New Age Islam
Fri Sep 25 2020, 04:30 AM

Islam and Politics ( 2 Jun 2013, NewAgeIslam.Com)

Who Really Speaks For Islam?

 

 

By Ayaan Hirsi Ali

May 29, 2013

After British soldier Lee Rigby was hacked to death last week in south London, Julie Siddiqi, for the Islamic Society of Britain, stepped before the microphones to attest that all good Muslims were "sickened" by the attack, "just like everyone else".

This happens every time. Muslim men wearing suits and ties or women wearing stylish headscarves are sent out to reassure the world that these attacks have no place in real Islam that they are aberrations and corruptions of the true faith.

But then what to make of Omar Bakri? He, too, claims to speak for the true faith, though he was unavailable for cameras in England last week because the Islamist group he founded, Al Muhajiroun, was banned in Britain in 2010. Instead, he talked to the media from Tripoli in Lebanon, where he now lives.

Michael Adebolajo - who was seen on a video at the scene of the Woolwich murder, talking to the camera while displaying his bloody hands and a meat cleaver - was Bakri's student a decade ago. "A quiet man, very shy, asking lots of questions about Islam," Bakri recalled last week. The teacher was impressed to see in the grisly video how far his shy disciple had come, "standing firm, courageous, brave. Not running away".

Bakri also told the press: "The Prophet said an infidel and his killer will not meet in Hell. That's a beautiful saying. May God reward (Adebolajo) for his actions . . . I don't see it as a crime as far as Islam is concerned."

The question requiring an answer at this moment in history is clear: which group of leaders really speaks for Islam. The officially approved spokesmen for the "Muslim community"? Or the manic street preachers of political Islam who indoctrinate, encourage and train the killers - then bless their bloodshed?

In the US, too, the question is pressing. Who speaks for Islam: the Council on American-Islamic Relations, America's largest Muslim civil-liberties advocacy organisation? Or one of the many web-based jihadists who has taken the place of the late Anwar al-Awlaki, the US-born al-Qaida recruiter?

Some refuse even to admit this is the question on everyone's mind. Amazingly, given the litany of Islamist attacks - from the 9/11 nightmare in the US and the London bombings of July 7, 2005, to the slayings at Fort Hood in Texas in 2009, at the Boston Marathon last month and now Woolwich - some continue to deny any link between Islam and terrorism.

This week, BBC political editor Nick Robinson had to apologise for saying on air that the men accused of murdering Rigby were "of Muslim appearance". Memo BBC: they were shouting "Allahu Akbar" as they struck. Yet when complaints rained down on the BBC about Robinson's word choice, he felt obliged to atone. One can only wonder at people who can be so exquisitely sensitive in protecting Islam's reputation yet so utterly desensitised to a hideous murder committed in the name of Islam.

In the wake of the Boston bombing and the Woolwich murder, it was good to hear expressions of horror and sympathy from Islamic spokesmen, but something more is desperately required: genuine recognition of the problem with Islam. Muslim leaders should ask themselves what exactly their relationship is to a political movement that encourages young men to kill and maim on religious grounds.

Think of the Tsarnaev brothers and the way they justified the Boston mayhem. Ponder the words last week of Adebolajo, his hands splashed with blood: "We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you. The only reason we have done this is because Muslims are dying every day."

My friend, the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, was murdered in 2004 for having been insufficiently reverent toward Islam. In the court, the killer looked at Theo's mother and said to her: "I must confess honestly that I do not empathise with you. I do not feel your pain . . . I cannot empathise with you because you are an unbeliever."

And yet, after nearly a decade of similar rhetoric from Islamists around the world, last week the Guardian could still run a headline quoting a Muslim Londoner: "These poor idiots have nothing to do with Islam."

Really? Nothing? Of course, the overwhelming majority of Muslims are not terrorists or sympathetic to terrorists. Equating all Muslims with terrorism is stupid and wrong. But acknowledging there is a link between Islam and terror is appropriate and necessary.

On both sides of the Atlantic, politicians, academics and the media have shown incredible patience as the drumbeat of Islamist terror attacks continues. When Barack Obama gave his first statement about the Boston bombings, he didn't mention Islam. This week, British Prime Minister David Cameron and London Mayor Boris Johnson have repeated the reassuring statements of the Muslim leaders to the effect that Rigby's murder has nothing to do with Islam. Many people hear such statements and scratch their heads. A man kills a young father while yelling "Allahu Akbar" and it's got nothing to do with Islam?

I don't blame Western leaders. They are doing their best to keep the lid on what could become a meltdown of trust between majority populations and Muslim minority communities. But I do blame Muslim leaders. It is time they came up with more credible talking points. Their communities have a serious problem. Young people, some of whom are not born into the faith, are being fired up by preachers using basic Islamic scripture and mobilised to wage jihad by radical imams who represent themselves as legitimate Muslim clergymen.

I wonder what would happen if Muslim leaders like Julie Siddiqi started a public and persistent campaign to discredit these Islamist advocates of mayhem and murder. Not just uttering the usual laments after another horrifying attack, but making a constant, high-profile effort to show the world that the preachers of hate are illegitimate. After the next zealot has killed the next victim of political Islam, claims about the "religion of peace" would ring truer.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is the author of Nomad: My Journey from Islam to America. She is a fellow at the Belfer Centre of Harvard's Kennedy School and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wall-street-journal/who-really-speaks-for-islam/story-fnay3ubk-1226652526449

URL: http://newageislam.com/islam-and-politics/ayaan-hirsi-ali/who-really-speaks-for-islam?/d/11862

 

Loading..

Loading..