By
Pervez Hoodbhoy
February
19, 2012
School
syllabi demand it, but even then few young Pakistanis want to study science
subjects and still fewer want to become scientists. Many generations have found
science so odiously dull that they are now indifferent — even hostile — to a
subject that stands at the very pinnacle of human understanding and progress.
While some of our better students will be reasonably successful in
science-related professions such as engineering, medicine, and information
technology, their poor science backgrounds will leave them ill-equipped for
pushing the frontiers of these rapidly evolving fields.
Contrast
this with India. Surveys show that school students see science as the most
prestigious and glamorous career to pursue. For them Einstein, Stephen Hawking,
black holes, genes, etc. is the way to go. Although most students eventually
opt for more ‘normal’ professions, yet sufficient numbers persist and some
eventually rank among the world’s better scientists. This has been key to
India’s emergence as a world power.
Why the
difference? A good part of the answer comes from looking at our
locally-authored science textbooks. Although a dysfunctional examination system
and bad science teachers are also blameworthy, poor textbooks are especially
debilitating in a culture where the written word is considered virtually
unchallengeable.
Over the
years, I have collected many titles, both Urdu and English. The Urdu ones are
even more unattractive than their English counterparts. All were produced by
the Punjab and Sindh textbook boards. The number of printed books must now run
into many hundreds of millions.
The books
reflect an attitude that science is to be taught no differently from geography
or history. A stern looking Quaid-i-Azam on the inside of every front cover
admonishes students to study else ‘we may be wiped out altogether’. But threats
— or exhortations that learning is a holy duty for improving our chances in the
Hereafter — are useless. They cannot create interest in a subject that springs
from human curiosity.
Local books
seem designed to kill curiosity rather than nurture it. Mathematics is reduced
to a set of drills shorn of relevance and meaning while physics, chemistry and
biology are just about remembering formulae and diagrams. Whether written from
scratch, or with bits cut and pasted from here or there, these books give no
hint that knowledge is being continuously created by human endeavour and
intelligence.
Bad
pedagogy is all over. For example, a terrible way of teaching about surface
tension is to begin with “surface tension comes because a skin is created on
the surface of a liquid by attraction of molecules”. Now, no one has ever seen
a molecule with a naked eye, much less seen one attracting the other. A student
who learns it this way has not learnt anything at all.
On the
other hand, a good approach would be to ask the student to gently place a razor
blade on the still surface of water. Why does it float? The student is then
allowed to deduce that there is some kind of invisible skin; a drop of liquid
soap thins it further and the blade sinks. In this manner the student could be
led towards meaningful comprehension of phenomena through a logical process.
The weakest
parts of the books I have browsed through are the chapter-end questions and
exercises. This is useless memory-recall drill. The authors do not know that
the essence of science is problem-solving, and that good scientific training
builds a student’s capacity to internalise newly-learnt principles by applying
them to problems whose answers are yet unknown. In contrast, foreign-authored
O-level books — used only by a tiny sliver of upscale Pakistani schools —
usually do have good questions.
There is
only a little good news. Compared to earlier textbooks, newer ones have fewer
conceptual and spelling mistakes. Also, with time, better printing and use of
colour illustrations are more common. But, as before, a jumble of facts bundled
together cannot spark the imagination of young minds.
Some say
that money lies at the root of the problem. Indeed, authoring textbooks is a
lucrative business because of the sheer volume of books sold. The pressure to
include incompetent authors — and to share profits — is enormous. This is
probably why the current Class X mathematics book of the Punjab Textbook Board,
has six authors and the slim 187-page Class X chemistry book has eight authors!
So, while every individual gets a cut from the sales, the blame can be easily
passed on to others.
I doubt
that stricter regulations can help. Local textbooks are such poor pedagogical
instruments for a very good reason: science is not part of Pakistan’s national
culture. There is endless political entertainment on TV but no locally-produced
science programmes. I know of no science museums except for one in Lahore. So
great is the public’s ignorance of science that the path-breaking work of Abdus
Salam is considered inferior to the copycat reverse engineering that led
Pakistan to the bomb.
There is a
solution: good science books exist. So use them! Elite O-level schools use
books chosen from the most successful ones published internationally. Surely
matric-level schools can be made to do the same after the books are properly
adapted/translated. Should a Pakistani be the author (or among the authors), so
much the better! But quality alone should matter, not where the author comes
from.
Unfortunately,
nationalist bravado kicks in whenever this is proposed. The rhetoric is that
Pakistanis can author science textbooks just as well as anyone else. The
conclusion is that we should not rely upon foreign educational materials. But
an inflated national ego, together with small scientific accomplishment, is
hardly helpful.
Firm
resolve is needed to turn the situation around. Pakistanis must admit locally
written textbooks are nowhere as good as foreign ones, and decide to use the
very best ones available anywhere. The argument against importation is
senseless because we use medicines and computers invented by outsiders, fly in
their planes, and use their mobile phones. False pride and misplaced beliefs must
be set aside. Eating humble pie is never easy, but surely this is a small price
to pay for having scientifically smart Pakistanis in the future.
The writer
currently teaches physics and political science at LUMS (Lahore). He taught at
Quaid-i-Azam University for 36 years and was head of the physics department. He
received a doctorate in nuclear physics from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology
Source: The Express Tribune, Lahore
URL: https://newageislam.com/islamic-society/pakistani-students-science-phobic/d/6676