By
Rim-Sarah Alouane
March 10,
2021,
Switzerland,
hard-hit by the coronavirus pandemic, has been in a partial shutdown since January.
Face masks are mandatory everywhere from public transportation to the country’s
idyllic ski slopes. But that reality didn’t stop a slim majority of Swiss
voters from approving a ban on full-face coverings in public spaces in a March
7 referendum.
A campaign poster
advocating for a ban on full-face coverings in Biberen, Switzerland, on March
7. The poster reads “Stop extremism!” in German. FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP VIA GETTY
IMAGES
------
The new ban
wasn’t motivated by anti-mask sentiment. In fact, it won’t apply to facial
coverings worn for health reasons—now or after the pandemic. Rather, the
measure was aimed at a minuscule minority of Muslim women who wear the Burqa
or Niqab. And while similar initiatives in France, Belgium,
Bulgaria, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Austria have always been controversial,
the deeply ironic timing of Switzerland’s Burqa ban proves once and for
all that efforts to ban face coverings were never really about supposed
security concerns surrounding face concealment in public spaces. At their core,
burqa bans have always been an attempt to marginalize Muslim women—and they have
succeeded in bringing anti-Muslim sentiment into the mainstream.
Switzerland’s
referendum was the product of a people’s initiative launched by the Egerkinger
Komitee, an advocacy group that includes members of the right-wing, national
conservative Swiss People’s Party (SVP) and aims to organize against “the
claims to power of political Islam in Switzerland.” Arguing that “free people
show their face” and “the Burqa and Niqab are not normal
clothes,” the group in 2017 collected the required 100,000 petition signatures
to put the issue to a referendum. On March 7, 51.2 percent of Swiss voters
approved it.
The deeply
ironic timing of Switzerland’s Burqa ban proves it was never about
supposed security concerns.
Clamping
down on the visibility of Muslims in Switzerland is nothing new. Swiss Muslims
have been under scrutiny since 2004, when Switzerland held a pair of
referendums on measures that would have eased access to citizenship for second-
and third-generation immigrants. The SVP’s strong mobilization against the
initiatives transformed them instead into cultural referendums on whether
Muslims are part of the Swiss national community, a notion the majority of
Swiss voters rejected. Then, in 2009, the Egerkinger Komitee proposed an
initiative that sought to ban minarets on the grounds that they are a symbol of
political Islam. It was approved by 57.5 percent of Swiss voters despite the
opposition of domestic Muslim organizations and church leaders from other
religious groups.
In December
2014, the SVP first sought to prohibit full-face coverings via a parliamentary
initiative to amend the Federal Constitution, arguing that burqas are a threat
to national security. But the Swiss Council of States rejected it in March 2017
on the grounds that the small number of burqa-clad women in Switzerland meant
public order was not disturbed. There was also concern that a ban would have a
negative impact on tourism from Gulf countries.
Though the
SVP and Egerkinger Komitee have been active for decades, Switzerland’s burqa
referendum can’t be explained without the broader regional context: namely,
Europe’s crisis of identity in a globalized, multicultural world. Switzerland
is only the latest country to express and assuage this cultural insecurity by
managing the visibility of Muslims and Islam, which are perceived as a
political, ideological, and national security threat to European values and
civilization.
Muslims
have been part of Europe’s fabric for centuries, but they continue to be
misunderstood and misrepresented in media and politics, where Islam is often
framed as an inherently violent religion and Muslims are portrayed as incapable
of integrating into European societies. While there is certainly some cultural
anxiety—the natural result of rapidly changing demographics on the
continent—most of the sensationalism is constructed, encouraged, and egged on
by political parties that have a vested interest in creating a supposed “Muslim
problem.” The purveyors of these ideas seek to convince the broad populace that
Islam is a religion inherently at odds with Western values and that Muslims
must be tamed and domesticated. Right now, they are winning.
In
Switzerland, demonizing Islam, Muslims, and immigrants as hostile to human
rights and freedom—of expression, religion, and sexual orientation—has long
been a pillar of the SVP’s electoral strategy, as well as that of other
populist national conservative parties such as the Federal Democratic Union of
Switzerland and the Ticino League. Because this fixation has contributed to
countless electoral victories for the SVP—transforming it into one of the most
powerful parties in the country—others have adopted its strategy.
In
left-wing circles, too, there is now a narrative claiming that Islam violates
democratic standards and practices. Many Swiss leftists believe that Muslims
are particularly susceptible to the use of violence or terrorism, and that they
seek to create a society based on religion as a pillar of the social, cultural,
and political order. In Geneva, the far-left is split between advocates of a
hard-line interpretation of secularism—like the Swiss Party of Labor and its
coalition partners—and those supportive of an open and inclusive model that
recognizes multiculturalism, like the Solidarity party.
The nascent
Swiss debate about secularism mirrors that of its more established French neighbour.
In France, the promotion of laïcité—the French brand of secularism—has become a
rallying cry for the political and intellectual elite who wish to erase Muslim
visibility and enforce assimilation under the guise of legal neutrality.
Once a
liberal tool that protected religious freedom and freedom of conscience,
laïcité has been weaponised to target the public expressions of Islam that are
deemed incompatible with French values, however vaguely defined. In recent
years, both the right and the gauche laïcarde (the secularist left) have
expressed support for a more restrictive and narrow understanding of laïcité
that effectively makes religious Muslims—especially women—disappear from public
spaces.
Keeping “Political
Islam” Ill-Defined Is A Boon for Islamophobes.
The French
debate about laïcité and Islamic dress reached a fever pitch in the summer of
2016, when several cities across France banned the wearing of burkinis. The
bans, which have since been overturned by the Council of State, were introduced
as an ostensible effort to curb “political Islam.” At the time, former
President Nicolas Sarkozy denounced the full-coverage bathing suits as a
“provocation” in support of radical Islam. Likewise, in Switzerland, the new Burqa
ban was won through allusions to the spectre of “political Islam.” Across
Europe, the term has proved an effective electoral weapon
The problem
is that “political Islam” is a vague notion that can mean virtually anything when
alluded to under the mantra of fighting terrorism. For some, wearing a visible
Muslim religious garment, eating halal food, or simply having conservative
social beliefs is considered a step too far. As a result, authorities can
interpret a mandate against “political Islam” very broadly, which can lead to
the curtailment of civil liberties. France’s controversial new bill
“strengthening republican principles,” which aims to fight “separatism,” is a
case in point.
Keeping
“political Islam” ill-defined is also a boon for Islamophobes. The SVP’s
initiatives have succeeded largely because the party has been able to convince
broad swaths of the public that Muslims who choose to make their presence
visible simply by practicing their religion—whether by constructing a minaret
or wearing a burqa—are attempting to “Islamize” the Swiss public. Then come
referendums aimed at erasing any sign of a Muslim presence in Switzerland, with
the implication that Muslims must remain invisible to fit into Swiss society.
But these bans create an inevitable paradox: Targeting Muslims makes them even
more visible, only contributing to an increase of racism and Islamophobia. The
process is cyclical.
While
Muslims are targeted as a collective, veiled Muslim women bear the brunt of Islamophobic
outrage—framed as being victims of patriarchal norms or blindly following
religious dictates. But far from liberating, Burqa and Burkini bans often only
serve to exclude Muslim women from public life. Authorities, politicians,
pundits, and certain groups of feminists claim to want to “free” Muslim women
without including them in that process. And if these women do speak up, there
is a systematic distrust of the true freedom of their choice, and therefore of
their moral autonomy.
In all of
this, it is important to remember that the number of Muslim women who conceal
their faces remains vanishingly small in Europe. In 2009, the French newspaper
Le Figaro estimated that only 2,000 women in France—out of a total French
population of 65 million—wore a face veil for religious or philosophical
reasons. In Switzerland, population 8.5 million, that number is estimated
between 21 and 37. These are fractions so small they barely register on a
calculator.
If the
statistical insignificance of Europe’s burqa-clad population seems surprising,
that’s because anti-Muslim parties across the political spectrum have
successfully inflated the Muslim population in order to provoke fear in voters.
In a 2017 survey conducted by Tamedia, a Swiss media company, respondents estimated—on
average—that Muslims make up 17.2 percent of the Swiss population. In reality,
that number lies at 5.1 percent, according to the Swiss Federal Statistical
Office.
Besides Burqa
bans, it’s hard to think of another instance where the public would support a
government initiative that targets so few people. But it makes sense in a
climate where political success depends on fear—convincing voters that the
“traditional culture” of Europe (whatever that may be) is in decline.
What Europe
must recognize is that the hyper-securitization of Islam will only lead to
deeper-entrenched segregation, thereby jeopardizing the liberal values it
claims to stand for. Switzerland’s Burqa ban is proof that the continent has
yet to view its Muslim citizens as fully capable of autonomy and
self-determination and able to formulate their own political will. If Europe
really wants to save itself from cultural decline, recognizing Muslims as full
citizens is where it should start.
----
Rim-Sarah
Alouane is a Ph.D. candidate and a researcher in comparative law at the
Toulouse 1 Capitole University in France. Her research focuses on civil
liberties, constitutional law, and human rights in Europe and North America.
Original
Headline: Where Face Masks Are Required
but Burqas Are Banned
Source: The
Foreign Policy
URL: https://newageislam.com/islam-west/switzerland’s-crackdown-islamic-symbols-normalizing/d/124548
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism