Demolished Babri Masjid—Proposed Ram Janambhoomi Mandir Dispute: Another Opportunity for Minority Muslims to Earn Hindu Majority’s Goodwill
By Sultan
Shahin, Founder-Editor, New Age Islam
31 October
2019
It is only
natural for Muslims in India to be a little anxious as the country awaits the
Supreme Court verdict on the Babri Masjid-Ram Janam Bhoomi dispute at Ayodhya
to be delivered in a few days. A variety of rumours are floating which do not
bear repetition in any responsible section of our media. But these are making
many Muslims restive.
However,
every challenge is also an opportunity. The demolition of Babri masjid on 6
December 1992 presented Muslims with an opportunity. Now that the masjid was no
more and Muslims do not worship bricks and mortar or plots of land, they could
have forgiven the miscreants who demolished the mosque and moved on, gifting
the land for building a temple. I made this point in an article entitled
“Opportunity for Muslims,” published by The Hindustan Times, New Delhi, on 13
Jan 1995. This was reproduced on NewAgeIslam.com on July 1, 2009.
Let me give
you here some relevant excerpts from this article written almost 25 years ago.
“… This
brings me to my main plea—forgiveness. Forgiveness is the essence of both the
Muslim and Hindu spiritual traditions. It is the only way out of the vicious
and very debilitating grip of bad karma. It is our belief that one has to
always pay individual or collective karmic debts in this or any subsequent
incarnations or on the Day of Judgement. Both Hindu and Muslim spiritual
traditions consider God as the greatest teacher, this world a great school, the
events that involve us in this mayajaal (illusionary world) as messages.
“What could this Great Teacher be teaching us
in this section of the school through the great Babri Masjid-Ram Janam-bhoomi
drama? Perhaps the all-important lesson of forgiveness. It may take us years,
decades, centuries or millennia to learn this lesson. But learn we will. There
is no escaping. God is a very determined teacher. We have the option to learn
the lesson now. Let us exercise it.”
Then I had
gone on to conclude: “…. If this mutual forgiveness and reconciliation does not
take place — and if present Hindu and Muslim leaders are considered
representatives of their respective communities, it is not likely to happen —
ordinary people of both communities must make their presence felt and come out
openly for peace at all costs. If that too does not happen, we Muslims should
thank God for providing us with this unique opportunity to exercise our option
of forgiveness and making a gift of a piece of God’s land on the specific
condition that it be used for nothing but building a place of worship, so that
its sanctity is maintained.
I know this is not going to be easy.
Forgiveness is never easy, except for the spiritually evolved. But I don’t
think we have any other option. We have many things, important things to do. We
cannot afford to remain embroiled in inconsequential disputes. The renowned
Islamic scholar, Maulana Ali Mian Nadwi had reacted to the opening of Babri
Masjid locks (for all Hindu worshippers by Rajiv Gandhi government on 1
February 1986) the following day in these very sensible words: “Many mosques
are in the possession of other people.” And indeed, they are.
“There were many mosques in East Punjab of the
pre-Partition days? But very few are left as mosques today? A Punjabi Hindu
friend of mine complained of so many mosques having been converted into
gurudwaras and temples. His Muslim friend (not me, some great soul) reacted:
“But they are still places of worship. There is only one God, after all. No
matter what you believe in, you cannot but worship the same God.” Amen.”
However,
guided by short-sighted, self-styled leaders as they are, Muslims did not take
that opportunity. Now another opportunity beckons. The highest court in the
land is about to give its final judgement. First of all, Muslims should make it
clear that they would abide by the judgement and accept it willingly no matter
what the verdict is. This is what out leaders have already done. But this bears
repetition, particularly in view of the divisive, almost Rwandan nature of most
of the media, print, electronic and social that has taken control of nearly all
means of communication in north India. Unfortunately, some ignorant, greedy
Mullahs too participate in the cockfights at prime time that go in the name of
television debates, giving legitimacy to the palpable efforts to divide the
society. The very least Muslims could have done to combat this national
security threat was to socially boycott those treacherous Juhalawho are
respectfully called Ulama by our media. But this is a subject for another day.
The silver lining in these darkening clouds is that the secular, pluralistic
foundations of Indian society are too deep to be shaken by these charlatans who
are projected by the media as representatives of the Muslim community. The
credit for pluralism in our society, I must add, goes largely to the broadmindedness
of Hinduism that is willing to accommodate all religions.
Another
reason Muslims should reiterate their faith in the Supreme Court now is that
they have already committed once the cardinal mistake of pressurising a
government to overturn a Supreme Court judgement delivered on 23 April
1985,based on the compassionate nature of Islam as the judges understood our
religion. The Supreme Court invoked Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure,
which applies to everyone regardless of caste, creed, or religion to rule that
a divorced Muslim lady with no means of sustenance, 70-year-old Shah Bano, be
given maintenance money, similar to alimony. Supreme Court concluded that
"there is no conflict between the provisions of section 125 and those of
the Muslim Personal Law on the question of the Muslim husband's obligation to
provide maintenance for a divorced wife who is unable to maintain
herself."
Considering
the Holy Quran as the greatest authority on the subject, the court held that
there was no doubt that the Quran imposes an obligation on the Muslim husband
to make provision for or to provide maintenance to the divorced wife. But the
Muslim leadership, both Mullah and non-Mullah, refused to accept it.
With this
background, it is imperative that Muslims reiterate repeatedly their faith in
the Supreme Court and declare that they will accept the judgement even if it
goes against them, as this is the highest court in the land.
This also
accords well with the exhortations in Quran and Hadith. All schools of Islamic thought accept that
Islam requires Muslims to be loyal to their country’s institutions, regardless
of the ruler’s faith. The Holy Quran states, “O ye who believe, obey Allah and
obey the Prophet and obey those in authority from among you” (4:60). Prophet
Muhammad declared, “Whoso obeys the ruler obeys me, and whoso disobeys the
ruler disobeys me” (Muslim); “Listen to and obey your ruler, even if you
[despise him]” (Bukhari).
Prophet
Muhammad and his few followers endured bitter persecution for about 12 years in
Mecca. But they did not defy the Meccan Establishment. They peacefully left
Mecca, following the Quranic ruling, “Create not disorder in the earth” (2:13).
Indeed, Islam not only requires Muslims to obey their government, but also to
love their country. In a well-known Hadith, Prophet Muhammad instructed, “Love
of one’s country is a part of faith” (Sakhavi; Safinat al-Bihar, vol. 8, pg.
525; Mizan al-Hikmah, Hadith # 21928).
Secondly,
it is time Muslims use the next few days to introspect and consider what they
would do if the judgement comes in their favour. It’s not just that they will
find it impossible to build a mosque on that plot of land in the present
atmosphere of heightened tensions and shrill Hindu demands and preparations to
build a temple on that plot of land where the masjid stood for nearly five
centuries. The important question is: is it even necessary for Muslims to do
so. Babri mosque was a heritage building. Like the Bamiyan Budhas in
Afghanistan, it is now lost for ever. It simply cannot be rebuilt. So common
sense dictates that Muslims donate this piece of land for the building of the
temple that our Hindu brothers and sisters want so badly. The argument that the
faith in Lord Rama having been born exactly on that spot is a manufactured
faith does not hold water. It doesn’t matter how a faith has taken hold. Now it
is the Faith, and as Muslims themselves demand that their Faith, even the
irrational parts of it, is given due deference, they too should respect the
Faith of others regardless of its historical validity.
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism