Books and Documents

Middle East Press (09 Nov 2016 NewAgeIslam.Com)

All Is Not Quiet On the Libyan Front: New Age Islam's Selection, 09 November 2016

New Age Islam Edit Bureau

09 November 2016

All Is Not Quiet On the Libyan Front

By Osama Al Sharif

Final Saudi Observations On The US Elections

By Faisal Al-Shammeri

Does America Matter To The Arab World?

By Khaled M. Batarfi

US Elections: Why Iran Could Prefer Trump Over Clinton

Camelia Entekhabi-Fard

Compiled By New Age Islam Edit Bureau


All Is Not Quiet On the Libyan Front

By Osama al Sharif

9 November 2016

Libya has not been much in the news lately but that does not mean that all is good. Five years after western powers intervened militarily in that country — in the height of the so-called Arab Spring — resulting in the collapse of the regime of autocratic leader Muammar Gaddafi and his subsequent murder by rebels, Libya continues to be embroiled in political divisions, internecine infighting, financial crisis and institutional failure.

Successive governments and parliaments have failed to secure national consensus and prevent secessionist trends, especially between the western and eastern parts of the country.

Today the likelihood of a civil war erupting between loyalists of the Tripoli-based, UN-backed Government of National Accord (GNA), headed by Fayez Al-Sarraj, and supporters of the Libyan National Army chief Gen. Khalifa Haftar in Benghazi is stronger than ever. Many observers believe that clash is imminent, especially since Haftar’s forces took over the oil-rich region last month, cutting off vital revenues to the Sarraj government and the ailing Presidency Council.

Meanwhile, the “legitimate” parliament in Tobruk, whose term has ended, continues to deny Sarraj’s cabinet its approval and insists on altering the political agreement reached in Skhirat in Morocco last December. That UN-mediated agreement brought about the Presidency Council and the GNA, both of which lack parliament’s support. To make things worse the Tobruk legislature has created its own parallel government, under Prime Minister Abdullah Al-Thinni who refuses to recognize Sarraj and the Tripoli administration. Sarraj has other problems following last month’s seizure by militia groups of government buildings thus denying access to national accord ministers. The militias appear to be backing the unrecognized, Islamist-supported government of Khalifa Ghweil.

The real victims in this chaotic situation are the Libyan people. The economic situation has become so dire that western powers, meeting in London last month, appointed a “supreme expenditure council” to take charge of the Libyan economy and back Sarraj who is at odds with the head of Libya’s Central Bank governor. Libya’s oil exports have fallen drastically since 2014 and the World Bank warned in October that the country was on the brink of collapse.

The West’s main interests in Libya are twofold: It wants to have access to the country’s huge oil and natural gas reserves while hoping that a strong government will check the daily flow of illegal migrants, mostly from sub-Saharan countries, who use the country’s long coasts as a departure point to European shores. But following the West’s military intervention, there has been little interest to address the deep-seated suspicions among various tribes and the need to incorporate as many local players as possible in any political agreement.

Critics of the Skhirat accord say it was forced by UN Special Envoy Martin Kobler who had failed to take into account political sensitivities especially between tribes in the West and those in the eastern parts of the country. Haftar’s future role in the Libyan Army has become a bone of contention as well. This is why many believe that the Skhirat agreement needs to be renegotiated in light of the current political deadlock. Kobler is refusing to budge.

Adding to Libya’s piling problems is the fact that Arab countries have failed to appreciate the larger picture and opted to choose sides in the current standoff. While western countries object to Haftar’s current role and future ambitions, a number of Arab countries, such as Egypt and Jordan and some Gulf states, have supported him. Not surprisingly, the Arab League has no role in ending the crisis and has not proposed an alternative road map. Even Libya’s immediate neighbors have failed to take measures to bring stability to the beleaguered country.

One positive sign coming from Libya is that the threat of Daesh, whose fighters, mostly locals, were expanding their control at the beginning of this year, appears to have been thwarted. Forces loyal to Sarraj— assisted by US airstrikes — were able to clear the terrorist group from most of Sirte recently. But a possible military confrontation between government backed forces and Haftar’s Libyan army over the oil crescent could create a vacuum that militants could use to regroup.

Libya’s failure as a country is a real possibility and its breaking up remains a looming threat. Such scenarios will undoubtedly destabilize North Africa, threaten Egypt’s western borders and increase the flow of migrants to Europe. Understanding Libya’s inter-tribal tensions is key to providing a flexible political framework that the Libyans can subscribe to and support. Engaging all players, including the Islamists, is the only path forward, but by the end of the day it is the Libyan leaders who must find a common base to keep them together.

Osama Al Sharif is a journalist and political commentator based in Amman.

Source: arabnews.com/node/1008196/columns


Final Saudi Observations on the US Elections

By Faisal Al-Shammeri

8 November 2016

The current election for the next President of the United States is nearing its end. In this final stretch there is now a legitimate opportunity to take a look at what has transpired so far and make some observations with hindsight.

What began with nearly two dozen candidates in the primaries for both parties has now become a contest of two. It goes without saying that this will be a decision that will affect not just the United States but throughout the global community. The outcome of critical events such as Ukraine, Syria, ISIS and other terrorist organizations, Iran, Yemen, and the South China Sea (just to name a few of many ongoing events of global importance) will all take their final shape based on who becomes the next president.

The United States is the only country in the world which has the ability to decisively influence events anywhere by its mere presence in any given situation. Neither Europe, Russia, or China have the same economic capacity, military potential or influence that Washington has.

Assessing Strengths and Weaknesses

How these factors are utilized and just as important how Washington will prioritize its use of them will have profound effect on the United States and the world at large. The purpose here is not to advocate for either candidate, assess their strengths or weaknesses but to provide a general assessment based on where we are at and a look into conventional thinking at the moment.

One candidate, Hillary Clinton, has been referred to as the most accomplished and qualified to ever seek presidency. For assumptions sake let’s agree with this. After all it would be a flattering thing for people to say and would provide a formidable basis for any candidate in direct competition to have to overcome.

If this is so why has there not been any decisive separation in the polls from their opponent and a maintaining of any substantial lead over an extended period of time during the election cycle?

Would it not be reasonable to think that at a time where there is more global uncertainty, with more dangerous potential flash points than ever since the end of The Cold War, that the most experienced, accomplished, and most qualified individual would be able to make a clear and decisive case for why they should be President?

There are no clear answers. Only the acknowledgement of their existence when one applies a reasonable assessment to the gap between conventional wisdom and the reality of the election cycle as it stands now.

The other candidate, Donald Trump, has absolutely no experience in political office and has never been considered as a viable candidate at any level, either local, state or national. Yet what began as a primary process among 17 others resulted in a clear winner for one individual who had not made a career in politics. It needs to be seriously asked how someone with no background in politics in any way, shape, or form beat career politicians in a contest where the professional and experienced should have emerged victorious.

How Has He Come So Far?

The obvious question here is how, and why, did a candidate with no experience succeeded in getting so close to the most accomplished and qualified individual in a national election?

Here is equally important question with as many geopolitical shifts. What is making someone with no experience viable in a geopolitical environment that is the most dangerous since the end of the Cold War?

We will get answers to these questions only at the end of the elections. In American politics 24 hours is a lifetime, and it is difficult to predict what happens between now and the day of the elections. In the current American political spectrum, it is hard to determine where exactly there is a sizable slot of those who reside in the centre.

German Philosopher Johann Goethe once said: “Theories are grey but real life is green.” This statement applies the current political environment within the US. The common sentiment beneath the surface in the US, and also other Western countries, is the feeling among many that there is a massive gulf between the rulers and the ruled. If drastic and immediate action is not taken, this gap will only grow and perhaps never fill again.

Those who carry this sentiment believe that their rulers are not only completely indifferent but perhaps do not care at all about their day-to-day wellbeing and legitimate concerns. This gap is interpreted by those being ruled as oozing with disdain and even downright snarky contempt.

Conventional wisdom was turned on its head with the vote by the citizens of Great Britain to leave the European Union. Many deemed it not possible beforehand that modest citizen may simply exercise their right to vote against it.

What will happen in a few hours is anybody’s guess. What does happen will affect everyone from the United States to Ukraine to Aleppo and indeed from Raqqa to Mosul, to Tehran and to the Western Pacific Ocean.

Faisal al-Shammeri is a Saudi writer based in Washington D.C.

Source: english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2016/11/09/Last-minute-Saudi-observations-on-the-US-Elections.html


Does America Matter To The Arab World?

By Khaled M. Batarfi

8 November 2016

When asked about the state of our relations with the United States of America, I would assure my questioner that it is solid. Then I would qualify, “We have had better days!”

Our 85-year old partnership with the “Leader of the Free World” is not about to end anytime soon. The bases are too vital and concrete to be affected by political differences. Our partnership has started with oil business, but flew to higher skies since then.

Sheikh Abdullah Balkhair, who worked with King Abdulaziz as a media secretary and interpreter, related to me that once he attended an event hosted by US officials. He conveyed to them how the king viewed our relations with America and Britain, “There are friends and partners. Britain is a friend and America is an ally. When it comes to national interests, partners come ahead of friends,” the king said.

Since the first meeting between the founder of Saudi Arabia and US President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, in 1945, kings and presidents were building bridges between the two peoples and nations.

However, there comes a time in any relationship when interests diverge, and each partner goes her own way. US blind support of Israel has always been a dividing issue. So was the US invasion of Iraq (2003) and its policies there and toward the Syrian crisis.

Disagreement over Iran

Today, we could add Iran right at the top of our disagreements. Somehow, America decided to repeat its historic misstep. Recently disclosed records showed that the Carter’s administration and Britain were secretly communicating with exiled Khomeini and in support of his revolution. After paving the way for his victorious return to Tehran in 1979 from Paris, rewards for betraying their closest friend in the region, the Shah, had not materialized.

Within months, Iran was screaming “Death to America,” confiscating US interests and occupying its embassy for 444 days. President Obama came up with the same pacifist massage President Carter sugar-coated his dirty politics with. He decided to bet on Iran against America’s best friends, hoping for a more reliable, pragmatic partner, who would not hesitate to serve US, Britain and Israel’s interests.

Shiite terrorists, as John Kerry put it to Syrian opposition in a recent meeting, are not attacking us, but Sunnis are. Both president and secretary of state seem to forget how it was like during the 1980s in Iran and Lebanon, and why America had to withdraw from Beirut and pay hefty and embarrassing ransoms (like the scandalous Iran Contra) to free hostages in both countries.

Hopefully, the new administration, whether under Tramp or Clinton, would be more aware and a better learner from historic lessons. The interests of great nations are too important to gamble with. If you have to choose between solid old allies and newly-found partners with criminal records, you should go for the most reliable and decent choice.

Not to mention, that betraying friends would force them to switch camps. Old and new partners would learn not to trust you. No matter how strong or big you think you are, time will come when you need what only true friendship provides. Realpolitik and interest-based relationships are not good enough to build lasting solid alliances.

Our best option is to continue our political, military and economic diversification. The US would always be a friend and a partner. You cannot ignore “the” superpower of the world. Our relationship is too intertwined and deeply rooted to be weakened by current disagreements. Our interests on most fronts are mutual.

However, when you have a partner who thinks of your relationship as a business deal, and is willing to sell your bond for the highest bidder, you need options.

More solid partners and “safer,” higher yielding markets can be found if we keep looking. In Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia and Russia we may find plenty of opportunities. But let’s start with our Arab and Muslim nations. We should form a 1.5 billion-customer common market. Our Islamic military alliance against terrorism could be upgraded to a NATO-like defense pact. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation should activate all its agencies and projects. We urgently need to set up the Islamic Court of Justice and put other cultural, media and economic institutions under its umbrella.

The Gulf Cooperation Council and Arab League must do better — and faster. The Arab Military Alliance can be made permanent. Allies like Morocco, Jordan and “new” Yemen should join the GCC as full or partial members in a GCC+ format.

Once we had developed our own capabilities and strengthened our “reliable” alliances, we could say to those offering their mercenary service: Thanks, but your presence is no longer needed! If you are not here to protect your interests, you may as well leave — we could take care of our own!

Dr. Khaled Batarfi is a Saudi writer based in Jeddah. This article was published in the Saudi Gazette on Jan. 1, 2013.

Source: english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2016/11/08/Does-America-matter-to-the-Arab-world-.html


US Elections: Why Iran Could Prefer Trump over Clinton

Camelia Entekhabi-Fard

8 November 2016

The day of the US presidential election is upon us and although Super Tuesday took place during the primaries, this is a “super” Tuesday indeed.

November 8, 2016 will mark a significant shift in US politics and will also impact the world – the election will have consequences for everyone, everywhere.

The close race between Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and Republican candidate Donald Trump not only confused Americans but also the people of the Middle East who are not sure what they will wake up to on Wednesday morning.

Iran has made a point of commenting on the US election, with President Hassan Rowhani recently stating that the choice came down to bad and worse.

Then came the supreme leader’s turn to make his thoughts known.

Ayatollah Khamenei chose not to mention the candidates by name, rather arrogantly. He instead referred to them by their gender and called “the man” more honest than the other candidate.

Speaking to a crowd who had gathered to mark 38 years since the occupation of the US embassy in Tehran on November 4, the supreme leader criticized the presidential election in the US by saying “the remarks made by these two U.S. presidential candidates over the last few weeks on immoral issues — which are, for most part, not baseless accusations — are enough to disgrace America.”

Observers have taken his remarks to mean he has more interest in the Republican candidate despite Trump’s stated disillusionment with the Iranian nuclear deal which he thinks is a bad deal for the US.

Surprisingly, some Iranian officials have repeated Trump’s negative reactions and praised him by saying that the deal wasn’t a good deal, not even for the Iranians.

Preparing themselves for Trump?

Khamenei said that people are paying more attention to the male candidate “because the people look at what he says and see it is true. They see it in the facts of their lives.”

Some observers believe that political leaders in Tehran are more fearful of Clinton than Trump and see Trump as more open to negotiation than Clinton. These analysts say that Iran’s perceived lean toward the Republicans stems from a fear of Clinton.

Perhaps human rights issues and Iran’s controversial presence in Syria and regional interferences are pushing the Iranian establishment to support Trump.

Complaining about the implementation of the Iranian nuclear deal has become a staple of Ayatollah Khamenei’s public speeches. In the past few months, he has used all opportunities to express his frustration and disappointment toward the nuclear accord and has called Americans untrustworthy.

Perhaps in his view, the Americans are not to be trusted as the economic and political benefits granted to Iran as part of the deal have not yet been realized and the US has not accepted Iran’s adventures in the region.

Iranians are not worried about the fate of Iran’s nuclear deal that was reached over a year ago for they know that the nuclear accord is an international bond and is hard to dismiss by the next US president, despite the difficulties he or she can cause over its implementation.

What Iran has fears from the next US president is a lack of tolerance regarding Iran’s regional adventures. The presence of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps in Syria and Iraq and Tehran’s support of the Houthis in Yemen. It seems that Hillary Clinton is not okay with such affairs and will address the matter if she becomes the American president.

But for the rest of the region, they will be waiting to see how the next president deals with Iran and Syria.

Tuesday November 8 is a historical day on the US calendar and whichever way the election goes, the outcome will be considered phenomenal.

Camelia Entekhabi-Fard is a journalist, news commentator and writer who grew up during the Iranian Revolution and wrote for leading reformist newspapers. She is also the author of Camelia: Save Yourself by Telling the Truth - A Memoir of Iran. She lives in New York City and Dubai.

Source: english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/world/2016/11/08/US-Elections-Why-Iran-could-prefer-Trump-over-Clinton.html

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/middle-east-press/new-age-islam-edit-bureau/all-is-not-quiet-on-the-libyan-front--new-age-islam-s-selection,-09-november-2016/d/109051


Compose Your Comments here:
Email (Not to be published)
Fill the text
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.