By Judith Reveal
January 24, 2013
The First Muslim: The Story of Muhammad
By Lesley Hazleton
Publisher: Riverhead Hardcover (336 pages)
As a journalist stationed for many years in Jerusalem, author Lesley Hazleton is not unfamiliar with religious research and writing.
Her newest book, The First Muslim: The Story of Muhammad reflects the detailed research she has completed in her previous books. Ms. Hazelton’s examination of the many stories, books, words written about this enigmatic man concludes, “Though the reverential legends about him are often magnificent, they work as perhaps all legends do: they obscure more than they reveal, and he becomes more a symbol than a human being.”
And yet intrigued with his story she continues her search.
Laying out the story of Muhammad in biography form is not a simple statement of facts. The history of one of the most important religious figures in history requires an understanding not only of his background and development, but an understanding of how that background and development unfolded on a much different level with unpredictable results, and Ms. Hazelton takes this understanding through three separate sections.
She starts Part One, ORPHAN with: “A human encounters the divine: to the rationalist, a matter not of fact but of wishful fiction. So if Muhammad had behaved the way one might expect after his first encounter on Mount Hira, it would only make sense to call the story just that: a fable concocted by piety and belief. But he did not.”
With this brief paragraph, she begins to unfold the story of Muhammad and the challenges he faced regarding his experience and its meaning.
In Part One, Muhammad’s growth from childhood to adult is introduced as a child who is orphaned, yet not. His father dies before he is born, leaving his mother in the care of her father in law. This is a cultural responsibility, and she and Muhammad are seen as a burden.
Muhammad is soon placed in the care of a Bedouin woman—a wet nurse, or foster mother. He grows to understand the ways of the Bedouin people better than his blood family, and when he returns to his family the reception is not warm.
By this time he has skills valuable to the caravan leaders of Arabia, and as his life progresses, he hones these skills, further proving his value to his family. Yet his acceptance into the heart of the family remains elusive.
Ms. Hazelton describes an event early in Muhammad’s life that points to mystical observances when a solitary ascetic seems to recognize that this young man was more than just a camel driver in a caravan.
As he grows and matures, he experiences a vision on Mount Hira on a dark, quiet night in 610. His first reaction is one of doubt, believing it could not have really taken place. Through the encouragement of his wife Khadijah who senses his extraordinary abilities he follows his religious directions.
In Part Two, EXILE, Hazelton gives us several definitions of ‘exile,’ including physical, spiritual, and mental. The physical exile begins as Muhammad appeals to the community leaders for reform, to refrain from their lives of corruption and social inequity. Although the leaders believe they are honest, Muhammad sees their behaviours as anything but.
Throughout this discussion, Ms. Hazelton follows the trail of Muhammad’s beliefs and his subsequent expressions as they take him from Mecca to Medina and back down a path of exile by his family and other clans.
Spiritually, as his understanding of monotheism grows and he begins to gather a following, he finds himself in a two-year period of retribution from clan leaders who believe his teachings to be against their cultural history.
His mental exile comes from certain self-doubt about fulfilling the role he is called to.
In Part Three, LEADER, Hazelton takes us to the point where Muhammad enters the part of his life where he realizes the enormity of his achievement: the successes, the sadnesses, and the expectations for the future.
Muhammad takes monotheism to its full awareness. He shows the true meaning of the Quran’s insistence on forgiveness of former enemies by forgiving his own enemies. The previous rejection of this man comes full circle after his exile, to accept his teachings as the word of one God: Allah.
As Muhammad reaches the end of his life, Ms. Hazelton discusses his demise from two places: his concerns about who of the living will carry forward the truth of his teachings and the simplicity of manner in which he left the world.
“There was no pomp or circumstance, no elaborate ritual or mass procession no throngs of mourners, no eulogies. . . . As he entered his grave, he was simply a man again. . . . At last, he would find some rest.”
The First Muslim presents the periods of Muhammad’s life with both historical detail and Quranic quotes and their meanings relative to his life and teachings.
This story is deep with details not only of Muhammad’s life journey, but with historic information about the culture of the times in Arabia. His passage from Mecca to Medina and back is filled with rich colour of the locations, culture, and people; it is a book plentiful with tales of Muhammad’s life that follow logically from orphan to religious leader, but more than that, it enriches us with the detail of a time and place in history.
While this book is true to the history of Muhammad, The First Muslim is equally valuable to those who know little or nothing of Islam and its development as told through the experiences of the prophet Muhammad.
Judy Reveal is the author of Around Greensboro and the Lindsey Gale Mystery series including Cheating Death, The Music Room, A House to Kill For, and a work of historical fiction, The Brownstone, coming out Fall 2012.
'The First Muslim,' by Lesley Hazleton –
Review By Jonathan P. Berkey
January 25, 2013
The First Muslim: The Story of Muhammad
By Lesley Hazleton
(Riverhead; 320 pages; $27.95)
Who was the first Christian? Many Christians would probably answer: "Jesus." But the Gospels make it clear that Jesus lived and died as a Jew. A better guess might be the Apostle Paul, whose letters reveal a community beginning to distinguish itself from its parent faith. But naming him would be just that: a guess.
If the narratives of Islamic origins are accurate, there is no doubt who was the first Muslim. Around the year 610, Muhammad began to hear a voice. In response to its revelations, Muhammad preached to his pagan Arab neighbours a message of submission to the God also worshiped by Jews and Christians. It took two decades and a long political struggle, but eventually Muhammad persuaded the Arabs to adopt his new faith.
Lesley Hazleton has drawn on those narratives, the most important of which are available in English translations, to compose a rich biography of this first Muslim. There are other excellent biographies of Muhammad, including scholarly accounts by Montgomery Watt, Maxime Rodinson and others. Hazleton's is aimed at a broader audience.
The figure of Muhammad lies behind the misunderstanding and conflict between the Muslim world and the Christian West. Christians have compared Muhammad to Christ, and found the former lacking. Hazleton's account demonstrates just how unhelpful such an approach is. For all that Muhammad apparently saw himself as a prophet in direct line of spiritual descent from Jesus, the two played radically different roles.
Above all, Muhammad was a political leader as much as a spiritual one, more Moses than Jesus, and Hazleton frames his prophetic career as a struggle to overcome his enemies and to unite the inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula for the first time in a single state. For the average Westerner, this is the critical but largely unknown context without which it is impossible to understand the Muslim prophet or the doctrines he preached.
So, for example, jihad is not proof that Islam is inherently violent. Rather, it is a doctrine that evolved to address the political circumstances that Muhammad (and his successors) faced. Hazleton provides a nuanced account of those circumstances, among them a raid carried out by some of Muhammad's followers against their enemies shortly after Muhammad fled his home in Mecca and established a Muslim polity in the nearby community of Medina.
The raid was a minor affair, but, occurring as it did during a sacred month when violence was taboo, it provided the occasion for a revelation that would shape later Muslim thinking about warfare: "Say: 'Fighting in that month is a great offense, but still greater offenses in God's eyes are to bar others from God's path. ... Persecution is worse than killing.' "
Emphasizing context allows the author to explain without apologizing for those aspects of the prophet's life that are most likely to jar Western sensibilities. One of the most troubling episodes was Muhammad's execution of the male members of a Jewish tribe in Medina that had allegedly conspired with his Meccan enemies. As Hazleton notes, the episode is invoked today by some Muslims to demonstrate Jewish perfidy, and by critics of Islam to accuse it of anti-Semitism.
Both allegations miss the point. The incident was shocking enough that many of Muhammad's contemporaries, even among his supporters, were disturbed by it. But the move was calculated to demonstrate his power and bring about the more rapid submission of his other enemies, particularly those in Mecca, and in that he largely succeeded.
For many, one of the most puzzling aspects of Islam is its very heart: the Quran. The Muslim scripture is not a narrative account of Muhammad's life or, indeed, of anything else. It is, rather, an arbitrarily arranged collection of verses revealed to Muhammad over 20 years. Each verse addressed particular circumstances faced by the prophet or his followers, but those circumstances are not spelled out in the text. Unless one knows the contexts of the revelations, reading the Quran can therefore be baffling. Hazleton conveniently situates its scattered verses in the circumstances to which they were addressed. As a result, her book will function for many readers as a comprehensible introduction to the Muslim scripture.
With her broad audience in mind, Hazleton wants not only to recount what happened in Muhammad's life but also how he felt about it. That's consistent with the goal of most modern biographers, who typically are interested not just in what their subjects did, but why, and what they thought and felt.
Unfortunately, the relative absence of direct evidence of people's interior lives in premodern sources - the occasional St. Augustine notwithstanding - makes that project difficult. For all the detail about Muhammad's life that the surviving Muslim narratives provide, little of it allows much direct insight into Muhammad's state of mind.
To overcome that difficulty, Hazleton allows herself a considerable, and sometimes unsettling, degree of imaginative license. But if in doing so she strays further from the sources than scholarly precision might prefer, most readers will still appreciate and benefit from the portrait of the Muslim prophet provided in this book. Its goal is not to urge its readers to love, or to hate, the man, simply to understand the forces that produced him. Those who read it will come away well prepared to understand the prophet whose message, 14 centuries later, is the creed of more than a billion and a half people.
Jonathan P. Berkey is an associate professor of history at Davidson College and the author of "The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800" (Cambridge University Press).
Excerpts from: The First Muslim: The Story of Muhammad
By Lesley Hazleton
If he weren’t standing lonely vigil on the mountain, you might say that there was no sign of anything unusual about him. The earliest sources describe him with infuriating vagueness for those of us who need images. “He was neither tall nor short,” they say. “Neither dark nor fair.” “Neither thin nor stout.” But here and there, specific details slip through, and when they do, they are surprising. Surely a man spending night after night in solitary meditation would be a gaunt, ascetic figure, yet far from being pale and wan, he had round, rosy cheeks and a ruddy complexion. He was stockily built, almost barrel-chested, which may partly account for his distinctive gait, always “leaning forward slightly as though he were hurrying toward something.” And he must have had a stiff neck, because people would remember that when he turned to look at you, he turned his whole body instead of just his head. The only sense in which he was conventionally handsome was his profile: the swooping hawk nose long considered a sign of nobility in the Middle East.
On the surface, you might conclude that he was an average Meccan. At forty years old, the son of a man he had never seen, he had made a far better life for himself than had ever seemed possible. The child born an outsider within his own society had finally won acceptance, and carved out a good life despite the odds against him. He was comfortably off, a happily married business agent with the respect of his peers. If he was not one of the movers and shakers of his prosperous city, that was precisely why people trusted him to represent their interests. They saw him as a man with no axe of his own to grind, a man who would consider an offer or a dispute on its merits and decide accordingly. He had found a secure niche in the world, and had earned every right, in middle age, to sit back and enjoy his rise to respectability. So what was he doing alone up here on one of the mountains that ringed the sleeping city below? Why would a happily married man isolate himself this way, standing in meditation through the night?
There was a hint, perhaps, in his clothing. By now he could certainly have afforded the elaborate embroidered silks of the wealthy, but his clothing was low-key. His sandals were worn, the leather thongs sun-bleached paler than his skin. His homespun robe would be almost threadbare if it hadn’t been so carefully patched, and it was hardly enough to shield him against the night-time cold of the high desert. Yet something about the way he stood on the mountainside made the cold irrelevant. Tilted slightly forward as though leaning into the wind, his stance seemed that of someone who existed at an angle to the earth.
Perhaps a man could see the world in a different way up here. He could find peace in the silence, with just the soughing of the wind over the rock for company, far from the feuds and gossip of the city and the endless negotiations of trade and politics. Here, he was merely a speck in the mountain landscape, his mind free to think and reflect, and then finally to stop thinking, stop reflecting, and submit itself to the vastness.
Look closer and you might detect the shadow of loneliness in the corners of his eyes, something lingering there of the outsider he had once been, as though he were haunted by the awareness that at any moment everything he’d worked so long and hard for could be taken away. You might see a hint of that same mix of vulnerability and resoluteness in his mouth, the full lips slightly parted as he whispered into the darkness. And then perhaps you’d ask why contentment was not enough. Did the fact that it had been so hard-earned make him unable to accept it as a given, never to be secure in his right to it? But then what would? What was he searching for? Was it a certain peace within himself, perhaps? Or was it something more—a glimpse, maybe just an intimation, of something larger?
One thing is certain: by Muhammad’s own account, he was completely unprepared for the enormity of what he would experience on this particular night in the year 610.
A human encounters the divine: to the rationalist, a matter not of fact but of wishful fiction. So if Muhammad had behaved the way one might expect after his first encounter on Mount Hira, it would only make sense to call the story just that: a fable concocted by piety and belief. But he did not.
He did not come floating off the mountain as though walking on air. He did not run down shouting “Hallelujah” and “Bless the Lord.” He did not radiate light and joy. There were no choirs of angels, no music of the heavens. No elation, no ecstasy, no golden aura surrounding him. No sense of his absolute, foreordained, unquestionable role as the messenger of God. Not even the whole of the Quran fully revealed, but only a few brief verses. In short, Muhammad did none of the things that might seem essential to the legend of a man who had just done the impossible and crossed the border between this world and another—none of the things that might make it easy to cry foul, to denigrate the whole story as an invention, a cover for something as mundane as delusion or personal ambition.
On the contrary: he was convinced that what he had encountered could not be real. At best it must be a hallucination: a trick of the eye or the ear, or his own mind working against him. At worst, possession, and he had been seized by an evil jinn, a spirit out to deceive him, even to crush the life out of him. In fact he was so sure that he could only be majnun, literally possessed by a jinn, that when he found himself still alive, his first instinct had been to finish the job himself, to leap off the highest cliff and escape the terror of what he had experienced by putting an end to all experience.
So the man who fled down Mount Hira trembled not with joy but with a stark, primordial fear. He was overwhelmed not with conviction, but by doubt. He was sure of only one thing: whatever this was, it was not meant to happen to him. Not to a middle-aged man who had hoped perhaps at most for a simple moment of grace instead of this vast blinding weight of revelation. If he no longer feared for his life, he certainly feared for his sanity. By his own account, he was painfully aware that too many nights in solitary meditation might have driven him over the edge.
Whatever happened up there on Mount Hira, the sheer humanness of Muhammad’s reaction may be the strongest argument for its historical reality. Whether you think the words he heard came from inside himself or from outside, it is clear that Muhammad experienced them, and with a force that would shatter his sense of himself and his world. Terror was the sole sane response. Terror and denial. And if this reaction strikes us now as unexpected, even shockingly so, that is only reflection of how badly we have been misled by the stereotyped image of ecstatic mystical bliss.
Lay aside such preconceived notions for a moment, and you might see that Muhammad’s terror speaks of real experience. In fact it sounds fallibly human — too human for some, like conservative Muslim theologians who argue that the account of his trying to kill himself should not even be mentioned despite the fact that it’s in the earliest Islamic biographies. They insist that he never doubted for a single moment, let alone despaired. Demanding perfection, they cannot tolerate ordinary human imperfection.
Perhaps this is why it can be so hard to see who Muhammad really was. The purity of perfection denies the complexity of a lived life. For Muslims worldwide, Muhammad is the ideal man, the prophet, the messenger of God, and though he is told again and again in the Quran to say “I am just one of you”—just a man—reverence and love cannot resist the desire to clothe him, as it were, in gold and silver. There is a proprietary feeling about him, a fierce protectiveness all the stronger at a time when Islam itself is under such intense scrutiny in the West.
But the law of unintended consequences applies. To idealize someone is also, in a way, to dehumanize them, so that despite the millions if not billions of words written about Muhammad, it can be hard to get any real sense of the man himself. The more you read, the more liable you are to come away with the feeling that while you may know a lot about Muhammad, you still don’t know who he was. It’s as though he has been all but smothered by the accumulated mass of so many words.
Though the reverential legends about him are often magnificent, they work as perhaps all legends do: they obscure more than they reveal, and he becomes more a symbol than a human being. Even as Islam is rapidly closing on Christianity as the world’s largest religion, we thus have little real sense of the man told three times in the Quran to call himself “the first Muslim.” His is without doubt one of the most consequential lives ever lived, yet for all the iconic power of his name alone—or perhaps because of it—it is a life still to be explored.
How did this man shunted as a child to the margins of his own society (“a man of no importance,” as his opponents call him in the Quran) come to revolutionize his world? How did the infant sent away from his family grow up to redefine the whole concept of family and tribe into something far larger: the Ummah, the people or the community of Islam? How did a merchant become a radical re-thinker of both God and society, directly challenging the established social and political order? How did the man hounded out of Mecca turn exile into a new and victorious beginning, to be welcomed back just eight years later as a national hero? How did he succeed against such odds?
To answer such questions requires exerting the biographer’s privilege and real purpose, which is not merely to follow what happened but to uncover the meaning and relevance within the welter of events. It means weaving together the complex elements of Muhammad’s life, creating a three-dimensional portrait not so much at odds with the “authorized” version as expanding it.
The great British philosopher and historian R. G. Collingwood maintained in The Idea of History that to write well about a historical figure, you need both empathy and imagination. By this he did not mean spinning tales out of thin air, but taking what is known and examining it in the full context of time and place, following the strands of the story until they begin to intertwine and establish a thick braid of reality. If we want to understand the dynamics of what can only be described, with considerable understatement, as a remarkable life—one that would radically change his world, and is still shaping ours—we must allow Muhammad the integrity of reality, and see him whole.
His story is an extraordinary confluence of man, time, and culture, and it begs a deceptively simple question: Why him? Why Muhammad, in the seventh century, in Arabia?
Just to think in such terms is both exciting and daunting. On the one hand, these questions lead straight into a virtual minefield of deeply held beliefs, unwitting preconceptions, and cultural assumptions. On the other, they allow us to see Muhammad clearly, and to understand how he accomplished his journey from powerlessness to power, from anonymity to renown, from insignificance to lasting significance.
The constant guides through his life are two early Islamic histories: the lengthy biography of him written in eighth-century Damascus by Ibn-Ishaq, on which every subsequent biography at least claims to be based, and the more politically focused history of early Islam by al-Tabari, written in late-ninth-century Baghdad, which comes to a magisterial thirty-nine volumes in translation, four of them devoted to Muhammad’s lifetime.
These early historians are conscientious. Their authoritativeness lies in their inclusiveness. They wrote after the fact, working with oral history in the full awareness of how both time and piety tend to warp memory, blurring the line between what was and what should have been. If they erred, it was deliberately on the side of thoroughness rather than judgment. Reading them, one senses their awareness that they are walking a fine line between their responsibility to history on the one side and tradition on the other. This delicate balancing act between history and faith goes hand in hand with their acknowledgment of the elusiveness of definitive fact—a quality as slippery in the hyper-documented world of today as it was in the oral tradition of theirs. Instead of aspiring to omniscience, then, they included conflicting accounts and left it to their readers to decide for themselves, though they did indicate their point of view. Throughout Ibn-Ishaq’s work, for instance, there are phrases such as “it is alleged that” or “so I have been told.” And when several eyewitness accounts seem to contradict one another, he often sums up with “As to which of these is correct, only God knows for sure”—a statement that verges on a helpless “God knows!”
Maybe the only other life that has been written about so much and has yet remained such a mystery is that of Jesus. But thanks to the efforts of scholarly groups like the Jesus Seminar, new studies in the past few decades have explored beyond the letter of the Gospel accounts to create not only a more human portrait of him, but also deeper insight into his impact. These scholars delved beyond theology into history, political science, comparative religion, and psychology, highlighting the radical political relevance of Jesus’s message. By looking at him in the full context of his time, they made him not less but more relevant to our own.
The parallels between Muhammad and Jesus are striking. Both were impelled by a strong sense of social justice; both emphasized unmediated access to the divine; both challenged the established power structure of their times. As with Jesus, theology and history travel side by side in any account of Muhammad’s life, sometimes as close as train tracks, at others widely divergent. Miracle stories abound in an accretion of sacred lore built up by those treasuring what should have happened even if it didn’t. Despite the Quran’s insistent disavowal of the miraculous, there seems to be a very human need for it and for theology to demand faith in the improbable— in fact the impossible—as a test of commitment.
Conservative Islamic tradition thus maintains that Muhammad was destined from the start to be the messenger of God. But if that is so, then there is no story of his life. That is, it becomes a matter of the inevitable unfolding of divine will, and thus devoid of all conflict or tension. To some pious believers, this will more than suffice; the prophet’s innate exceptionalism is a given, and any biography is irrelevant. But to many others, what is compelling is not the miraculous but the humanly possible. Muhammad’s is one of those rare lives that is more dramatic in reality than in legend. In fact the less one invokes the miraculous, the more extraordinary his life becomes. What emerges is something grander precisely because it is human, to the extent that his actual life reveals itself worthy of the word legendary.
His story follows the classic arc of what Joseph Campbell called “the hero’s journey,” from inauspicious beginnings to extraordinary success. But this journey is never an easy one. It involves struggle, danger, and conflict, within oneself as much as with others. So to elide the more controversial aspects of Muhammad’s life does him no service. On the contrary, if we are to accord him the vitality and complexity of a man in full, we need to see him whole. This means taking what might be called an agnostic stance, laying aside piety and reverence on the one hand as along with stereotype and judgementalism on the other, let alone the deadening pall of circumspection in the middle. It means finding the very human narrative of a man navigating between idealism and pragmatism, faith and politics, non-violence and violence, the pitfalls of acclaim as much as the perils of rejection.
The pivotal point of his life is undoubtedly that one night on Mount Hira. That was when he stepped into what many think of as his destiny, which is why Muslims call it laylat ul-qadr, the Night of Power. It’s certainly where he stepped into history, though that word too can be misleading. It implies that Muhammad’s story belongs in the past, when in fact it continues to have such an impact that it has to be considered a matter as much of current events as of history. What happened “then” is an integral part of what is happening now, a major factor in the vast and often terrifying arena in which politics and religion intersect.
To begin to understand this man who wrestled with the angel on the mountaintop and came down seared by the encounter; however, we need to ask not only what happened that night on Mount Hira and what it would lead to, but what led him to it. Especially since from the start, despite the legends, the signs were not promising. Indeed, any objective observer might have concluded that Muhammad was a most unlikely candidate for prophethood, since whatever stars he was born under, they seemed anything but auspicious.