certifired_img

Books and Documents

Islamic Society (18 May 2019 NewAgeIslam.Com)



Pakistan’s Blasphemy Law Typically Targets the Minorities



By Khaled Ahmed

May 18, 2019

The big news on May 8 was that Asia Bibi, acquitted two years ago by the Supreme Court of blasphemy, was finally allowed to leave for Canada to join her already exiled family. She had rotted in jail for eight years as the judges refused to challenge the injustice of Pakistan’s infamous Blasphemy Law. What the sessions court had ruled could not be set aside by the High Court either. Even at the Supreme Court, it took a lot of guts to let the innocent woman walk.

A Christian, Asia Bibi was convicted of blasphemy in 2010 under dubious circumstances. She was treated as an untouchable by society, and called unclean because of her religion whereupon a quarrel ensued. She was then accused of insulting the Holy Prophet, triggering prompt police action who put her in jail. A cleric “Maulvi” said she had, indeed, blasphemed.

This “black law”, Pakistan Penal Code’s (PPC) Section 295-C, inserted into the Penal Code by an Act in 1986, has made hundreds rot in jail. It seeks to punish with death individuals who insult the Holy Prophet in “word gesture or innuendo” — it typically targets the minorities in Pakistan.

The Ahmadis, declared a non-Muslim minority in 1974, collectively insult the Prophet by allegedly violating the doctrine that he was the last prophet. All Christians, by reason of their belief in the Old Testament, attract death penalty because the Old Testament, which the Muslims believe is fake, contains insulting references to the prophets mentioned in the Quran. All the Shia community, who disagree on the status of the Companions of the Prophet, by innuendo, insult the Holy Prophet, and therefore may be collectively liable to be punished under the law.

Since “insult” happens by innuendo, desecration of the Holy Quran can also be converted to “insult” if the judge so decides. Hundreds of cases where the Christian community has been assaulted by mobs relate to the dispossession of land, removal from job, plunder and rape. Most cases have been reported in the press with a slant that goes against the minority community. The police have, more often than not, joined hands with the mobs to persecute the Christians, and the judges have passed unfair judgements under pressure from groups pursuing vengeance through the Law.

When the accused have been awarded bail, they have been either attacked and wounded or killed, thus establishing the trend of not awarding bail to the accused. The biggest flaw in the law, apart from conviction on the basis of innuendo, is its FIR, used by the semi-literate police officer to arrest individuals whom he is unable to protect from the mob. Or, he leverages it to let off individuals on the payment of a heavy bribe.

Why is Pakistan doing it? The latest wisdom is that the majority community wishes to retain or enhance its identity through what social scientist Francis Fukuyama calls “isothymia” or the collective urge to be recognised as “equal”. He explains the injustice arising out of this urge: “Contemporary identity politics is driven by the quest for equal recognition by groups that have been marginalised by their societies. But that desire for equal recognition can easily slide over into a demand or recognition of the group’s superiority. This is a large part of the story of nationalism and national identity, as well as certain forms of extremist religious politics today.”

India follows in the footsteps of Pakistan in setting aside what its founding fathers had sought to avoid while writing its constitution. The violence unleashed against the minorities by mobs in the streets while no existing law supports or allows it, is the new “identity” trend. Fukuyama says: “National identities can be built around liberal and democratic political values, and the common experiences that provide the connective tissue around which diverse communities can thrive. India, France, and the United States are examples of countries that have tried to do this. Such an inclusive sense of national identity remains critical for the maintenance of a successful modern political order for a number of reasons.”

Most Indians who react negatively to my opinion in The Indian Express, express nothing but contempt for Pakistan. But it is shocking how most Indian critics of Pakistan forget the imitative groove into which India itself has fallen despite the fact that India has no comparable Blasphemy Law dishing out death as the minimum punishment.

Pakistan is trapped. Its top judiciary, when not manned by Islamists, lets the victims walk after an average period of six to eight years in jail. But a victim can get presented before a court manned by “pious” judges, in which case, he is sure to go to his death.

Source: indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/pakistan-blasphemy-law-asia-bibi-christians-shia-muslims-prophet-mohammed-5734298/?pfrom=HP

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/islamic-society/khaled-ahmed/pakistan’s-blasphemy-law-typically-targets-the-minorities/d/118633





TOTAL COMMENTS:-   3


  • That is a silly rant against Fukuyama's nod to an  inclusive sense of national identity. Muslim ghettoes in European cities are multi-causal but their existence has nothing to do with what is discussed in this article.


    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 5/19/2019 11:56:48 PM



  • “National identities can be built around liberal and democratic political values, and the common experiences that provide the connective tissue around which diverse communities can thrive. India, France, and the United States are examples of countries that have tried to do this. Such an inclusive sense of national identity remains critical for the maintenance of a successful modern political order for a number of reasons.”

    forget about india which is a barely concealed theocracy. what with supreme court judges, high ranking officials and political goons, presidents and prime ministers all making a bee line to the nearest degenerate swamy at his ashram to lick his feet or whatever.

    on the othe other hand liberal democracies with these fukuyama values are the easiest target for islamists of all hues. moderates who infiltrate it, extremists who will occupy entire streets in aggressive war like prayer, forcing halaal certification on the country, refusing to follow surgical protocols, refusing to show faces at banks and other vulnerable buildings, grooming local girls because they are uncovered meat, calling the other faithfuls to not follow local laws if they are against shariah and so on and so forth.

    eventually most of the muslims in these liberal democracies wall themselves inside islamic ghettoes or no-go zones and make little pakistans wherever they go. and inside these ghettoes shariah rules.

    just look at parts of stockholm, marseilles, london or other metropolises of europe.

    By hats off! - 5/19/2019 6:11:59 PM



  • Why to blame pakistan ? If you plant a mango seed you get a mango tree and then mangoes not an apple tree and apples. Pakistan is an Islamic state and its laws are based on Islam . Islam is intolerant to other religions and it advocates barbaric and cruel ways of deeling with other religions. So blaming pakistan for its intolerance and sparing Islam is ignoring facts.
    By Madhuraj Patinhare Covilakam - 5/19/2019 6:49:54 AM



Compose Your Comments here:
Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.

Content