By
Rowan Scarborough
March 25, 2015
While President Obama and his aides insist that Muslim
extremists have nothing to do with Islam the religion, other world leaders are
leaving that approach behind.
British Home Secretary Theresa May on Monday announced
a get-tough policy that includes a comprehensive strategy to combat what she
called “Islamist extremists,” a phrase the Obama administration officials have
repeatedly refused to use.
Ms. May said the new counter-extremism measures
include the power to close sites “that are owned or occupied by extremists or
are used to host extremist meetings or speakers.” It was widely interpreted in
Britain to mean closing Islamic centers and mosques that foment intolerance and
violence.
She also announced new scrutiny of religious figures
trying to enter Britain and a requirement that they speak English when speaking
to followers. The policies would take effect if a new Conservative government
is elected in May.
Tunisia, site of two horrendous terror attacks in
recent months, has been closing mosques since last summer. This week, the North
African country, seen as one of the few success stories of the so-called “Arab
Spring,” issued a report identifying scores of additional mosques as catering
to Islamic extremists.
And in France, Prime Minister Manuel Valls told The
Wall Street Journal in late February, “France has been struck very much at its
heart by terrorism — jihadist terrorism and radical Islamism, because let us
call things like they are.”
France has enacted tougher and more intrusive
counterterrorism laws in the wake of the Jan. 7 Charlie Hebdo massacre carried
out by two Islamists against a satirical magazine that had lampooned Islam.
In Egypt, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi on Sunday
expanded a campaign to forcefully urge his country’s Muslim leaders to purge an
ideology of violence from its ranks. The president, a former head of Egypt’s
military forces, does not hesitate to say the religion of Islam has an
extremist problem.
Even Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani, addressing a
joint session of Congress Wednesday at the end of a four-day Washington visit,
said leaders in Muslim-majority countries must do more publicly to condemn
terror movements such as the Islamic State, even as Mr. Ghani denied jihadi
terror groups were a true reflection of Islam as a faith.
For public officials and Islamic leaders in
Muslim-majority countries, “silence is not acceptable,” Mr. Ghani said.
The United States is home to a relatively small, but
growing, Muslim population of 5 million to 8 million people, or about 2
percent, compared to 4 percent in Britain and France’s 8 percent. But the U.S.
too has witnessed the kind of incidents seen in Europe. American Muslim
residents have traveled to Syria to try to join the ultraviolent Islamic State
terror army. Authorities have stopped a number of homegrown terror plots. Some,
such as the Fort Hood massacre and the first attack on the World Trade Center,
were carried out by self-proclaimed jihadis in this country.
Soeren Kern, an analyst at the Gatestone Institute,
which tracks radical Islam, said domestic politics are at work in Britain and
France just as much as security concerns. Britain has general elections set for
early May.
“The flurry of counterterrorism activity in recent
months is an attempt by the Conservative government to stanch the flow of votes
to right-wing parties such as the United Kingdom Independence Party, which has
long warned of the danger posed by radical Islam, and which is now the
third-most-popular political party in Britain,” Mr. Kern said.
In France, presidential elections are two years away,
but the security issue is already playing into the jockeying for advantage.
“In the wake of the jihadist attacks in Paris in
January, we can expect all presidential candidates to take tough positions
against radical Islam and Islamic terrorism as the election draws near,” Mr.
Kern said.
Focused
on Islam
It was the Theresa May speech on Monday that will
perhaps usher in a new era in Britain of directly combating homegrown
extremism. And while she spoke of all types, her focus was clearly on Islam,
whose radical members seem to be on the march in the U.K.
Ms. May acknowledged that unauthorized courts that
follow harsh Shariah law have been springing up outside the British court
system and making rulings, some of them particularly anti-woman.
“There is increasing evidence that a small but
significant number of people living in Britain — almost all of whom are British
citizens — reject our values,” she said. “We have seen the Trojan Horse plot to
take over state schools in Birmingham. Some concerns about religious supplementary
schools. Widespread allegations of corruption, cronyism, extremism, homophobia
and anti-Semitism in Tower Hamlets. Hate speakers invited to speak at British
colleges and universities. Segregation by gender allowed at universities and
even endorsed by Universities UK. Charities and the generosity of the giving
public abused by extremists. Examples of Shariah law being used to discriminate
against women. Thousands of ‘honor’ crimes committed every year. And hundreds
of British citizens who have traveled to fight in Syria and Iraq.”
The “Trojan Horse” scandal, uncovered by a special
government investigation last year, involved a plot by Muslim faculty to turn
Birmingham public schools into essentially Islamic institutions. Tower Hamlets
is a predominantly Muslim neighborhood in East London.
“Islamist extremists believe in a clash of
civilizations,” Ms. May said. “They promote a fundamental incompatibility
between Islamic and Western values, an inevitable divide between ‘them and us.’
They demand a caliphate, or a new Islamic state, governed by a harsh
interpretation of Sharia law. They utterly reject British and Western values,
including democracy, the rule of law and equality between citizens, regardless
of their gender, ethnicity, religion or sexuality. They believe that it’s
impossible to be a good Muslim and a good British citizen.”
In defending the conservative government’s decision to
call out “Islamist extremists,” Ms. May said:
“I know there are some people who disagree with me.
They say what I describe as Islamist extremism is simply social conservatism.
But if anybody else discriminated against women, denounced people on the basis
of their religious beliefs, rejected the democratic process, attacked people on
the basis of their sexuality or gave a nod and a wink in favor of violence and
terrorism, we wouldn’t hesitate to challenge them or — if the law was broken —
call for their prosecution and punishment.”
In Tunisia, the Ministry of Religious Affairs
disclosed this month that 149 mosques are under the control of radical
Salafists, a hard-line version of Islam, reported the Tunis Times. The
Salafists took over scores of mosques in 2011, evicting more moderate imams,
while other militants set up or controlled additional places of worship.
Since the fall of Tunisian strongman Zine El Abidine
Ben Ali, whose regime exerted control on all mosques, “over 1,000 have fallen
into the hands of radicals,” said a Ministry of Interior spokesman.
Last July, the government began closing scores of
mosques tied to militants, including al Qaeda, in the aftermath of an extremist
attack that killed 14 soldiers near the Algerian border.
Amid the mosque crackdown, the country suffered one of
its worst terrorists attacks on March 18, when gunmen trained by the Islamic
State in Libya opened fire inside the Bardo museum, killing 24 people, 20 of
them foreign tourists.
In January, Egypt’s President el-Sisi delivered what
could turn out to be a landmark address on an Islamic reformation.
He went to the heart of Sunni Islam, the Al-Azhar
University in Cairo, and spoke directly to senior scholars and imams.
“I am addressing the religious scholars and clerics.
We must take a long, hard look at the current situation,” he said. “It is
inconceivable that the ideology we sanctify should make our entire nation a
source of concern, danger, killing and destruction all over the world.”
CIA Director John Brennan is the most recent senior
Obama official to reject the use of the phrase “Islamic extremists.”
At a forum at the Council on Foreign Relations on
March 13, he said he was “amused” by the intense focus on what label President
Obama and his aides used. Calling the terrorists “Islamic,” Mr. Brennan argued,
plays into the enemy’s hands.
Terrorism, he said, “is totally inconsistent with what
the overwhelming majority of Muslims throughout the world [believe],” he said.
“And so by ascribing it as, you know, Muslim terrorism or Islamic extremism, I
think it really does give them the type of Islamic legitimacy that they are so
desperately seeking, but which they don’t deserve at all.
“They are terrorists. They’re criminals. Many of them
are psychopathic thugs, murderers, who use a religious concept and masquerade
and mask themselves in that religious construct. And I do think it does
injustice to the tenets of religion when we attach a religious moniker to
them.”
Source:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/25/islamist-extremists-phrase-rejected-by-obama-embra/?page=3#ixzz3VhPxB2Tg