Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi, New Age Islam
02 January 2017
As the New Year 2017 arrives, one of the
most sought-after questions is: will the Islamic State—the chief jihadist cult
in the current history— end in the near future?
The self-imposed caliphate of Abu Bakr
Baghdadi has reportedly been cleared from its two major strongholds—Mosul and Raqqah.
Syria is believed to have defeated the ISIS monsters after a bloody civil war.
But one wonders how could it be considered an end to the ISIS sympathizers and
scores of other violent jihadist cults over the world?
Even Barak Obama had to acknowledge that
merely destroying the ISIS strongholds may not reduce the danger in the near
future. While the ISIS fighters have been physically fought in Syria on a large
scale, their ideological supporters and sympathizers are playing havoc across
much of the world today.
2016 ended with the jihadists striking
various peaceful parts of the world. Their attacks in Ankara, Zürich and Berlin
were the most recent. In Ankara, Mevlüt Mert Altıntaş, a radical Islamist
off-duty policeman assassinated Andrei Karlov, the Russian ambassador as he
approached the podium to make a few words. In Zürich, a burst into a downtown
Muslim gunman prayer center popular with Somali migrants and opened fire,
shooting three worshippers. In Berlin, the pre-Christmas festivities were shattered
by a semi-truck plowing into crowds gathered at the Christmas market in the
heart of downtown. In most cases, the terrorists belonged to a normal
background, but were later transformed into the jihadists or ISIS sympathisers.
Researchers and analysts have identified various reasons and stimulus that
catapult Muslims from being sane citizens to the mindless perpetrators of
violence. But not many tend to go through the Islamic history to explore the
deeper ideological underpinnings of the violent jihadism. The fact is that from
Ankara to Zürich to Berlin, there is a significant role of ideological stimulus
behind the nefarious spade of violent extremism.
A historical reading evidences that an
intolerant jihadist narrative underpinned by the political Islamist ideologues
has been at play in every age, not only today. The Kharijite movement—the first
bloodthirsty incarnation of jihadsim— appeared in the early era of Islam in
what is known today as Saudi Arabia. There is an endless list of the Prophet’s
companions who were killed at the hands of the Kharijites who propounded the
takfirist ideology. The Umayyad dynasty, the then Arabian government, sponsored
the Kharijites. This was exactly what we call today as “state-sponsored
terrorism”. But later, the Umayyads themselves destroyed the terror faction as
it turned into a rebellious movement challenging the government. Much in the
same way, the Saudi kingdom is fighting today the terror monsters of the ISIS
who drive their ideological inspiration from Wahhabism, the state religion of
the Saudi Arabia. Alastair Crooke, the author of “Resistance: The Essence of
Islamic Revolution”, has candidly covered it in his article titled, “You can’t
understand ISIS if you don’t know the history of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia”. (Source:
After the Kharijites, the movement of Ali
bin Muhammad emerged from the same deserts of Arabia—Najd. The militants of his
movement, allied with the slaves of Zanj, indulged in wanton killing, looting
and vandalism. This movement is known in the Islamic history as “Zanj
Rebellion”. Between 255 to 270 Hijri, they killed hundreds of thousands of
people and destructed the city of Ublah and Basra in Iraq. Having slaughtered all
men in these cities, they took their women as ‘sex slaves’. Many women of the
elite classes were sold out and distributed among the men of the Zanj for 2
dirhams each. Noted Islamic historians like Tabari and Mas’udi have detailed in
their books the grave devastation caused by the Zanj movement in the Arabia.
After the Kharijites and Zanj, the
Qaramatian movement originated in the Arabian Peninsula. The followers of this
movement started razing down the historical heritage and went to the extent of
attacking the Ka’ba—the holiest Islamic site in Mecca. They destroyed several
cities in Syria and Iraq, particularly Hama, Maratun Noman, Baalbek and
Salmiya. Almost all inhabitants were brutally annihilated in these cities.
According to Tabari, the Qaramatians resorted to the gruesome terror tools
which were not introduced earlier. One of the Qaramatian leaders owned a slave
who would slaughter only ‘deviant’ Muslims. The present Saudi Arabian regions
of Qatif and Ahsa were the Qaramatian strongholds. Majority of the Najdi tribes
in Arabia were followers and supporters of the Qaramatian movement. The terror
culture of burning cities and razing historical sites was initiated by the
Qaramatians. They were mentors of the Mughals and the Tatars in this violent
strategy. According to many authoritative historians, Qaramatians were among
the first to use suicide bombers as war tactic. Al-Nuwayri, noted Arabic
scholar writes in his book, Nihayatul Arab (the ultimate ambition of the Arabs)
that the Qaramatians were first to lure and train the youth for suicide
attacks. Today, suicide bombing is the most common tactic of the ISIS, Boko
Haram, Taliban and all other jihadist outfits.
In 18th century, the world's biggest
radical jihadist movement sprang out of the Najdi tribe settled in the central
region of Saudi Arabia. Ibn Abdul Wahhab
formed the bedrock of this global jihadist movement which later came to be
known as “Wahhabism”. With its deep roots in the Kharijite ideology, Wahhabism
was influenced by the extremist fatwas of Shaikh Ibn Taymiyyah (1263-1328). Ibn
Abdul Wahhab, with the support of the Saudi Arabian ruler, Muhammad bin Saud,
established the Wahhabi ideology as the state religion of the kingdom. This
turned out to be the most extremist religious movement in the Islamic history.
All Muslims who did not adhere to it were declared kuffar (disbelievers).
Takfiri wars were waged against them. Other tribes of the Arabian Peninsula
were fought as pagans and idolaters. Their lands were looted and women and
properties were distributed as "maal e ghaneemat" (war booty), as the
Arab historian Usman bin Bashar Najdi recounts in his book on the history of
Wahabi movement “unwan al-majd fi tareekh al-najd”.
From 1745 to 1818, the Wahhabi movement
waged the global jihad going berserk more than even the Kharijites in their
atrocities, as the 18th century Arab scholar Shaykh Zaini Dahlan Makki, writes
in his Arabic book “Al-Balad Al-Haram” (the sacred city). The aggression of the
Wahhabi jihadists spread rapidly throughout the Muslim world, causing great
distress among the common people. Given this, the governor of Egypt, Muhammad
Ali Pasha sent his army to Saudi Arabia on the behest of the Ottoman Caliphate.
After a long battle, the Egyptian forces defeated the Najdis and completely
destroyed the capital of the first Saudi dynasty, Diriyah where the Wahhabi
movement spearheaded. Thus, the Wahhabi jihadsim was militarily defeated to an
extent, but it remained active on an ideological level to this day and age.
This glimpse from history clearly shows
that the war on jihadism cannot be fought in a battlefield. It requires an
entirely ideological onslaught. Just as the Wahhabism is flourishing today over
the world despite its physical defeat several times, the ISIS will continue to lure
many in the global Muslim societies, no matter it is cleared from Iraq and
Syria. In order to defeat the ISIS, extremist religious thoughts need to be
rebutted and hardcore philosophies have to be defeated. But this is too
gigantic a task to achieve. It was neither done by the governor of Egypt nor by
the Ottoman Empire. Therefore, soon after the return of the Egyptian forces
which existed from 1821 to 1889, the second Saudi-Wahhabi nation state emerged
with an ideology that resulted in the rise of many global jihadist movements
including the ISIS.
It is interesting to note that the Turkish
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan now claims to have “confirmed evidence” to prove
that the US-led coalition supports ISIS and other terrorist groups in Syria.
However, the U.S. has rebuffed Erdogan’s allegation stating that it did not
create or support ISIS. “Assertions the US government is supporting Daesh are
not true," the US Embassy in Ankara wrote, using the Arabic-language
acronym for ISIS. (Source: tr.usembassy.gov/statement-12282016/)
Whether Daesh or ISIS was created and
supported by the US or Saudi Arabia is not difficult to see. While both the
U.S. and Saudi governments have always castigated the Daesh as a terror outfit,
researchers find that ISIS is running on the American weaponry and
Saudi-Wahhabi ideology. Does the Turkish Islamist President have courage of
conviction to expose the complete truth? Regrettably, all political Islamists
like Erdogan propagate the half truth. But what they try to hide from the world
is now an open secret. Karen Armstrong, author of the seminar work “Religion
and the History of Violence” clearly points it out: “It [ISIS] is neither
typical nor mired in the distant past, because its roots are in Wahhabism, a
form of Islam practised in Saudi Arabia that developed only in the 18th
Therefore, Armstrong aptly suggests that
only Saudi Arabia which has already thwarted IS attempts to launch a series of
attacks in the kingdom, may be the regional power capable of crushing the ISIS.
New Age Islam columnist, Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi is a scholar of Comparative
Religion, Classical Arabic and Islamic sciences, cultural analyst and
researcher in Media and Communication Studies.
Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic
Muslim News, Arab
World News, South
Asia News, Indian
Muslim News, World
Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic
In Arab, Islamophobia
in America, Muslim
Women in West, Islam
Women and Feminism
and Mr. Ashok Sharma Sahiban: Both of you believe that "Jihadists
will be defeated only when the Muslim majority countries are secularized."
The western powers have already used their
full might of bombarding for years to establish secularism and democracy in the
countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, and Palestine etc by destroying every bit of human civilization there. What
is left now to destroy there in the name of jihad? According to your theory, there
is secularism, democracy, peace and tranquility everywhere in the ruined
are of Canadian-French origin who are firing in the mosques, the birthplace of
jihadists have changed now, they are being originated in their own motherland.
How will they tackle their own jihadi people?