By
Shahid Javed Burki
July 27,
2020
Most likely
these are the waning days of the Trump administration. Polls show Joe Biden,
his Democratic rival in the presidential election of November 3, 2020, with a
healthy lead. Trump himself has begun to talk about a “rigged election” leading
to his removal from the White House. There are some analysts who believe that
Trump is not beyond creating a foreign crisis to shore up his chances in the
elections. The Middle East is one geographic space where he may be thinking of
some kind of military play. China could be another but that would involve a
costly confrontation on which Trump’s America may not be prepared to embark. If
China is targeted, the focus would be on some of the areas that are of
strategic interest for Beijing and where China is already militarily involved.
The upper Himalayas is one place where India, now a close American ally, is
actively confronting China. But it will be in the Middle East that Trump is
most likely to strike. In the Middle East, if Trump acts to help him in the
elections, Iran will be the most likely target. If this happens it would have
serious consequences for Pakistan.
As Jackson
Diehl, a Washington Post columnist says, foreign leaders read polls and some of
them are sprinting to take advantage of Trump’s willingness to tolerate
initiatives they know would be unacceptable to Biden if he were to move into
the White House. “None are running faster than Benjamin Netanyahu — who, along
with Vladimir Putin, has already been the biggest international beneficiary of
the Trump administration.” The Israeli Prime Minister is fighting hard at home
to escape being formally charged for corruption. He is also looking for foreign
adventures to divert domestic attention. He is already involved in two
adventures, both audacious and risky. One is to annex 30% of the West Bank it
occupied in 1967 but against the laws of war did not vacate once the conflict
was over. Instead, Israel began to settle newly arrived immigrants in the
occupied land. Now under the guise of Trump’s dormant Middle East plan
developed by Jared Kushner, the President’s devout Jewish son-in-law, Netanyahu
would like to add parts of the West Bank to the state’s territory. The other
move involves Iran, a favourite Trump target and also that of his Secretary of
State, Mike Pompeo.
In the past
few weeks, according to Post’s Diehl, “Israel has apparently been conducting
what amounts to a slow-motion, semi-covert military campaign against Iran’s
nuclear and missile programmes, and perhaps other industrial and infrastructure
targets as well. Mysterious explosions and fires have struck a key centrifuge
production facility, a military base where missiles are produced, as well as
power plants, aluminium and chemical factories, and a medical clinic. Last
week, a fire erupted at the port of Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, destroying
seven ships.” The Israelis were not particularly shy about distancing
themselves from these activities. “I’m surprised the Israelis have not been
more circumspect about this,” said Dennis Ross, a former senior Middle East
adviser in several past Washington administrations. He and several other
analysts say Netanyahu almost certainly obtained Trump administration’s
consent, if not collaboration for the Israeli offensive. The question is: How
would Tehran react to these provocations? The answer is important for Islamabad
since it would bring conflict right to the Pakistani border.
Returning
to the Diehl assessment of the situation: “Yet despite the risks, Trump appears
to be all in on the Iran campaign. No doubt that is partly because the
President and his Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, are nearly as zealous as
Netanyahu about destroying the Iranian regime. But it is also because Trump’s
‘maximum pressure’ campaign has ended up heightening rather than decreasing the
threat it poses, while all but excluding remedies other than the military
action.” Iran’s cleric rulers have shown that they can use options other than
the use of their military to respond to the combined military action by the
United States and Israel. They could disrupt world oil supply. That won’t hurt
the US as much as was the case in the past. By investing massively in fracking
and other new technologies to reach reserves in the ground that were not
readily available in the past, America has increased the domestic supply of oil
to make it self-sufficient. That notwithstanding, any major disturbance in the
Gulf would deliver a shock to the global economy at the time when it is dealing
with the severe consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Iran has
moved to increase its options by approaching China and concluding a deal with
that country. This was detailed in a document prepared by the two sides that
runs over 18 pages. The document was in preparation for two years. Its opening
sentence refers to “two ancient Asian cultures, two partners in the sectors of
trade, economy, politics, culture and security with similar outlook and many
mutual bilateral and multilateral interests that make them strategic partners.”
Work on the
joint plan began after a China-Iran arrangement was proposed by President Xi
Jinping in 2016, during a visit to Tehran. It was approved by President Hassan
Rouhani’s cabinet in June 2020 and announced by Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.
When implemented, it would provide billions of dollars of Chinese investments
in energy and other sectors, undermining Trump administration’s efforts to
isolate Iran. In return, China would receive a regular supply of Iranian oil
over the next 25 years. China gets about 75% of its oil from abroad and is the
world’s largest importer at more than 10 million barrels a day. A good part of
this oil would enter the planned Pakistan-China oil pipeline at Gwadar, the
deep-water port Pakistan is constructing with Chinese assistance on its
Balochistan coast. The port is an important component of Xi Jinping’s Belt and
Road Initiative (BRI). The Chinese identified a number of BRI projects as a part
of their Iran investment programme making the country an important part of the
Xi Jinping initiative. The proposed economic links between Beijing and Tehran
could possibly add Iran to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) that is
under implementation.
Once the US
has pulled out of Afghanistan, Kabul would be free to act to serve its
strategic interests. It has interest in working with China which needs the
abundant mineral resources Afghanistan has which remain unexploited. China is
already involved in tapping iron ore in a mine on which it has been working now
for a while. Afghanistan also has large reserves of lithium, a metal in great
demand for developing products that use modern technologies. Afghanistan does
not have oil which it could get from Iran. Pakistan could provide the linkages
that are needed to move these materials around. While this kind of reaction is
not a part of the American game in the Middle East it may result as one of its
unintended consequences.
Original
Headline: Trump engineered chaos in the Middle East
Source: The Express Tribune, Pakistan
URL: https://newageislam.com/current-affairs/once-pulled-afghanistan,-kabul-be/d/122479
New
Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African
Muslim News, Arab
World News, South
Asia News, Indian
Muslim News, World
Muslim News, Women
in Islam, Islamic
Feminism, Arab
Women, Women
In Arab, Islamophobia
in America, Muslim
Women in West, Islam
Women and Feminism