New Age Islam
Fri May 16 2025, 08:41 PM

Islam and Politics ( 1 Jun 2024, NewAgeIslam.Com)

Comment | Comment

Demonizing Critics of Islam and Atheists Will Only Make Matters Worse

By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi, New Age Islam

1 June 2024

Muslims Who Have Turned into Atheists and Begun to Criticise Islam May Have Specific Reasons, Such as Complaints, Doubts, Or Questions About the Religion. This Is Particularly Relevant In Today's Era Of So-Called Jihadist Groups Causing Violence And Trouble. Addressing These Issues Politely Is Crucial, As Demonizing Them Will Only Make Matters Worse. Instead, It Is Essential to Address Their Concerns and Address Their Issues in A Respectful Manner.

Main Points

1.    Richard Dawkins, despite being an atheist, asserts Christianity's suitability for Western culture.

2.    Nehru, despite being born a Hindu, acknowledged his ambiguity in identifying as a Hindu.

3.    Being an atheist does not mean being disconnected from one's past culture or society.

4.    Those who criticize religion and religious customs should be viewed with compassion.

5.    Critics of Islam often have specific reasons, especially in the era of Jihadist violence. Addressing these issues politely is crucial, as demonizing them will only cause more problems.

------

We had a conversation a few days ago on Richard Dawkins, one of the so-called “four horsemen” of the New Atheists and a longtime, ruthless opponent of Christianity. The subject of discussion was his confessions to host Rachel Johnson of LBCNews. The Oxford biologist and author of The God Delusion felt alarmed upon noticing Islamic Ramadan lights on a street that had previously had Easter lights. He said, “I call myself a cultural Christian. I’m not a believer, but there’s a distinction between being a believing Christian and being a cultural Christian. … I love hymns and Christmas carols, and I sort of feel at home in the Christian ethos. … We [in the U.K.] are a “Christian country” in that sense.” Dawkins then said to Johnson that he finds it "horrifying" that mosques and Islamic celebrations are replacing Christian cathedrals and feast days throughout Europe. He further said, “If I had to choose between Christianity and Islam, I’d choose Christianity every single time. It seems to me to be a fundamentally decent religion in a way that I think Islam is not.”

We can disagree with Dawkins and present evidence to show that he is incorrect in his assessment of Islam, so supporting our position in favour of Islam. It is crucial to understand, though, that demonising him and other Islam critics is neither appropriate nor consistent with Islamic teachings.

We must understand the distinction between cultural identification and religious conviction. While Dawkins and the majority of other Western atheists reject Christianity as a religion, they fully support it over other faiths because they see it as an integral aspect of the cultural identity of Western society.

Jawaharlal Nehru, for instance, exemplifies this kind of dedication. Nehru expressed his opinions on religion in a very public way. Nehru acknowledged that although he was born a Hindu and spoke for the Hindu community, he was unsure of how far he could go in identifying as a Hindu in his 1929 presidential address to the Lahore Congress. According to some sources, he didn't believe in religion, a personal God etc.  It is true, nevertheless, that he considered himself to be a part of the continuous legacy of Hindu history and civilization, as noted in The Discovery of India.

Maulvi Abdul Majid Dariyabadi is a well-known figure among Muslims who adopted the appearance of atheism. In this sense, it's also worthwhile to observe the emotions of his time that he detailed in his autobiography. Philosophers who were referred to as atheists in ancient Greece also had a connection to and dedication to their religious tradition. As a result, being an atheist does not imply that one is completely disconnected from one's past or society. Someone may have rejected their religious convictions but not their religious culture because doing so might go against human nature.

An atheist does not reject any religion by being only in a void or on an abstract plane. In essence, he is at odds with a certain religious tradition within a specific cultural tradition and seeks to support or validate his atheistic viewpoint within that framework. Because of this, you will observe that those who regularly spread atheism among Muslims in the modern era have essentially the same attitude towards Islam, regardless of whether they are in America, Britain, or Australia, even though Islam is not the predominant religion in any of these countries. This is because people who identify as atheists find it difficult or impossible to break apart from the historical and cultural traditions that have shaped who they were and who they are. They want a voice and to have an impact within the parameters of this tradition. Needless to say, without a strong commitment to this legacy, this is not conceivable.

We so ask that those who practise Islam view with compassion those who criticise religion and religious customs, or who identify as atheists yet do not subscribe to any particular religion but rather embrace cultural identity. Even though Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy's or others' analysis differs from yours regarding the reasons behind Muslims' scientific underachievement and the individuals accountable, their concern is nonetheless important for the advancement of Muslim civilization.

Meet ordinary youths and try to understand their perspective. You will discover that their animosity towards religion stems from a grievance or the contradictions between the religious worldview and the circumstances of our day. In a time of cultural crisis, it is a normal human response. Demonising these youths, who are our own people, is not a good move at all.

In conclusion, if some Muslims have turned into atheists and begun to criticise Islam, you should assume that they did so for specific, traceable reasons, complaints, doubts, or questions about Islam. This is especially true in this day and age when some so-called Jihadist groups are wreaking havoc in the name of Islam. Therefore, you should address their issues and allay their concerns in a very polite manner rather than taking the approach of demonising them. You can never win by demonising them because it will only make them more irate.

------

A regular Columnist with NewAgeIslam.com, Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi Dehlvi is an Alim and Fazil (Classical Islamic scholar), with a Sufi-Sunni background and English-Arabic-Urdu Translator. He has also done B. A (Hons.) in Arabic, M.A. in Arabic and M.A. in English from JMI, New Delhi. He is interested in Islamic Sciences; Theology, Jurisprudence, Tafsir, Hadith and Islamic mysticism (Tasawwuf).

 

URL:   https://newageislam.com/islam-politics/demonizing-critics-atheists-worse/d/132430

New Age IslamIslam OnlineIslamic WebsiteAfrican Muslim NewsArab World NewsSouth Asia NewsIndian Muslim NewsWorld Muslim NewsWomen in IslamIslamic FeminismArab WomenWomen In ArabIslamophobia in AmericaMuslim Women in WestIslam Women and Feminism


Loading..

Loading..