By
Arun Chaudhary
Jul 06,
2020
August 5
will mark a year since Article 370 was effectively nullified, the state of
Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) was divided into two separate units, and both units
— J&K and Ladakh — were made union territories (UTs). In light of the
current domestic and external situation, it is time to review the policy
approach towards J&K.
Whether
NC and PDP agree to participate in elections in a Union Territory (UT), or
whether they insist on restoration of statehood as a precondition, will have to
be carefully examined (Waseem Andrabi/ Hindustan Times)
----
It is
important to, first, recognise a paradox of the Kashmir policy. While everyone
agrees that Kashmir is a political issue, which needs to be dealt with
politically, the government’s efforts, to achieve peace and tranquillity, have
been centred on reducing Pakistani influence in social and political Kashmiri
life.
There is,
indeed, a strong section, particularly those loyal to the Jamaat-e-Islami,
which believes that the state should have been part of Pakistan since 1948.
But, in contrast, the majority in J&K believe that integration with India
was the correct decision. The National Conference (NC), which has ruled the
state for the longest period after accession, despite the usual political ups
and downs, accepted the Indian Constitution and its democratic institutions —
Supreme Court, Parliament, Election Commission, among others.
In this
backdrop of the overall acceptance of the Indian State, Article 370 — focusing
on exclusivity in certain spheres — played the role of assuaging the emotions
of the state’s leaders and its people. Its nullification undermined the
emotional connect. But that, too, was palatable: It was losing statehood that
was considered unacceptable by the majority of J&K’s polity.
At a time
when China is flexing its muscles in eastern Ladakh and is understood to want
Pakistan to increase terrorist activities across the border, it is time to
focus sharply on finding a political mechanism in J&K.
As the
national polity gears up for elections in other parts of the country, there is
no reason that people of J&K should be excluded from the political arena.
The government’s core objective now in J&K has to be to restore democracy
and hold elections. This, in turn, will require a three-step approach.
The first
task is convincing mainstream political leaders in J&K to participate in
elections. Credible interlocutors from the Centre will be needed for each party
— the NC, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), as well as the Congress — to persuade
them to join the electoral process. Only this will make it legitimate and
representative. Managing these elections, just like panchayat elections were
“managed”, simply will not work.
It is
instructive to go back to the past in this regard. In 1996, elections were
conducted in the state after extended periods of President Rule. There was a
recognition that without the participation of a regional party, there would be
questions about its legitimacy.
Despite his
initial reluctance, Farooq Abdullah consented to participate in polls. Attempts
to form a second regional party failed before the polls. The NC, under
Abdullah, won comfortably.
A boycott
call by Hurriyat, and fear of militants, kept the voter turnout low in the
Kashmir Valley and upper regions of Jammu, north of Chenab, but the other
regions saw a high turnout.
But in
subsequent elections, the turnout increased. By 2002, a second regional party —
the PDP — took shape. The PDP, on two occasions, came to power — once in
alliance with Congress (2002), and then in alliance with the Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP) in 2014.
There is
also, now, a third political front of Altaf Bukhari and Ghulam Hassan Mir. This
new party, perceived to be close to the Centre, also acknowledges that to have
legitimacy, elections must have the participation of NC and PDP.
Whether NC
and PDP agree to participate in elections in a UT, or whether they insist on
restoration of statehood as a precondition, will have to be carefully examined.
The NC and PDP leadership will initially show some hesitation in participating
in UT elections — but nothing will be lost if statehood to J&K is restored,
while keeping Ladakh as a separate UT. Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself has
kept the door open for this.
This, then,
requires the second step. All mainstream political prisoners, without any
prejudice, must be released immediately. The government may also want to
consider releasing leaders of moderate secessionist parties who have earlier
shown some inclination to participate in elections.
The third
step is security planning. To be sure, Pakistan will try to create trouble. It
has closely noted the loss of local militant cadres of Hizbul-Mujahideen and
even foreign militants of Jaish-e-Mohammed in the last six months.
There is a
deliberate move to exaggerate the possible impact of Al Badr — a small group
picked, trained and controlled by the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which
also includes ex-Pakistan army soldiers — to offset the low morale in the
militant camp because of other losses, and infuse a sense of fear. While the
J&K police is perfectly capable of taking it on, security forces should
account for it in planning actions against terrorist groups.
They will
also have to be prepared for the infiltration of fresh cadres of the Pakistan
army, infused with extremist fervour, before passes close this winter. The new
security matrix — where Pakistan will seek to synchronise its offensive along
with China — will also have to be taken into consideration, but the Indian Army
is capable of taking them on in this theatre.
The people
of J&K would like normalcy to return, in the real sense of the term. They
would like business, especially the travel industry, hit by both the
developments of the past year and the Covid-19 pandemic, to revive.
Also, they
would like to be part of the Indian State not only physically, but emotionally.
They would like to exercise all the democratic rights enjoyed by citizens elsewhere,
and elect their own representatives. The time is now ripe to announce the
elections in the state — to be held along with elections in Bihar, later this
year.
This will
be the best gift to J&K as the one year anniversary of the constitutional
changes approaches.
Arun
Chaudhary, a retired Indian Police Service officer, tracked Kashmir for the
Intelligence Bureau and served as director-general, SSB
The
views expressed are personal
Original
Headline: Time to revive democracy in Jammu and Kashmir
Source: The Hindustan Times
URL: https://newageislam.com/current-affairs/democracy-be-best-gift-jammu/d/122306
New
Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African
Muslim News, Arab
World News, South
Asia News, Indian
Muslim News, World
Muslim News, Women
in Islam, Islamic
Feminism, Arab
Women, Women
In Arab, Islamophobia
in America, Muslim
Women in West, Islam
Women and Feminism