certifired_img

Books and Documents

Muslims and Islamophobia (10 Feb 2012 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Confronting Islamophobia in America: Need for a Major Paradigm shift in Mosque Proceedings

Need for a Major Paradigm shift in Mosque proceedings/ sub-culture in America to forestall any potentially catastrophic fallout of Islamophobia, and for Americanization of the minority Muslim community.

– A 12 point agenda for serious consideration by the board of all mosques and Islamic centers and the whole spectrum of Muslim community leaders in America.

By Muhammad Yunus, NewAgeIslam.com

(Co-author (Jointly with Ashfaque Ullah Syed), Essential Message of Islam, Amana Publications, USA, 2009.)

The most naïve thing on earth will be to assume that there is no counterpart of Breivik or bin Laden among the 3-4 billion combined Christian and Muslim population of the world, leave alone the violent extremists of other faith communities, and mercenary terrorists – a breed that might be in existence underground or in the offing– no one knows. Since any single person (such as Fort Hood shooting by Nidal Hasan) - or barely a handful of them, not necessarily of Islamic faith (Oslo terrorist Anders Breivik is not a Muslim) can commit an ingenious but monstrous act of terror, the chance of another major terrorist attack ever in future on US soil cannot be ruled out. Therefore, the American Muslims have to put their act together to avert a potentially deadly backlash, given the ominous cloud of Islamophobia hovering overhead. Since American Muslim communities are surrounded by many ‘potential’ enemies (the Islamophobes among the neighborhood) they must groom and project themselves as an exclusive ‘American Muslim’ community that has nothing to do with the terror attack - whoever might be its alleged perpetrator, before it is too late. Here are some tips that can save them from a potentially aggressive backlash and at the same time, assist their Americanization.

1.  The mosque and community discourses not to differentiate Allah with God. The word ‘God’ appears at the back of each American dollar note, is taken regularly by American leaders, and is without any trace of doubt, the verbal symbol for the Almighty Creator that in Arabic is called Allah. Until the rise of symbolism in the wake of the Dome of Rock fire (1969) and the Yom Kippur war (1973), many English translations of the Qur’an by Islamic scholars had the word God for Allah. But later editions of those works have used the Arabic word only implying that God had to be identified by a proper Arabic noun – a notion the Qur’an dispels by asserting that Allah is no different from God who is remembered in all places of worship - churches, synagogues, monasteries and mosques (22:40). Any insistence to calling God in the Arabic tongue reinforces the Islamic stereotype as a Cult of Muhammad with an Arabic deity and feeds the growing anti-Islamic propaganda and Islamophobia.

2. To visibly communicate Islam’s recognition of the Christians and Jews as fellow believers to the mainstream Christian community, such Qur’anic verses (illustrated below) that project them as religious co-equals with the Muslims should be inscribed in bold or gold on mosque façades in large letters:

“Say, ‘We believe in God, and in what was revealed to us, and in what was revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes; and in what was given to Moses and Jesus, and all the prophets from their Lord. We do not make a distinction between any of them. To God alone do we submit” (2:136).

“Those who believe, and those who are Jews, and Christians and Sabians - and (in fact) any who believe in God and the Last Day, and do good deeds - shall have their reward with their Lord. There will be no fear upon them, nor shall they grieve” (2:62).

“Those who believe, and those who are Jews, and Sabians and Christians - (in fact) any who believe in God and the Last Day, and do good deeds - there will be no fear upon them, nor shall they grieve” (5:69).

3. Muslim youngsters to be groomed to excel in moral conduct and behavior so as to uphold the heritage of their Prophet (33:21) as exemplified in the Qur’an, and to cultivate an urge for excellence in all their lawful pursuits for gaining a goodwill that excellence invariably brings.  

4. As the Qur’anic message puts no bar against participation in cultural activities the Muslims in the Western world must encourage youngsters to participate in games, sports, athletics, swimming, song, dance and music – keeping within bounds of modesty and morality, to help inter-faith interaction as commanded by the Qur’an (49:13) and prevent cultural isolation.

5. Muslim women in America/the Western world may actively consider giving up the head-ear-chin wraparounds they wear on the following grounds:

Its distinctiveness gives a false signal of an exaggerated presence of the Muslims that may be threatening to some.

Its association with medieval papal attire creates a social barrier in that a non-Muslim woman (or even a Muslim woman) going about casually with her head and ear exposed may feel alienated from a woman wearing a uniform type headdress that is reminiscent of de-feminized medieval nuns.   

It gives a false notion of regimentation as Muslim women from different cultures are as unconnected with each other as their non-Muslim counterparts from different cultures, but wearing a uniform type head-ear wraparound, they collectively look like a team or troop (as a prelude to a cultural invasion).

It can be physically inconvenient to some working women as well as to those participating in outdoor games, sports, swimming and athletics by blocking natural ventilation around their heads and ears.  

It has lost its original role of providing security in an exclusively male occupied public arena. Today, a Muslim woman in any backstreet of America or Europe is probably far safer without the head-ear-chin wrap around than with it.

Face veiling is already banned in many places including the premise of al-Azhar University, public places in France; besides, it conflicts with a clear Qur’anic directive to women to keep the face visible for personal identity (33:59), and there is no Qur’anic instruction to cover the head, ear or chin.

The truth is, the head-gear covering the ear and chin entered Islam from Christianity some “three to four generations after the Prophet’s death when the Muslims were copying the Greek Christians of Byzantium.” [1]. As this antiquated Christian custom is distorting the image of Islam and giving a false picture of gender bias/ oppression, Muslim women will do better by retracting from this purely symbolic custom in their new Western abode.

6. Muslims must translate their devotion to the great Prophets Jesus Christ and Moses by celebrating the Christmas/ Yom Kippur for example, in all Islamic centers and mosques in a befitting manner, inviting sympathetic priests and rabbis - and there must be plenty of them - to grace the occasions.  

7. Some thoughts regarding the role and architecture of the mosque:

The earliest mosques in different parts of the world where Islam went were modeled after the local monasteries, temples and churches. Example: Masjid Agung, Demark, Java built in 1466 and Niujie mosque built in China 996 look like monasteries. Cheraman Juma Masjid, Kerala, India built in the Prophet’s lifetime has the façade of a Hindu Temple. The Great Mosque of Kairouan, Tunisia, built in 863 and Mosque of Cordoba built over 784-987 reflect strong influence of Berber, Roman and Gothic architecture. Therefore mosques in the Western countries should have the facade of the local churches rather than those of the classical Islamic civilization.

Islamic centers will do better to building architecturally compatible functional buildings for prayer and enhance its religious role by employing it, in addition to prayer, for community service (such as free health clinic, food bank, free IT training etc. in present day context) as required by their faith and practiced in early Islam - some are already engaged in, albeit in a limited scale. A model architectural design for 21st century utility mosque is illustrated in this link:      

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noor_Cultural_Centre

8. The gender segregation in mosques in the Western world, where there is no gender segregation in public place is meaningless, and undermines Islam’s image as a universal gender-neutral faith. In the same spirit, Muslim women, whom the Qur’an projects as co-guardians of men (9:71) should not be barred from leading a congregation prayer as traditionally imposed.

9. A professional mosque imam, if engaged, should have the following credentials to effectively play his community and inter-faith role as a witness to humanity (2:143, 22:78) and to defend the faith and the Prophet in the media.

Adequate universal education, IT skill and command in English written communication.

Well read on the clear ahkamat (commandments) of the Qur’an that he may convey to the community as part of Friday pre-prayer address (khutba) or through any Qur’anic learning program for the youngsters. (Traditional khutba in Arabic is against a historical context that is more than a millennium ante-dated and is profoundly anachronistic in 21st century America/West.)  

Well read on the noble personal qualities of the Prophet, drawn on the historically authentic references of the Qur’an to be able to inspire the community with his noble qualities, and defend him against the barrage of diatribes and abusive and demonizing remarks, his opponents frame by drawing on his classical biographic accounts. 

Have a basic idea of American history and law and national leaders.

Clearly understand the dichotomy between Islamic theological disciplines (Classical Islamic Sharia, Hadith and the Sira of the Prophet), and the Qur’an – the former historically derived, informed, shaped, and contextualized and therefore profoundly anachronistic for the 21st century Western world/ America [2] and the latter universal with no space, time boundaries and applicable for all times and historical contexts.

Preferably skilled in some art forms like song, dance and music that the Prophet himself watched (with his wives) on festival occasions [3], is very popular in the West/world today and therefore serves as an ideal avenue for interfaith interaction as enjoined by the Qur’an (49:13), mentioned under 4 above. 

10. Muslim leaders, spokesmen, ulama and imams must be respectful to all faiths and faith-communities, quote only what is the best in the Qur’an as it enjoins (39:18, 39:55), must not make any statement that purports to undermine other faiths, promote hatred, feed religious bigotry radicalization, gender and racial discrimination, cultural alienation and other vices with which Islam and Muslims are brush-stroked today.    

11.  The Muslims must stop debating whose religion is the most perfect and instead preach the fellow Muslims to excel in goodness and lawful pursuits and to cultivate other universal virtues (justice, forgiveness, tolerance, good neighborly relations etc.) as their faith (the Qur’an) enjoins.

12. The Muslims must shun any proselytizing as today it is far more important for the Muslims to gain the respect and admiration of the people of other faiths that in its early centuries brought converts, rather than soliciting others who despise and trivialize them to join their faith. Besides, with their singular emphasis on prayer, rituals and symbolism, a potential convert is not likely to acquire the noble virtues of the Qur’an from his association with the Muslim community as his early counterpart did. Today, it is immensely more important for a Muslim to epitomize the noble paradigms of the Qur’an, following the Prophet’s example (2:143), rather than bring into Islam the Christians or adherents of other faiths – who may be better than them in conduct and behavior and God’s sight; and the community leaders should tailor their speeches and thinking accordingly to win friends from among potential foes.

Notes:

Karen Armstrong, Islam,  Islam, A short history, New York 2002, p. 16.

2. See the following articles for details:

i)  The evolution of the Hadith sciences and the Prophet’s Sunna and the need for a Major Paradigm Shift regarding the role of the Hadith Corpus and the scope of Madrassa education.

http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicShariaLaws_1.aspx?ArticleID=6581

ii Acceptance of The Satanic Verses Episode of The Classical Sira is Shirk and Kufr.

www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicIdeology_1.aspx?ArticleID=6444

iii)  The Classical Islamic Law (Islamic Sharia Law) is NOT a Word of God!

http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicShariaLaws_1.aspx?ArticleID=5714

http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicShariaLaws_1.aspx?ArticleID=5723

3. Afzalur Rahman, Role of Women in Society, London 1986, p. 374-381.

Muhammad Yunus, a Chemical Engineering graduate from Indian Institute of Technology, and a retired corporate executive has been engaged in an in-depth study of the Qur’an since early 90’s, focusing on its core message. He has co-authored the referred exegetic work, which received the approval of al-Azhar al-Sharif, Cairo in 2002, and following restructuring and refinement was endorsed and authenticated by Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl of UCLA, and published by Amana Publications, Maryland, USA, 2009.

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamMuslimsAndIslamophobia_1.aspx?ArticleID=6602

 




TOTAL COMMENTS:-   9


  • Excellent! Each and every point is very good. Shahzan, if you don't agree with his views on Hijab then don't just say it, give your reasons and then only can we have a healthy discussion.


    By Aiman Reyaz - 7/17/2012 11:43:44 PM



  • Good article.

    Just modify point 2, and the whole thing can apply even to improve the situation in India. Say that though Hindus are not people of the book, and though they do worship idols, the underlying message of Hinduism is one of universal brotherhood, and the oneness of God. Vasudeva Kutumbakam. So stop denigration our idols - the Shivlinga seems to be a special object of derision among muslims - and accept that there are different ways to God, and each is as legitimate as the other, so long as one doesn't harm the other - temple destruction, religious conversion during inter-community marriage, religious conversion and persecution of non-muslims during civil conflict, etc  for example. 

    If all these 12 suggestions are followed, I think inter-faith harmony can be achieved. 

    My reading of the situation is as follows:

    Muslims, misguided by their religious leaders, dislike other religions and cultures because they do not pray, eat, think, dress, or follow the same moral code as they do. They also go about proclaiming the superiority of their religion, when in fact a rational person who does an unbiased study of Islam sees it as having strengths and shortcomings in equal measure. As indeed, do all religions of the world. 

    In reaction to this attitude, non-muslims who observe this unfriendliness in thought and action dislike Muslims because Muslims dislike them. So though there is dislike on both sides, the causes of the dislike are different. It is clear, then, that  the road to harmony must ideally begin by removing the cause of disharmony. 

    By secular logic - 7/12/2012 1:17:36 AM



  • @Shahzan.1. The article does not make any reference to ‘hijab’. You can readily verify by a Google search. It only warns the American/ Western Muslim women against the medieval papal head-gear that covers head, ear and chin as a wrap-around. I am raised in India (born in mid 40’s) in a highly conservative Muslim family. I never saw any grown up girl/ woman wearing such wrap around. I never saw this in Pakistan in 50’s and 60’s. In those days, grown up girls wore ‘dupatta’ that they put over head, shoulder and chest in a casual non-regimented and graceful way. Many did wear ‘burqa’ as a traditional outfit as they lived in a male occupied space, but since burqa clad woman was a common sight, it posed no security risk – rather it enhanced the personal security. hijab is more of a moral barrier that does not warrant wearing a Medieval Christian nun style head-ear-chin wrap around.

    2. There can be no more authentic book – in terms of historical integrity, than the Qur’an that captures the plight of the Prophet in Mecca and Medina. The following Qur’anic allusions meticulously though summarily records i) how the Prophet and the revelation were rejected, derided and the Muslims persecuted in Mecca and ii) what agony Prophet must have faced in Medina from the constant threat of attack from the Meccans/pagan Arabs:

    i) The Meccan enemies of the Prophet called him impostor, a madman (30:58, 44:14, 68:51), and an insane poet (37:36) and ridiculed the Qur’anic revelation (18:56, 26:6, 37:14, 45:9), which they declared to be strange and unbelievable (38:5, 50:2), a jumble of dreams(21:5) and legends of the ancients (6:25, 23:83, 25:5, 27:68, 46:17, 68:15, 83:13). They accused him of forging lies and witchcraft (34:43, 38:4), forging lies against God, forgery and making up tales (11:13, 32:3, 38:7, 46:8), witchcraft (21:3, 43:30, 74:24), obvious witchcraft that was bewildering (10:2, 37:15, 46:7), and of being bewitched or possessed by a Jinn (17:47, 23:70, 34:8). The also hoped for a misfortune to befall Muhammad any time (52:30), while they captured and persecuted those converts who were weak and helpless (8:20, 85:10.

    ii) They (the Meccans and their allies) came on them, waves upon waves. (As the Muslims watched them from distance,) their eyes dimmed and their hearts rose up to their throats and they imagined (weird) thoughts about God. This was a moment of trial for the believers as they were shaken by a most violent shock. (On the other hand) the hypocrites and those with sickness in their hearts said what God and the Prophet of God had promised was mere illusion. A party of them said to others to go back as it was no (safe) place for them, and a party of them sought the Prophet’s permission saying that their homes were exposed, though they were not exposed and they only wanted to flee. But had the enemy entered (the city) from the sides and asked them to dissent and join a civil war, they would have readily done so, despite their oaths of allegiance. (33:10-15). This relates to a major invasion the Meccans/pagans launched against Medina.

    3. The Qur’an is a book of wisdom (hikmah, 10:1, 31:2, 43:4, 44:4) that is made clear and distinct (12:1, 15:1, 16:64, 26:2, 27:1, 36:69, 43:2, 44:2) with all kinds of illustrations (17:89, 18:54, 30:58, 39:27) and has guidance for the believers in God (7:52, 16:64, 27:77. 31:3), the heedful (muttaqi) (2:2, 3:138, 24:34), and for humanity at large (2:185, 10:108, 14:52). It lays a great emphasis on the ‘constants’ of life – how a human being should behave regardless of time and era. Thus, it encompasses a broad spectrum of universal paradigms - justice, liberty, equity, good deeds, good neighborly and inter-faith relations, sharing of wealth with the poor, eradication of slavery, deliverance of women from various entrenched taboos, conjugal oppression and dehumanization; good business ethics, fair payment for goods and services, financial support to the needy, use of intellect, striving for excellence – to cite some major examples. These tenets are as relevant today as they were at the Prophet’s time. These tenets constitute the message of God that the Prophet delivered to humanity. Therefore just saying “Muslims should follow the life Of Prophet Muhammad(saws) how he lived under harsh environment of Mecca and how kindly he(saws) treated the non Muslim after gaining power” greatly reduces the scope of the all-embracing, eternal and universal Qur’anic message.


    By Mohammed Yunus - 2/14/2012 10:50:51 PM



  • Satwa says, "From the cleric community how many takers are there for the good suggestion of Yunus?" All the more reason why progressive voices should continue reiterating the good word even if there is no possibility of seeing changes in one''s life time. It is better to have good ideas out in the open than locked up in one''s head.
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 2/12/2012 1:46:28 PM



  • I dont agree with autohrs bview on Hijab.
    By shahzan - 2/11/2012 11:58:13 PM



  • Muslims should follow the life Of Prophet Muhammad(saws) how he live under harsh environment of Mecca and how kindly he(saws) treated the non Muslim after gaining power.
    By shahzan - 2/11/2012 11:57:28 PM



  • From the cleric community how many takers are there for the good suggestion of yunus is the billion dollar question ???  As rightly pointed out, any type of fundamentalism must not be encouraged as one will feed on the other.  
    By satwa gunam - 2/11/2012 9:12:31 AM



  • Janab Younus Sb. is Masha Allah always correct and perfect in his ideas and expressions which are very authentic and useful for the Muslims. His suggestions and recommendations are very wise and sensible. Of course , we should try to emulate the instruction given by our Islamic scholars. The mosques must be utilised for the reformation activities in a noble and acceptable way; otherwise the communal parties will accuse of destructive activities being done in the mosques. So It is better to have a segregated place for the reformation session, talk, debate and compromise among the Mslims.


    By Raihan Nezami - 2/11/2012 1:18:57 AM



  • Mr. Yunus makes excellent points. He says Muslim youngsters should be groomed to excel in moral conduct and behavior. This should be a major part of mosque khutbas as well as madrasa lessons. Undue emphasis on the "Five Pillars of Islam" or on battles fought 1,000 years ago is sterile. Imams should be spending a lot more of their time talking about why killing is a horrible sin, why suicide bombing should lead straight to hell and why we should consider ourselves to be a part of the human family, not just the Islamic family or the Sufi family or the Wahabi family. 
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 2/11/2012 12:05:38 AM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content