By
Nadeem F. Paracha
June 28,
2020
Newspapers
and news websites in Pakistan continue to carry reports and lament about how
large sections of society are being careless in their attitude towards the
Covid-19 pandemic. Such reports have also lambasted the federal government for
bungling the crisis by being misinformed about the dynamics of the Covid-19
virus and its spread.
ILLUSTRATIONBY
Abro
----
Many have
also criticised the regime for allowing its political biases to impact its
contingency policies, which have so far been chaotic, ad hoc and almost
entirely unable to stall the rapid spread of Covid-19.
Prime
Minister Imran Khan and many of his ministers have been censured for
‘misinforming’ the people about the true nature of the disease while, at the
same time, vetoing the idea of strict lockdowns. So, as the outbreak ravages
the country and overwhelms the country’s already fragile health system with
frightening speed, PM Khan does not have much to say or show other than claim
that he knew things are going to get bad.
With
examples like China, Italy, Spain, Iran and the US before us, or other
countries where Covid-19 had begun to peak before it spiked in Pakistan, it
didn’t require a genius to ‘already know’ that things would get bad here as
well. Even though PM Khan was hailed by his sycophantic circle of ministers for
being oracular for this insightful prediction, he had also earlier described
the disease as, merely, a ‘flu.’
The
government then continued to add unsubstantiated claptrap to its largely
convoluted narrative in this regard, until intense media criticism triggered a
sudden about-turn and saw the government resort to accusing the general
populace for letting things get out of hand.
What’s
more, the government also continued to sideline and ignore some rational and
sound advice from provincial governments and health experts. One such advice
was for imposing stricter lockdowns. But the PM disagreed. Instead, he began to
rationalise his disapproval of lockdowns as an egalitarian act, undertaken for
the benefit of the poor.
This
rationale was almost immediately debunked by some writers on the economy. In a
March 27, 2020 article in Dawn, business and economics journalist Khurram
Hussain pointed out that lockdowns were, in fact, opposed by the business
community, and that it were members of this community who were influencing PM
Khan’s anti-lockdown sentiments. In his show on Channel 24, veteran journalist
and political pundit Najam Sethi shared similar views.
Martin Gak
in a piece for the German news site DW explains the idea of opening up
businesses (and thus, allowing the deaths of thousands from Covid-19) as the
21st century equivalent of an ancient past, in which human sacrifice was
practised in some cultures, supposedly for the well-being of the larger
community.
The
Covid-19 problem in Pakistan was further compounded by a controversial Supreme
Court order in which the court asked provincial governments to open the malls
and markets just before Eid. Not surprisingly, two weeks after this order was
carried out, Covid-19 cases in Pakistan witnessed an unprecedented spike.
But
Pakistan is not the only country where the government has badly botched the
response to the pandemic and where the denial of Covid-19’s dangers or even its
existence can be found in large sections of the society. Similar scenarios are
being played out in countries such as the US, Brazil, Mexico and India.
Interestingly, each one of these, like Pakistan, have governments headed by
populists.
The
Brazilian PM actually took part in an anti-lockdown rally and then issued an
order that the number of Covid-19 cases in Brazil should not be reported. US
President Donald Trump claimed that the virus threat was insignificant. But
when it began to spread like wildfire, he more-than-alluded that China was
behind the spread.
In India,
it became apparent that the Modi regime only had the muscle to impose its
Hindutva ideology but had no idea how to control the virus. In Pakistan, PM
Khan with nothing to show in this respect, ended up somewhat absurdly gloating
that Pakistan was the only Muslim country where mosques were not closed for
prayers. As if this were some colossal achievement in a time of a raging
pandemic.
In a March
5, 2020 article for The Atlantic, journalist and novelist Karl Taro Greenfeld
writes that historically, societies often go through ‘four stages of grief’
during pandemics and plagues.
Mount Saint
Vincent University’s Professor Jonathan Roberts, an expert on the history of
plagues, agrees. Roberts told CTV News Atlantic, also in March, that the
historical pattern in which societies behave during outbreaks of pandemics has
remained intact, and that he is seeing the same pattern being repeated during
the current Covid-19 pandemic.
Roberts has
been investigating the ancient and modern histories of social and political
responses to pandemics and plagues. The pattern he was talking about starts
with the outright denial of an outbreak, followed by ‘a panic reaction.’ This
is then followed by scapegoating, which is tied to the emergence of conspiracy
theories. On a more hopeful note, Robert suggests that during the fourth stage,
those in power finally allow the proliferation of correct information to get
out.
But by
then, thousands of lives have been lost and economies devastated. What’s more,
a community of people who are blamed for the outbreaks during the scapegoating stage,
would have suffered severe ostracism and harassment. This is related to what
the World Health Organisation (WHO) calls an ‘infodemic’, when madcap theories
once relegated to the lunatic fringes of society, suddenly emerge on the
mainstream during the fear and chaos triggered by an outbreak of disease.
In the
February 2020 issue of Psychology Today, author and medical sociologist Dr
Robert Bartholomew writes that Jews were blamed for the 14th Century Bubonic
Plague in Europe, and the 1918 flu pandemic — which killed millions — was
dubbed the Spanish Flu, not because Spain was the outbreak’s epicentre, but
because the Spanish government was the first to identify the problem. During
the same pandemic, many in Britain believed that the virus was a germ created
by the German military, even though an equal number of Germans were dying from
the same virus.
With the
proliferation of social media sites, unsubstantiated claims, denials and
scapegoating has increased at an alarming rate, with even the governments of
the US, Brazil and India alluding that the Covid-19 was created in a secret
Chinese lab and unleashed across the world.
But to
historians like Robertson and authors such as Greenfeld, there is light at the
end of this frightening tunnel. Both claim that, historically, the last stage
of the aforementioned historical pattern is when societies and rulers usually
come to their senses and do some actual work to address and contain the
problem.
Indeed,
vaccines remain the ultimate goal for eliminating the virus. But rational
contingency plans and their implementation, scientifically sound advice and
instructions to the public, and the debunking of crackpot theories, are vital
to buy time before a vaccine is made available. Unfortunately, even though
millions have lost their lives due to the pandemic, many countries, including
Pakistan, still seem to be stuck in the earlier stages of reaction: denial,
confusion and scapegoating. Only a handful of nations have moved into the more
hopeful fourth stage.
Original
Headlne:
Source: The
Dawn, Pakistan
URL: https://newageislam.com/current-affairs/dynamics-covid-19-virus-its/d/122236
New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic
Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism