By Dr. Azeem Ibrahim
17 May 2018
In Pakistan, China is the most active and positive economic force. So much so that continued cooperation between the two countries is supported by virtually all sides of this otherwise deeply divided country.
Everyone from the Taliban to the secularist military leaders view Chinese investment as a boon to the country, the main source of job creation, and, in all truth, the most promising source of kickbacks for themselves.
It certainly is the case that the infrastructure projects part of China’s Belt and Road initiative are the most significant economic development stimulus in the economically underdeveloped country, and the most likely to also have significant upsides for the people themselves, not just a handful of corrupt officials.
But it must also be acknowledged that China is not doing this out of the goodness of their heart. One aspect of this is quite uncontroversial: the strategic rival of China in Asia is India, India and Pakistan are historically opposed to each other, so it makes sense to both China and Pakistan that they should align themselves geopolitically.
The investments along the Indus river both strengthen Pakistan, and entrench the country firmly in the Chinese sphere of influence, much to the perceived benefit of both parties.
Cost of Cooperation
What is less well advertised is the terms of the cooperation, and the costs. Many of the infrastructure projects are financed through debt. They are Chinese projects built for China’s geopolitical and economic advantage, but they will be ostensibly owned by the Pakistani state, so the Pakistani state will pay for them – with loans from China.
By June 2019, Pakistan will owe Beijing $19 billion. But the interest rate on those loans averages an astronomical 7 percent per annum, payable over 25-40 years. According to experts’ calculations, the cost of servicing the debt owed to China will average $7-8 billion per year, for the next 43 years, starting from now. To begin with at least, that will be between 0.5-1 percent of Pakistan’s GDP.
There is a reason why Pakistan is becoming increasingly dependent on Chinese loans. That is because the normal financial channels for sovereign debt would not extend such loans to Islamabad. No Western investor would expect Pakistan to be able to pay off these kinds of debts on these kinds of terms.
Well, nor does China. But that is not an issue. In fact, that is the point. China has been extending loans on unsustainable terms throughout South-East Asia and the Pacific region. So what happens when things come to a head?
Beijing’s Point Of View
Beijing will extend payment terms, or underwrite those parts of the debt, which the debtor countries cannot afford – provided the local governments understand Beijing’s point of view on this issue of infrastructure, or that issue of geopolitical alignment, and so on.
Should any of the 16 countries identified by the US State Department as already under the sway of Chinese “debt book diplomacy”, 17 now if we include Pakistan, try to wiggle free of Chinese impositions, they will most likely be confronted by the prospect of sovereign debt default – which would make any further economic development virtually impossible, and severely undermine their political stability in a region which is already volatile enough.
Pakistan, like so many other countries in the region, has its own good reasons for wanting closer relations to China at this moment in time. But if things go along the current trajectory, “cooperation” with China will become much less voluntary in the near future.
For now, this serves the interests of Pakistan, and especially the interests of the political decision-makers in Islamabad. But when China will come in and ask for concessions, Pakistan will have no choice but to acquiesce. And when that happens, the price will, of course, not be paid by the political elite. As always, it will be paid by the average citizen.
Azeem Ibrahim is Senior Fellow at the Centre for Global Policy and Adj Research Professor at the Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College. He completed his PhD from the University of Cambridge and served as an International Security Fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and a World Fellow at Yale. Over the years he has met and advised numerous world leaders on policy development and was ranked as a Top 100 Global Thinker by the European Social Think Tank in 2010 and a Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum.