By New Age Islam Staff Writer
12 Feb 2011
Aziz Burney
------
Last month,
on January 29 to be precise, the front page of the Urdu daily Rashtriya Sahara
carried an unconditional apology to the RSS in Hindi for trying in his articles
and editorials to establish links of the RSS to the Mumbai terror attacks 2008.
The readers of the daily in particular and the Urdu speaking community in
general were taken aback by Aziz Burney’s acknowledgment that his writings were
misleading and detrimental to the image of a national organisation and
demoralising to the security agencies and the security forces of the country
because he had come to be known to be an undaunted Urdu journalist who wrote
about the ‘truths’ issues after issues of the daily of which he was the group
editor.
He was so emboldened by his own bravado and
the encouragement he was getting from the Urdu speaking community and the
secular Hindus that he compiled the articles in the form of a book titled
‘26/11: RSS ka shadyantra (Conspiracy of the RSS)’. It gave the impression that
the Mumbai attacks were not carried out by the mercenaries and terrorists from
Pakistan with the covert help of the ISI and the LeT but by the RSS with the
covert help of Mossad and CIA. It also pointed fingers at the supposed
complicity of our own security agencies.
The RSS
took strong exception to this and decided to follow the legal path and won the
case. As a result Aziz Burney had to acknowledge the fact that whatever he
wrote against the RSS did not have solid evidence and proof to back it but were
based on assumptions and presumptions, characteristic of the Urdu media. The
readers were not provided with the information about what were the causes
behind Aziz Burney’s unconditional apology to the RSS nor did the Urdu media
dare to write on the topic.
Here is the
turn of events that led to Mr Aziz Burney’s apology to the RSS in which he even
offered to change the name of the book if the RSS so demanded.
After the
Mumbai attacks, Urdu mass media had started the ‘propaganda’ that the RSS was
also indirectly involved in the attacks with the help of Mossad and CIA. Urdu
daily Rashtriya Sahara, owned by Sahara Group that is owned by Mr. Subrata Roy,
had taken the lead and was vociferous in its assumptions that the RSS was also
involved in it. It claimed that this was done because Hindutva outfits like
Abhinav Bharat led by Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Srikant Purohit and others
allegedly linked to the RSS wanted to scuttle the probe being carried out by
the ATS Chief Hemant Karkare exposing the role of Hindutva elements in
Maliegaon and other blasts. The Rashtriya Sahara had also provoked Abdul Rahman
Antulay to raise the issue in Maharashtra Assembly and was subjected to
humiliating treatment by the opposition leaders. He later lost his seat in the
following elections.
The RSS
decided to take the battle to the courts to prove that it was not involved in
the attacks. Advocate Prashant Maggu and Vinay Joshi fought a legal battle
against Aziz Burney, editor-in-chief of Roznama Rashtriya Sahara.
It is known
to all that Kasab's testimony during the inquiry in Mumbai terrorist attack on
November
26, 2008 brought forward names like Hafiz Saeed, Pakistan and
ISI.
Roznama Rashtria Sahara published a special edition in January 2009 entitled
Shaheed-E -Vatan Hemant Karkare Ko Salam! (Salute to martyr Hemant Karkare!)
The issue was published simultaneously in Urdu, Hindi and English. In this
edition, charges were levelled against Indian army, Intelligence bureau, RSS,
CIA and Mossad. These charges were similar to charges leveled by media in
Pakistan regarding 26/11 incident.
Apart from
these the main arguments in the charges made by Sahara were:
1) The security force in Nepal arrested Ajmal
Kasab two years ago in Kathmandu and Indian intelligence bureau brought him to
India after 26/11attack on Mumbai.
2) The higher authorities with criminal
background from Mumbai police force killed Hemant Karkare with the help of
Indian army.
3) CIA, Mossad, Narendra Modi and RSS are
responsible for 26/11 attack.
4) Constables from Mumbai police force fired at
CST railway station and some BJP volunteers who had already arrested Kasab
brought him before CC TV camera.
After
reading these allegations the lawyers representing the RSS wrote a letter to
Mumbai police commissioner seeking clarification regarding these allegations
and asking to file a criminal suit against Sahara. In its reply Mumbai police
commissioner refused to take action by stating that this issue was in the
jurisdiction of Delhi police.
Left with
no option, they filed a court suit against Aziz Burney, editor-in-chief of
Sahara (Urdu) on August 9, 2009. The charges were involvement in anti-national
activities, plotting against the country and waging a war against the country.
Advocate Prashant Maggu appealed an action under articles 121, 108, 107, 117,
124 (A), 153 (A), 153 (B), 505 (2) and 506 of Indian constitution and MOCCA
(Maharashtra organized Crime Control Act). The allegations leveled by Aziz
Burney refuted the claims made on international level by Indian External
Affairs Ministry, Central Home Ministry and Mumbai police and defamed Indian
Security Forces and intelligence forces, so it was necessary to take action
against them.
An appeal
was made to the Press Council Of India to cancel the recognition of Roznama
Rashtriya Sahara. The Press Council is still investigating the matter. Later
information was collected regarding Burney's international visits along with
the Prime Minister. Aziz Burney was getting security cover from the CISF which
was removed subsequently.
When this
case was filed, Burney was trying an entry in Rajya Sabha through president's
reserved quota. But there was a stay on his entry to Rajya Sabha because of
this legal suit. Engrossed with problems all around, on January 29, 20011, Aziz
Burney apologized on the front page of his paper Rojnama Rashtriya Sahara.
Advocate Prashant Maggu fought the case and lodged complaints constantly
against Burney's ‘anti-national’ writings. Though Aziz Burney has apologized to
the Country and the RSS , the legal battle against him will continue as
indicated by the RSS who has said that it has not accepted Burney’s apologies.
Aziz
Burney’s ‘defeat’ does not augur well for the Urdu media. It has vindicated the
charge that Urdu media has a paranoid psyche and hallucinates the ghost of
conspiracy in every affair and does not have faith in the government, the
security agencies and the army. Indeed, even a casual reading of practically
any Urdu newspaper creates the impression that Indian Muslims are in a state of
Jihad against their own country. Rashtriya Sahara had ostensibly emerged as a
strong voice of the minorities as it had seemingly carried extensive research
and investigations into stories of the victims of terrorism, riots and social
oppression of every kind. However, in its defence and praise of Karkare and his
two colleagues who were killed during the Mumbai attacks, the daily went much
beyond journalistic boundaries and, in the usual way the Urdu Press functions,
wrote something it could not back with solid evidence and proof, also without
bothering if it was damaging national interest.
A journalist should never be carried away by emotions. The renowned Urdu journalist and editor of the Azad Hind, Kolkata, Ahmad Sayeed Malihabadi once said, “A journalist should know what he should NOT write more than what he should write.” Today Mr Mallihabadi is comfortably ensconced in the Rajya Sabha seat with the help of both the Congress and the communists. From Aziz Burney’s case, it is evident that he did not know this thumb rule of journalism. Whether the Urdu daily Rashtriya Sahara goes the Illustrated Weekly way or not is something to be seen sooner or later.
URL: https://newageislam.com/islam-media/the-story-behind-aziz-burney’s/d/4113
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic
Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism