Books and Documents

Islam and Pluralism (20 Feb 2015 NewAgeIslam.Com)

Who Is A Kafir In The Quran? (Part 3): Why Kufr Is A Relative Concept While Shirk, Idol Worship Etc. Have Fixed Meanings


By Naseer Ahmed, New Age Islam

20 Feb 2015

The Muslims display a glaring lack of insight of their holy Book, when they judge others who are not followers of the Quran, by the yardstick in the Quran applicable only to the Muslims. This is in direct contradiction to the message of the Quran. In this article, we explore how the Quran shows without any ambiguity, that Kufr is a relative concept, and conduct that would render a Muslim kafir, may not render even an ahl-e-kitab (Jew or Christian) kafir,  let alone a polytheist.

A small background note on the Quran

We see a major change in the Prophetic mission of Muhammad (PBUH) compared with that of all the previous prophets. Allah strengthened Muhammad’s mission with His Word alone and not with miracles, signaling that from now on, the Word was enough to achieve what required prophets, miracles,and Allah’s direct interventions in the past. God destroyed the disbelievers after the previous prophetic missions through flood (Noah), showering with brim stone (Lut) and in a similar manner those of Shoeb and Hud (peace be upon all the prophets). In the case of the last prophet, everything was achieved through the agency of man alone signifying that the agency of man was enough from now on. The Quran is also unique among all the scriptures in that it is recorded and preserved exactly as revealed in a language that is spoken till today. All other scriptures survive only as translations as the language of their original recording is long dead and forgotten. Neither has God sent any calamity comparable to how He destroyed several nations for their transgressions before Muhammad. It would therefore appear from the verses cited below, that Man has undertaken a trust to do the work of prophets and God, for which God has given them the “The Book” or the Quran.

The power of the Quran is allegorically described in the verses below:

(59:21) Had We sent down this Qur´an on a mountain, verily, thou wouldst have seen it humble itself and cleave asunder for fear of Allah. Such are the similitudes which We propound to men, that they may reflect.

(13:31) If there were a Qur´an with which mountains were moved, or the earth were cloven asunder, or the dead were made to speak, (this would be the one!) But, truly, the command is with Allah in all things! Do not the Believers know, that, had Allah (so) willed, He could have guided all mankind (to the right)? But the Unbelievers,- never will disaster cease to seize them for their (ill) deeds, or to settle close to their homes, until the promise of Allah come to pass, for, verily, Allah will not fail in His promise

Kufr- A Relative Concept

(33:72) We did indeed offer the Trust to the Heavens and the Earth and the Mountains; but they refused to undertake it, being afraid thereof: but man undertook it;- He was indeed unjust and foolish;-

(73) (With the result) that Allah has to punish the Hypocrites, men and women, and the Unbelievers, men and women, and Allah turns in Mercy to the Believers, men and women: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

Once God has sent His messengers and His revelations, it becomes incumbent upon God then to punish/reward man by judging his deeds in the light of the guidance provided through the revelations. Without the revelations, there is no believer, unbeliever, or hypocrite or punishment for the sins of kufr, shirk, nifaq etc.

It is easy to understand now, that kufr is relative to the message received. For example, observing the Sabbath was prescribed to the followers of Moses and not to other people. For Muslims, since there is no Sabbath, there cannot be kufr through violation of the Sabbath and punishment for it. We know from the Quran, that the Jews were punished in a very exemplary manner in this world itself for violating their Sabbath.

For a Christian, certain beliefs of later generations in violation of what Prophet Jesus (pbuh) taught them, or what was revealed in the Bible become kufr. The Quran says that there is no authority from their books or from the teachings of Jesus (pbuh) for them to believe in the concept of Trinity or of Jesus as divinity. Such beliefs that are in contradiction of the teachings of Jesus (pbuh) are therefore kufr. It is only incidental that such beliefs dilute Tauheed and are a form of shirk. From this example, it cannot be deduced that shirk is kufr for all people just like we cannot deduce that violation of the Sabbath is kufrfor all people. Although it is the kufr of shirk for the Christians to have such beliefs, they cannot be judged by the standards applicable to the Muslims.Indeed, except for considering Christ as God Himself, which the Christians do not, the Quran treats the other forms of shirk relatively lightly by avoiding mention of punishment for these in the hereafter. The Quran however, does not dilute the horror of the `blasphemy’ of shirk committed by these people.

Consuming intoxicants is prohibited for a Muslim and a violation by him is kufrbut not for the Jews or the Christians or not to the same degree. According to the covenant of the Prophets, the Christians and the Jews are expected to be guided by the Quran and therefore it is not entirely true that what is kufr for a Muslim is not necessarily true for them. (3:81) Behold! Allah took the covenant of the prophets, saying: "I give you a Book and Wisdom; then comes to you a messenger, confirming what is with you; do ye believe in him and render him help." Allah said: "Do ye agree, and take this my Covenant as binding on you?" They said: "We agree." He said: "Then bear witness, and I am with you among the witnesses."

What was Kufr for the Meccan pagans?

The Meccan pagans we are told by the Quran, were not a people to whom a messenger was sent before, nor did they have a Book of revelation like the Christians or the Jews. The Quran describes them as an ummi nation and their state as of Jahaliya or ignorance. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse but there was no divine law for them at all. For these people therefore, shirk, idol worship, adultery was not kufr.

What was kufr for them was solely violating self-evident truths or what was accepted by their own society as a serious crime. The only deeds for which the Quran treats the Meccan pagans as kafir are for:

1.         Persecuting the Muslims for no other reason other than for their faith

2.         Fighting the Muslims for their faith and driving them out of their homes. Breaking peace treaties and aiding the enemy.

The Meccanpagans  are uniformly referred to as the Mushrikin except those standing against the Muslims in battle, those that practiced persecution, or those who broke their treaties with the Muslims. These exceptions, who were the enemies of the new faith of Islam, are referred to as the kafaru among the Mushrikin, clearly implying that not all the Mushrikin are Kafirin.

Every sin is a violation of divine guidance and therefore an act of kufr. Committing an act of kufr does not necessarily mean that a person has become a kafir. By that reasoning, every Muslim would become a kafir and indeed every person in the world! The Quran does not describe the Jews or the Christians of any denomination as either Kafir or Mushrik for their beliefs, even though it describes their beliefs that contradict their scriptures as kufr. The only Christians referred to as the kafaru in the Quran are those who were guilty of specific acts of kufr described in the verses listed in Part 1 of this article. These are necessarily the people of the Prophet’s times and none of the verses in the Quran which refer to the kafaru among the Christians, Jews or Polytheists apply to the people of today.

When does rejection of the `Truth’ brought by the Messenger become kufr?

The earlier Prophets such as Noah, Moses, Lut, Shoeb, Saleh and Hud also preached to the Mushrikin of their times. At the end of the mission, the disbelievers were totally destroyed by an act of God. This did not happen unless kufr or the rejection of the truth was established as evident from the following verses:

(41:53) Soon will We show them our Signs in the (furthest) regions (of the earth), and in their own souls, until it becomes manifest to them that this is the Truth. Is it not enough that thy Lord doth witness all things?


27:14 "And they rejected those Signs in iniquity and arrogance, though their souls were convinced thereof: so see what the end of those who acted corruptly was!

Whether the truth has become manifest in their own souls, God alone can say. A Mushrik does not become a kafir for rejection of the message until the truth has become manifest in his own soul.

Again regarding the Mecan pagans, after the conquest of Mecca, the Quran says:

(9:6) "If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah; and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge."

This is proof that those Meccans who had not accepted Islam despite the Prophet preaching in Mecca for 13 years and for another 8 years in Medina,  were to be treated as merely “those without knowledge” and not as kafir, even if they had fought against the Muslims earlier. The mere act of seeking asylum was to be treated as a sign of non-defiance or of not being a kafir.

How will God judge earlier generations to whom no messenger was sent?

As a corollary of this discussion, it should be clear as to how God will judge people of earlier generations who had received no guidance. They will be judged by the standards of their own society. It is also clear from a verse in surah Kahaf that DhulQarnain simply left alone simple tribals without evangelizing. We can infer from this that these simple folks were in no need of any religion!

What ails the Muslims?

While followers of other religions are not judgmental about people of other faiths, many Muslims judge the non-Muslims as kafir. This is a violation of the very clear message of the Quran and constitutes kufr of a very serious nature. It is no less than a betrayal of the trust that the Muslims have undertaken in which they are required to:

(16:125) Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.

If we deem the non-Muslims as kafir, then by the verses 3:28, 4:139, and 4:144 cited in Part 2 of the article, the Muslims must not befriend them and turn the entire rest of the world into our enemy. This is what the extremists are doing. The Quran advises us in verses 60:8 and 9, however, to treat all non-Muslims who do not fight you, with kindness and justice on par with our nearest kin. The Quran therefore does not consider those who are not the open enemies of Islam and fighting the Muslims as the Kafirin.

The Quran says:

(2:143) Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves;

We have become an unbalanced overbearing witness inviting revulsion rather than respect, regard and love.

The early Muslims had no confusion about the meaning of kafir in the Quran or about the remarkable even handedness of the Quran and its inclusiveness, and pluralism. The broad definition of Islam renders all other religions as sects of the religion of Allah. It is on account of such understanding, that the early Muslims and the Islamic countries were far more tolerant of other faiths than the people/lands of other faiths. It is this sense of broad mindedness and inclusiveness that made them Muslims. Unfortunately, today, people of other faiths have become more inclusive and tolerant and it is the Muslims who have become intolerant, exclusive and supremacists. By the criterion of the Quran, there are more kafirs among the Muslims than among the non-Muslims. If anyone wants to understand the reason for the present plight of Muslims, it is only this. To go back to the Islam of the Salafis or the early Muslims therefore means to become tolerant, inclusive and broad minded and to consider every person a Muslim unless proved otherwise.

Naseer Ahmed is an Engineering graduate from IIT Kanpur and is an independent IT consultant after having served in both the Public and Private sector in responsible positions for over three decades. He is a frequent contributor to NewAgeIslam.com. The author initially used a pseudonym "Observer" for this article.

URL of Part 1: http://www.newageislam.com/islam-and-pluralism/by-observer-in-new-age-islam/who-is-a-kafir-in-the-quran?-(part-1)---kafir,---mushrik--and--idolater--are-not-synonyms/d/101509

URL of Part 2: http://www.newageislam.com/islam-and-pluralism/who-is-a-kafir-in-the-quran?-(part-2)--muslim–-non-muslim-relationship/d/101525

URL of Part 3:  http://www.newageislam.com/islam-and-pluralism/who-is-a-kafir-in-the-quran?-(part-3)--why-kufr-is-a-relative-concept-while-shirk,-idol-worship-etc-have-fixed-meanings/d/101618

URL: http://newageislam.com/islam-and-pluralism/observer-for-new-age-islam/who-is-a-kafir-in-the-quran?-(part-3)--why-kufr-is-a-relative-concept-while-shirk,-idol-worship-etc-have-fixed-meanings/d/101618



  • Sure Shahin Sb. I will do that someday.
    By Naseer Ahmed - 4/27/2015 2:45:05 AM

  • Nasser Saheb, could you please elaborate this a little with some specific evidence. Islam's early history is so full of wars among Muslims themselves and with others that it is hard to believe that early Muslims understood Islam well, and if they didn't then the question would arise, why. 
    You say: "The early Muslims had no confusion about the meaning of kafir in the Quran or about the remarkable even handedness of the Quran and its inclusiveness, and pluralism."

    By Sultan Shahin - 4/27/2015 2:22:21 AM

  • Thanks to Mubashir, I have found a scholar whose views resonate with what I have painstakingly derived from a thorough analysis of the Quran and written in my article on the subject of shirk, kufr and idolatry.

    The Speaker is Hasan bin Farhan Al-Maliki, a Saudi-based intellectual, author, Scholar of Islam, and investigative historian. Please watch this video for a refreshing perspective on concepts such as *Kufr*, *Shirk*, and the essence of Islam:




    By Naseer Ahmed - 4/6/2015 2:55:46 AM

  • Rational, Your last comment is not related to the article. I would not like to digress from the topic. Also, you are only repeating what you have asked before not once, but many times.

    By Observer - 2/25/2015 1:41:37 AM

  • Observer
    my response could not be uploaded on tese two verses. there is a verse indeed that maention that criminals will be identified.
    the problem is the Quiran has no order. another point can criminals be executed without trial?

    can a judge kill a criminal without asking any question? even if a criminal caught with a weapon is not executed without trial.

    We are talking about God not about people. Allah is luring believers with virgins. that is mentioned quite few times in the Quran.under the influence of Hinduism and Christianity Muslim scholars first deny such pleasures and punishments and if they accept, they twist the words of the Quran and invent new meanings.
    why to get ashamed if God wants to supply virgins, and want the paradises in continuous sexual ecstasy.
    When Muslim scholars make such image of paradise and Jehadis use same descriptions to carry the jehad, it makes a bigger picture. on what ground jehadis can be hold resp[onsible for their criminal activities.
    one thing is sure the Quran, hadith are equally useful and convincing to both peaceful and jehadi
    both sources have served well to jehadis and peaceful. Muslim warriors had full conviction from Islamic sources.

    Disjointed verses of the Quran, abrupt change of subject, abrupt usage of subjects make this book a jumbled book not a clear book.
    your work is one example that the Quran needs scholars to explain it. it is on the mercy of scholars.

    By rational mohammed yunus - 2/25/2015 12:19:55 AM

  • Rational, So you have on your own mixed up verses from different surahs without mentioning the surah/verse number! And you deliberately left out the verse which provides the answer.
    Now can you ask the question once again without mixing up verses?
    Regarding fetishes, did it or did it not matter to you whether your first wife and your son's first wife or  your daughter on her first marriage was a virgin or not? To many these days it does not matter and to many it matters. To those for whom fornication is a sin, it matters. The Quran is addressed to the believers and the heaven is promised to those for whom fornicating is a sin and guarding their modesty a virtue. 
    Some people do have a preference for 'experienced' women and if you are one of them and should you become entitled to heaven, you shall get what you desire. The Quran says that you will get all that you desire in heaven.
    The only question that I cannot answer is whether the  fact that a person  has such a desire is a sign that he is not destined for heaven or whether the Quran made a mistake in not taking into account the taste of some otherwise "good" people who would be entitled to heaven.

    By Observer - 2/24/2015 5:07:55 AM

  • SL says: “Mr Observer, the fact that nobody is accepting this unique version of Kufr may not be a sign that you are a pathbreaking scientist. It may merely mean that your version is not supported by the Quran and the secondary islamic literature.”

     Is SL unable to see that the Quran is saying very directly that the concept of Kufr is relative? He can read once again the section `Kufr – a relative concept’ to see that it is entirely based on the Quran. The Ayats (signs) of the Quran and the ayats or signs of a heliocentric universe have remained the same. Some people starting with one person was able to take the correct meaning from the same signs and others could not. It took others time to come around the same view.

     He further says: “The Islamic reformation we all wish for is not going to come by parsing the Quran in ways we desire, but by ignoring the offending and controversial verses altogether.”

     Yes, it will never come from interpreting and reinterpreting but from establishing the clear meaning without leaving anything unexplained and without the tiniest contradiction. Ignoring is the same as treating some verses as abrogated which is what the extremists and many Muslims do. That is the problem and not the solution.

    By Observer - 2/24/2015 4:49:33 AM

  • Mr Observer, the fact that nobody is accepting this unique version of Kufr may not be a sign that you are a pathbreaking scientist. It may merely mean that your version is not supported by the Quran and the secondary islamic literature. 

    Most Muslim people do believe polytheism and idol worship to be unforgivable sins no matter who does them. Your theory of relativity is not borne out by many actions prescribed by the Quran in treatment of non-Muslims. The mixed marriage without conversion to islam being a case in point. There are others. The heirarchy you yourself pointed out. The Jizya, which it turns out, IS referred to in the Quran, as mentioned in the article that Mr Khalid provided the link to. 

    The Islamic reformation we all wish for is not going to come by parsing the Quran in ways we desire, but by ignoring the offending and controversial verses altogether. 

    This is my last comment on this subject. Thank you for your patience in responding to the issues I raised though I am sorry it ended in disagreement, as always. 

    By secularlogic - 2/24/2015 4:34:12 AM

  • Observer
    there is a verse. but it seems to suggest that the criminals will be punished without any trial merely looking at the signs of crimes visible. Should not criminals be given the chance to defend themselves?
     The Quran also says that nobody will be punished without trial.
    Allah speaks in fragments. that makes the Quran unclear, prone to man manipulation.

    next verses give vivid details of punishment in the Quran for sinners. when these verses of the Quran are questioned, it is told that theses verses are just allegorical in nature. it has nothing to do with a real punishment or rewards mentioned in these verses.
    jitne moonh utni batten
    which leads to
    imaan walon men ghunse aur laaten
    Sahih International
    In them are women limiting [their] glances, untouched before them by man or jinni -

    Is it an allegorical verse or Allah has fetish of untouched women, or paradise lovers have such fetishes?

    By rational mohammed yunus - 2/24/2015 4:20:54 AM

  • Observer
    you are wrong. when i quote from Islamophobic site, i never deny it.

    By rational mohammed yunus - 2/24/2015 3:35:34 AM

  • Rational, I did not expect this from you!
    You have quoted: 37:24 "But stop them, for they must be asked:
    followed by (55:39) On that Day no question will be asked of man or Jinn as to his sin.and omitted:
    (55:41) (For) the sinners will be known by their marks: and they will be seized by their forelocks and their feet. which provides the answer!
    You have mixed verse from two different surahs and omitted the verse that provides the answer to your question.
    This is how the Islamophobes try to mislead. Is this your own chicanery or something you downloaded as usual from an Islamophobic site?

    By Observer - 2/24/2015 3:11:13 AM

  • Rational,

    We have gone through this before. Denial is Kufr and maintaining a position of "I do not know or I am not sure" is not kufr as long as one is not convinced. On the day of judgement it is not your mouth that will speak but your inner self. If it acknowledges that it did not accept despite being convinced then such non-acceptance will be held as kufr.

    You are asking me to second guess God by asking me "Why God did this or that?!" 

    By Observer - 2/24/2015 2:33:06 AM

  • SL says: "Those who are promoting a sanitised version of Islam should go and argue their case there, on what they call 'islamophobic sites'."
    The comment is amazing when it is admitted that the article goes against the beliefs of most Muslims. When those on the staff of NAI would not comment what is the point in chasing the Islamophobes or the Islamists? Rational had downloaded a whole lot of stuff arguing very much what the links says which was responded to in part 1 of the article. Read that.

    A definition of Kufr which explains everything and leaves no contradiction is clearly the correct one and a definition which leaves many questions unanswered and makes one verse contradict another verse of the Quran is clearly the wrong one. I am glad that Rational and Siraj are able to appreciate this.

    Moving from the Geocentric view to the Heliocentric view explained many things which were unclear in the geocentric view. It was not an easy step either and not without opposition. Unbelievable as it may seem in this age, there are people who hold onto the geocentric view with the earth at absolute rest even today! In matters of science, it is far easier to convince people with proof that is difficult to controvert. In matters of Religion it is far more difficult. A Renaissance in religious thought does not come about unless the conditions are right. This is the time but the right conditions for Renaissance are not enough without the right ideas. My attempt is to come up with the right ideas to help this process. In this endeavor, those that support and those that oppose, are both useful. Thanks for your contribution.

    All the contradictions that people find will disappear once they move away from the “Follower of Muhammad =Muslim and all non-Muslim=kafir view” of the world. Such a “Muslim” centric view is not held by the Quran and anyone who takes such a view will end up with many things unclear and with many contradictions which they then try to explain away by holding inconvenient verses as abrogated! 

    My article ignores nothing and takes a view where every verse related to the subject makes sense without the tiniest contradiction. This is the point of reaching  perfect balance when one can be sure that one has correctly understood the meaning as it is meant to be understood. All other versions then are mere interpretations or misinterpretations and must be discarded in the face of having arrived at the meaning of what the Quran says.

    By Observer - 2/24/2015 2:22:40 AM

  • SL,

    The Quran asks you to affirm your faith in all the prophets whether Abrahmic or non Abrahmic and not deny anyone of them, but follow the Quran which affirms the truth of all previous scriptures. The Quran is inclusive. If you have read my previous comments in the same thread in one of the parts, denying for example, that Confucius was a prophet would also amount to Kufr if Confucius was a prophet but saying that I do not think he was a prophet but God knows best would save you from the possibility of inadvertent Kufr

    Going away from the Quran amounts to then rejecting one of the prophets. As discussed earlier, maintaining a neutral position regarding any scripture or prophet is not Kufr but rejection is. It is for this reason, people of other faiths are not guilty of Kufr until they reject and a follower of Muhammad changing his faith amounts to rejecting the last Prophet. When the faith is inclusive of all previous prophets, where is the question of leaving it and remaining believer?

    By Observer - 2/24/2015 1:26:27 AM

  • "Verily, those who [despite all evidence] are bent on denying the truth - [be they] from among the followers of earlier revelation or from among those who ascribe divinity to aught beside God - will find themselves in the fire of hell, therein to abide: they are the worst of all creatures. S. 98:6 Asad"
    What is denying of the truth in this verses or other verses.
    it is the Quran as speech of God
    and the prophet hz mohammed a prophet , jews and Christians denied.
    beside that they associated partners with God. they still continue to do so.
    So majority of ahl e kitab are worst of all creatures as per the Quran.
    this is the simple truth Muslims believe in and consider ahl e kitab mushrik/kafir bound to hell.
    what else is the reason of their vilification except denying the belief in the Quran and its prophet.

    By rational mohammed yunus - 2/24/2015 12:12:04 AM

Compose Your Comments here:
Email (Not to be published)
Fill the text
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.