By
Nikhat Sattar
11 Dec 2020
AMONG other
dysfunctional and anti-people characteristics of states that claim to be
governing Muslim populations, one is the muzzling of free speech, dissent with
the state or traditional religious narrative and open dialogue and debate.
Countries
that claim to be otherwise democratic clamp down on anything and anyone their
agencies and individuals think might go against their notions of what is good
and moral for the public.
One Muslim
country employs a moral police that swoops down on ordinary people, especially
women, for perceived immoral acts. A few years ago, a senior police official
said that women should cover their eyes because they seduce men through them.
Another country imprisons and punishes women with lashes if they protest
against the head covering. In Pakistan, a woman is watched at every step,
abused for every word she might utter against the majority norm and blamed for
every crime against her.
This is not
limited to moral policing of women. Many countries are wary of dissidents of
government policies, even of allowing debates in educational institutions. In
one country, Khutbah are monitored, not for their hate content but for anything
that could be deemed critical of the government. In Pakistan, people are either
afraid of voicing differences or frustrated as the environment for encouraging
openness and new ideas becomes increasingly restricted.
Intellectuals
perceived to be critical of the political and social environment are barred
from giving lectures in universities; educational curricula that would promote
robotic patriotism and religiosity are developed. In one conflict-ridden
region, when women tried to come together to discuss their role in
peace-building, they were visited by security personnel and warned.
Just as
Muslim countries are far behind their Western counterparts in ethics,
philosophy, technology, science, financial strength, so are they in developing
human capital. Their projects are designed, operated and managed mostly by foreign
companies and where locals are employed, they are low-skilled labour. The main
reason is their low investment in education. But the intellectual stagnation is
also the result of decades of authoritarian rule and curbs on freedom of
thought and debate.
Yet, Islam
is the faith that brought the best of morality and ethics, to be implemented in
every walk of life. The Quran and the life of the Prophet (PBUH) are the
guidance that provides humans with a light towards their collective and
individual development in this world and preparation for the next. Early Muslim
societies created great thinkers and provided platforms for them to travel,
come together, ponder over books that were obtained from ancient peoples, and
translated and wrote huge volumes of ground-breaking work in mathematics and
science. They met, shared ideas and often disagreed with each other and with
the policies and systems of the state. Later, Muslim rulers began to adopt laws
aimed at preventing dissent in order to ensure their hold over power. This
approach continues.
The Quran
instructs Muslims to settle all matters through counselling. The Holy Book
states: “Those who hearken to their Lord, and establish regular Prayer; who
(conduct) their affairs by mutual consultation. …” (42:38). The surah is ‘Al
Shurah’ (consultation).
It is not a
case of pronouncing judgement on an issue between two parties; it is a
discussion and debate where decisions are taken through consensus. Anyone in
the group can disagree and the Quran thus encourages differences of opinion.
This could be in any matter: legal, financial, religious or social.
During the
time of the Prophet and during the rule of the four caliphs, there is not a
single incident of punishment due to dissent. Even God allowed His angels to
raise their voices and express their concerns over His plan to create humans:
“...Wilt Thou place therein one who will make mischief therein and shed blood?
— whilst we do celebrate Thy praises and glorify Thy holy (name)?” (2:30). He
listened to them and explained His reasons through argument and example.
The Prophet
had to face considerable dissent in his lifetime. When it was offensive, he
would often pass it off with a goodhearted comment (Seerat Ibn Hisham Vol 1).
Vituperative comments and abuse too were answered through well-reasoned
arguments, and well-meaning differences of opinion were welcomed and considered
in decision-making. Many examples are available of the common public
disagreeing with Caliph Umar and his acceptance of their criticism. During his rule,
people were empowered and participated in governance.
The path we
follow is not the path towards a progressive state and an intelligent society
that could take part in innovation and creativity. Islam advocates finding
solutions to all matters of contention by means of discussion rather than by
violence.
Original
Headline: Dissent in Islam
Source: The Dawn, Pakistan
URL: https://newageislam.com/islamic-society/quran-instructs-muslims-settle-all/d/123726
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in
America, Muslim Women in
West, Islam Women and
Feminism