Investment Dialogue and the 2012 framework agreement on economic cooperation provide appropriate channels for coordinating trade policies. As the US and GCC countries are major producers of energy, they have overlapping interests in both conventional and renewable energies. They have an abiding imperative to coordinate on both types of energy. As most GCC currencies are pegged to the dollar, it is important to continue to coordinate closely on monetary policy, as decisions taken by the Fed affect GCC economies and have a direct impact on monetary policy.
On culture, the framework of the GCC-US Strategic Partnership allows for engagement to promote mutual understanding, although this area was in the past dealt with bilaterally with member states. Rising cultural tensions in the US and elsewhere make it necessary to develop and grow cooperation at the regional level to deal with this phenomenon.
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2579304
----
A Stairway To Stars For Turkish Brands: Turquality
By Mehmet Öztürk
Nov 15, 2024
Many of you are familiar with expressions such as German cars, Japanese electronics, Italian fashion or French cuisine. This piece aims to inspire the creation of similar phrases that highlight Turkish craftsmanship and innovation, such as Turkish fabrics, Turkish wood, Turkish metal or even Turkish airplanes and spaceships.
Türkiye is a global leader in many industries, yet we still lack enough trailblazers to put our name at the forefront.
Have you ever considered what drives us to purchase certain products? Is it always a matter of seeking better prices, higher quality or improved functionality? Or do we sometimes choose products that evoke a certain feeling or identity? We do live in a world where perception is almost everything.
Why is branding essential?
Branding is the process by which a company creates a unique identity for itself, its products or its services in the minds of consumers. This goes beyond logos, names or visual elements; branding encompasses a company’s values, its mission and, most importantly, the promise it delivers to its customers.
It is crucial for a company to build trust in the eyes of its customers, create an emotional bond and differentiate themselves from competitors through branding. A strong brand reflects consistency and quality, signaling customers what they can expect. Moreover, branding shapes perception, influencing how a company or product is seen and remembered.
For Turkish companies seeking to expand globally, not just with their products but also with their names, branding becomes an invaluable tool for building recognition, loyalty and sustainable competitive advantage in foreign markets.
Türkiye, as one of the world’s top 20 economies, has established itself as a robust player across diverse sectors – from textiles and home furnishings to construction, forestry, and paper production. Turkish companies in these industries are recognized internationally for their production capabilities, quality, and innovation. Yet, a critical question remains: despite these industrial capabilities, why haven’t more Turkish brands become household names worldwide? They lack one thing: A good story, economically speaking and successful branding – a vital growth mechanism that Türkiye has yet to fully leverage.
Branding means more than a logo or a slogan. It is a sophisticated, value-driven tool that enables a company to establish an identity and its message ready to broadcast to the world. Thanks to this perception, customer loyalty, market presence and economic growth can be built step by step.
A stairway to stars: 'Turquality'
Turkish "Turquality," the sole example of its kind, is a crucial program aimed at empowering Turkish firms to transcend from "Made in Türkiye" to "Brand of Türkiye" through comprehensive support and training in branding, marketing, strategy, operational excellence and business development.
"Turquality" has positioned itself as one of the world’s most extensive branding support programs, providing Turkish companies with the tools to compete in international markets. Besides strategy, operational excellence and digital transformation, a well-developed brand strategy has an accelerating effect on economic growth, extending beyond the financial gains of exports. Achieving a certain level of brand recognition will be utilized not only when companies are representing themselves but also will showcase Türkiye’s innovation, quality and reliability. These brands, when successful, become de facto ambassadors of Turkish excellence, reinforcing positive perceptions of Türkiye across diverse international markets. They will be Türkiye’s soft power.
With Turquality's support, Turkish companies are better equipped to overcome entry barriers and thrive in competitive global markets. Branding enables these firms to differentiate themselves, allowing them to command higher prices, build customer loyalty and secure a stable market presence. This stability transforms into higher earnings and resilience, specifically during global market fluctuations. Particularly in industries like textiles, clothing, construction materials and white goods, where Türkiye is already a major global player, branding provides a vital layer of differentiation that protects companies from being driven solely by cost competition.
Catalyst for growth, innovation
The benefits of branding extend beyond individual companies to entire sectors, even an entire country. When a Turkish textile or construction firm succeeds globally as a trusted brand, it sets a precedent that enhances the credibility of the whole industry. This effect is particularly pronounced in sectors where Türkiye has a competitive edge. In textiles, for instance, the presence of recognized Turkish brands would attract greater investment, increase market share, and drive technological and process innovation. As more companies reach international markets through Turquality’s framework, these industries evolve, fostering a positive feedback loop of growth, quality enhancement and global recognition.
Türkiye's economic strategy can greatly benefit from the cultural and symbolic capital generated by strong brands. Although Türkiye is officially 100 years old, it has a rich history, sits at the crossroads of numerous civilizations and is home to major religions and diverse cultures. Well-known brands don’t just sell products; they can represent a culture and lifestyle by harnessing the valuable assets that Türkiye already possesses. Each successful Turkish brand contributes to Türkiye’s “soft power,” the subtle yet influential ability of a country to shape perceptions and forge connections beyond its borders. For Türkiye, increasing brand awareness is directly related to expanding its cultural and economic footprint globally and fostering goodwill and partnerships that may yield strategic advantages in diplomacy, trade and tourism.
For Türkiye to capitalize on its economic potential, prioritizing brand-focused marketing and supporting it through programs like Turquality is vital. While the program has already paved the way for many Turkish companies, the journey is ongoing and inherently self-driven. Turkish firms, with the support of "Turquality," must seize this opportunity not only to expand their market reach but also to shape a distinct, trusted identity on the global stage. By enhancing their brand value and maturing their operating models, Turkish companies can contribute to sustainable economic growth, sectoral innovation and a strengthened international presence for Türkiye as a whole.
https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/op-ed/a-stairway-to-stars-for-turkish-brands-turquality
-----
Lebanon-Syria Refugee Crisis Risks Destabilizing The Region
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh
November 14, 2024
Israel’s ongoing war on Lebanon has caused an unprecedented wave of displacement, with thousands of Lebanese and Syrians fleeing across the border to Syria to escape the escalating violence. This mass exodus represents a new humanitarian crisis, with more than 276,000 people, primarily women and children, forced to cross into Syria under extremely challenging circumstances. The displaced face a lack of essentials — such as water, food and shelter — at border and reception areas, revealing a severe shortfall in resources to address the needs of this vulnerable population.
This humanitarian crisis should not be underestimated or overlooked. The situation extends far beyond a simple refugee movement; it could become a multifaceted disaster affecting the entire region. As global powers struggle to broker a peace deal or offer substantial aid, the toll of inaction grows.
“We can no longer view the situation in the Middle East as a series of isolated conflicts and displacement crises. Political failure risks destabilizing an entire region and condemning millions to catastrophe. Global diplomacy must move beyond platitudes and unkept commitments,” said Angelita Caredda, the Norwegian Refugee Council’s Middle East and North Africa regional director. Her words capture the urgency needed from international leaders to prevent an escalation of this crisis.
This issue is compounded by Syria’s limited capacity to manage an influx of refugees. Economically, the country is already under immense strain due to 13 years of internal conflict that have decimated its economy, reduced national income and left millions impoverished. The nation’s struggling economy cannot feasibly absorb this influx of displaced people from Lebanon, adding a new layer to the crisis.
Refugees require jobs, housing and economic support, all of which are in short supply in Syria due to years of conflict and the country’s own humanitarian challenges. This economic strain ultimately impacts both the host country and the displaced individuals, who face higher costs and limited opportunities for survival.
Syria’s infrastructure is similarly unprepared to handle this influx. With hospitals, schools and housing already in disrepair, Syria lacks the essential facilities to support both its citizens and the incoming refugee population.
Years of war have severely damaged basic services like healthcare, education and transportation, creating barriers for those in need. The Norwegian Refugee Council has reported that the situation is dire: basic resources are unavailable, food prices have surged and affordable housing is scarce. In this environment, even the most resilient refugees will struggle to rebuild their lives.
In some cases, refugee populations can benefit host economies through contributions to the workforce and demand for goods and services. However, these benefits are only possible when there is sufficient infrastructure and basic resources to support the additional population. In Syria’s case, where even the foundational elements of public services are severely depleted, the refugee influx presents a daunting challenge rather than an economic opportunity. For Syria to experience any economic benefits from hosting refugees, substantial investments in infrastructure and humanitarian support are essential.
This crisis within a crisis becomes even more complex considering Syria’s prolonged suffering. After 13 years of conflict, it does not seem to be in a position to handle the arrival of a new wave of displaced families. The situation for Syrian refugees has been dire for more than a decade, with humanitarian aid stretched thin and communities exhausted from years of instability. The thousands of families crossing into Syria from Lebanon now face challenges with no immediate or sustainable support in sight.
“Syria is already on its knees after 13 years of conflict. The mass displacement from Lebanon comes at a time when the aid response already cannot keep pace with existing needs. Thousands of families crossing into Syria will struggle to find a safe place to stay or the basics their children need. This is a crisis within multiple crises,” Caredda noted, underscoring the heavy burden on Syrians.
More fundamentally, refugees need more than mere survival — they need access to healthcare, education and protection, especially children, who are often left vulnerable. The children crossing into Syria alone or with their families are at risk of trauma, malnutrition and neglect. Basic provisions, including water, food, shelter and mental health support, are vital for their survival and well-being. Mental health services, particularly for children who have experienced the horrors of war, are critical to help them cope and adapt. In the absence of these fundamental necessities, the crisis will continue to spiral, affecting generations.
As a result, the international community must urgently address this humanitarian catastrophe. Three essential actions must be taken to prevent further suffering and instability. First, global leaders need to secure and create a pathway toward peace. Diplomatic efforts must shift from empty promises to concrete actions that prioritize stability and security in the region.
Second, humanitarian aid must be significantly increased, focusing on essential services and infrastructure for refugees. The €5 million ($5.2 million) allocated by the EU last week is a positive step, but much more funding and resources are required to meet the needs of the displaced. Third, support can be provided to strengthen Syria’s ability to host refugees. The international community should focus not only on immediate relief but also on building long-term resilience in host regions.
In a nutshell, the emerging refugee crisis between Lebanon and Syria demands immediate and concerted action from the global community. Without substantial intervention, this crisis risks destabilizing the entire region, resulting in untold human suffering. The needs of the displaced cannot wait and the international community has a moral obligation to prevent this crisis from spiraling out of control.
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2579300
----
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism