FOLLOW US:

Spiritual Meditations (25 Jan 2012 NewAgeIslam.Com)
'The Biggest Damage Religion does is Brainwashing Children'

Richard Dawkins in an interview with Vineet Gill

Jan 25, 2012,

Richard Dawkins is amongst the most provocative thinkers of our times. The Oxford University geneticist has waged a blazing intellectual war on religion, calling for the rule of science and rationality. At the recent Jaipur Literature Festival, Dawkins spoke with Vineet Gill about why he prefers science over faith, whether he is an 'atheist fundamentalist', - and issues such as immortality:

What are your views on moderate religion today? You've earlier called this 'a seedbed for extremists'?

I have said that a¦ I fear it's true that if children are taught, however moderately, that faith is a virtue, that you don't need evidence to believe something, then that paves the way for a minority to be extremists. Everybody has been indoctrinated with this view that if it's their faith, you can't argue with them. I think that is pernicious. If children are taught they don't need to defend their beliefs with evidence, that paves the way for extremisma¦the biggest damage religion does is indoctrinating and brainwashing children.

You believe passionately instead in science - but what happens when science gets it wrong?

Science doesn't actually claim to know all the truth. It works hard by getting closer and closer to the truth, but of course science learns by its mistakes and advances by disproving hypotheses and getting things wrong. One of the virtues of science is that it is prepared to change its mind when the evidence warrants it. Public sharing is an important part of science. No scientist will ever say - 'Oh, it's true for me, it may not be true for you.'

Science gets space for research and development - why can't we look at religion too as a living laboratory with people developing their thoughts, rather than just dismissing it?

It would be very nice to study religion in anthropological and psychological ways. By the way, i do think children need to be educated about religion. They just shouldn't be told you belong only to this or that religion. They should be told, there is this religion and that religion. And when you grow up, you may - or may not - choose to join any of those.

If science were to triumph over time, would you like to become immortal with its help?

No. I think if there's something frightening about death, it is eternity. And it's equally frightening whether you're there or not. Actually, it's more frightening if you are there. Just imagine billions and billions and billions of years - terribly boring! I prefer to spend eternity under a general anaesthetic - and that is exactly what's going to happen.

Stepping out of science, how do you explain the powerful effect faith has on people?

It is fascinating. What is it about faith that can make somebody kill? Patriotism is another one - people believe my country is right or wrong. In the World Wars, people were perfectly able to shoot other people just because they belonged to the wrong country, without ever asking what their opinions were. Faith too is like that.

Rejecting belief outright, are you an atheist fundamentalist?

The term 'fundamentalist' means you stick to a holy book and never change your mind. I will change my mind whenever the evidence warrants it.

Finally, your thoughts on your friend and legendary fellow atheist, the late Christopher Hitchens?

Christopher Hitchens was a great warrior, a magnificent orator, a pugilist and a gentleman. He was kind, but he took no prisoners when arguing with idiots.

Source: The Times of India, New Delhi

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamSpiritualMeditations_1.aspx?ArticleID=6473

 


COMMENTS
  • I believe this piece of information does belong here for the sake of related information.  "Dawkins made it to my sociology class".  It does affect our thinking one way or other.
    http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/10096/dawkins-made-it-to-my-sociology-class/


    By Syed Rizvi - 2/10/2012 9:29:31 PM
  •  I just ran into this old piece again while browsing around the site and a thought occurred to me that I want to share; maybe some readers would like to comment on it.

    Am I correct in my observation that people with faith and a set of a belief system are easily disturbed  when reason and logic are brought into the equation?  But it is not the other way around.


    By Syed Rizvi - 2/10/2012 11:00:36 AM
  • Rashid Sb is right regarding the following Ayat    5-35, “……that if any one slew a person --unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land—it would be as if he slew the whole humanity and if one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of a whole humanity.
    In fact, there are many fine Ayas of that sort --- no question about it.
    The good part is that the book has everything for everyone where people can pick and choose depending upon their own upbringing, temperament and convictions.


    By Syed Rizvi - 1/28/2012 5:44:55 PM
  • Mr Rizvi, your point is valid looking at the state of affairs of the Muslim world and in particular what the young-passionate-‘religious’ man says in the link you provided. There are many such links in any one day around for the world at large to read and watch, more than enough to form a particular opinion of so called Muslims, based on them only.

     

    But in all mature fairness, if one quotes just one reference from the Book, will we be correct in concluding that it was quoted out of context? Here it is just in relevant part as an example:-

     

    5-35, “……that if any one slew a person --unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land—it would be as if he slew the whole humanity and if one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of a whole humanity …..yet even after that many of them continued to commit excesses in the land”. Verse 36 and 37 form a connecting chain for this argument, and there are others such as 8-39.

    The emphases of the italics are just to draw the readers' attention to the context of spreading mischief in the land, obviously a crime against humanity!

     

    This is only because I was specifically addressed.


    By Rashid - 1/28/2012 7:37:13 AM
  • Mr. Rashid says: if it is predicated on killing a person of another faith to prove its own correctness, obviously cannot be a faith in the meaning of myriads of faith -philosophies that have sprouted in Humanity over the ages.
    However, I am not sure he speaks for all faiths.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=670qHZBM5Is&feature=share
    I admire this man in the video because at least he is telling the truth what the scripture actually says in black and white.
    Although it is very easy to say he is taking it "out of context." . If that happens to be the case, then we need to compile an extensive list and spell it out which of the Ayas if quoted at their face value are to be considered as "out of context" and which ones we can use as they are without having to worry about them being taken out of context.
    However, that would be a huge task and will require a major review and scrutinizing of the book. And I am not sure our Mullahs and their followers will buy that.
    Labeling embarrassing lines as "out of context" is a good cop-out but I am not sure how far we can stretch that.


    By Syed Rizvi - 1/28/2012 3:19:13 AM

Compose Your Comments here:

Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the below text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.