Books and Documents

Radical Islamism and Jihad (19 Dec 2017 NewAgeIslam.Com)

Quetta Church Attack: Is Pak Army Serious In Battling The Radical Islamist Militancy In The Country?



By Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi, New Age Islam

19 December 2017

On Sunday, suicide bombers stormed a Christian church in south-western Pakistan, killing at least 10 people and wounding up to 50 others.

Notably, the terrorists attacked the church in Quetta city when the Church's Sunday services had just opened. Hundreds of worshippers were attending the church ahead of Christmas. But suddenly and quite tragically, two suicide bombers attacked the church in the Pakistani city, as the home minister for Baluchistan province has clearly stated. According to the church's Facebook page, it had organised different programmes all throughout December to mark Christmas, and was holding a 'Sunday School Christmas Programme' at the time of the attack.

Clearly, the Quetta church attack was a direct strike on the increasing communal cohesion between the Christians and Muslims in Pakistan. General Qamar Javed Bajwa, while condemning the attack has aptly called it, "an attempt to cloud Christmas celebrations/create religious cleavages." Indeed, it was an attempt to cloud Christmas celebrations and create religious cleavages. But is the Pakistan army genuinely interested in tackling the onslaughts of the contagious religious extremism in the country?

Though the ultra-extremist Salafist terror group, Daesh (Isis) has claimed responsibility for the attack via the al-Aamaq media outlet, it has not yet provided evidence-based statement to substantiate its claim. But Baluchistan, a strategically important region bordering Iran as well as Afghanistan, has long been in the grip of deep-rooted sectarian groups linked to the Taliban, al Qaeda and now ISIS.

The first thought that emerges on this gruesome incident is that if the terror attack on the Church in Pakistan was carried out by the ISIS, it was clearly a systematic attack to counter the growing unity of Muslims and Christians, as some moderate Muslim thinkers have rightly pointed out.

Pakistan is on top of the Muslim majority countries where religious minorities are persecuted for their religious beliefs and rituals. Christians make up an estimated 1.6 per cent of Pakistan’s 200 million people. But besides systematic attacks by extremist groups, they face institutional persecution and violence from the majority-Muslim members who are brazenly violating the basic human rights as well as the essential Islamic values. The famous Islamic historian and Hadith scholar Imam Bukhari quoted the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as saying: "Whoever kills a Muaa'hid (any peaceful citizen) will not smell the fragrance of paradise". Speaking generally about all the non-Muslims living in a Muslim state, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said, "Anyone who kills a non-Muslim citizen of a Muslim country will not smell the fragrance of the paradise." (Nasaa'i). He is also quoted as saying: “If anyone kills a man whom he has granted protection pre-maturely, Allah will forbid him to enter paradise.” (Abu Dawood)

But ironically, the self-styled 'Islamic' Republic of Pakistan remains in brazen violation of the holy Prophet's traditions. Pakistan's most notorious blasphemy laws are ill-designed to target the religious beliefs and practices of various faiths and sects, eventually leading to smear the face of Islam, Qur'an and the holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the global media.

With the blasphemy laws, extremist goons in Pakistan are often underfoot to justify mob violence against liberal-thinking individuals as well as the non-Muslim minorities.

Along with other minority communities, Christians in particular, have long been held hostage to religious persecution, discrimination. Sidelined into lowly paid jobs and often the target of trumped-up blasphemy charges, this religious minority in Pakistan has always been hit by the radical Islamist ideologies over the years. Courts require a higher burden of proof for Christians to prove their innocence and some have been imprisoned on the testimony of their accusers.

Following the latest attack, dozens of Christians protested in the north-western city of Peshawar and called on officials to protect religious minorities. Similarly, last year Lahore suffered one of Pakistan’s deadliest attacks during the Easter season — a suicide bomb in a park that killed more than 70 people including many children. In 2013, 82 people were killed when suicide bombers targeted a church in the city. The bombing was later claimed by the Jamaat ul Ahrar faction of the Pakistani Taliban.

Thus, it seems that Pakistani police and troops have been less serious in battling the radical Islamist groups in the country. This is utterly tragic state of affairs in a society which prides itself in its Nizaam-e-Mustafa (prophetic rule of governance).

Nevertheless, the Prophet of Islam avowedly advocated the rights of Christians whom he adored ad "the people of the book" as well as other non-Muslim citizens in his state. During his lifetime in the Arabia, the non-Muslim citizens were protected even against the foreign invading enemies. He stated in categorical terms: "He who hurts a non-Muslim citizen of Muslim state hurts me and he who hurts me annoys Allah." (reported by Imam Tabrani). Another Hadith reporter Al Khateeb quoted the Prophet as saying this: "Whoever hurts a non-Muslim, I am his adversary, and I shall be an adversary to him on the Day of Rising" and "On the Day of Resurrection I shall dispute with anyone who oppresses a person from among the non-Muslims, or infringes on his right, or puts a responsibility on him which is beyond his capacity or takes something from him against his will." (reported by Abu Dawood).

Noted classical scholar of the fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), Imaam al Quraafi comments on the above Hadith reports: “The covenant of protection imposes upon us clear obligations towards the non-Muslims living in our states: they are our neighbours under our shelter and their protection is upon us. Whoever violates these obligations against any one of them by even an abusive word, or by slandering their reputation or by causing them a harm or assisting in it, has breached the guarantee of Allah, His messenger and the religion of Islam.' (Kitaab al Furooq).

Even going by the Islamic laws enunciated in the state of Pakistan, Muslims have no legal superiority or privilege over non-Muslims. There are compelling evidences in the sources of Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) that establish the full liberty for non-Muslims to practice their religions, follow their cultural customs and rites and lead their lives as per their own choice. No coercion or restriction can be inflicted upon them.

Despite these unequivocal Islamic traditions in favour of religious minorities, Christians in Pakistan are the worst hit, that too during the Christmas season. Their churches are the target of extremist Islamist zealots, especially during Christian holidays.

Tellingly, an AFP reporter at the scene saw shattered pews, shoes and broken musical instruments littered across the blood-smeared floor of the church in Quetta. The dastardly attack on innocent Pakistani Christians praying in Quetta's church on Sunday was not an isolated instance. Earlier, in March 2016, more than 70 people died in an attack on a Lahore park where many Christians were celebrating on Easter Sunday. The deadliest attack against Christians in Pakistan happened in September 2013, when two suicide bombers targeted All Saints Church in Peshawar, killed more than 80 people. But these xenophobic acts can bring no gain to Islam or Muslims. They can only fuel the fire of global Islamophobia or further the nefarious ends of the extremist fringes in the country.

Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi is a scholar of classical Islamic studies, cultural analyst and researcher in media and communication studies and regular columnist with www.NewAgeIslam.com

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/radical-islamism-and-jihad/ghulam-rasool-dehlvi,-new-age-islam/quetta-church-attack--is-pak-army-serious-in-battling-the-radical-islamist-militancy-in-the-country?/d/113621

New Age IslamIslam OnlineIslamic WebsiteAfrican Muslim NewsArab World NewsSouth Asia NewsIndian Muslim NewsWorld Muslim NewsWomen in IslamIslamic FeminismArab WomenWomen In ArabIslamophobia in AmericaMuslim Women in WestIslam Women and Feminism



  • Nasser Ahmed, Its better I see from the millions of Muslim heart who has been thought from whatever mullas they follow.

    I am not concerned of Bollywood movie, Bollywood movie also shows very stereotype which is irrelevant.

    This issue of Adab is not that small, I am not living in Allien part where there are no Muslims.

    Here is what my Muslims friends told me, we invented Adab because we cannot say Salam Walekum to non-Muslims especially to Hindus in India.

    You need some research rather than me, I am talking of common lay man thoughts that had flowed and thought through madrasas.

    By Aayina - 12/25/2017 1:59:43 PM

  • Aadab and Tasleem are ways of greeting which were common among Muslims. Watch any Bollywood movie and you will find Muslims greeting each other with aadab or Tasleem but never with salam alaikum.
    By Naseer Ahmed - 12/24/2017 10:15:27 PM

  • Mr Nasser.

    Thank you for your response it is very good answer and may be very useful in your personal life.

    But it look like your thinking does not matter if you look,through Quran, otherwise it would consider all peace loving non-Muslim( a Muslim degoratory and negativity for not following Mouhmmad and Quran) will have been declared Muslims.

    I think you are diverting seaprateism message of Quran, it clear precise and attacks on the way of praying the god, and seprate tham differently.

    The hieight of superatisim is to such extent that you guys will greet non-Muslim Aadab rather than Salam walekum, you are trying to prove that Quran is universal.

    By Aayina - 12/24/2017 9:32:02 AM

  • Aayina,
    The meaning is very clear. If people fight against you because you are an oppressor, then your fighting back is not fighting in the cause of Allah. 
    Only if they are fighting against you for no other reason except your faith, that your fighting back, is fighting in the cause of Allah. 

    By Naseer Ahmed - 12/23/2017 10:09:59 PM

  • Naseer Ahmed.
    Your statement""There is no command..........except your faith"
    But whose faith Muslim faith or non-Muslim faith.

    By Aayina - 12/23/2017 11:23:05 AM

  • 60:8 As for such [of the unbelievers] as do not fight against you on account of [your] faith, and neither drive you forth from your homelands, God does not forbid you to show them kindness and to behave towards them with full equity: for, verily, God loves those who act equitably
    By Mubashir - 12/23/2017 9:23:14 AM

  • Aayina,

    There is no command to fight/kill anyone except those who fight against you for no other reason except your faith.
    By Naseer Ahmed - 12/21/2017 2:20:14 AM

  • My Question is Simple is Quran has killing treatment for bad Muslim as it has for so called declare non-Muslims when Muslims do atrocities to non-Muslims.

    Nasser Ahmed I have understood you that you divide humans between Just loving and Opressor, than how you will deal with idol worshippers or Athiest like Richard Dawkins who constantly work for future of human society,  this  are just people  towards humans, how you will, than eliminate which all,basis to kill idol worshiper.

    By Aayina - 12/20/2017 10:46:23 PM

  • Aayina,

    You will find your answer in the following two articles:

    The relevant portion is reproduced below:

    To Summarize:

    The Quran, even among its very last revealed verses, makes a distinction between those who are Kafir among the Mushrikin and those who are not, although all the Mushrikin are considered disbelievers. Not all the Mushrikin are kafir and some among the Muslims and the People of the Book are also kafir. Logically therefore, all that we can say is that Kafir does not mean disbeliever, although there are some who are Kafir among the disbelievers.

    Fighting is permitted against the oppressors to protect the weak and the oppressed and not for any other cause. The faith of the Oppressor and the Oppressed is immaterial. Those who fight to protect the weak and the oppressed, fight in the cause of Allah and are the Mominin. The oppressors are Kafir. The faith professed by those who fight in the cause of Allah, the Oppressor and the Oppressed are immaterial.

    In Islam, the other is the Kafir, but they are not the non-Muslims but the unjust and the oppressors who could be professing any faith including Islam. The cause of Allah, identified from the Quran, is to end all injustice and oppression, and all those who stand up for justice and fight against oppression are from “the community of God” and the Muslims must form an “Ummat-e-Wahida” or a united front with all such people to end injustice and oppression in the world.

    The God of Islam is the God of all the people and is not the parochial God of only the Muslims in our theology for Allah says:

    “Nay,-whoever submits His whole self to Allah (by whatever name) and is a doer of good,- He will get his reward with his Lord; on such shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve” (2:112).

    The Muslim of the Quran, is therefore simply anyone who submits to God (by whatever name), and is a doer of good deeds. There are therefore only two kinds of people - those who stand for justice and against oppression are the friends and helpers of God and the oppressors are the enemies of humanity and of God.

    Is It Possible To Logically Derive A Single Meaning Of Every Verse Of The Quran? Or, Does Allah Provide A Level Playing Field To All The People?

    There appear to be very few people of understanding across the spectrum of the “believers” and the “disbelievers”, providing proof thereby, that the playing field is very level indeed for all, and there is little difference among the people, except their deeds. False beliefs are common to all people, and the “believers” equally blaspheme God, their Prophet and their Book with their false beliefs.

    By Naseer Ahmed - 12/20/2017 1:43:53 AM

  • Dear Aayina,

    While you have put my name as a participant in the discussion about who all are kafir/ worst creatures in the eyes of the Qur'an...,most of my comments have merely defended the following definition of kufr/kafir as  tabled in my jt. publication dated 2009:

    Kufr is Willful rejection or denial of any self-evident or irrefutable proposition. The Qur’an refers to its recalcitrant audience by the plural noun forms kafirun, kafirin, which, for want of any appropriate English counterpart have been rendered as disbelievers or deniers as appropriate. The Qur’an also connotes kufr with canceling or effacing something (29:7, 47:2), being thankless or ungrateful (17:27, 76:24). 

    I may also invite you to read my following article:

    By muhammad yunus - 12/20/2017 1:28:30 AM

  • To Gulam Rasool Dhelvi, Sultan Shain, Gulam Ghaus, Muhmmad Yunus and Naseer Ahmed
    I have question for all of you.
    You Guys have been discussing who is Kafir, he should be killed or not killed not Accepting Quran and Muslims dominance.
    But does yours Quran has any single verse that punish peaceful Non-Muslim((( A muslim degoratory and negativity toward other))) in is earth, rather than talking about paradise((( a vague statement which is can be valid after the death))), because your Quran has lots of killing for mischief making non-Muslim towards Muslims.
    But I have never seen anyone discussing mischief making Muslims toward non-Muslims by Quran.
    If Quran is God book it will, not have such big loophole, if person is not believer of God but peaceful, when Muslims Haress him/her just God will say that I will see you on judgment day or in paradise.
    Your God should not be impatient towards one human being  and patient towards other human being, your god should have equal facility of killing which is Abrahmic God is famous for and remain just.
    I have raised this question because you guys has been discussing fate of non-Muslim but as they are kafir or not, why they were killed and why some other( except new age Islam) want to kill them, so naturally question for Muslims making mischief in world towards non-Muslims.
    Well you all so called scholars can remain shun, readers of new age Islam  will conclude themselves as readers of Quran are concluding themselves.
    By Aayina - 12/19/2017 11:18:57 PM

  • How Islam can be so perversely distorted requires a more in-depth study than we have the courage to carry out.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 12/19/2017 11:08:56 AM

  • “The famous Islamic historian and Hadith scholar Imam Bukhari quoted the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) as saying: "Whoever kills a Muaa'hid (any peaceful citizen) will not smell the fragrance of paradise". Speaking generally about all the non-Muslims living in a Muslim state, Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) said, "Anyone who kills a non-Muslim citizen of a Muslim country will not smell the fragrance of the paradise." (Nasaa'i). He is also quoted as saying: “If anyone kills a man whom he has granted protection pre-maturely, Allah will forbid him to enter paradise.” (Abu Dawood)

    The terrorists are not accepting such beautiful ahadith. Their ideologues call themselves ‘ahle hadith’ ‘salafis’, but they do not follow such beautiful ahadith.!!! 

    By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi غلام غوث الصديقي - 12/19/2017 3:44:29 AM

Compose Your Comments here:
Email (Not to be published)
Fill the text
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.