By Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam
25 Aug 2010
Mullahs and maulvis of Uttar Pradesh and some other self-styled Muslim leaders have threatened Mayawati government of dire consequences unless a chapter on Ahmadiya Islamic sect is removed from the Social Study book of standard xth. These maulanas, reverentially called ulama (scholars), although most of them, completely ignorant of the world around them as they are, should be better called Juhala (ignoramuses), have warned U P chief minister Mayawati of country-wide protests, if this section of the book is not immediately removed.
The maulanas may have actually struck gold in the form of this mention of Ahmadiyas as an Islamic sect in the UP social science book. They have been on the lookout for long for an emotional issue on which to create more disturbances in the country and mint money. Babri demolition did not only rob the Sangh Pariwar of an issue to befool Hindus with; it also made our maulanas jobless.
Kafirs, Murtids galore, deserve their throats being slit
A few questions these Juhala should be asked. How come you all get so excited, if even a nincompoop like Chander Mohan claims to have embraced Islam, even if it is clear, right from the beginning that he is merely out to cheat his wife as well as his mistress? A wave of jubilation runs through the community almost world-wide even if one silly conversion takes place, even if it is done under compulsion which is totally opposed to Islamic teachings.
But on the other hand practically every Muslim “scholar” is eager to denounce virtually every Muslim sect other than his own as Kafir or murtid and out of Islam.
Now why should Mayawati government merely exclude Ahmadiyas from the text books? Why not Shias? Why not Wahhabis? Why not Sunnis? Why not Bareilwis? Why not Deobandis? Why not Sufis? And so on. They are all kafirs in the eyes of one or the other sect.
If no one knows what Islam is all about, why teach Islam at all?
Ask all these Juhala, who are mentioned in the report below, who are asking Ahmadiyas to be excluded from the text books, ask them the same question, the former chief justice of Pakistan Supreme Court Justice Munir, investigating the widespread riots against the Ahmadiyas in 1953, had asked the Juhala of every sect in his country: Who is a Muslim? How would you define Islam? No two Juhala, he reported, in his report [available on this site in full], even from the same sect agreed on any definition of a Muslim.
So the real question before Mayawati government would be: If no one knows what Islam is all about, why teach Islam at all? Excluding Islam itself from the text books should be the safest option.
Mayawati Govt. should take any mention of Ahmadiya Islamic sect out of the U.P curriculum immediately, demand Ulema and Muslim leaders, threaten action
A report in Urdu newspaper Hamara Samaj, New Delhi
Strongly criticising the inclusion of the Qadiani sect founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani in the 19th century in the syllabus of Social Science text book of the UP, all the ulema of various schools of thought, have unanimously demanded its exclusion from the syllabus immediately. They said that since the Muslims the world over had unanimously expelled Ahmadiyya sect from Islam, it is all the more painful to term them as a reformist sect among the Muslims and that if the UP government did not expunge it from the syllabus it should be ready to face the ire of the Muslims. It is surprising that the UP government had been informed of the Ahmadiyya sect being termed as a sect of Muslims and their inclusion in the syllabus time and again but despite assurances, hurting the Muslim sentiments had been going on.
It is to be noted that on page 30 of ‘Samajik Vigyan’ of Class X, in the chapter titled “Ahamdiyya Andolan”, the sect has been linked to Muslims terming it as a reformist sect. Not only that, on page 29, in the essay titled ‘Muslim Andolan’ an attempt has been made to present Muslims as divided into various sects as Wahabi Andolan( Movement), Deobandi Andolan and Aligarh Andolan. It is to be noted that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was born in mouza Qadian in Gurdaspur district of Punjab (India) in 1839. He claimed to be a prophet in 1899 and died in 1908.
Reacting on the inclusion of the Ahmadiyya sect in the school syllabus, the President of Jamiat-e-Ulema, Hind, Qari Syed Md Usman Mansurpuri said that it was grossly wrong and hurtful to Muslims. Despite the fact that Darul Uloom Deoband had constantly run a movement against the Ahmadiyyas, the act has hurt Muslim sentiments. Qadianis do not believe in Hadhrat Mohammad (PBUH) as the last prophet and believe in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani too as a prophet. So the Muslims cannot compromise on it. He said that it was injustice to Muslims to include the Ahamadiyya sect as a reformist sect among the Muslims and demanded that the UP government should exclude it from the syllabus immediately otherwise the Jamiat-e-Ulema would launch a nationwide movement.
The General Secretary of All India Personal Law Board Maulana Nizamuddin said that the Islamic world including India and Pakistan had excluded Ahmadiyya sect from Islam, so Muslims could not tolerate being ridiculed in this way. The founder of Darul Qalam, Maulana Yasin Akhtar Misbahi said the Muslims of the entire world had rejected the Qadiani sect and a fatwa was in effect against them and therefore, it was intolerable to include them in Muslims or in a book. He also said that the incident also proved that either the author had poor knowledge or he had done it deliberately to create mischief. He demanded that the UP government should take immediate action taking out from the syllabus not only the aforesaid chapter but all such poorly researched material that might mislead the young generation. Joint Secretary of All India Council for the Protection of Finality of the Prophet(PBUH) under Darul Uloom Deoband which is fighting against the ‘false’ propaganda of the Qadianis, Maulana Shah Alam Gorakhpuri told Hamara Samaj that a delegation led by Saharanpur MLA Imran Masud, Haji Md Anas Usmani, Deoband and Amir Usmani, Deoband, conveyed Council’s message to the representatives of the Mayawati government, Nasimuddin Siddiquee , Mr Abudl Mannan and others demanding the removal of the chapter from the syllabus but the state government did not show seriousness over the issue. He said that Hamara Samaj deserved praise for its coverage of the issue over the Ahmadiyya sect and they wanted that the UP government resolve this issue. Renowned Shia scholar and the member of the All India Personal Law Board Maulana Syed Kalbe Jawad clearly said, “The Islamic world has declared the Ahmadiyyas as non-Muslims and apostates. How then can we tolerate their inclusion in the Muslim community or in the syllabus?” He asked. He said that including them in the syllabus would mean misleading our new generation. “We, therefore, request the UP government to immediately remove this sect from the syllabus”, he said.
Drawing the government’s attention towards the issue, Maulana Abdul Khalique Sambhali of Darul Ulum Deoband said that the issue was an important religious one of the Muslims and no complacency would be tolerated over it. He demanded that the UP government take action and bring the guilty to the book. The President of the All India Milli Council said that the inclusion of the expelled Ahmadiyya sect would not be tolerated at any cost as it would mislead our new generation. Maulana demanded that the UP government remove it from the book and cleansed the book (committee) of Muslims who are enemies of Islam in the disguise of Muslims.
General Secretary of the Jamat-e-Islami Hind, Mujtaba Faruque argues that the Qadiani sect is in fact a product of the Jews and the Christians. That the centre of the Ahmadiyyas is in Britain is clear testimony to this. He said that the UP government should realise that it was not wise to hurt the Muslims. He warned that they would be compelled to launch a movement if the essay was not expunged immediately.
General Secretary of the All India Majlis-e-Mashawarat , Maulana Umeduzzaman Kairanvi and Secretary Md Ilyas Malik jointly said that they would not tolerate it and the chapter should be removed immediately. They said that the syllabus committee should have realised the dangers of including the sect in the syllabus and called for a stop on hurting Muslim sentiments. Maulana Abdul Wahab Khilji of Jamiat-e-Ahle-Hadith said that those associated with the syllabus committee should know that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani was a product of the British who had promoted Mirza to create schism between the Muslims and their fellow countrymen. Muslims have jointly declared this sect as apostates. I feel that it was done with the purpose of hurting the sentiments of the Muslims, he said. He further said that if the UP government rectifies its mistake, it will be good for it otherwise it may toll the death knell for this government.
Maulana Tauqueer Raza Khan said, “In fact such problems are created to divert Muslims’ attention from their own problems. Such acts are committed to deprive us of our peace of mind. We do not expect Mayawati government to protect Muslims’ interests. But at least as citizens of a democratic country, we will ask the UP government to remove the essay immediately otherwise it should be ready to face the consequences because if it is not done, we shall launch a nationwide movement.”
General Secretary Tanzeem Abna-e-Sharfia, Mubarakpur, UP, Maulana Mubarak Hussain Misbahi reacted strongly saying this was an extremely wrong step taken by the UP government and the essay should be removed immediately. He furher said that since Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani has been expelled from Islam and to include such a person in the ranks of the Muslims hurts sentiments of the Muslims. The former Chairman of the Delhi Minority CommissionKamal Farooquee said that the UP government must punish those guilty of it. He said that there was no alternative to removing such material from the syllabus otherwise the UP government would have to face our agitations. The National President of Muslim Political Council of India Dr Taslim Ahmad Rahmani said the Muslims live on the power of truth. The Ahamadiyya sect can never get a place in the Muslim community till the Day of Judgement, albeit, the Mayawati government will have to pay the price. A teacher in Darul Uloom Salfia, Varanasi, UP said, “All the Muslims in the world are unanimous on the fact that Ahmadiyya sect is out of the purview of Islam. Given the truth, how can we tolerate that this sect is included in the syllabus terming it a parallel sect among the Muslims?” He further said that the essay should be removed immediately otherwise the Muslims would launch a nationwide movement and it will then be difficult for the Mayawati government to face the consequences.
The naib imam of Shia Jama Masjid, Delhi and the Principal of Jamiat-us-Shaheed Maulana Muhsin Taqvi said, “If a sect has already been expelled from Islam, why was such a committee formed that hurt the Muslims’ sentiments?” He warned the UP government of the Muslims’ ire if it did not heed to their protests.
ریاست یوپی میں دسویں جماعت کی سماجیات کی کتاب میں احمدیہ فرقہ کوشامل کرنے پر علمائے کرام اور سرکرہ شخصیات کا سخت رد عمل
نئی دہلی؍ رامپور: یوپی کی دسویں جماعت کی سماجک وگیان میں مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی کے ذریعہ انیسویں صدی میں تولد پائے احمد یہ فرقہ کی شمولیت پر تمام مکتب فکر کے علمائے کرام نے متفقہ طور پر سخت تنقید کرتے ہوئے مطالبہ کیا ہے کہ یوپی سرکار ا س فرقہ کو فوری طور پر نصاب سے خارج کرے۔ ان کا یہ بھی کہنا تھا کہ چونکہ پوری دنیا کے مسلمانوں نے متفقہ طور پر احمد یہ فرقہ کو اسلام سے خارج کیا ہوا ہے ، اس لئے اس کو مسلمانوں میں سے ایک مصلح فرقہ قرار دیا جانا ہمارے لئے مزید تکلیف دہ ہے اور اگر یوپی سرکار نصاب سے خارج نہیں کرتی تو وہ مسلمانوں کے عتاب کیلئے تیار رہے۔ حیرانی کی بات ہے کہ احمدیہ فرقہ مسلمانوں کے صف میں کھڑاکرنے اور اس کو شامل نصاف کرنے کے بعد اس پر یوپی کی مایاوتی سرکار کو مسلسل آگاہ کیا گیا تھا ،لیکن یقین دہانیوں کے علاوہ مسلمانوں کی دلآزاری کا سلسلہ جاری رہا۔ خیال رہے کہ دسویں جماعت کی ‘‘سماجک وگیان’’ کی کتاب کے صفحہ نمبر 30پر ‘‘ احمدیہ آندولن’’ کے نام احمدیہ فرقہ کو مسلمانوں سے جوڑ تے ہوئے اس کو مصلح قرار دیا گیا ہے۔ اتنا ہی نہیں مسلمانوں کو مختلف فرقوں میں تقسیم کرتے ہوئے صفحہ 29پرنوجاگرن تتھا ارشٹریہ کاؤکاس کے تحت ‘‘ مسلم آندولن’’ نامی مضمون میں مسلمانوں کو وہابی آندولن ،دیوبندی آندولن اور علی گڑھ آندولن کے تحت انہیں مختلف فرقوں میں تقسیم کرنے کی بھرپور سازش کی گئی ہے۔
قابل ذکر ہے کہ مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی کی پیدائش 1839میں پنجاب کے ضلع گرداس کے موضع قادیان میں ہوئی ، 1899میں نبی ہونےکا دعویٰ کیا اور 1908میں انتقال ہوا۔ یوپی کی نصابی کتاب میں احمدیہ فرقہ کی شمولیت کے تعلق سے جمعیۃ علما ہند کے صدر مولانا قاری سید محمد عثمان منصورپوری نے سخت رد عمل کا اظہار کرتےہوئے کہا کہ یہ انتہائی غلط اور مسلمانوں کو تکلیف پہنچانے والی بات ہے۔دارالعلوم دیوبند نے احمدیہ فرقہ کیخلاف مسلسل تحریک چلائی ہوئی ہے، اس کے باوجود ایسی کوئی حرکت مسلمانوں کی دلآزاری کے سوا کچھ نہیں ۔ قادیانی نعوذ بااللہ آخری نبی صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کو آخری نبی نہیں مانتے اور مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی کو بھی نبی کہتے اس لئے قادیانیوں کے تعلق سے مسلمان کوئی سمجھوتہ نہیں کرسکتا۔ قاری محمد عثمان نے سخت الفاظ میں کہا کہ نصاب میں بحیثیت ایک مسلم مصلح فرقہ کے شامل کرنا مسلمانوں کے ساتھ ظلم وزیادتی ہے، اس لئے یوپی سرکار اس مضمون کو فوری طور پر کتاب سے خارج کرے ورنہ جمعیۃ علما ہندملک گیر تحریک چلانے پر مجبور ہوگی۔ آل انڈیا مسلم پرسنل لا بورڈ کے جنرل سکریٹری مولانا نظام الدین نے کہا کہ احمد یہ فرقہ کو ہندوپاک سمیت پورے عالم اسلام نے خارج قرار دیا ہے اس لئے مسلمان برداشت نہیں کرسکتا کہ ان کا مزاق اڑایا جائے۔
مولانا نظام الدین نے کہا کہ یوپی سرکار کتاب سے احمد یہ فرقہ کو فوری ہٹائے ورنہ اس کا خمیازہ برداشت کرنا پڑے گا۔ دارالقلم کے بانی و مہتمم مولانا یاسین اختر مصباحی نے کہا کہ مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی کے فرقہ قادیانیت کو پوری دنیا کے مسلمان مسترد کرچکے ہیں اور ان پر کفر کا فتویٰ صادر ہے، پھر انہیں مسلمانوں میں یا کسی نصابی کتاب میں شامل کرنا ناقابل برداشت ہے۔انہوں نے کہا کہ اس سے یہ بھی ثابت ہوا کہ کتاب کے مصنف کا یا تو بھرپور مطالعہ نہیں ہے یا اس نے شر انگیز ی پھیلانے کیلئے ایسی حرکت کی ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ یوپی سرکار فوری کارروائی کرتے ہوئے نہ صرف وہ مضمون بلکہ ایسے تمام غیر تحقیقی مضامین کو نصاب سے خارج کرے ، جن سے ہندوستان کی نئی نسل گمراہ ہوتی ہے۔ احمدیہ فرقہ کے جھوٹے پروپیگنڈے کے خلاف دارالعلوم دیوبند کی کل ہند مجلس تحفظ ختم نبوت کے نائب ناظم مولانا شاہ عالم گورکھپوری نے ہمارا سماج کوبتایا کہ مجلس کی جانب سے یوپی کی مایاوتی سرکار کے نمائندوں نسیم الدین صدیقی، مسٹر عبدالمنان وغیرہ کو بھی سہارنپور کے ممبران اسمبلی عمران مسعود ،حاجی محمد انس عثمانی دیوبند اور عامر دیوبند کے ایک وفد کے ذریعہ مجلس کا پیغام پہنچاتے ہوئے یوپی سرکار سے نصاب سے ہٹانے کا مطالبہ کیا گیا تھا، لیکن ریاستی سرکار مسلمانوں کے جذبات کا خیال کرتے ہوئے اس قضیہ کو فوری نمٹائے ۔
معروف شیعہ عالم اور مسلم پرسنل لا بورڈ کے سینئر رکن مولانا سید کلب جواد نے صاف طور پر کہا کہ احمدیہ فرقہ کو عالم اسلام نے اسلام سے خارج اور مرتد قرار دیا ہے اس لئے ہم یہ کس طرح برداشت کرسکتے ہیں کہ اس فرقہ کو شامل نصاب کیا جائے یا اس کو مسلمانوں کی جماعت میں شامل کردیا جائے۔انہوں نے کہا کہ نصاب میں شامل کرنے کا مطلب ہماری نئی نسل کو گمراہیوں میں مبتلا کرتا ہے اسلئے ہم یوپی سرکار سے فوری مطالبہ کرتے ہیں کہ وہ بلاتاخیر اس فرقہ کونصاب سے خارج کرے۔ دارالعلوم دیوبند کے نائب مہتمم مولانا عبدالخالق سنبھلی نے ریاستی سرکار کی اس طرف فوری توجہ دلاتے ہوئے کہا کہ یہ مسلمانوں کے اہم مذہبی مدعہ سے جڑا ہوا مسئلہ ہے، اس لئے اس پر کوتاہی برداشت نہیں ہوگی۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اس پر یوپی سرکار ایکشن لے اور ان تمام لوگوں کے خلاف کارروائی کرے جو اس حرکت کے مرتکب ہیں ۔ آل انڈیا ملی کونسل کے صدر مولانا عبد اللہ مغیثی نے کہا کہ ہم قطعی برداشت نہیں کریں گے کہ خارج اسلام احمدیہ فرقہ کو یوپی کے نصابی کتاب میں شامل کیا جائے، جس سے ہماری نئی نسل کو گمراہ کیا جائے۔
مولانا نے کہا کہ یوپی سرکار اس کو فوری نکالے اور کتاب کو ایسے لوگوں سے پاک کرے جو مسلمانوں کے نام پر اسلام کے کھلے دشمن ہیں۔ جماعت اسلامی ہند کے جنرل سکریٹری مجتبیٰ فاروق کا موقف ہے کہ دراصل قادیانی فرقہ یہود یوں اور انگریزوں کی پیداوار ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اس پر یقین رکھنے کیلئے یہ کافی ہے کہ آج بھی برطانیہ میں احمدیوں کا مرکز ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ یہ تو یوپی سرکار کو سمجھ میں آنا چاہئے کہ مسلمانوں کو تکلیف پہنچانا ٹھیک نہیں ۔ مسٹر فاروق نے کہا کہ اگر فوری کارروائی کر کے مضمون خارج نہیں کیا گیا تو ہم تحریک چھیڑ نے پر مجبور ہوجائیں گے۔آل انڈیا مسلم مجلس مشاورت کے جنرل سکریٹری مولانا عمید الزماں کیرانوی اور سکریٹری محمد الیاسی ملک نے مشترکہ طور پر کہا کہ ہم ہر گز برداشت نہیں کریں گے۔ یوپی سرکار اس مضمون کو فوری ہٹائے ۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اس نصابی کمیٹی کو سمجھنا چاہئے کہ اس فرقہ کو مسلمانوں میں شامل کرنا کتنی خطرناک بات ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ ایسی حرکتوں سے مسلمانوں کی دلآزاری بند ہونی چاہئے ۔ جمعیت اہل حدیث ہند کے سابق ناظم عمومی مولانا عبدا لوہاب خلجی کا کہنا تھا کہ جن لوگوں نے نصاب میں شامل کیا ہے انہیں اس تاریخ کو جاننا چاہئے کہ مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی انگریزوں کے پروردہ تھے ۔
انگریزوں نے مسلمانوں اور برادران وطن میں انتشار کیلئے مرزا کو کھڑا کیا تھا ۔مسلمان متفقہ طور پر اس فرقہ کو مرتد قرار دیتے ہیں۔ مجھے لگتا ہے کہ مسلمانوں کو دلی تکلیف پہنچانے کی غرض سے ایسا کیا گیا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ مایاوتی حکومت اگر فوری سنبھل جاتی ہے تو ٹھیک ورنہ یہ بات بی ایس پی کیلئے موت کا سبب بن سکتی ہے۔ نبیر ہ اعلیٰ حضرت مولانا توقیر رضا خان نے کہا کہ دراصل مسلمانوں کو اپنے بنیادی مسائل سے ہٹانے کیلئے ایسے مسائل پیدا کئے جاتے ہیں۔ ہماری چین وسکون چھیننے کیلئے ایسی حرکتیں کی جاتی ہیں۔ ہمیں مایاوتی سے مسلمانوں کے مفاد کی توقع نہیں ہے ، لیکن ایک جمہوری ملک میں کم از کم ہم یوپی سرکار سےکہیں گے کہ وہ اس مضمون کو فوری ہٹائے ورنہ اس کا خمیازہ بھگتنے کیلئے تیار رہے، کیونکہ اگر ہٹایا نہیں گیا تو وہ ملک گیر تحریک چھیڑ نے پر مجبور ہوجائیں گے۔ جنرل سکریٹری تنظیم ابنائے اشرفیہ مبارکپور یوپی مولانا مبارک حسین مصباحی نے سخت رد عمل پیش کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ یوپی سرکار کے ذریعہ یہ انتہائی غلط قدم ہے اس لئے اس کو پہلی فرصت میں خارج کیا جائے ۔
انہوں نے کہا کہ چونکہ مرزا غلام احمد قادیانی اسلام سے خارج ہیں اس لئے مسلمانوں کی صفوں میں ایسے شخص کو کھڑا کرنا مسلمانوں کی دلآزاری ہے۔ دہلی اقلیتی کمیشن کے سابق چیئر مین کمال فاروقی نے دوٹوک الفاظ میں کہا کہ یوپی سرکار کو اس حرکت پر انہیں سزا دینی ہوگی جنہوں نے ایسا کیا ہے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ نصاب سے ایسی چیز ہٹانے کے سوا کوئی دوسرا راستہ نہیں ہے، ورنہ یوپی سرکار کو ہماری تحریکوں کاسامنا کرنا پڑے گا ۔ مسلم پولیٹیکل کونسل آف انڈیا کے قومی صدر ڈاکٹر تسلیم احمد رحمانی نے سخت تنقید کرتے ہوئے کہاکہ مسلمان حقانیت پر زندہ ہیں ۔مایاوتی کے کہنے سے مسلمانوں میں احمدیہ فرقہ کو قیامت تک جگہ تو نہیں ملے گی البتہ اس کا خمیازہ یوپی سرکار کو ضرور بھگتنا ہوگا۔ دارلعلوم سلفیہ بنارس یوپی کے استاذ مولانا محمد مستقیم سلفی کا کہنا تھا کہ دنیا کے مسلمانوں کا متفقہ فتوی ہے کہ احمدیہ فرقہ خارج اسلام ہے ، اسی صورت میں ہم کس طرح برداشت کرسکتے ہیں کہ اس فرقہ کو مسلمانوں میں ایک مساوی مسلک قرار دیتے ہوئے شامل نصاب کیا جائے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اس کوفوری ہٹایا جانا چاہئے ، ورنہ مسلمان اس کے خلاف پورے ملک میں تحریک چھیڑدیں گے اور مایا وتی سرکار کو راہ فرار نہیں ملے گی۔ شیعہ جامع مسجد دہلی کے نائب امام اور جامعۃ الشہید کے پرنسپل مولانا محسن تقوی کہتے ہیں کہ جب ایک فرقہ اسلام سے خارج ہے تو نصابی کمیٹی ایسی کیوں بنائی گئی جس نے مسلمانوں کو دلی تکلیف پہنچائی ۔ مولانا نے کہا کہ یوپی سرکار فوری سنبھل جائے ورنہ مسلمانوں کا عتاب جھیلنے کیلئے تیار رہے۔
URL for this article:
Mr Jamsheed Basha is a living testimony to God's Glory. If a God can make a man speak out of both sides of his mouth then Mr Jamsheed is it! With a little practice he can speak two languages at the same time! He should get more practice.
aoa i am shazad from lahore .jobe koc kaha he ap sab ne 1 dam galat kaha hi keya janti ho ap sab ahmadiy ke bare me bas naftar he .ap sab karte ho ke ye jamat a gaye to ap sab ke joot kool jaye ge ? our ketna karo ge zulam samjo ab be keyo ke (point not karo ahmadiyon ka khon 28tarikh ko bahaya gya our airblue ka haksa be our shadeed sailab bi 28 ko paish aya keya khudi taqdir josh mein nae aa rahi ? batio molve hazrat samjo sac our hak ke bat ? our kes ka w8 kar rahai ho ap sab koye zenda nahe geya asman par na kese ne ana he koda ke kalam me saf saf he leka our koye hades be nahe he ise ? dhoka mat 2 sab ko .fatve fatve lagate ho darte ho ap sab hamadiy jamat se jabbe ap logo ne zulam keya to khoda ne badla leya ap logo se . nahe mante to bhogto ap sab ceko our ceko ap sab hamare saht khooda hi .ham coop he keyo ?keyo ke khoda he hamare sat .our karo zulam karo dil kol kar karo our ham koc nahhe kare ge khoda he kare ga hasab keyo ke khoda ke late ke koye avaz nahe hote /jes den ham age a gaye our hakekat kahe to ye sab zaroor poce ge ap mula ko ke keya keya galat bate karte te ap loog ?
mula hazrat darte ho .hamare sat bat be nahe karte karo bate ham dete he ansar har cez ka qoran our sunat ke sat ? kheer jete ka kamyab hoge jamat ahmadiy keyo ke khoda ka vada he es jamat ke sat /(rabta karne ke leye mere numbar he 03334888878 nadar ahmadiy shezad ahmad) our kesne kaha ke ham ap peyare nabe ko nahe mante jetna ham mante ho outna ap loog nahe mante balke oun ke name lekar khoonn bahate ho larte ho hangame karte ho apne to nahe kaha ke laro mera name lekar ? our kaha hamne toheen ke ap ke khoda ke peyare nabe ke hmm ? tohen karte ho ap loog akbaro me name lekte ho sarkar ka our pero me pekte ho vohe akbar ? kesne hak deya hi ap loog ko ke kalma metio teke dar ho ap mula loog hmm ? apne to kaha ta ke jesne qalma para mo mere me se huga to tom loog kese kafar kete ho ham loog ko tom loog to chote kasme kate ho . khoor kheer khkoda dek raha hi tom logo ko hadayat de khoda tala
I am sure the UP Government had included a text on Islam to be inclusive of all its religious groups and could not have wanted any flak.
The noise that Mullahs are making about the inclusion of a text on Qadiani Islam is out of all proportion.
No non-Muslim or secular person would like to get into an argument about what is or what is not Islam. Why should they be interested?
Still more importantly, no Muslim has a right to declare any person who calls him/her self Muslim a Kafir or non-Muslim. Islam does not have a church which has a right to excommunicate any Muslim.
The Mullah has no standing in Islam. Ideally there should be no Mullah or leader for Islam. The individual is answerable. The Muslims have a book which they are meant to follow, and each individual has been asked to read the book and follow it in accordance to his own understanding.
And God knows what is in our hearts, and if we make a mistake He knows & is Oft Forgiving & Merciful. That is what Allah says in the Quran.
There is no place for these people who are doing their best to create a Church & establish their power & rule over Islam. If anything, they need to be denounced as they are defying God's instructions in the Quran.
Mullahs have been misleading Muslims about Islam. I remember one story where a woman was raped by her father-in-law and the Mullah gave the fatwah that she has to divorce her husband & marry the father-in-law as she has attained the position of her husband's mother due to her relations with her husband's father. Excuse me! What Islam was that? Why did the Muslims of India not make a noise about such an atrocious & criminal behaviour? Would the woman not have got protection from the criminal father-in-law through the courts? Here is one example of the result of Mullah power.
So far as the Indian Government is concerned, I would recommend that it remove any text on Islam and never include any article, on any sect, or aspect of Islam. It would be doing itself a great favour. Let the individual Muslim teach their children what they believe. They may guide or misguide their own child. I believe every parent should teach their own child their faith and take responsibility for it.
There is in any case no reason to include religious texts in school books on any religion. One is seeing a rise in religious intolerance and all sane human beings are fed-up of these elements who have made living peacefully a near impossibility.
Assalaamu 'Alaa ManiTtaba'al Hudaa
"Ask all these Juhala, who are mentioned in the report below, who are asking Ahmadiyas to be excluded from the text books, ask them the same question, the former chief justice of Pakistan Supreme Court Justice Munir, investigating the widespread riots against the Ahmadiyas in 1953, had asked the Juhala of every sect in his country: Who is a Muslim? How would you define Islam? No two Juhala, he reported, in his report [available on this site in full], even from the same sect agreed on any definition of a Muslim. "
The definition of Muslim is very clear from the initial Aayaat of Soorah al-Baqarah, and all non-Qadianis and non-Bahais qualify the criteria of People of Qiblah.Also Pakistan Supreme court has declared that every Qadiani is equivalent to Salman Rushdie Mal'oon in blasphemy of Rasool sall Allaahu 'alaihi wasallam in a 1993 court decision.
Hello Jamsheed Basha, I appreciate your reply and explaining in great depth; much appreciated!
I do worry, however, about your comment that "....where ninety percent of Muslims are Sunnis, true followers of Islam. Other sects have their own shortcomings; do not fall within the definition of Islam, though they may claim to be within the fold of Islam."
Shia Muslims, Ahmadiyya, Alevi, Alewite, and so forth, will see things differently and also remember that global Islamic terrorism on the whole is done by Sunni Islamists and not by the followers of minority Muslim groups.
Christianity went through bloody wars and Muslims should learn from this; after all, the outcome will lead to greater secularism in the long term because people will become fed up with all the brutality.
Some Protestant Christians look down on Catholics, and the other way; and this also happens in Islam..............however, the body of Christianity suffers because of this and now you have greater unity.
Islam needs to follow the same path and it does not matter if you are Sunni, Shia, or whatever.
I beg to differ about Islam meaning peace; after all, you don't have many Muslims nations where peace is part and parcel of society.
Yet this issue is not important; but remember, the Ahmadiyya are facing many problems now and it is not the right time to make matters worse - if God is almighty, then God will judge of the Day of Judgement.
Again, I appreciate your valuable time.
Lee Jay Walker
Mr. Lee Jay Walker, it’s a rejoinder to you:
I am one of the liberal Muslims like Mr. Sultan Shahin, always believed in peaceful co-existence of all communities in India. I do not approve of the narrow minded Ulema of their fatwas issued from time to time. They are a spineless bunch of self-styled heads of Islamic jurisprudence. They have no following with the ordinary Muslims of India. They cry wolf whenever an issue touching Islam's sensitivity, blowing them out of proportions. Often, they succeed in inciting the passions among the Muslims. I have been in the forefront to condemn the attitudes of the so called Jamaat-e-Islami and Tableeghi Jamat group or any other group that does not conform to my belief in Islam. Islam is a liberal religion. Allah Himself had ordained Muslims to live in peaceful co-existence some 1500 years ago. Read the chapter of "Khul Ya Ayuhal Kafiroon" where Allah asked our Prophet Mohammed to declare to the Kafirs "Lakum Deenukum Wali Ya Deen" meaning, "Your religion is good to you and so is mine". It’s a solemn declaration of a secular character in Islam. If our narrow minded Ulema or Muslims do not follow this, it is nothing but unfortunate.
Mr. Lee referred to a passage from my comments, where I said Qadiyan died while in stools. Here I only intended to convey the fate of apostates who tried to divide Islam or harm Islam. By saying this I never intend to kill or cause harm to any apostates. History is before you and the fate of the enemy of Islam and his fearsome death, where Abu Lahab's body was stoned and pushed to the grave dug a few feet away, by none other than his own children, because the body was stinking so much so even his children refused to handle it, is any lesson. It only reminds us of the fate that awaits all those who tried to malign Islam or cause harm to the peaceful religion.
May be Mr. Lee has not followed my writings in these columns earlier. If he had, he would not have formed such an opinion about me. I still stand by my views on Ahmadiyas, whether one likes it or not. They are "Kafirs".
About the definition of a Muslim, as stated in Munir Commission Report, yes, my definition of a Muslim is the same but where is the place for an apostate group like "Ahmediyas"?
As for the culture of suicide bombing of Muslims against each other, it only reminds us of the killings that took place soon after the death of our Third Rightly Guided Caliph, Hazrat Uthman RA. What followed later is history, where Muslims, for pure political power, fought against each other and indulged in wholesome killing within a few years after the death of our Prophet PBUH.
It all started with the Fourth Caliph Hazrat Ali, assuming the Caliphate with the support of the Killers of Hazrat Uthman RA. His monumental mistake in not punishing the killers of Zinnurein, was the focal point of dispute that led to two battles. That also resulted in the assassination of Hazrat Ali RA himself. But later when the Caliphate passed on to Hazrat Muawiyia, Islamic rule spread and there was peace all over again. His 20 years rule and more took Islamic rule to a great height. He like Hazrat Ali, too indulged in establishing dynastic rule. That was his undoing. I am not here to apportion blame on the greats of Islam. But then, no one can alter the history. It only reminds us how chequered is our history. But then, Islam, being the religion of Allah, was protected by Allah all these years and it is the second greatest religion of the world, where ninety percent of Muslims are Sunnis, true followers of Islam. Other sects, have their own shortcomings, do not fall within the definition of Islam, though they may claim to be within the fold of Islam. It is therefore no wonder, if the tradition is followed here too, where the hot headed Taliban and their followers have taken a destructive route and indulged in wholesale suicide bombing of each other. They are just making the job of Americans easy. If there is any sense or awareness in them, these misguided so-called puritans of Islam, would see reason and mend themselves. The killing would not do any good to Islam except harming its image. Today, Muslims are hounded everywhere in the world and the slightest suspicion leads to untold harassment of them, however, high one may be placed in life. For instance, Shah Rukh Khan too faced harassment in America.
Muslims have to join together to erase this bad image that all Muslims are terrorists. Terrorists have no religion and they are anti-social elements and enemies of humanity. They are not Muslims, Hindus or Christians but a bunch of barbarians out to ruin the life of ordinary people in the world. They should be dealt with severely.
--A.M. Jamsheed Basha, Chennai-based Columnist.
Hello Jamsheed Basha
You state the following: "But the Ahmediyas, created a rift in Islam, as their founder, Ghulam Ahmed of Qadiyan, claimed to be the 'Prophet" and incidentally, like any other apostate he died in the 'toilet'..as one poet said about him."
You also state that the "Definition of Islam is very clear. It stands for peaceful co-existence and one should have unflinching faith on Allah and His Messengers, Prophet Mohammed PBUH being the last in the chain of Prophets descended on earth for the benefit of the people to guide them aright. There is therefore no need to get over agitated, Mr. Shahin, over this issue, unless you are one belonged to the apostate group called Ahmediyas."
On the contrary Jamsheed Basha (and I am not defending Sultan Shahin because my thinking is a million miles away) look at your major contradiction.
You state "Definition of Islam is very clear. It stands for peaceful co-existence" and then you state in other places that "like any other apostate he died in the 'toilet'" and "...to the apostate group called Ahmediyas."
Therefore, apostates according to you deserve to die "in the toilet."
Nice to know that you are yet another hating Muslim who believes that apostates deserve death or "to die in the toilet."
Also, you know that the Ahmadiyya are being persecuted and your comments will only inflame the situation; you should think more before you make major contradictions.
In your article enclosed, you say: "Babri demolition did not only rob the Sangh Pariwar of an issue to befool Hindus with; it also made our maulanas jobless."
Are you implying that if the Hindus give up the recovery of the Shri Ramjanbhoomi site, things will be different?
Mayawati government should remove Ahamadiyya sect from syllabus, demandUP UlemaAuthor: Sultan ShahinPublication: New Age IslamDate: August 27, 2010URL:http://www.NewAgeIslam.com/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=3351
Mr. Jamsheed Basha, Please read the following exchange. You might begin to understand why we should not allow our Juhala to guide our Islamic beliefs. This might even help you arrive at your own definition of who is a Muslim. As Muslims are presently suicide-bombing one another in mosques and shrines regularly, it is necessary to arrive at such a definition, if nothing else to answer the question, who to bomb and who not to, although of course, Petrodollar Islamists are clear in their mind that all non-Ahl-e-Hadeesis should be bombed out of existence.
Excerpts from: Munir Commission Report-24: The Definition of a Muslim
Keeping in view the several definitions given by the ulama, need we make any comment except that no two learned divines are agreed on this fundamental. If we attempt our own definition as each learned divine has done and that definition differs from that given by all others, we unanimously go out of the fold of Islam. And if we adopt the definition given by any one of the ulama, we remain Muslims according to the view of that alim but kafirs according to the definition of everyone else.
Maulana Abul Hasanat Muhammad Ahmad Qadri, President, Jami’at-ul-Ulamai- Pakistan —
“Q.— What is the definition of a Muslim?
A — (1) He must believe in the Unity of God.
(2) He must believe in the prophet of Islam to be a true prophet as well as in all other prophets who have preceded him,
(3) He must believe in the Holy Prophet of Islam as the last of the prophets (khatam-un-nabiyin).
(4) He must believe in the Qur’an as it was revealed by God to the Holy Prophet of Islam.
(5) He must believe as binding on him the injunctions of the Prophet of Islam.
(6) He must believe in the qiyamat.
Q.—Is a tarik-us-salat a Muslim?
A.—Yes, but not a munkir-us-salat” Maulana Ahmad Ali, President, Jami’at-ul-Ulama-i-Islam, Maghribi Pakistan —
“Q.— Please define a Muslim?
A.—A person is a Muslim if he believes (1) in the Qur’an and (2) what has been said by the prophet. Any person who possesses these two qualifications is entitled to be called a Muslim without his being required to believe in anything more or to do anything more.” Maulana Abul Ala Maudoodi, Amir Jama’at-i-Islami —
“Q.—Please define a Muslim?
A.—A person is a Muslim if he believes (1) in tauheed, (2) in all the prophets (ambiya), (3) all the books revealed by God, (4) in mala’ika (angels), and (5) yaum-ul-akhira (the Day of Judgment).
Q.—Is a mere profession of belief in these articles sufficient to entitle a man to call himself a Musalman and to be treated as a Musalman in an Islamic State?
Q.—If a person says that he believes in all these things, does any one have a right to question the existence of his belief?
A.—The five requisites that I have mentioned above are fundamental and any alteration in anyone of these articles will take him out of the pale of Islam.” Ghazi Siraj-ud-Din Munir—
A.—I consider a man to be a Muslim if he professes his belief in the kalima, namely, La Ilaha Illalah-o-Muhammad-ur-Rasulullah, and leads a life in the footsteps of the Holy Prophet.” Mufti Muhammad Idris, Jamia Ashrafia, Nila Gumbad, Lahore—
“Q.—Please give the definition of a Musalman?
A.—The word ‘Musalman’ is a Persian one. There is a distinction between the word ‘Musalman’ which is a Persian word for Muslim and the word ‘momin’. It is impossible for me to give a complete definition of the word ‘momin’. I would require pages and pages to describe what a momin is. A person is a Muslim who professes to be obedient to Allah. He should believe in the Unity of God, prophethood of the ambiya and in the Day of Judgment. A person who does not believe in the azan or in the qurbani goes outside the pale of Islam. Similarly, there are a large number of other things which have been received by tavatir from our prophet. In order to be a Muslim, he must believe in all these things. It is almost impossible for me to give a complete list of such things.”
Hafiz Kifayat Hussain, Idara-i-Haquq-i-Tahaffuz-i-Shia—
“Q.—Who is a Musalman?
A.—A person is entitled to be called a Musalman if he believes in (1) tauheed, (2) nubuwwat and (3) qiyamat. These are the three fundamental beliefs which a person must profess to be called a
Musalman. In regard to these three basic doctrines there is no difference between the Shias and the Sunnies. Besides the belief in these three doctrines, there are other things called ‘zarooriyat-i-din’ which a person must comply with in order to be entitled to be called a Musalman. These will take me two days to define and enumerate. But as an illustration I might state that the respect for the Holy Book, wajoob-i-nimaz, wajoob-i-roza, wajoob-i-hajj-ma’a-sharait, and other things too numerous to mention, are among the ‘zarooriyat-i-din’”
Maulana Abdul Hamid Badayuni, President, Jami’at-ul-Ulama-i-Pakistan:
“Q.—Who is a Musalman according to you?
A.—A person who believes in the zarooriyat-i-din is called a momin and every momin is entitled to be called a Musalman.
Q.—What are these zarooriyat-i-din?
A.—A person who believes in the five pillars of Islam and who believes in the rasalat of our Holy Prophet fulfils the zarooriyat-i-din.
Q.—Have other actions, apart from the five arakan, anything to do with a man being a Muslim or being outside the pale of Islam? (Note—Witness has been explained that by actions are meant those rules of moral conduct which in modern society are accepted as correct.)
Q.—Then you will not call a person a Muslim who believes in arakan-ikhamsa and the rasalat of the prophet but who steals other peoples’ things, embezzles property entrusted to him, has an evil eye on his neighbour’s wife and is guilty of the grossest ingratitude to his benefactor?
A.—Such a person, if he has the belief already indicated, will be a Muslim despite all this”. Maulana Muhammad Ali Kandhalvi, Darush-Shahabia, Sialkot —
“Q.—Please define a Musalman?
A.—A person who in obedience to the commands of the prophet performs all the zarooriyat-i-din is a Musalman.
Q.—Can you define zarooriyat-i-din?
A.—Zarooriyat-i-din are those requirements which are known to every Muslim irrespective of his religious knowledge.
Q.—Can you enumerate zarooriyat-i-din?
A.—These are too numerous to be mentioned. I myself cannot enumerate these zarooriyat. Some of the zarooriyat-i-din may be mentioned as salat, saum, etc.” Maulana Amin Ahsan Islahi —
A.—There are two kinds of Musalmans, a political (siyasi) Musalman and a real (haqiqi) Musalman. In order to be called a political Musalman, a person must:
(1) Believe in the Unity of God,
(2) believe in our Holy Prophet being khatam-un-nabiyin, i.e., ‘final authority’ in all matters relating to the life of that person,
(3) Believe that all good and evil comes from Allah,
(4) Believe in the Day of Judgment,
(5) believe in the Qur’an to be the last book revealed by Allah,
(6) Perform the annual pilgrimage to Mecca,
(7) Pay the zaka’at,
(8) Say his prayers like the Musalmans,
(9) Observe all apparent rules of Islami mu’ashira, and
(10) Observe the fast (saum).
If a person satisfies all these conditions he is entitled to the rights of a full citizen of an Islamic State. If any one of these conditions is not satisfied, the person concerned will not be a political Musalman. (Again said) It would be enough for a person to be a Musalman if he merely professes his belief in these ten matters irrespective of whether he puts them into practice or not.
In order to be a real Musalman, a person must believe in and act on all the injunctions by Allah and his prophet in the manner in which they have been enjoined upon him.
Q.—Will you say that only the real Musalman is ‘mard-i-saleh’?
Q.—do we understand you aright that in the case of what you have called a political (siyasi) Musalman, belief alone is necessary, while in the case of a haqiqi Musalman there must not only be belief but also action?
A.—No, you have not understood me aright. Even in the case of a political (siyasi) Musalman action is necessary but what I mean to say is that if a person does not act upon the belief that is necessary in the case of such a Musalman, he will not be outside the pale of a political (siyasi) Musalman.
Q.—If a political (siyasi) Musalman does not believe in things which you have stated to be necessary, will you call such a person be-din?
A.—No, I will call him merely be-amal”.
The definition by the Sadr Anjuman Ahmadiya, Rabwah, in its written statement is that a Muslim is a person who belongs to the ummat of the Holy Prophet and professes belief in kalima-i-tayyaba.
WHY ARE YOU SO AGITATED, MR. SULTAN SHAHIN, OVER MUSLIM ULEMAS' DEMAND FOR REMOVAL OF A CHAPTER ON AHMEDIYAS FROM THE TEXT BOOKS IN UP?
Mr. Sultan Shahin's outburst against the Ulemas or in his own words Juhalas, for the demand they made for removal of the chapter on Ahmediyas from the Text Books of UP Schools, is totally ununderstandable. Mr. Sultan Shahin may claim to be a liberal Muslim, championing the cause of liberal Islam. But that does not give him the liberty to thrash learned Muslim Ulemas at the drop of a hat. If the Ulemas are over sensitive, so is our own Mr. Sultan Shahin. What is the difference between him and the Ulemas, in the present case? Both are over sensitive. But the issue is not this. The main issue is whether Ahmediyas were Muslims at all? They are not and Mr. Sultan is fully aware of the fact and its declaration made earlier in Pakistan to that effect that they were 'kafirs'.
Mr. Shahin's comparion of other beliefs in Islam like Shias, Whahibs, Bravelis, etc., equating them with Ahmediyas, is totally meaningless and coming from a learned person like Shahin, is regrettable. These Whabis, Shias, or Bravelis, never ever claimed that there was any other Prophet after our last Prophet Mohammed PBUH. But the Ahmediyas, created a rift in Islam, as their founder, Ghulam Ahmed of Qadiyan, claimed to be the 'Prophet" and incidentally, like any other apostate he died in the 'toilet'..as one poet said about him, "Qadiyana Hagta Hagta margiya' meaning Qadiyan died while in stools.
I am here, in no way extend, my support to all the fatwas issued by our Ulemas. But in this particular case of Ahmediya, I am totally with them. Ahmediyas, cannot be called an Islamic Sect. Its a separate religion at the worst. Let them have their own belief and practice or worship Qadiyan. It is for them. Let them not at the same time claim to be within the fold of Islam. The core belief of Islam is the oneness of Allah and Prophet Mohammed PBUH, being the "Khatimun Nabayeen". Any other belief contrary to this would be un-Islamic. Poet of the East, Sir Mohammed Iqbal, once said in pharsi Qitta, "Ba Mustafa, barashan kheesh ra ke Deen Hamawoost; Agar bavoo na raseedi, tamam Boo Lahabist: meaning, anything that doest not conform to the teachings of our Prophet Moahmmed PBUH, is un-Islamic. Are the beliefs of 'Ahmediyas' confroms to the teachings of our Prophet Mohammed PBUH?
There is no logic or reason in Sultan Shahin's suggestion for removing Islam as such from the text books as the best option. If he has not understood the very meaning of Islam that has been explained supra, then no one can help him in this regard. Definition of Islam is very clear. It stands for peaceful co-existence and one should have unflinching faith on Allah and His Messengers, Prophet Mohammed PBUH being the last in the chain of Prophets descended on earth for the benefit of the people to guide them aright. There is therefore no need to get over agitated, Mr. Shahin, over this issue, unless you are one belonged to the apostate group called Ahmediyas.
A.M. Jamsheed Basha, Chennai-based Columnist.
Brother Sultan Shahin,
Assalaam O Alaikum Warahmatullah Wabarakatuh!
It is good sometime to stir up “Hornets’ nests" and eventually the news would reach these "Mullahs" or Juhala as they are, that you have published this "piece" on your website. They would certainly give a " fatwa" that you are Ahmadi no matter how much you deny it. But that is neither here nor there.
Your bravery to expose the Truth must be admired and I am sure a huge majority of those who subscribe to your website recognise your sterling qualities!
The Juhala never win. In the end “Truth Prevails!" but at what cost.
86 Ahmadi Muslims were slaughtered just recently, in one swipe at 2 Ahmadi Masajid in Lahore, Pakistan. Then the floods came. Is it the wrath of Allah descending upon them?? In the floods in Pakistan, numerous Ahmadi Muslims have been denied basic human relief on the instigation of the Juhala.
What is so interesting about this entire saga, is that the Holy Prophet Muhammad (SAW) prophesied that a time will come when the Muslim Ummah would follow in the footsteps of the Jews, inasmuch as a pair of shoes are alike, and if the Jewish man should commit adultery with his mother, then people of the Muslim Ummah will do likewise. He further announced that as the Jewish people were divided into 72 sects, his Ummah, meaning Muslims, would be divided into 73 sects, one more than the Jews. Said the Holy Prophet (SAW) all of these Muslims would be hell bound except one. When asked who are these people belonging to the one sect who would be saved from Jahala. He replied: Those who would follow in his footsteps and the pattern set out by his Companions and in another Hadith, he said “Al Jamaat".
The interesting part of this whole issue, is that the Ulama of Pakistan declared that 72 sects would go to heaven and ONE SHOULD BE CAST OUT OF ISLAM = IF THEY HAD THEIR WAY THEY WOULD SEND ALL AHMADIS TO HELL!!!
These "Juhala" as you so kindly refer to them, have reversed the edict of the Holy Prophet and are rejoicing that they have been able to achieve an “IJMAA" a consensus in this era. However their consensus have not stopped the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community from performing its duties to Humanity on the whole as the Community grows from strength to strength, day after day with its fully organised missionary activities worldwide, totally independent of any government or non government support. Likewise the Nusrat Jahaan Scheme is serving humanity in many parts of the world, especially in African countries in the field of Health / Medical and Educational services.
Humanity First, an NGO born out of the need to invite non Muslims alongside "Muslims" to serve in disaster relief is the brainchild of the late Khalifa of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, His Holiness: Hadrat Mirza tahir Ahmad (RA)
Even if a chapter on Ahmadiyyat is removed from the social studies texts in the UP, this is not going to stop or deter Ahmadi Muslims to nonstop continue their preaching and teaching Islam.
The community is now established in more than 190 countries worldwide and it is the institution of Khilafat which is the secret behind the growth of the community. Without the institution of Khilafat there is no Jama'at. The present Khalifa is , His Holiness : Hadrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad (ATBA)
This is the huge difference between Ahmadi Muslims, the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama'at and these " Juhala".
Who is and who isn't it, to be or not to be. We choose but He/It decides.Btw, my safe house for Mr. Sultan Shahin is still open.
I stated before, I follow the Orthodox Christian faith but many aspects of Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism in nations like Japan, are just based on different branches and all have divisions.
Only the Roman Catholic Church is truely universal and now you have nearly 1.2 billion Roman Catholics in the world.
Christianity went through a bloody period and inter-religious conflict was brutal; and now Islam is going through a brutal period and in time this will weaken Islam, just like it weakened Christianity in Western Europe.
Christianity is now growing rapidly in Africa and parts of East Asia; but the brutal internal divisions weakened the faith in the heartland of Europe.
Muslims will suffer the same fate and in time many people will reject Islam in Iran and Pakistan because they are fed up with internal massacres or political control by self-centred religious leaders.
Sadly all major faiths have had major internal divisions and unless a universal Muslim centre can be found, then the same fate awaits Islam.
It appears that human nature is based on fearing "the brother and sister in faith" and what does this tell us about humanity?
My question to ulema,
If only mentioning a sect which has been expelled from Islam can mislead the young generation, what about the mention of Arya Samaj, Buddhism, Jainism,Christianity etc which are also mentioned in social science books in India? Will you ask for the exclusion of those religious orders because they mght mislead the young generation? And if they are trying to mislead them, what are you made for? Only to issue fatwas on cycle and burqa and making statements on Babri mosque and Muslim personal law?
Ahmadiyyas are a sect and they were expelled from Islam. So it makes bigger news and more apt reason to mention in any book of social science. And Aligarh Movement, Deoband Movement were even taught to us in Urdu medium schools. What's wrong in it. Can the mullahs deny the fact that Muslims have various sects and faith groups? Are not they divided into sects? There are sects which give great importance to hadiths and there are others who do not. How then will the question of who is a Muslim and who is not be resolved?