Hajj with Unlawful Wealth: Valid or Not, Accepted or Rejected, and Does It Fulfil the Obligation?
By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi, New Age Islam
02 May 2026
What do the noble scholars (ʿulama-e-kirām) and eminent jurists (muftiyān-e-ʿiẓām) state regarding the following issue: What is the ruling, according to Islam, on performing Ḥajj through wealth that has been acquired via bribery or other unlawful means? Furthermore, kindly clarify whether the obligation of Ḥajj becomes binding upon a person who possesses only unlawful wealth. Additionally, if Ḥajj has already become obligatory upon a person due to lawful wealth, will a Ḥajj performed using unlawful wealth suffice for the discharge of the obligation or not? Please provide a detailed and substantiated answer in the light of the Qurʾān, Sunnah, and the statements of the jurists.
Questioner: Mawlana Wasi Ahmad from Lahuria Baswaria, Sitamarhi, Bihar.
In the Name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
Answer with the aid of the Sovereign, the Bestower: O Allāh, guide us to the truth and correctness.
In the sight of Allāh ﷻ, only lawful (ḥalāl) wealth is accepted, whereas unlawful (ḥarām) wealth is, in itself, a cause of ruin and accountability. Therefore, a Ḥajj performed through unlawful wealth is not accepted in the Divine Court.
According to the Sacred Law, Ḥajj becomes obligatory only upon that person who possesses the means of provision and conveyance (i.e., the financial ability to undertake the journey). Hence, if a person has never possessed sufficient lawful wealth by which he could attain the capacity (istitāʿah) for Ḥajj, then Ḥajj does not become obligatory upon him.
However, if a person does possess sufficient lawful wealth to meet the conditions of obligation, and thus Ḥajj has become obligatory upon him, then it is strictly unlawful (ḥarām) for him to expend unlawful wealth in its performance. In such a case, if he proceeds to perform Ḥajj, then according to the explicit statements of the majority of jurists (jumhūr al-fuqahāʾ), the obligation will indeed be discharged. Nevertheless, since the act was performed in conjunction with sin, no reward (thawāb) will be accorded for it; rather, in terms of acceptance, such a Ḥajj will be deemed rejected (mardūd), even though the liability of neglecting the obligation will be lifted from him.
The following noble verses provide exceedingly clear and principled guidance on this matter:
﴿يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُلُوا مِنْ طَيِّبَاتِ مَا رَزَقْنَاكُمْ﴾
(Al-Qurʾān al-Ḥakīm, Sūrah al-Baqarah (Chapter 2), Verse 172)
Translation: “O believers! Partake of the pure and wholesome things which We have provided for you.”
﴿وَلَا تَأْكُلُوا أَمْوَالَكُمْ بَيْنَكُم بِالْبَاطِلِ﴾
(Al-Qurʾān al-Ḥakīm, Sūrah al-Baqarah (Chapter 2), Verse 188)
Translation: “And do not consume one another’s wealth unjustly”.
﴿يَا أَيُّهَا الرُّسُلُ كُلُوا مِنَ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَاعْمَلُوا صَالِحًا﴾
(Al-Qurʾān al-Ḥakīm, Sūrah al-Muʾminūn (Chapter 23), Verse 51)
Translation: “O Messengers! Eat of the pure things and perform righteous deeds.”
﴿يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَنفِقُوا مِن طَيِّبَاتِ مَا كَسَبْتُمْ﴾
(Al-Qurʾān al-Ḥakīm, Sūrah al-Baqarah (Chapter 2), Verse 267)
Translation: “O believers! Spend from the pure things which you have earned.”
A reflective contemplation upon these blessed verses makes it evident that Islam has established, as a fundamental principle, that all forms of financial engagement, whether pertaining to personal consumption or acts of worship, must be grounded in what is ṭayyib (pure) and ḥalāl (lawful). In the first of these verses, the believers are commanded to consume only pure sustenance. In the second, a stern prohibition is issued against acquiring or utilizing wealth through false and unlawful means, such as usury (ribā), bribery (rishwah), and other illicit avenues. The third verse further reinforces this foundational principle by demonstrating that pure sustenance and righteous action are inextricably intertwined. Finally, the fourth verse explicitly restricts all forms of charitable expenditure (infāq) to wealth that is lawfully earned, thereby affirming that purity of wealth is a essential condition for its acceptance in acts of devotion.
Hence, in the light of these Qurʾānic evidences, it becomes manifestly clear that for financial acts of worship, particularly the obligation of Ḥajj, it is an essential requirement that the wealth employed be lawful (ḥalāl) and pure (ṭayyib). The utilization of unlawful wealth is, in itself, a sin, and an act of worship performed through sin is deprived of Divine acceptance. On this basis, it shall be stated regarding such a Ḥajj that, although it may suffice in discharging the obligation, it is neither accepted in the sight of Allāh ﷻ nor does it entail any reward.
It is reported in Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī:
لَا يَقْبَلُ اللَّهُ إِلَّا الطَّيِّبَ
Translation: “Allāh ﷻ accepts only that which is pure.”
(Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī, Kitāb al-Zakāh, Bāb mā jāʾa fī faḍl al-ṣadaqah)
Moreover, in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, it is narrated from Ḥaḍrat Abū Hurayrah that:
قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ! إِنَّ اللَّهَ طَيِّبٌ لَا يَقْبَلُ إِلَّا طَيِّبًا
Translation: “The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: O people! Indeed, Allāh ﷻ is Pure and accepts only that which is pure.” (Al-Ṣaḥīḥ li-Muslim, Kitāb al-Zakāh)
It is further mentioned in Irshād al-Sārī by Mullā ʿAlī al-Qārī:
لَا لَبَّيْكَ وَلَا سَعْدَيْكَ، وَحَجُّكَ مَرْدُودٌ عَلَيْكَ حَتَّى تَرُدَّ مَا فِي يَدَيْكَ
Translation: “Neither is your call accepted, nor is your service accepted; and your Ḥajj is rejected back upon you—until you return that unlawful wealth which is in your possession.”
(Irshād al-Sārī li-ʿAlī al-Qārī, Bāb al-Mutafarriqāt, p. 323, Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, Beirut)
Furthermore, in Al-Targhīb wa al-Tarhīb, it is narrated from Sayyidunā Abū Hurayrahؓ that:
قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: إِذَا خَرَجَ بِالنَّفَقَةِ الْخَبِيثَةِ فَوَضَعَ رِجْلَهُ فِي الْغَرْزِ فَنَادَى: لَبَّيْكَ، نَادَاهُ مُنَادٍ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ: لَا لَبَّيْكَ وَلَا سَعْدَيْكَ، زَادُكَ حَرَامٌ وَنَفَقَتُكَ حَرَامٌ وَحَجُّكَ مَأْزُورٌ غَيْرُ مَبْرُورٍ
Translation: “The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: When a servant sets out for Ḥajj with unlawful provision, and places his foot in the stirrup, then calls out “Labbayk,” a caller from the heavens proclaims: “Lā labbayka wa lā saʿdayk; your provision is unlawful, your expenditure is unlawful, and your Ḥajj is burdened with sin and is not accepted (ghayr mabrūr).” (Al-Targhīb wa al-Tarhīb, al-Targhīb fī al-Nafaqah fī al-Ḥajj wa al-ʿUmrah, Vol. 2, p. 113, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, Beirut)
The jurists have also provided explicit clarification on this issue. Thus, it is stated in Al-Hidāyah:
الْحَجُّ وَاجِبٌ عَلَى الْأَحْرَارِ الْبَالِغِينَ الْعُقَلَاءِ الْأَصِحَّاءِ إِذَا قَدَرُوا عَلَى الزَّادِ وَالرَّاحِلَةِ
Translation: “Ḥajj is obligatory upon those who are free, legally mature, sane, and physically sound, when they possess the means of provision and conveyance.” (Al-Hidāyah, Kitāb al-Ḥajj, Vol. 1, p. 145, Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, Beirut)
It is stated in Al-Durr al-Mukhtār:
وَقَدْ يَتَّصِفُ بِالْحُرْمَةِ كَالْحَجِّ بِمَالٍ حَرَامٍ
Translation: At times, Ḥajj may be described with unlawfulness, such as performing Ḥajj with unlawful wealth.
(Radd al-Muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-Mukhtār, Kitāb al-Ḥajj, Maṭlab fī man ḥajja bi-māl ḥarām, Vol. 3, p. 519, Quetta edition)
Further elaboration is provided in Radd al-Muḥtār as follows:
إِنَّ الْحَجَّ نَفْسَهُ الَّذِي هُوَ زِيَارَةُ مَكَانٍ مَخْصُوصٍ إِلَخْ لَيْسَ حَرَامًا، بَلِ الْحَرَامُ هُوَ إِنْفَاقُ الْمَالِ الْحَرَامِ، قَالَ فِي الْبَحْرِ: وَيَجْتَهِدُ فِي تَحْصِيلِ نَفَقَةٍ حَلَالٍ، فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقْبَلُ بِالنَّفَقَةِ الْحَرَامِ كَمَا وَرَدَ فِي الْحَدِيثِ، مَعَ أَنَّهُ يَسْقُطُ الْفَرْضُ عَنْهُ مَعَهَا، وَلَا تَنَافِيَ بَيْنَ سُقُوطِهِ وَعَدَمِ قَبُولِهِ، فَلَا يُثَابُ لِعَدَمِ الْقَبُولِ، وَلَا يُعَاقَبُ عِقَابَ تَارِكِ الْحَجِّ
Translation: Indeed, Ḥajj itself, being the visitation of specific sacred sites, is not unlawful; rather, what is unlawful is the expenditure of unlawful wealth. It is stated in Al-Baḥr that one must strive to obtain lawful provision, for Ḥajj performed with unlawful expenditure is not accepted, as has been reported in the ḥadīth. Nevertheless, despite this, the obligation is discharged thereby, and there is no contradiction between the discharge of the obligation and its lack of acceptance. Thus, no reward is granted due to the absence of acceptance, nor is the person punished with the punishment of one who abandons Ḥajj.
(Radd al-Muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-Mukhtār, Kitāb al-Ḥajj, Vol. 3, p. 519, Quetta edition)
Similarly, it is stated in Fatḥ al-Qadīr:
لَا يُقْبَلُ الْحَجُّ بِالنَّفَقَةِ الْحَرَامِ مَعَ أَنَّهُ يَسْقُطُ الْفَرْضُ مَعَهَا
Translation: Ḥajj performed with unlawful expenditure is not accepted, although the obligation is discharged thereby. (Fatḥ al-Qadīr, Kitāb al-Ḥajj, Vol. 5, p. 1, Beirut, Lebanon)
From these explicit statements of the jurists, it becomes evident that lawful wealth is an indispensable requirement for the proper performance of the obligation of Ḥajj. Although a Ḥajj performed with unlawful wealth may suffice for the discharge of the obligation, it is neither accepted in the sight of Allāh ﷻ nor does it carry any reward.
Aala Hazrat Imam Ahmad Raza Barelwi states in Fatāwā Raḍawiyyah:
Translation: If a person has never possessed sufficient lawful wealth by which he could perform Ḥajj, even though he may have possessed thousands in bribery, then Ḥajj has not become obligatory upon him, because wealth obtained through bribery is akin to usurped property, and he is not its rightful owner. However, if he possesses, or at any time possessed, sufficient lawful wealth by which Ḥajj became obligatory upon him, then Ḥajj is binding upon him; yet, to expend unlawful wealth such as bribery therein is prohibited. If he nevertheless performs Ḥajj with such wealth, it will not be accepted, although the obligation will be discharged.” (Fatāwā Raḍawiyyah, Vol. 10, p. 708, Raḍā Foundation)
Furthermore, it is also stated in Fatāwā Raḍawiyyah:
Translation: “Good deeds performed with usurious wealth do not entail any entitlement to reward… nor is it permissible to utilize such wealth for that purpose. However, the obligation of Ḥajj will be discharged thereby, for indeed:
فَإِنَّ الْقَبُولَ شَيْءٌ آخَرُ غَيْرُ سُقُوطِ الْفَرْضِ
“Acceptance (qabūl) is one matter, and the discharge of obligation (suqūṭ al-farḍ) is another.”
It is analogous to one who performs prayer on usurped land; although the obligation is fulfilled, the prayer is not accepted. (Fatāwā Raḍawiyyah, Vol. 23, p. 542, Riḍā Foundation)
From these explicit statements of Aala Hazrat Imam Ahamd Raza, the ruling becomes abundantly clear: the obligation of Ḥajj is contingent solely upon the possession of lawful wealth sufficient to establish istiṭāʿah (capacity), and not upon wealth in an absolute sense. Thus, a person who has never possessed sufficient lawful wealth, even if he holds abundant unlawful wealth such as bribery or usury, Ḥajj does not become obligatory upon him in the Islamic sense, as unlawful wealth does not constitute valid ownership.
However, if at any time a person did possess sufficient lawful wealth by which Ḥajj became obligatory, then its performance becomes binding upon him. Yet, it remains impermissible (ḥarām) to utilize unlawful wealth in fulfilling this obligation. Should he nonetheless perform Ḥajj with unlawful wealth, then although, from a juristic standpoint, the obligation will be discharged (saqūṭ al-farḍ), it will not be accepted in the sight of Allāh ﷻ, nor will any reward be accorded.
Moreover, the second passage from Fatāwā Raḍawiyyah elucidates with remarkable clarity the principle that acceptance (qabūl) and discharge of obligation (suqūṭ al-farḍ) are two distinct and independent realities, and there is no necessary correlation between them. Just as a prayer performed on usurped land technically fulfils the obligation yet remains devoid of acceptance, likewise a Ḥajj performed with unlawful wealth may discharge the obligation but remains bereft of the honour of acceptance and reward.
In conclusion:
It is an essential requirement for the performance of the obligation of Ḥajj that the wealth utilized be lawful and pure. A Ḥajj performed through unlawful wealth, although it may suffice for the discharge of the obligation in the juristic sense, is not accepted in the Divine Court and carries no reward. Therefore, it is incumbent upon every Muslim to ensure that only lawful and pure wealth is employed in the performance of Ḥajj, for the acceptance of worships is contingent upon it.
(Most of the juristic evidence and references herein are derived from Fatwa of Mufti Anas Raza Qadri, Fiqh Academy Online.)
------
URL for Urdu: https://newageislam.com/urdu-section/hajj-unlawful-accepted-rejected-fulfil-obligation/d/139833
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism