FOLLOW US:

Books and Documents
Islamic Sharia Laws (27 Feb 2012 NewAgeIslam.Com)
Sharia For India?

By Aiman Reyaz, New Age Islam

Sharia For India: sounds intriguing? Read on. Many in India may not know who Sheikh Anjem Choudhary is.  He is the founder of the radical Islamist group ‘Islam4UK’. His main aim is “to convince about the supremacy of Islam thereby changing public opinion in favour of Islam in order to transfer the authority and power [...] to the Muslims in order to implement the Sharee’ah”. He was behind what earned notoriety as some areas in London being designated as “Shariah Controlled Zones”. His group was proscribed for his extreme views. Now he is bringing the same ideology into India with ‘sharia4hind’.

He along with Omar Bakri Muhammad, former spokesman of Osama bin Laden in Europe, is asking “the Muslims to rise for Islam”. Omar Bakri is an Islamist militant leader who was instrumental in developing Hizb-ut-Tahrir into a major organization in the United Kingdom. Later he headed another radical Islamist organisation, Al Muhajiroun. The goal of this group, before it was officially banned, was to establish public awareness about Islam, to prove its “supremacy”, to influence people in favour of Sharia, to unite Muslims on a global scale and to re-establish the Caliphate. It was under the influence of these groups that Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) used to organise Khilafat (Caliphate) conferences in India to promote the idea of a world-wide caliphate of Muslims before it was itself banned in 2001.

Omar Bakri founded Al Muhajiroun in Mecca on 3 March 1983, long before the world witnessed the catastrophe of 9/11. The Saudi government banned the group in 1986. This forced Bakri to arrive in Britain, where he worked as part of Hizb ut Tahrir. In 1996 he was dismissed by the group’s global leadership. In March 2001, Britain Union of Students banned the group after they received complaints from Muslim and non-Muslim students about the group distributing hate literature and the organization training members in militant camps.

Abu Ibrahim, an Al Muhajiroun leader said:

"When they speak about September 11th, when the two planes magnificently run through those buildings, OK and people turn around and say, 'hang on a second that is barbaric. Why did you have to do that?' You know why? Because of ignorance. ... For us it's retaliation. Islam is not the starter of wars. If you start the war we won't turn the other cheek. ... According to you it can't be right. According to Islam it's right. When you talk about innocent civilians, do you not kill innocent civilians in Iraq?"

New Delhi, 3rd March 2012: A New Spring Waits, this is the warning that sharia4hind is giving. “India is now ruled by the most incompetent, unqualified and wicked individuals who have no clue about their purpose in life let alone how to rule a nation.” They further say “Indian political parties have preyed on the Muslim community, as the wolf preys a lamb; they have divided us with nationalism and poisoned us with democracy but most significantly have made us forget what the final Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him) was sent down for i.e. the total domination of the world by Islam”.

On 22nd February 2012, an organisation by the name of ‘Bhagat Singh Kranti Sena’, will attend the Delhi High Court appealing for a ban of organisation Shariah4Hind. They will also be demanding that the planned rally for Shariah on 3rd March 2012 outside Sansad Bhavan be outlawed and that visas for Anjem Choudhary and Shariah4Hind representatives be rejected. After knowing about this the sharia4hind reacts in one of its articles entitled ‘A Response to Delhi High Court Hearing’: “How ironic it is that supporters of the so called 'biggest democracy in the world' suddenly turn dictator when the truth becomes unpalatable; why has President Tajinder Bagga not called for the banning of misogynistic industries like Bollywood or the removal of blasphemous idols from the public arena? Why has he not called for the eradication of alcohol, the number one contributor to domestic violence in the country? The answer is that he like countless others in India sees no problem with it because they have become drunk with man-made law and reject the true guidance of Islam.” In the end it says “any banning will never stop the rise of Shariah in the Indian subcontinent, for the seeds of revolution have already been planted and it is only a matter of time before the black flag of Islam flies high over Sansad Bhavan.”

People have a tendency to move forward and march ahead in life with the needs of the time but Anjem Choudhary and his colleague Omar Bakri want pre-British era to be established which, according to them is “glorious golden period”. They write in one of the articles, “The recent history of the Indian sub-continent is fraught with hardship, poverty, racism and oppression. We are not calling for people to go back to 1971 or 1947 or even 1857 but rather to before the British occupied India and to the example of the Messenger Muhammad (saw) on how to govern the affairs of Muslims and non-Muslims.” Of course, these enemies of Islam and Muslims do not want to recall that the very first Islamic State Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) founded in Medina was a secular State. It was based on “Meesaq-e-Medina”, the first Islamic constitution and probably the first secular, multicultural, plural constitution in the world that was based on tolerance or even acceptance of all religions as well as atheism, as ways of life that had to be accorded equal respect by all citizens . Many common Muslims have not even been allowed to become aware of these facts by the Madrasa-based theological education available to them. This is the main problem of the Muslim community; they do not know about their religion and hence they follow those enemies of Islam who “claim” that they know and thus get misguided in the process.

They claim that the problem of Kashmir, Babri mosque, riots in Gujarat, slums of Mumbai, drugs, alcohol etc will be solved once Shariah is imposed on India. They intend to give non-Muslims a zimmi (second-class, though “protected”) status. “Some of the many problems that a united Indian sub-continent will resolve are the troubles in Kashmir, the problem of Babri mosque, the discrimination in Gujarat, the inner cities slums as in Mumbai, exploitation and widespread bribery, the presence of foreign forces (as in Afghanistan), public idolatry, the inhuman caste system, drugs, alcohol, promiscuity and pornography, the use of men and women's gender for monetary gain, usury, gambling, the boom and bust of the capitalist economic model etc.. Moreover all non-Muslims will be given the Zimmi status where their life and wealth will be protected in return for obeying the divine law of the land who will never be asked to be part of the Muslim armies whose job it will be to expand the frontiers of the Islamic State (into China, Indonesia, Malaysia etc...) and protect it from its enemies.

They want to expand their wings around the neighbouring countries of India like China, Indonesia, and Malaysia etc. A superpower is what they want to create which will be unparallel in the history of the world. “With a united Indian sub-continent and with the annexation of the Muslim-majority regions around it, from China, Indonesia, Malaysia etc... we will have united together over a billion Muslims, creating a superpower unparallel in the world. It being obliged for every mature, sane and capable Muslim man to be part of the armies of Jihad, this will be the beginning of the end of man-made law on the Earth Insha’Allah and could fulfill the prophecy of the Messenger Muhammad (saw) i.e. Izhar ud-Deen, the complete domination of the world by Islam.”

No matter how ridiculous these visions may appear and these ideas may sound to a normal person, it would be foolish to think that there will be no takers for them in India. Insanity is no monopoly of Britain or Saudi Arabia or Pakistan. It should not surprise us if some people here may start being beguiled by these ideas regardless of the chaos and violence they may cause. Indeed followers of SIMI have already organised Khilafat conferences in India before. They are openly repudiating Hindu gods, Muslims are being asked to boycott elections, “Bollywood gets the axe” etc. They intend to replace “India’s public idols and statues with mosques, symbolising the transformation from polytheism to monotheism, from darkness to light”. Similarly, they say “The people of Uttar Pradesh and the whole of India must be aware that their politicians are tyrants and that voting for such men or women to legislate man-made law is an act of polytheism (shirk). Muslims in India must steer clear from all electoral polls and place their trust in Allah alone by adhering strictly to the traditions (Sunnah) of the final Messenger Muhammad (peace be upon him)”. About Bollywood they say: “polytheism, interfaith and promiscuity and all of the other various ills of the Bollywood industry would be replaced with Islamic monotheism (Tawheed) and righteousness, providing a healthy environment for Muslims and non-Muslims to live under.”

Mr Upananda Brahmachari of ‘hinduexistence.com’ says “..this open declaration for denouncing the Indian Constitution by the Indian Muslims (fomented by their Pan Islamic counterparts) through an official permission from Government Of India to uphold Shariah for Muslims and the others afterwards under pressure is an unprecedented one. We should stop ‘Shariah for Hind’ at any cost.”

The clock is ticking in shariah4hind.com as if some strange thing is about to happen (now as I am writing this the counter-clock reads ‘4 days, 18 hours, 3 minutes). This will be a tough test for our Indian democracy, with the rise of radicalism in recent times; it will be difficult to soothe all the communities. Sharia4hind may have put Indian Muslims in the awkward position of being on the same side as those Hindutva goons who beat up reputed lawyers and activists against corruption like Prashant Bhushan in their Supreme Court cabins, but we have no choice. It would have been far better if someone like Zafaryab Jilani, the Babri Masjid activist lawyer had filed this case against Sharia4hind. But we can depend on our so-called leaders to always fail us. Anjum Choudhary says ‘Muslims must rise for Islam’; I say ‘Indian Muslims must rise for India’.

URL: http://www.newageislam.com/islamic-sharia-laws/aiman-reyaz,-new-age-islam/sharia-for-india?/d/6735



TOTAL COMMENTS:-   34
  • shariat will bring only the dark stage..
    By Arnab Das - 5/13/2012 7:00:44 PM
  • @Sadaf. As expounded in my article referenced below that fired the imagination of only on reader to the extent of posing a remark expounds that the Classical Sharia Law of Islam as “a cumulative juristic tradition that encompasses the legal responsa (fatawa) and opinions (rai) of all past jurists of Islam. Accordingly, it is shaped and informed by the customs, traditions, social and political conditions, juristic norms and the state of knowledge of the diverse historical points of Islamic civilization - dating from the founding Caliphate (632-661/10-40 AH) through the medieval ages to this day. Accordingly, it is a repository of, among countless other rulings, such notions as stoning to death for adultery, capital punishment for apostasy and blasphemy, punishment for homosexuality, slavery, discrimination and hatred against non-Muslims, demographic division of the world between the Muslims and non- Muslims, division of knowledge between Islamic and non-Islamic, temporary marriage, on the spot divorce, parental immunity against child abuse, gender disparity and so on, that are antithetic to the Qur’anic message.”
    The article has the following comments under Conclusion: However, with an endless series of paradigm shifts in human civilization from the medieval era to this day, many of the Classical Islamic Law’s rulings stand in conflict with the modern secular values, creating a civilizational divide. Besides, its application by the Islamists and extremist Muslim outfits such as in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sudan is pushing those countries to anarchy and civil war. Most alarmingly, some of its preposterous rulings and notions that remain buried in its exhaustive discourses feed Islamophobia, Islamopathy, radicalization, Islamofacism, violent sectarianism and international terrorism, demonize Islam and its Prophet, and trivialize the entire global Muslim country in the eyes of the rest of the world. Thus, any perceptive mind would conclude that in the historical perspective, the domain of the Classical Islamic Law (Islamic Sharia Law) has run out its course. However, the Divine Sharia of Islam – the Qur’an is beyond history’s timeframe. Its compatibility with the Western secular values and pluralistic, humanistic, gender neutral, universal paradigms [1 above] crown it as the ideal alternative to the Classical Islamic Law. However, the Qur’an must be probed in a historic-critical, gender-neutral, intra-textual and universal manner while its best meaning must be sought (39:18, 39:55). [14]…. It is time that the Muslim elite and leadership put their act together to achieve a gigantic paradigm leap - from the Classical Sharia Law of Islam to a Modern Islamic Law (Sharia), accommodating Western secular values - within the broader framework of the Qur’an. Their complacence and inaction may lend strong credence to Khaled Abou El Fadl’s agonizing concern: "Is it possible that the day will come when ours will be designated a "vanished civilization."

    http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicShariaLaws_1.aspx?ArticleID=5714
    http://www.newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamIslamicShariaLaws_1.aspx?ArticleID=5723

    Title: The Classical Islamic Law (Islamic Sharia Law) is NOT a Word of God!
    - Epitome of Justice and Equity for a thousand years of Islamic civilization - now a threat to Islamic civilization and World peace, warranting an urgent paradigm shift in Islamic Juristic thoughts.


    If you care and are perceptive and not averse to reading any serious discourse – as most educated youngsters are – forced or conditioned by the unremitting callings of the modern competitive and challenging life, kindly take a look at the articles and post your comment.


    By muhammad yunus - 3/3/2012 7:51:21 PM
  • I need update of what happened of the proposed gherao of Sansad by Anjem Choudhary and by Shariah4Hind which was supposed to happen today. Yes as a Muslim, I do not want to follow the man-made law in the name of Shariah. Anjem Choudhary’s Shariah is his Shariah- his made Shariah, man made Shariah and hence haram. Chances are that his Shariah will percolate into Indian Muslim homes through the foolishness of Zakir Nayak’s Peace TV. Meanwhile RSS opposition to such a Shariah will convince many stupid Muslims that since RSS is opposing it, it must be favourable to Muslims. Indian Muslims must clearly identify their enemies. RSS is open enemy, Anjem Choudhary in garb of a Muslim is a hidden enemy. Anjem Choudhary is basically what RSS is to Hinduism. Godse-a Hindu killed Gandhi-a Hindu because Gandhi was an obstacle to his dream of his kind of Hindu rule in India and similarly Anjem Choudhary or his fans will not hesitate to kill any Muslim whom he would see opposing his Shariah- his made Shariah- man-made Shariah. Muslim need their original Islamic Shariah coded in proper fashion which should be presented to Minority Welfare Ministry and forwarded to all Muslim bodies that oversees the affairs of Muslims like that of Muslim Personal Law Board etc. Let the work begin to collect and codify the correct set of Shariah. It has to follow at least three basic rule: 1. The Shariah has to be compatible with Islam. 2. It has to be relevant to the present time. 3. It should cite examples from Islamic history. Procedure: All that is needed to do is to take up the present code book which is already accepted by Muslim Personal Law Board and line by line go through it to see what needs to be corrected where. Of course where ever it needs to be corrected it will have to be validated by studying solution found out by Muslim jurists across the world. And if nothing of such kind exists then the same should be prepared. It may take time and energy but it has to be. And Mr. Muhammad Yunus need not be dissappointed by lack of response from his kins. He will find response from his readers and admirers- and that is another form of kinship.
    By sadaf - 3/3/2012 6:04:53 AM
  • Sreenivasa, it is morons like you who would say that sati and untouchability define Hinduism!
    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 3/2/2012 1:47:19 PM
  • Yunus Saheb, if you find that people "are intellectually frozen - as far as the Qur'an is concerned," we have to find innovative ways of reaching them. We live in a world in which "the consumer is always right."


    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 3/2/2012 1:32:00 PM
  • What has pislam contributed to the world other than terrorism ?, subjugation of women ?, child abuse ?,
    By sreenivasa - 3/2/2012 11:44:51 AM
  • @Muhiyuddin Saheb. The reposting was an erroneous double entry by the website staff. Perhaps my joint publication you ordered will meet your expectation.
    As for directly approaching youth, I have done my best to arouse the interest of youth among the next generation - two Phds from USA universities, couple of Masters degree from America/Canada/leading Indian University - all belonging to the elite section of the society and engaged in prestigious jobs - but no effect. Each of these young people will have no hesitation to lodge me for weeks (my children in USA/Canada for months) spend time and money for me to please me - but they all subtly duck my bidding to read any of the articles I write. I gave free copies of the book you ordered to dozens of youths in the family/ close circle. No enthusiastic response. They all are intellectually frozen - as far as the Qur'an is concerned.
    By muhammad yunus - 3/2/2012 7:39:53 AM
  • Yunus saheb, you reply is just a re-post of your earlier post!

    I am not interested in any argument with the ulamas or any TV campaign against them. I was alluding to our directly approaching the youth and giving them a positive message in a language that they themselves use, reminding them that Islam emphasizes the ideals and values that they themselves hold dear.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 3/1/2012 1:00:19 PM
  • @Gholam Muhiyuddin. The problem in any argument with the ulamas or any TV campaign against them is that they can read in the Qur’an whatever un-Islamic stuff they are taught in their madrassas. Thus for example, in response to my article on the historically derived character of the Hadith, Moulana Wajidi – probably the head of the leading Deobandi School in India cited the opening verses of Sura Najm to conflate the Hadith with the Qur’anic revelation. I had to refute his contention by quoting over a score of Qur’anic verses in point 10 of my rejoinder that has your comments. In case you just scanned through it, here is how I refuted him: “Sura al-Najm is an early Meccan verse. It was a time when the Prophet was rejected by the community and all sorts of diatribes were hurled against him as well as the revelation. As the Qur’an attests they (the Meccans) called Muhammad an impostor, a madman (30:58, 44:14, 68:51), and an insane poet (37:36), and ridiculed the Qur’anic revelation (18:56, 26:6, 37:14, 45:9). They also found the revelation strange and unbelievable (38:5, 50:2), and condemned it as the legends of the ancients (6:25, 23:83, 25:5, 27:68, 46:17, 68:15, 83:13) and jumbled up dreams (21:5). They questioned why Muhammad could not show any miracles (6:37, 11:12, 13:7, 17:90-93, 21:5, 25:7/8, 29:50), and why the Qur'an was not revealed to a man of importance from the two cities (43:31) - for Muhammad was neither wealthy nor powerful. They also declared that other people coached him or dictated to him morning and evening (25:5, 44:14). They also charged him with forging lies and witchcraft (34:43, 38:4), forging lies against God, forgery and making up tales (11:13, 32:3, 38:7, 46:8), witchcraft (21:3, 43:30, 74:24), obvious witchcraft that was bewildering (10:2, 37:15, 46:7), and of being bewitched or possessed by a Jinn (17:47, 23:70, 34:8). It was to refute the foregoing charges against the Prophet and Qur’anic revelation that the Qur’an declares in the opening verses of Sura al-Najm: "By the Star as it goes down (53:1) - Your companion (O Meccans) is neither astray nor demented (ghawa) (53:2). Nor does he say (yantaqu) (anything) out of (his own) whim (53:3). It is nothing but revelation (wahi) revealed unto him (53:4).” Thus, any media campaign against the moulvis and ulamas at this point in time – when the vast majority of educated and almost the entire lay Muslim populace has no clue about the contents of the Qur’an can be of no avail. As a first step we must create awareness among the educated youth to the fact that their silence and aloofness has allowed the extremists complete liberty in projecting Islam in a politicized, distorted, perverted, patriarchic, restrictive, exclusive and ritualistic manner inspiring/ justifying hatred, violence, intolerance and other social and moral evils which is adversely impacting the image of Islam and thus their own image and therefore, for their own secular interest they must know what their religion really is all about – as long as they bear a Muslim name and claim Islamic identity. But alas! Our educated youth have no time for the Qur’an as you will know from your own experience. So the few of us post our comments, and watch the losing battle helplessly to the detriment of our posterity.
    By Mohammed Yunus - 3/1/2012 7:42:29 AM
  • Yunus saheb, you are right in saying that our youth should study the Quran and find out what is really in it, but you yourself aver "But alas! Our educated youth have no time for the Qur’an." Your kind of educational effort must of course continue, but parallel to that a direct, lucid, simplified and concise approach emphasizing the fact that Islam's values are the same values that our youth, with their youthful idealism, cherish.

    As I said before, we have to have positive and exhortative statements such as:

    (1) Islam respects all religions.
    (2) Islam does not seek world domination.
    (3) We do not desire the return of the Caliphate.
    (4) Islam is completely compatible with democracy, secularism and pluralism.
    (5) We believe in gender equality.
    (6) We are against war and killing. We believe in resolving disputes through reconciliation and compromise.
    (7) We hold Arts and Sciences in high regard.

    Add to these your suggestions, namely universal justice, good neighborly relations, equal treatment of the minorities, universal brotherhood of humanity, striving for excellence etc. Each of the above can be the subject of a lecture or chapter in a book. We should of course have Quranic support for all our statements if required to produce them.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 3/1/2012 2:03:21 AM
  • @Gholam Muhiyuddin. The problem in any argument with the ulamas or any TV campaign against them is that they can read in the Qur’an whatever un-Islamic stuff they are taught in their madrassas. Thus for example, in response to my article on the historically derived character of the Hadith, Moulana Wajidi – probably the head of the leading Deobandi School in India cited the opening verses of Sura Najm to conflate the Hadith with the Qur’anic revelation. I had to refute his contention by quoting over a score of Qur’anic verses in point 10 of my rejoinder that has your comments. In case you just scanned through it, here is how I refuted him:
    “Sura al-Najm is an early Meccan verse. It was a time when the Prophet was rejected by the community and all sorts of diatribes were hurled against him as well as the revelation. As the Qur’an attests they (the Meccans) called Muhammad an impostor, a madman (30:58, 44:14, 68:51), and an insane poet (37:36), and ridiculed the Qur’anic revelation (18:56, 26:6, 37:14, 45:9). They also found the revelation strange and unbelievable (38:5, 50:2), and condemned it as the legends of the ancients (6:25, 23:83, 25:5, 27:68, 46:17, 68:15, 83:13) and jumbled up dreams (21:5). They questioned why Muhammad could not show any miracles (6:37, 11:12, 13:7, 17:90-93, 21:5, 25:7/8, 29:50), and why the Qur'an was not revealed to a man of importance from the two cities (43:31) - for Muhammad was neither wealthy nor powerful. They also declared that other people coached him or dictated to him morning and evening (25:5, 44:14). They also charged him with forging lies and witchcraft (34:43, 38:4), forging lies against God, forgery and making up tales (11:13, 32:3, 38:7, 46:8), witchcraft (21:3, 43:30, 74:24), obvious witchcraft that was bewildering (10:2, 37:15, 46:7), and of being bewitched or possessed by a Jinn (17:47, 23:70, 34:8). It was to refute the foregoing charges against the Prophet and Qur’anic revelation that the Qur’an declares in the opening verses of Sura al-Najm: "By the Star as it goes down (53:1) - Your companion (O Meccans) is neither astray nor demented (ghawa) (53:2). Nor does he say (yantaqu) (anything) out of (his own) whim (53:3). It is nothing but revelation (wahi) revealed unto him (53:4).”
    Thus, any media campaign against the moulvis and ulamas at this point in time – when the vast majority of educated and almost the entire lay Muslim populace has no clue about the contents of the Qur’an can be of no avail. As a first step we must create awareness among the educated youth to the fact that their silence and aloofness has allowed the extremists complete liberty in projecting Islam in a politicized, distorted, perverted, patriarchic, restrictive, exclusive and ritualistic manner inspiring/ justifying hatred, violence, intolerance and other social and moral evils which is adversely impacting the image of Islam and thus their own image and therefore, for their own secular interest they must know what their religion really is all about – as long as they bear a Muslim name and claim Islamic identity. But alas! Our educated youth have no time for the Qur’an as you will know from your own experience. So the few of us post our comments, and watch the losing battle helplessly to the detriment of our posterity.


    By muhammad yunus - 2/29/2012 8:28:12 PM
  • Mr Yunus thank you for correcting me. Instead of writing 'to choose the meaning that suits HIM', I should have written 'to choose the meaning according to the needs of the TIME and ENVIRONMENT'. May be this would have been better. I agree with you entirely that a handful of intellectuals and activists will not change the mindset of the of the ulemas. But I think we all should keep on trying, everybody is brainwashing or rather I should say programming the mind of the other person. If the orthodox can programme a young child's mind into doing extreme activities, similarly we can also try to programme that child's mind into doing peaceful activities. Not hate but love, this is what we should try to teach, but I must say that we do not have that much resource to do this on a massive scale. Constructive works always require more time and more effort.
    By Aiman Reyaz - 2/29/2012 6:52:06 PM
  • After suggestions from several quarters the department of telecom has blocked the London based “Islamist” website shariah4hind.com which had called for scrapping the Indian constitution and implementation of Shariah in India.(TCN)

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 2/29/2012 6:50:45 PM
  • Thank you non-India hindu for your comment. By the way, the photo is mine and I am 20 years old. I really like your last line, "Muslim moderates have long been criticised as being either a minority, apathetic or toothless. Isn't it time that these criticisms be put to test?"
    By Aiman Reyaz - 2/29/2012 6:42:08 PM
  • Yunus saheb, my concern is that our maulanas go to the Quran and come back with a message of intolerance, hate and violence. What I suggested was that we reverse the process, list the positive attributes that we, the progressive Muslims, know to be the essence of Islam or compatible with Islam, and then go to the Quran to find support and confirmation for those attributes.

    We can argue that our message has Quranic support, but so can the orthodox maulanas about their message. Let us rely on the quality of our message. This is where we can trounce them.

    I saw the video of a Pakistani maulana holding forth, giving multiple references, on "why blasphemy makes a death sentence mandatory". He made me feel sick. But I thought how nice would it be if we took a better assertion, e.g. "forgiveness is good", study it, find references to support it, and articulate a sermon about it.

    By Ghulam Mohiyuddin - 2/29/2012 12:16:27 PM

Compose Your Comments here:

Name
Email (Not to be published)
Comments
Fill the below text
 
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the articles and comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect that of NewAgeIslam.com.