By
Huma Yusuf
27 Jul 2020
THE drone
footage showed hundreds of men, shaved, blindfolded, shackled. Western
countries saw this as evidence of what is being termed as ‘genocide’ against
Uighurs and other ethnic and religious minorities in China. For China and its
allies, this was fake news, another example of Western hypocrisy.
Efforts to
hold China to account for its treatment of Uighurs are gaining momentum. The US
has imposed targeted sanctions against party officials implicated in rights
abuses. The UK’s foreign secretary has accused China of “egregious” human
rights abuses. France wants international observers to be permitted access to
Xinjiang.
China is
allegedly detaining between one and two million Uighurs and other minorities in
‘re-education’ camps. There are reports of torture and forced sterilisation of
women. Uighurs are subject to constant surveillance and restrictions on their
religious beliefs, cultural practices and movement. China denies allegations of
rights abuses, instead arguing for the need to protect national security. It
says the camps are vocational training centres established under a CT
programme.
The timing
of Western outrage against Uighur oppression — of which evidence has been
mounting in recent years — will justifiably raise eyebrows. It is a barometer
of the rapid deterioration of relationships between the US and its Western allies
and China.
This
deterioration has less to do with human rights and more to do with China’s
growing political and security assertiveness, most recently manifest in the
imposition of a national security law in Hong Kong. The Uighur card is being
deployed as tensions mount over trade deals, the handling of the coronavirus
pandemic, and cybersecurity concerns linked to Huawei’s capture of the global
telecoms market and Chinese espionage.
Western
countries want more targeted sanctions and increased pressure on international
companies to ensure their supply chains are not exposed to China’s enforced
labour programmes. The latter is no small ask. Take the fashion industry, for
example: one in five cotton garments sold globally contains materials from
Xinjiang. Given the challenges of assessing supply chains, corporations are
likely to opt out of sourcing from China.
Pakistan
will, of course, remain silent as this issue intensifies. This is not
surprising; as Prime Minister Imran Khan has himself said, China has aided
Pakistan when it has been at “rock bottom”, so Islamabad will not publicly
shame Beijing on its Uighur track record (though he implied concerns may be
raised privately).
A similar
approach is likely across many Muslim-majority countries and others seeking
investment under the Belt and Road Initiative. Pakistan in July last year was
joined by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE among other Muslim countries to
block a UN motion calling for international observers to visit Xinjiang.
But
Pakistan’s refusal to publicly acknowledge the Uighur issue means that it must
control public discourse on this topic too. This will increase the impetus for
Pakistan’s censorship regime, already in overdrive. The establishment had
already discouraged critique of CPEC; it will hardly exert much energy in
maintaining an unspoken ban on raising Uighurs’ plight.
This is not
to say that Pakistan’s growing culture of censorship is entirely attributable
to increasing Chinese influence; the powers that be have long desired to control
national narratives. But free speech opponents will be grateful for a patron
that shares their disdain for dissent.
Silence on
Uighurs will also cost Pakistan credibility on the Kashmir issue. Khan has
previously argued that the scale of the two issues is different. But this
argument will not be enough if Pakistan wants to be perceived as a genuine
champion of Muslims’ and human rights when speaking on Kashmir. Given that
the audience for pleas for Kashmiri rights is in the West, and not China, Pakistan
will face pressure to be consistent.
There are
also future security implications. We have previously aided China’s crackdown
on Uighur separatists and terrorists, including by ensuring that the East
Turkestan Islamic Movement could not establish bases in north-western Pakistan.
If the Uighur situation worsens, there is potential for regional militant
groups that are ideologically committed to protecting Muslims to further ally
with the Uighur cause. Pakistan may then face retaliation.
More
broadly, China’s growing tensions with the West herald what is being described
as the next cold war, one defined by a fragmentation of global cyber
infrastructure and supply chains, and marked by a divide between
authoritarianism and populist democratic politics. As this polarisation
deepens, Pakistan is on track to side with China.
Ironically,
we are further along on this journey than we realise; there is no space to
debate whether this is the best course for Pakistan.
Huma
Yusuf is a freelance journalist.
Original
Headline: Silence won’t pay
Source: The Dawn, Pakistan
URL: https://newageislam.com/islamic-society/pakistan-kept-quiet-uighur-crackdown/d/122470