New Age Islam Special Correspondent
09 May 2019
China’s endorsement of Azhar as global terrorist, succumbing to the international pressure, is certainly a major diplomatic achievement for India, which augurs well for somewhat better Indo-China relations, but the continuation of China’s romance with the Pakistan-based radical Islamist groups, due to the strategic and economic reasons, cannot be ruled out. It seems that China will not make any major change in its policies towards the Af-Pak terror groups…..
On May 1, finally, China lifted its technical hold on the United Nations declaration of Pakistani terrorist group, Jaish-e-Muhammad’s chief Masood Azhar as a global terrorist. China’s much-delayed move came after a decade of opposition. But it had to succumb to rising international pressure in the wake of the obnoxious terror attack in Pulwama earlier this year. The decision came from UN Security Council's Al Qaeda Sanctions Committee with a proposal made by US, UK and France to this end. The committee was established on the basis of the Security Council resolution 1267 adopted in 1999 to create a sanctions regime for Al Qaida and the Taliban. The UN blacklisting of Masood Azhar means that it would subject him to an assets freeze, travel ban and arms embargo.
As a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, China had been blocking India's attempts to secure designation against the JeM chief almost for a decade. But now with the removal of objection regarding Azhar’s listing, China seems to have given up its obsession with Azhar. However, one still wonders why the terror ideologue of Jaish-e-Mohammed and former head of the Harkat-ul-Ansar has been the favourite jihadist for China for so long? What promoted China to prevent the UN Security Council from listing Azhar as a global terrorist, while he continued to mastermind several high-profile terror attacks, including the attack on Parliament, the Pathankot air base, murderous assaults on army bases in Uri, and the recent attack in Pulwama. The question arises as to what impelled China to block four international attempts to list Azhar as terrorist, in the last decade through its "technical hold".
In fact, China’s engagement with the terrorists in the AF-Pak region has a historical legacy based on its vested economic, security and geostrategic interests. The key reason behind China’s long-standing romance with Azhar and other AF-Pak terrorists is safeguarding its economic interests. Masood Azhar has been China’s go-to guy to ensure security of its geostrategic investments under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the top Chinese project under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the Af-Pak region, one of the world’s most crowded terrorist landscapes.
Strategically, China has been involved with the terror groups in the Af-Pak with an aim to contain the ‘extremism’ creeping into Xinjiang. By doing this, China expected from the Af-Pak terror groups not to support the Uyghur separatism and the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM).
This reeks of China’s double standards and inconsistent policies towards Muslims in general and the radical Islamists in particular. The Chinese government blatantly justifies the harsh measures taken against the Muslim minority—Uighurs— with its detention of a million Muslims in Xinjiang calling it 'The Fight Against Terrorism and Extremism'. In August 2018, the United Nations Human Rights Council was informed that China was involved in the religious persecution of the Uighur Muslims in the name of ‘de-radicalisation’. It has literally converted the Xinjiang region into a mass jail. Several human rights activists reported at the UNHRC last year that the Uighur Muslims are forced to learn Chinese Mandarin, swear by the Chinese Communist Party, eat pork that is strictly forbidden in Islam and swear loyalty to the Chinese President Xi Jinping. But the Chinese government in a White Paper claims that its counterterrorism policies in Xinjiang, which attempt to alter Islamic practices, are in accordance with the rule of law and protecting human rights.
But surprisingly enough, an as earlier New Age Islam column also remarked, the Islamic countries including Pakistan have remained silent onlookers at China’s arbitrary detention and torture of Uyghur Muslims. They have not yet demanded the closure of these “re-education camps”. Pakistan which shamelessly raises the Kashmir issue at international forums including the United Nations and Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), has tragically ignored the Uyghur persecution in china’s ‘concentration camps’. Ironically, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan recently said that he did not have a fair idea of the Uyghur issue, while Saudi Arabia audaciously justified China’s steps to curb ‘terrorism’ in the Uyghur dominated area.
In fact, it was the extremist groups in Pakistan which trained and indoctrinated the Uyghur community into separatism in the wake of the Afghanistan situation. Consequently in 1980, 1981, 1985 and 1987, several separatist agitations were held in Xinjiang by the indoctrinated Uyghurs. This anti-China movement, motivated by the Pakistani jihadists, began to spread in several places in Xinjiang including Urumchi, Kashgar, Khotan, Kucha, Aksu and Artush. On 6 April 1990, a mass protest of the Uyghurs erupted to wage jihad against the Chinese and establish the East Turkestan state.
Following the subsequent riots in which the Uyghurs killed six police officers, the Chinese govt. alleged that the rioters were trained in the Af-Pak region. This gave rise to Beijing’s fears about the Af-Pak terrorists bred by foreign interests against China. Therefore, China adopted two-sided policy in order to crack down on this ‘foreign’ onslaught.
As part of its internal policy, China started cracking down on the Uyghurs to the extent of an ethnic cleansing through its “re-education” drive. Up to one million are reportedly detained in China’s mass “re-education” camps. According to Amnesty International, China has intensified its campaign of mass internment, intrusive surveillance, political indoctrination and forced cultural assimilation against the region’s Uighurs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic groups. Ironically, while China sent over a million Chinese Muslims to detention centers on the pretext of counterterrorism, it prevented the Pakistani terror ideologue Azhar from being officially designated a terrorist by the United Nations.
But as an external policy, China engaged with the Af-Pak terror groups, particularly the JeM and Taliban, to stem the tide of terrorism in Xinjiang hoping that they would prevent them from supporting the Uyghur and the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM). Given Azhar’s influence over the radicalised elements in the region, China courted with Masood Azhar in particular. Azhar has emerged one of the most influential jihadist leaders in the region with his close ties with the jihadist groups like Harkatul-ul-Mujihideen, Sipah-e-Sahaba, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. He is also an active member of United Jihad Council (UJC).
Among the key factors that may have prompted China’s fascination towards Azhar is to safeguard its strategic and economic interests. It has been obsessed with the JeM chief particularly to secure the CPEC. With Pakistan facing mounting debt to Beijing from CPEC, and with several Belt and Road countries having backed out of projects over the past year due to financing concerns, Beijing may have wanted to make a gesture of goodwill to get Islamabad to shake off any emerging discontent over CPEC. Furthermore, Beijing may have wanted to offer a sop to Pakistan to preclude any chance of Islamabad calling China out for its Uighur policy. In return, Beijing sought to use Azhar’s influence to strengthen the Taliban, as they are antagonistic to Indian interests in Afghanistan and Kashmir.
In light of the above, it can be gauged that China has been protecting its favourite jihadist leader, Masood Azhar due to major strategic and economic interests. But now it has released its technical hold on the UN blacklisting of Azhar not because of any major policy change. But rather China is currently facing bigger problems than protecting the JeM chief. With India challenging them on the strategic chessboard, especially in the backdrop of the massive build-up of Western and Japanese military forces in the dragon's backyard, the Chinese don't have the capacity to open yet another front.
China’s endorsement of Azhar as global terrorist, succumbing to the international pressure, is certainly a major diplomatic achievement for India, which augurs well for somewhat better Indo-China relations, but the continuation of China’s romance with the Pakistan-based radical Islamist groups, due to the strategic and economic reasons, cannot be ruled out. It seems that China will not make any major change in its policies towards the Af-Pak terror groups.
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism