Controversy over a Beautiful, Inclusive Tanishq Ad That Had To Be Pulled Down: The Troll Is Not the Problem, Religious Division Is
By Arshad Alam, New
Age Islam
16 October
2020
A beautiful
advertisement, celebrating inter-faith marriage, was pulled down after being
pilloried as another instance ‘love jihad’. For right wing Hindus, any marital
or pre-marital relationship in which the man happens to be Muslim is defined as
‘love jihad’. It does not matter if the relationship was consensual; it does
not matter if the women in question publically proclaims that she was not
forced into it. All that matters is the shrill cacophony of right wing Hindu
men who are increasingly getting to define what Muslim men and Hindu women
should do and how they should conduct themselves. Tanishq, the jewellery
company, withdrew the commercial keeping in mind the ‘hurt sentiments and the
well-being of our employees, partners and store staff’. One might want to ask
who got hurt and what really constitutes this so called hurt sentiment, but
then what is the point? That the company acknowledged that sentiments did get
hurt just because a Muslim household was celebrating a ‘Hindu’ occasion tells
us how deep our society has got fragmented.
Not very
long ago, there were certain common rituals, which were observed both by Hindus
and Muslims. The breakdown of that cultural bond has many reasons but the
larger effect has been that today it feels foreign if a Muslim participates in
a Hindu ritual and vice versa. Discourses of separation have been building on
both sides: Muslims orthodoxy arguing that one should not play Holi and Hindu
orthodoxy arguing that one should desist from all things Muslim. In the process
of this religious boundary making, we have created deep social divisions.
The company
was right in pulling off the advert as it feared physical repercussions, which
it would have been in no position to dispel. Yesterday’s event in Gujarat,
where a mob threatened the staff at a local Tanishq store proves that the
threat of physical violence is real. The decision of the company can be called
a capitulation to the Hindu right wing mob, but then at a time when even the
left has stopped resisting, why should we expect anything different from a
business house?
It is
certainly unfortunate that such a beautiful advert was forced to be pulled
down, but then we have been there before. One just has to remember the brouhaha
which erupted after Nusrat Jahan, the TMC Member of Parliament, married a Hindu
and sported a vermillion. That time, the online mob largely comprised of
Muslims and they were vicious in their condemnation of this Muslim actor for
marrying a Hindu. Our republic of hurt sentiments has both Hindus and Muslims
in it and it certainly marks a shift on how we as a people have started to view
religion.
We have
come to a situation where trolls have the power to dictate what we should
watch, eat, read and even how we should think. It will be simplistic to limit this
phenomenon to India alone. Worldwide, the online mob is dictating terms,
especially in academic institutions as to what should be taught and how it
should be taught. In the western world, academics are being fired for their
‘unconventional’ views which may not be politically correct. This June, the
UCLA suspended the services of a professor because he refused to inflate the
grade of his black students. The professor was pilloried in the social media,
dubbed a racist bigot and eventually the university was forced to take action
against him, because he had become unpopular with the students. If things
continue this way, then the day is not far when university appointments and
major policy decisions will be taken by such trolls. The problem is getting worse
in India because the sentiments of these trolls are shared by many in the
government. We are heading towards more trouble, because in many ways, the
troll is the government.
Videograb of Tanishq advertisement.
-----
And yet,
this is not just the problem of trolls. Ultimately, it is a reflection of who
we have become as a society. Two distinct trends have been noticeable
throughout in our cultural history. One has always fostered an identity, which
is non-binary, the other has continuously stressed on the development of
monolithic identity. While the philosophy of Tantra went beyond the binaries of
established schools and even subverted the everyday symbolism, other traditions
stressed on faithfully walking on the path of established orthodoxies. As the
centuries wore on, Kabir and Bulle Shah would caution against the tyrannies of
Mullahs and Pandits and search the Ram within; other traditions continued to
vilify the other, either as the Mleccha or the Kafir. Throughout the
sub-continental history, both these traditions have existed in close proximity.
It is a fallacy to assume that India was once a secular and tolerant landscape
where religious divisions and hatred did not exist. This fable, fondly recalled
in the annals of our historians is another attempt at creating a
secular-communal binary. The fact is that our history is not just the
celebration of inter-faith harmony but also one of contested orthodoxies. This
hasn’t been just the land of Ashoka and Akbar but also of Pushyamitra Shunga
and Shaikh Sirhindi.
The very
fact that both these contested traditions existed in the country should have
alerted us that exclusionary tendencies can become hegemonic at any given time,
given the right context. Alas, we kept on deluding ourselves by projecting only
one kind of historical past tolerant and pluralistic- without trying to encode
this into social policy so that it becomes part of our daily lives. Instead, by
eulogizing our so called tolerant past and by not paying attention to
fissiparous tendencies, all we have done is just hope that with the passing of
time, religious orthodoxies and hatred would wither away on their own.
Today’s
right wing trolls are heirs to that exclusionary ideological imagination which
has been an intimate part of our history. Attacking a ritual which tries to go
beyond the binaries of Hindu and Muslim is the very reason of their
existence. Critiquing them as products
of colonial divide and rule will not do any good to us. In order to challenge
them, the first thing that needs to be done is to stop seeing them as products
of non-Indian thought systems. The second thing that needs to be done is to
understand how, each one of us, are enmeshed in such binaries. Even though many
well-meaning people are tolerant and plural, the ways in which they have
advocated religious pluralism has only ended up in another kind of orthodoxy.
----
Arshad Alam is a NewAgeIslam.com columnist.
URL: https://newageislam.com/interfaith-dialogue/controversy-beautiful,-inclusive-tanishq-ad/d/123167
New Age Islam, Islam
Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism