Ben
Hubbard
By
Ben Hubbard and David D Kirkpatrick
15 Feb 2021
A decade
ago, crowds massed in Cairo’s Tahrir Square to demand the ouster of Egypt’s
American-backed strongman, President Hosni Mubarak. In Washington, President
Barack Obama made a fateful decision, calling on him to leave power.
The
backlash from other Arab potentates was swift, Obama recalled in his recent
memoir.
Sheikh
Mohammed bin Zayed, the de facto ruler of the United Arab Emirates — a tiny
country with an outsized military built on US weapons and training — told the
president that he no longer saw the United States as a reliable partner.
It was a
“warning,” Obama wrote, that “the old order had no intention of conceding power
without a fight.”
A demonstration in Beirut, Oct 20, 2019, where huge protests failed to
change Lebanon’s corrupt, sectarian political system. The New York Times
-----
Ten years
later, the collisions between that old order and the popular uprisings across
the Middle East in 2011 that became known as the Arab Spring have left much of
the region in smouldering ruins.
Wars in
Libya and Yemen have reduced those countries to shattered mosaics of competing
militias. Autocrats cling to power in Egypt, Syria and Bahrain, snuffing out
all whiffs of opposition. Tunisia, hailed as the uprisings’ sole success, has
struggled to reap the benefits of democracy as its economy founders.
The hope
for a new era of freedom and democracy that surged across the region has
largely been crushed. The United States proved to be an unreliable ally. And
other powers that intervened forcefully to stamp out the revolts and bend the
region to their will — Iran, Russia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the Emirates —
have only grown more powerful.
“People now
know quite well that nobody is going to help them, that they have to help
themselves, and that those countries that they used to look to for change are
part of the problem,” said Amr Darrag, who served as a minister in the
democratically elected government that led Egypt for barely a year before it
was toppled by the military in 2013. “The forces that are against change in our
region are numerous and they have a lot of common interests that allowed them
to unite against any kind of positive change.”
The biggest
hope voiced by intellectuals in Washington and the region is that the Arab
Spring at least gave people a taste for the possibility of democracy. And that
if the underlying inequality and oppression that led to the revolts have only
gotten worse, uprisings are likely to return, as they have recently in Sudan,
Algeria, Lebanon and Iraq.
The spark
that ignited the Arab Spring was a fruit seller in a poor Tunisian town who
simply couldn’t take it anymore after the police slapped him and confiscated
his electronic scale. He set himself on fire, and his death crystallised
frustrations with despots across the region, who led by force, enriched their
cronies and left the masses mired in poverty, corruption and poor governance.
After
Tunisian protesters forced the country’s longtime autocrat, Zine El Abidine Ben
Ali, into exile, demonstrations erupted in Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain and
Syria. By early 2012, three other heads of state had been ousted, but the giddy
sense of popular power would not last.
Elections
in Egypt empowered the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood until the military stepped
in to topple President Mohammed Morsi and take power for itself.
In Libya,
the United States and allied countries bombed the forces of Moammar Gadhafi and
backed the rebels. But the opposition failed to unite, in part because regional
rivals backed competing factions, and the country remains divided.
In Bahrain,
Saudi tanks helped put down an uprising by the Shiite Muslim majority against
the Sunni monarchy.
In Yemen, a
longtime strongman left power but then joined with rebels who took over the
capital, starting a civil war and a bombing campaign by a Saudi-led coalition
that have produced a horrifying humanitarian crisis.
Syria, in
many ways, represents the worst-case scenario: an uprising that morphed into a
civil war that destroyed entire cities, opened the door for the Islamic State
group and other jihadis, sent millions of refugees fleeing abroad and invited
intervention by a range of international powers. After it all, President Bashar
Assad remains in power.
“Since the
Arab Spring, everything has become worse,” said Mohamed Saleh, a Syrian writer
from Homs. “What changed was that we have more foreign forces controlling
Syria. Syria is devastated and more divided.”
Those who
participated in the uprisings recall them with a mix of bitterness and
nostalgia and cite different reasons for their failure: inconsistent support
from the West, intervention by other powers, and the inability of protesters to
transition to politics, challenge entrenched elites and mend schisms in their
societies.
“We were
not mature enough, we did not know what conflict was, what democracy was, what
politics were,” said Bashar Eltalhi, who provided technical support to Libya’s
rebels and first transitional government and now works as a conflict analyst.
“We thought we just needed to get rid of the boogeyman, but we didn’t realise
the boogeyman had spread his magic in all of us.”
Many
accused the United States of not doing enough to support the revolts for fear
of damaging its own interests.
In Egypt,
the Obama administration refused to call the 2013 military takeover a coup,
preferring to safeguard relations with the Egyptian military, even after it
gunned down hundreds of anti-coup protesters. In Libya, Western engagement
waned after Gadhafi’s death, contributing to the collapse of the planned political
transition. In Syria, the United States shifted its focus from supporting the
opposition to fighting the Islamic State to, under President Donald Trump,
withdrawing most of its forces.
Other
powers, often closer to the region and with less concern for democracy, rushed
in to fill the vacuum.
Saudi
Arabia and the Emirates backed the monarchy in Bahrain and bankrolled the
Egyptian government, kicking off a more unapologetically interventionist
approach.
“We have
come a long way since the 1970s, when we were the little duckling that needed
protection from America and needed permission from America,” said Abdulkhaleq
Abdulla, an Emirati political scientist. “There is a certain level of
confidence, which has led to being more assertive regionally and being more
independent vis-à-vis America and other powers.”
Former US
officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said they were stunned in 2014
when the Emirates bombed the Libyan capital, Tripoli, with US-made weapons and
equipment, violating the terms of sale and contravening US policy. But when the
United States complained, the Emiratis pushed back, angry that the United
States was not supporting their chosen strongman, one of the officials said.
A National
Security Council spokesperson declined to comment.
A mural in Cairo’s Tahrir Square after Egypt’s revolution depicts ousted
President Hosni Mubarak and his former ministers, June 25, 2012. The New York
Times
------
Saudi
Arabia and the Emirates gave US officials little notice before launching a
military campaign in Yemen in 2015 and have since lent financial support to,
and extended their influence over, Jordan’s king and Sudan’s new government.
In Syria,
Iran flew in militiamen to bolster Assad’s forces, Russia sent its military to
bomb rebel strongholds and Turkey has turned swaths of the country’s north into
a de facto protectorate. The most active talks about the country’s future are
now among those three countries, while the West sits on the sidelines and the
destruction haunts Syrians.
But many
Arab Spring veterans argue that with so much of the uprisings’ business
unfinished, pro-democracy movements are bound to return.
“Anyone who
says that the Arab Spring is dead does not know the history of people’s
struggle,” said Tawakkul Karman, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2011 for her
role in Yemen’s uprising. “The dreams of our people have not died and will not
die.”
The
region’s population is profoundly young; most of its governments have failed to
ensure economic security; and a whole generation remembers the thrill of taking
to the streets and jumping on photos of dictators.
In recent
years, Arab Spring-style movements against corruption and poor governance have
pushed out long time autocrats in Algeria and Sudan. Similar protests have
shaken Iraq and Lebanon but, lacking a single despot on whom to focus their
ire, have failed to alter those countries' complex, sectarian political
systems.
In the long
run, low oil prices and growing populations could leave Persian Gulf states
with less money for foreign interventions, and veteran revolutionaries could
pass the lessons of their failures on to younger activists.
Tarek
el-Menshawy, 39, who owns a car repair shop in Cairo, looks back on the
protests a decade ago as the best days of his life. He wistfully remembers
bursting into tears when he and thousands of others finally overcame the police
cordons and reached Tahrir Square.
The
revolution may have failed, he said, but it still accomplished something
powerful.
“The
younger generations saw what happened,” he said. “It’s like a shark when they
smell blood. Freedom is like this. We smelled it once, so we’ll keep trying.”
His friend,
Ahmed Radwan, 33, said that if a revolt broke out against the current
government, he would gladly protest again. But he is convinced that another
uprising would be futile.
“We don’t
have the tools,” he said. “They are much stronger.”
Original
Headline: A decade after the Arab
Spring, autocrats still rule the Mideast
Source: The New York Times
URL: https://newageislam.com/islam-politics/arab-spring-hope-new-era/d/124305
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism