By S. Arshad, New Age
Islam
26 October
2020
Recently
the French President Emmanuel Macron said that Islam was in crisis. His remark
was made in the backdrop of the growing extremism, separatism and radicalism
and disenchantment from non-Muslims in the Muslim community not only in France
but also in large parts of the Muslim world. This phenomenon is particularly
evident among the Muslim youth who are being driven towards extremist and
militant organisations.
French
President Emmanuel Macron walks past the coffin of slain teacher Samuel Paty
during a memorial service Wednesday. (Francois Mori/Reuters)
-----
In European countries, Muslims tend to form their own ghettoes thanks to some European governments' policy of segregation. But also to blame for this is their own Islam supremacist mindset. Macron had not only urged Muslims to bring reformation within their community but had also advised the Christian community to study and understand Islam. Therefore, he was speaking not as a leader of Christians but as the President of a democratic country. He cannot be blamed for expressing Islamophobic ideas. He was most likely expressing his idea of a truly peaceful pluralist society. His thoughts were not one sided but balanced and pragmatic. Indeed, he expressed his plans to deal with extremist elements in the Muslim community that were dividing the French nation between us and them. In his view it was due to the 'foreign influences' (naming Muslim Brotherhood) that created a feeling of otherness among the Muslim community in France and encouraged them to form a counter-society within the French society.
But his
remarks were not taken by the Muslim world in the right spirit and was
described as Islamophobic. He was harshly criticised by prominent Islamic
figures for his alleged 'anti-Islam' remarks. But when we analyse the reaction
of prominent Muslim figures, we find that the Muslim scholars, leaders and
imams are not on the same page on the issue of Islamism, blasphemy etc.
For
example, on the beheading of the history teacher named Samuel Paty by a Chechen
Muslim youth named Abdullakh Anzorov on the charge of blasphemy different
Islamic scholars have given different reactions. The Salafist cleric Abu
Qatadah al Filastini praised the killer saying he did the right thing and that
Muslims were an Ummah that knew its rights. He was saying indirectly that a
Muslim had the right to kill anyone who spoke ill of the Prophet (pbuh) and
that any individual Muslim could execute the Shariah law. But another hard-line
Islamic scholar, Sheikh Ali al Yousuf, a member of International Union of
Islamic Scholars gave a different view. Sheikh Ali al Yousuf believes that
killing the blasphemer has been supported by Shariah but only an Islamic State
has the right to punish him, not just any individual Muslim or group.
Contradicting
the two, Imam Hassan Chalghoumi, President of the Conference of Imams of France
denounced the murder of Samuel Paty (as un-Islamic) and said that Islamism was
a poison, a disease, and should be banned by the government of France.
All these
Islamic scholars know the Islamic jurisprudence well but have opposite opinions
on blasphemy. One praises the killer while the other denounces him. One says
that the individual can punish a blasphemer while the other says that only the
Islamic state can punish him. The individual cannot take the law into his own
hands.
This is not
the only issue on which the Ulema radically disagree. They cite the same
Shariah while expressing radically different judgments on the same crime, in
different contexts too.
There are
other issues like secularism and the right form of government for an Islamic
country. For example, one religious organisation says secularism is compatible
with Islam while the other says it is akin to atheism.
On the form
of government, the imam of Colorado Islamic Centre believes that only Caliphate
is the prescribed form of government and Muslims can only prosper under a
caliphate. His belief is similar to the beliefs of the ISIS while Indian scholar
Allama Iqbal believed that democracy was compatible with Islam and the Arab
Islamic scholar Muhammad Asad opined that the Presidential form of government
with some modifications was the best suited to modern Islamic countries.
Interestingly,
no Islamic country today likes to be called a Caliphate. They call themselves
Kingdom, Emirate or Islamic Republic and no Islamic scholar or the common
people have any problem with them as long as they are on the right side of the
governance. Ironically, it is the terrorist organisations that call themselves
the flagbearers of Khilafat for winning the sympathy and support of the common
Muslims.
Then again
there are severe sectarian and ideological differences that have not only
caused riots and bloodshed but also civil war and massacre in earlier centuries
and in the 21st century.
Violence
has become a way of life and the second nature of Muslims the worldwide though,
at the same time, Muslims don't tire of parroting the claim that 'Islam is a
religion of peace.'
Doesn't all
this point to an ideological crisis among the Muslims? At the most one can say
that Islam is not in crisis because Islam's principles and teachings are clear,
but it's the varied interpretations of the principles enshrined in the Quran
and Hadith put forward by different Ulema that has caused the crisis the Muslim
world is in. That means that Muslims have to acknowledge that there is indeed a
crisis, if not in Islam then in the Muslim religious thought. Saying that there
is no crisis at all and criticising non-Muslims for holding the mirror up to
their face will be an unrealistic world view and an Ostrich-act.
URL: https://newageislam.com/islamic-society/is-islam-really-facing-crisis,/d/123275
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism