By
Abigail R. Esman
July 9,
2020
Some say
it's the "antidote to ISIS." Others aren't as sure. Now, the Belgian
security service (VSSE) has warned that Madkhali Salafism may pose the next
terror threat to Europe and beyond.
A symbol of Islam, the star and crescent, in a dark green. Created by
Kbolino in Inkscape, who releases the image into the public domain for all
intents and purposes.
------
Is it a
kind of Islamist Trojan horse?
Also known
as "Quietist Salafism," the Madkhali movement began in the 1990s
through the teachings of Saudi Salafist scholar Rabee al-Madkhali. The movement
largely follows the general tenets of Salafism, with devotion to sharia law and
strict interpretation of Quranic texts, but denounces actual violence. Above
all, and in contrast to the founders of the Islamic State, Madkhali Salafists
renounce all forms of political engagement – from peaceful advocacy to
leadership to terrorism.
Because
they believe that Allah chooses the leaders of the world, they view it as their
duty to obey any and all political regimes, be they dictatorships or
democracies.
But the
fact that Madkhalists do not rebel against democratic rule does mean that they
support democracy. Rather, they tend to separate themselves from all forms of
government and, according to Belgian officials, retreat from society in general
– especially when it comes to non-Islamic, democratic cultures.
"They
do not shake hands with the opposite sex," states the Belgian report,
which analyzes the various terror threats to the country. "Music,
festivals, parties, and relationships before marriage are forbidden, as is
homosexuality. A majority of the women wear nikab." And like all
Salafists, they seek a "pure" Islam devoted to the principles of
sharia which, the VSSE warns, forms a threat to "constitutional and
democratic order."
Nonetheless,
the non-political character of Madkhalism and its rejection of violent jihad
have led some Western scholars to argue that Madkhalis may be helpful in
turning other Muslims away from violent ideologies like ISIS and al-Qaida.
Moreover, the group emphatically opposes the very political Muslim Brotherhood,
a position in sympathy with most of the secular West.
Hence, in a
series of discussions hosted by the Brookings Institute in 2015, experts such
as Farid Senzai and Rashad Ali argued that quietest Salafists may be better
able than secularists and moderate Muslims to engage with radicalized
Islamists. Further, they suggested, quietists could potentially provide a
counter-narrative helpful in breaking the seduction of recruiters.
"Individuals
joining jihadi groups often have little knowledge about Islam or the Quran.
Many have little formal training; in fact, most have a rudimentary
understanding gleaned from online sources or extremist websites," Senzai
said at the time. "This perversion of Islam into an ideology that allows
the wanton killing of innocents in pursuit of a Utopian society must be
confronted directly. This is where Salafis [including quietests] can
help."
But not
everyone sees it that way. Jason Walters, a member of the Dutch-based Blue
Water Intelligence, an organization that specializes in radical Islam and
counterterrorism research, believes Senzai "completely misses the
point."
"What
we call 'ideology' is often a world, a reference of signification, based on
certain assumptions but also a living world, a community, where one does not
necessarily need thorough theoretical understanding but has a more intuitive
understanding, also rooted in social praxis -social life," he said "
... Salafists and Salafi-jihadists share almost exactly the same world, with
the differences between them being judicial disputes about the range of takfir,
but sharing almost all fundamental assumptions." In other words,
"even though quietists might not directly incite for violence, they do
bring along a worldview which sets a person up for further
radicalization."
Moreover,
Madkhali influence is growing in the Maghreb, where, according to World
Politics Review, "they are increasingly asserting themselves in the
political and social sphere" and helping to bolster the rise of
authoritarian states – another way in which they are scarcely harmless. Indeed,
in post-Ghaddafi Libya, a Carnegie Middle East study revealed, Madkhali-backed
groups have "ousted imams of mosques and replaced them with Salafis, set
up Salafi primary education, occupied a technical college, and taken over media
outlets."
Meantime,
closer to home, Madkhalis have also begun taking over mosques and Islamic
centers across Europe to spread what Belgium's VSSE calls their
"totalitarian, racist, and antidemocratic" ideologies.
Much of
this new Western Madkhali power comes via the Islamic University of Medina,
where Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad estimates 45,000 men from 160 countries
have been trained as imams – including dozens of Europeans. All students
receive free tuition, housing, transportation, even spending money as a gift
from the Saudi government, the NRC reports – offers that sweeten the deal for
Westerners. And Rabbe al-Madkhali was the chair of the Department of Sunnah at
the university from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s. Many of those European
imams would have been trained under his leadership.
Consequently,
Walters notes that while Madkhalism "was always considered as apolitical
Salafism, because it focused its extremism on culture," it is not
"apolitical" at all. Rather, he described them as a kind of benign,
apolitical group, which "says more about the desperation of western
analysts to distinguish a 'good' from 'bad' Salafism."
But Dutch
journalist and Salafism expert Carel Brendel believes that security and
counter-terrorism analysts are starting to recognize the dangers of Madkhali
Salafists "as a form of religious extremism. Not violent, but still a
potential threat."
Part of
that threat, Belgian officials say, comes through Madkhali groups' recruiting
efforts, especially when it comes to children, whom they recruit with
"immeasurable zeal." Much of this effort takes place through lessons
at Islamic schools and mosques, as well as on the Internet, where Western
Madkhalis appeal to Western youth in their native languages. And as Utrecht
University Salafism expert JoasWagemakers noted during the Brookings
discussions, "While quietists may provide an effective counternarrative to
ISIS, they may also reinforce beliefs that are at odds with [Western]
governments' secular values," further establishing their extremist
influence on Western culture.
Hence,
Madkhalists are no "antidote" to ISIS, Wagemakers and Brendel both
believe. Rather, says Brendel, they "form a potential bridgeway to
jihad." Because of this, he agrees with Belgian intelligence that
"they don't pose a direct threat, beyond being a midstation between youths
who are searching and those who are radicalizing." But "through the
spread of anti-Western, anti-Democratic, and anti-integration visions," he
adds, "the Madkhalis will prove to be a danger over time."
Abigail
R. Esman is a freelance writer based in New York and the Netherlands. She is
the author of Radical State: How Jihad Is Winning Over Democracy in the West
(Praeger, 2010). Her next book, Rage: Narcissism, Patriarchy, and the Culture
of Terrorism, will be published by Potomac Books in October, 2020. Follow her
at @radicalstates.
Copyright
© 2020. Investigative Project on Terrorism. All rights reserved.
Original
Headline: Are Madkhali Salafists an Islamist Trojan Horse?
Source: The Investigative Project
URL: https://newageislam.com/radical-islamism-jihad/some-say-madkhali-salafists-antidote/d/122364
New
Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African
Muslim News, Arab
World News, South
Asia News, Indian
Muslim News, World
Muslim News, Women
in Islam, Islamic
Feminism, Arab
Women, Women
In Arab, Islamophobia
in America, Muslim
Women in West, Islam
Women and Feminism