By New Age Islam Staff Writer
16 September 2020
-------
In any case the entire theology of Jihad evolved in pre-modern times when aggression was the order of the day. Acquisition of land by aggression was considered legitimate. That is no longer the case in this New Age. Nearly all countries have signed the UN Charter which ensures world peace. The days of aggressive Jihad are gone. It’s time Muslim ulema too recognise this and outlawed the very concept of Offensive Jihad whose Quranic legitimacy was doubtful even in olden days. This was more to justify the imperialist instincts of the Arab and Turk kings who went in the name of khalifas. let us build a new theology of Islam to suit our times and its imperatives.
-------
Terrorism has become almost synonymous with the Islamic concept of Jihad. The state and international security are widely concerned about this phenomenon. Regional, global and inter-state relations and policies are being reshaped with regard to international terrorism. Numerous terrorist activities carried out by the so-called Islamic groups such as ‘Al-Qaeda’, ‘Tahreek-e-Taliban’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Jaish e Muhammad’ and ‘Lashkar-e-Taiba’ etc have given a particular identity to the Islamic concept of Jihad. As a result, Jihad biI Nafs (Jihad against one’s lower self) that is the Greater Jihad has now become forgotten and once the word ‘Jihad’ is pronounced, the first meaning striking common minds is Jihad by fighting (Jihad biI Qital).
There
are two popular concepts of Jihad; 1) Jihad through fighting and 2) Jihad
through Nafs. The first revelation which permitted Jihad by fighting is either
2:190 or 22:39 which came much later in Madani period. Before revelation of 2:190 or 22:39, fighting
even in self-defence was forbidden in Makkah and initially in Madina too. The
Quranic verses which directly or indirectly debarred Muslims, in the initial
period, from waging Jihad by fighting even in self-defence are 23:96, 5:13,
73:10, 16:82, 88:21-22, 50:45.
“Repel evil with the best deeds;
We well know the matters that they fabricate”. (23:96)
“So, forgive them and excuse
them; indeed, Allah loves the virtuous”. (5:13)
“And be patient over what they
say and avoid them with gracious avoidance”. (73:10)
“Then if they turn away, O dear
Prophet, (Mohammed – peace and blessings be upon him) upon you is nothing but
to clearly convey (the message)”. (16:82)
“Therefore advise; indeed, you
are a proclaimer of advice. (The Holy Prophet is a Remembrance from Allah.) You
are not at all a guardian over them”. (88:21-22)
“And you are not one to use force
over them” (50:45)
However, when the verse 2:190 or
22:39 was revealed, Jihad by fighting in self-defence against anti-social
elements and religious persecutions was allowed, against those who initiated
fighting; Allah Almighty says,
“And fight in the way of Allah
against those who fight against you, but do not transgress. Truly Allah loves not
the transgressors.” (2:190)
The
reason of Jihad becoming obligatory is that, for as long as 14 or 15 years, the
Muslims were subjected to all sorts of persecutions. They suffered insults,
outrages, boycotts and injuries at the hands of their persecutors. They bore
all these indignities with the utmost humility and patience. When the
aggression and ruthlessness of the pagan Arabs grew more hotly than ever, Allah
granted permission to the believers to take up arms in their own defence. This
was known as Jihad by fighting. The context of Jihad makes it clear that this
Jihad can’t be performed to commit terrorism or kill civilians through suicide
attacks or by any other means.
The
so-called ‘JIHAD’ of terror groups, such as Al-Qaeda, ISIS and Taliban is not
Jihad but an act of terrorism. Jihad in today’s context can’t be valid unless
the pre-requisites of Jihad are performed. One must use one’s reasoning to
understand the value of pre-requisites without which many popular obligatory
actions of Islam can’t be deemed valid. In other words, every obligatory act in
Islam has its respective pre-requisites or conditions that must be performed
before the obligatory acts.
For
example, Allah Almighty says in the Quran, “Bestow Zakat”. Now the questions
are; who are the people commanded in this verse to bestow Zakat? Was it
incumbent upon the slaves? Is it incumbent upon insane, children, or the
Muslims who do not possess Nisab? The case is just the opposite. Zakat is an
ordinance of Allah, incumbent upon every person who is free, sane, adult and
Muslim, provided he be possessed, in full propriety, of such estate or wealth
as are termed in the Arabic language a Nisab, and that has been in possession
of the same for the space of one complete year.
The
usage of the commanding word ‘bestow’ is common to every believer but only
those who are free, sane, adult and Muslim have to bestow Zakat. It is not
incumbent upon slaves, insane, children and non-Muslims. The details of the
verse “bestow Zakat” come from the Quranic verses and Sunnah. It will be simply
a matter of ignorance to apply the command “bestow Zakat” in general to the
children, insane and those who do not possess the required Nisab. From this we
must deduce that Zakat, which is an obligatory act, has some conditions and it
is not incumbent upon those who do not meet the conditions of being free, sane,
adult, Muslim and possessor of Nisab for the space of one complete year.
Similarly,
Jihad which is performed through fighting has some conditions. One of the
conditions of Jihad is that it is the responsibility of the state against
aggressors. This can’t be waged against a country with which there is a peace
agreement. Also, those Muslim states who have signed the UN Charter cannot wage
an offensive jihad against any other state who is also a signatory to the UN
Charter. Of course, the question of Jihad against one’s own country and it's
elected government simply does not arise as the Constitution is an agreement
between the state and its citizens.
Take
Namaz (prayer) as another example. Through the divine command “establish
prayer” it becomes incumbent upon every Muslim to perform Namaz. However, to
establish prayer (Namaz/Salah), it is obligatory to perform the pre-requisites
or conditions of Namaz, without which the prayer or Namaz will not be valid at
all. There are six conditions for the validity of Namaz; (1) purification (2)
covering the essential parts of the body (3) facing the direction of the holy
Kaaba (4) Namaz must be performed in its prescribed times. It cannot be
performed before its prescribed time (5) Intention and (6) proclaiming Allahu
Akbar to commence Namaz.
Here
some may question, does a command only require for that action to be carried
out once? For example, Allah says, “establish prayer”. Can we just pray one
Namaz/prayer in order for it to be sufficient? Why do we have to repeat Namaz
if there is no repetition in the divine command? The answer is that here the ruling
for a command being repeated is because this action was not established through
the imperative sentence itself but through the repetition of the Asbab
(causes) through which it has been commanded. Therefore, we do not perform
these actions because of the imperative sentence, but because of the timings (Awqat)
of Namaz and their causes. That is why the repetition of these timings causes
us to continuously pray in accordance to it.
So now, one may ask—why is there a command if the cause (Asbab)
necessitates it? This is because the command (Amr) is mentioned by Allah
as a reminder to us of our obligations as Muslims.
Just
as Hajj, Zakat and Namaz have some prerequisites, Jihad too has some
conditions. Namaz is obligatory because of its causes and becomes valid only
when its prerequisites are performed. Jihad too has some pre-requisites without
which ‘Jihad through fighting’ can’t be valid at all. As mentioned before,
Jihad which is performed through fighting is the responsibility of the state in
defence. Moreover, Jihad through fighting is not valid in this age while there
is peace-agreement signed by Muslim states.
In
any case the entire theology of Jihad evolved in pre-modern times when
aggression was the order of the day. Acquisition of land by aggression was
considered legitimate. That is no longer the case in this New Age. Nearly all
countries have signed the UN Charter which ensures world peace. The days of
aggressive Jihad are gone. It’s time Muslim ulema too recognise this and
outlawed the very concept of Offensive Jihad whose Quranic legitimacy was
doubtful even in olden days. This was more to justify the imperialist instincts
of the Arab and Turk kings who went in the name of khalifas. let us build a new
theology of Islam to suit our times and its imperatives.
URL: https://newageislam.com/islamic-q-a/is-jihad-sense-qital-permanent/d/122869
New Age
Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in
Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In
Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim
Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism