New Age Islam
Mon May 10 2021, 09:53 PM

Interfaith Dialogue ( 4 Feb 2014, NewAgeIslam.Com)

Comment | Comment

Interfaith Dialogue as Mutual Learning



By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan

What is the purpose of interfaith dialogue? It is generally accepted that the purpose of interfaith dialogue is to establish harmony among religious groups. This kind of interfaith dialogue has been going on since long, may be several hundred years. But, according to my experience, all these exercises were fruitless and did not produce any positive results. Religious harmony among different religious groups is still a distant dream. If this was the purpose of dialogue, we have to reassess the whole matter. The question is why did these exercises fail?

 Dialogue not for Uniformity or Debating

I would say that one major reason for their failure was that their method was not right. The method adopted by these interfaith dialogues was unnatural. There were, broadly, two models of this interfaith dialogue. The first model was based on the concept of uniformity. According to this concept, all religions are one and the same and there is an essential unity in all religions. We have to discover this unity and make people aware of it. According to this way of thinking, achieving unity among all religions is the way through which harmony can be expected between religious groups. But, this exercise failed completely. There are thousands of big names and great minds behind this method. So, why did it fail?

The reason is that it is an unnatural concept—uniformity is against the Creation Plan of God. In nature, there is no uniformity. Nature believes in differences. Both the material and human worlds are based on differences. You cannot find any two men or any two women who are alike. The word “uniformity” is found in the dictionary, but not in the human world. Since this formula of establishing uniformity was unnatural and not in accordance with the Creation Plan of God it was but natural for it to fail.

The other model for interfaith dialogue is based on debating. This model believes that truth is one. The truth that someone is following is the only truth, and not anything else apart from it. So, everyone, in this model, tries to establish his superiority. This kind of model also failed. We know that many conferences of this kind have been held on interfaith dialogue. A lot of literature has been published on this subject. But, we see that these kinds of exercises failed to establish harmony.

It is now essential to reassess the whole matter. You have to find a formula other than these two formulas.

Dialogue for Mutual Learning

I have studied this matter. Also, I have participated in a number of dialogues throughout the world, both at the national and international levels. After study and experience, I can say that I have discovered a third formula. According to my perception, this third formula is quite in accordance with the Creation Plan. And it is undoubtedly feasible—there is no question of it failing. This third formula is based on a tradition. It can be called the Farooqi method. It was adopted by Umar bin al-Khattab, who was the second caliph of Islam, who was also called Al-Farooq. We read this about him in books: Kana Umar Yatallamu Min Kulli Ahad. It means: He used to learn from everyone.

This third formula is based on the learning process. When I apply this to the concept of interfaith dialogue, I would say that the third formula is the formula of mutual learning. It means that the purpose of interfaith dialogue is neither to discover uniformity among religions nor to establish one’s superiority over other religions. Instead of what these two formulas are based on, the third is based on mutual learning. All participants in the dialogue must try to learn from each other. I can say this is completely based on the law of nature. It is workable—there is no doubt about it.

This formula is a universal formula. In every walk of life, in every discipline, we use or exercise the same formula. For example, in education, industry, business, or social life, everywhere we try to learn from others. Mutual learning is the basic formula of life. So, why not apply it in matters related to religion as well? If we apply this universal formula to interfaith dialogue, in this sense, interfaith dialogue becomes part of the universal process.

I have learnt a lot from all my experiences of participating in interfaith dialogue. I have studied different religious literature and I have participated in many interfaith dialogues. I have learnt a lot from this. I never tried to establish my superiority. I simply wanted to learn from others. I always learn from what I read and the experiences I go through.

 Follow One and Respect All

Religion is an issue of conviction. When I say I believe in “so and so” religion, it means I take it as the truth with the capital T. Without this, I cannot have conviction in my mind. If religion fails to give conviction, then it has no use. The basic purpose of religion is to give you conviction regarding the purpose of life and the scheme of existence. I can say that I have great conviction in Islam. I have discovered Islam as my faith. I believe in it with all conviction. I have no doubt about it. According to my perception, Islam is the truth with the capital T. But, I can say that on account of this belief, I never developed hate for anyone. I love every human being. This is a fact. All those who know me can say that I have not an iota of hate for anyone.

 I can say that this is possible for every human being. This is because a human being has enormous capacity. Man is able to live with contradictions. It is quite possible for the human mind. The American writer Walt Whitman (1819-1892), has said: “I am large enough to contain all these contradictions.” So, there is no question that if you believe that Religion A is the truth with capital T, you would fail to respect other religions. Our mind is able to live with both concepts. Believing that your religion is true and at the same time giving respect to other religions is possible. This is not a matter of lip service.

Interfaith dialogue means religious learning. As far as establishing harmony is concerned, it is another subject. The best formula for it is given by a reformer in these words: peaceful coexistence. The UN has already adopted this formula. This same formula is also applicable to religious groups. I would say that as far as social harmony is concerned, we have to adopt the principle of coexistence. And as far as interfaith dialogue is concerned, we have to take it as a process of mutual learning. This is my finding, my experience and my discovery. I myself have adopted it in my life. For me, this formula is not simply a matter of talking about it. It is my way of life. By nature, I am a seeker. I always try to learn from others. My seeking spirit has no end. I learn from secular people, and I try to learn from people of other religions, too. There is no difficulty in doing this.

 Religious Belief and Social Harmony

We have to reassess the whole matter regarding interfaith dialogue. When the dominant two models I referred to at the outset have failed to yield any positive results, we have to try to avail of another formula. As I said earlier, the model based on uniformity failed in terms of results. The model based on debate, too, has failed. So, what is the purpose of repeating these models? We have to try to find out some other formula. That formula is the one based on mutual learning. This is what the Farooqi formula is. We have to separate the two issues of social harmony and religious truth. We are all seekers. We have to try to find the truth. This is a continued process, and an eternal one. We have to try to achieve conviction. For this, we have to study and interact. This is a process. Interfaith dialogue is for this purpose of mutual learning and sharing. Everyone must share his experience regarding the truth. Everyone must try to learn from other groups. This is healthy interaction. This kind of interfaith dialogue is a healthy interaction. Interaction is very important. Interaction, dialogue, exchange of thought is very important. But, they are not meant for establishing your superiority over others, they are only for the purpose of learning. Learning has no end. There are limitless things that we need to learn. The universe of facts is limitless, it has no end. Thus, our learning process is an eternal process, an unending process.

As far as social harmony is concerned, we have to adopt the tested formula of peaceful coexistence. And as far as interfaith dialogue is concerned we have to take it as learning, exchange of thought and sharing. By following this method, we can achieve both the goals. One goal is to discover the truth, the second is to establish harmony. By taking interfaith dialogue as mutual learning, we will be able to continue our process towards seeking the truth. By adopting the formula of coexistence, we can establish harmony in society. This is my experience. I can say this is according to the law of nature or the Creation Plan of God. There is no contradiction between this formula and nature.

This is the only formula for interfaith dialogue. It is very clear that dialogue for the sake of dialogue is nothing at all. So, if you want to make dialogue meaningful, if you want dialogue to have some purpose, then you have to discover that purpose. According to my experience, the purpose is sharing, mutual learning and interaction.

Then, if we have set a goal, we have to adopt a peaceful method for the achievement of that goal. If a method creates problems and negative thinking, then it is not an appropriate method at all. An appropriate method has to be peaceful. It has to be one that does not lead to the creation of further problems. In short, it has to be a peaceful and problem-free method. What I have suggested in this regard is a problem-free method, one which creates no problems at all. According to my experience, this is my finding. I have adopted it as the way of my life.