By
Robert J. Burrowes
11
February, 2015
The
usual definition of a 'terrorist' is simple: a person who uses violence in the
pursuit of a political objective.
By
this definition, the two major categories of terrorist are those political
leaders who perpetrate state terror by attacking other countries (ranging from
launching a war, perhaps following a false flag operation, to conducting a
drone strike) – see the classic book 'The Real Terror Network: Terrorism in
Fact and Propaganda'
http://www.amazon.com/The-Real-Terror-Network-Propaganda/dp/0896081346 – and
those political leaders who use military violence in defense of a political
objective. For insight into the damaged psychology of violent political
leaders, see 'Understanding Obama and other People Who
Kill'http://www.countercurrents.org/burrowes070513.htm For much greater detail,
see 'Why Violence?' http://tinyurl.com/whyviolence
However,
the narrower Western public perception of a 'terrorist' is someone who attacks
civilian targets usually, but not always, in the West (that is, far away from
any war zone). This is why US drone strikes on civilians in countries like
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen, for example, do not attract similar
condemnation. Nor is there any condemnation of the Western use of terrorist
groups as proxies in the war against the Syrian government. Consequently,
groups like al Qaeda, Islamic State, al-Shabab and Boko Haram are labelled
'terrorist', essentially because they are presented as targeting and attacking
'our' civilians (or, as in the case of the girls kidnapped in Nigeria in 2014,
ones with whom we are allowed to identify).
In his
extensive research in the discipline of critical terrorism studies, Professor
Richard Jackson recently concluded that 'every major terrorist attack on
Western targets since 2001, including the attacks in Bali, Madrid, London and
Boston, has been claimed by the perpetrators to be revenge for Western military
intervention in the Middle East. Even the beheadings of Western hostages were
justified by Islamic State captors as a response to US bombing. In fact, every
major academic study of the past ten years has confirmed that Western military
intervention and its policies in the Middle East, including support for the
state of Israel, is the primary motivation for anti-Western terrorist attacks.
In 1996, a major study by the CATO Institute concluded that U.S. military
intervention overseas was the primary driver of anti-American terrorism. The
Chicago Project on Suicide Terrorism has drawn the same fundamental
conclusion.'
https://richardjacksonterrorismblog.wordpress.com/2014/10/02/how-not-to-tackle-islamic-state/
Professor
Jackson goes on to say 'There is plenty of good research and information which
could help to make reasonable and effective policies'. But, as Professor
Jackson also knows, we would be naïve to believe that Western elites have any
interest in such policies. And here's why.
Terrorism
is the global elite's ultimate weapon and a primary instrument for achieving
its policies. That is, terrorism enables the elite to manipulate geostrategic
events in order to extend and consolidate its political, economic and social
control over national societies and their resources. Here's how it works.
Western
elites and their allies wage war, in one form or another, on countries in other
parts of the world (the Middle East and Africa being the preferred targets at
the moment) specifically in order to induce a violent retaliation, including by
groups which are secretly supported, materially and militarily, by these
elites. See, for example, 'A Shameless Movement: Boko Haram and the Politics of
Terror' http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/05/13/boko-haram-and-the-politics-of-terror/
Elites also conduct false flag operations, such as 9/11 – see, for example,
'The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account of 911
Cannot Be True'http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=32392 – and
the attack on Charlie Hebdo – see, for example, 'Charlie Hebdo Massacre:
Another Staged Event to Incite War and Destroy
Freedom?'http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/2015/01/11/514231charlie-hebdo-massacre-another-staged-event-to-incite-war-and-destroy-freedom/
– to provoke public outrage. They then use the public outrage generated by
these retaliations and the false flag operations to justify the continuation of
their military attacks. This enables them to expand elite control both in the
regions under attack and also domestically.
By
harping on the 'threat of terrorism' to scare domestic populations, Western
elites and their allies are able to maintain their perpetual war in pursuit of
control of essential diminishing natural resources – particularly fossil fuels,
strategic minerals and water – while increasing their social control of
domestic populations through increasingly repressive domestic legislation that
guts human rights and civil liberties, including those in relation to dissent,
while increasing the powers of 'intelligence' services and the police as they
consolidate the surveillance state. See, for example, 'How Australia just
became a "national security
state"'http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/10/07/how-australia-just-became-a-national-security-state/
Needless
to say, the elite makes good use of its paid agents in academia, think tanks,
the corporate media and elsewhere to make sure that you are kept carefully
misinformed and told what to think and how to react.
If you
are inclined to resist the elite use of terror against the rest of us, you are
welcome to sign the online pledge of 'The People's Charter to Create a
Nonviolent World' http://thepeoplesnonviolencecharter.wordpress.com
Terrorism
is intended to frighten and kill fellow human beings. Those who conduct
terrorism and those who endorse it are badly psychologically damaged.
Robert
J. Burrowes has a lifetime commitment to understanding and ending human
violence. He has done extensive research since 1966 in an effort to understand
why human beings are violent and has been a nonviolent activist since 1981. He
is the author of 'Why Violence?' http://tinyurl.com/whyviolence His email
address is flametree@riseup.net and his website is
athttp://robertjburrowes.wordpress.com
Source:
http://www.countercurrents.org/burrowes110215.htm