वहाबि हज़रात दुनिया भर में इस्लाम के नाम पर
दहशतगर्दी तो कर ही रहे हैं साथ ही साथ इमान व अकीदे पर भी हमला कर रहे हैं
बचपन में मैं बहुत नात गुनगुनाया करता था, एक
मर्तबा मैं ये नात पढ़ रहा था,
दिल की दुनिया को सजाओ आका,
अपनी उलफत में जिलाओ आका
हुब्बे दुनिया से बचाना मुझको
मुझको अपना ही बनाओ आका
गमें दुनिया में ना आंसू निकले
अपनी उलफत में रुलाओ आका
प्रोग्राम खतम होने के बाद जैसे ही जाने लगा,
एक वहाबी आया और कहने लगा, भाई नबी (सल्लल्लाहु अलैह वसल्लम) को आका कहना शिर्क
है. उस वक़्त मैं बहतु छोटा था इल्म की कमी थी लेकिन फिर ये जवाब दिया,
“अगर आपके कहने के अनुसार आका कहना शिर्क है तो
ये बताओ, ये जो आप लोग बल्कि सब लोग कहते हैं की हिंदुस्तान में फलां की सर्कार
है, बिहार में इसकी सर्कार है, और सर्कार और आका का माना तो एक ही जैसा ही, तो इस
तरह तो सारे लोग शिर्क कर रहे हैं” इस पर वो तिलमिला उठा और बिद्बिदाता हुआ चला
नतीजा: वहाबियों ने हर बात बात पर शिर्क की
फैक्ट्री खोल रखी है, किसी में ये जुर्रत नहीं कि फैक्ट्री को बंद किया जाए.....
Once a wahabi asked
me to change my name. When i asked him the reason he replied that using ‘Ghulam’
with any Sufi or saint is ‘shirk’. Everytime he met me, he used to say the same
thing. I refuted his corrupt wahabiyat with the enlightening evidences from the
Quran and Sunnah. But he is still blind and unable to learn a lesson from the
Quran and Sunnah. He has been made blind by his wahhabi theologians who teach
such a lesson in their wahhabi mosques and madaris.
The mosque is the
house of Allah, but the wahhabis sit disrespectfully and talk against
इन वहाबियों ने जीना दो भर कर दिया है, जहाँ
देखो वहां डिस्टर्ब करने चले आते हैं, कभी कहते हैं अपना नाम बदल लो, कभी कहते हैं
मुसलमान बन जाओ, तुम मुसलमान नहीं हो, जन्नत की बाते करके दिखा कर हमारे ईमान को
तबाह करने की कोशिश करते हैं,
किसी शायर ने किया खूब कहा है,
तुझ से और जन्नत से किया मतलब वहाबी दूर हो
हम रसूलुल्लाह के जन्नत रसूलुल्लाह के
Nasseer shab says,
“All of Islamic theology
and scholarship of every sect (past and present) is both extremely sub-standard
and barbaric. Why would I waste my time refuting such nonsense?”
Why would you waste your
time in refuting wahabiyat? You will waste your time only in defending
wahabiyat and diverting the subject by mangharat bayanat.
You should not waste your
time under my article. My article is not meant for you. I do not like to talk
to you. Why do you write your comment on my article? Why do not you stick to
your own matter? You have disturbed my peace. I never go and write any comment
under your article. Is it disturbing you? I want to be away from you.
I want to talk only to
good people. In this manner I am very selective. Some Wahhabis called me and
offered me a good amount of money to work for their websites. Offer was very
good and I could not work for wahhabism. Anyway it is my personal rights. I can
sit and spend time with Hindus but not with Wahhabis. The Hindus living in my
locality do not tease my religion; they show smile on their faces and we show a
good example of peaceful coexistence; but there are some wahhabis whose face
show wrath and they are in a lookout for any possibility to brainwash me. Perhaps
they do not know that I am not gullible and naive. Leave it, it is my personal
events. You do not need to worry about it.
You consider all Islamic ‘theology’
sub-standard and barbaric. What do you mean by ‘all’? Do you mean all theology
including the theology of holy companions based on authentic evidences? If it
so, then you are extremely gumrah and dishonest towards the holy companions who
witnessed the revelation of the Quran. Sometimes you steal good ideas from what
you call ‘all of Islamic theology’ but you make it your own.
Similarly I consider your
mangharat and manmaani theology sub-standard and barbaric which can never be
supported by the Quran and Sunnah.
You want to present
yourself as ‘exegete’ but you are extremely unaware of exegesis. What you do
with the holy Quran is simply a ‘mangharat or manmaani taawil’ in our Urdu term.
Your wahabiyat has no respect
for Allah Almighty, no respect for the prophets (peace be upon them), no
respect for the holy companions. This is reflected in your comments and
“I am following Islam of
the Quran” is merely a claim often made by the wahhabis. These wahhabis use
this claim to brainwash the followers of Islam in their mosques and madaris. You
are showing the same picture. Your hidden wahhabism is very transparent. You
can deceive others on this website but not me. I know ins and outs of
Wahhabis call the people
that they are following Islam of the Quran and they make the Muslims sit in
their mosques and start teaching the lessons of Abdul Wahhab Najdi, Ibn
Taymiyyah, and their likes. This is what they call Islam.
say, “He [Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi] has discussed, in the first part of his
article, verse 2:190 in detail while conveniently leaving the next two
important verses 2:191 and 2:193.”
first part was only meant for 2:190. I have already written a piece on the
verse 2:191 and 2:193 under the following headline:
ISIS While Interpreting the Quranic Verse ‘Kill the Mushrikin Wherever You Find
this time in this series, I have planned to write it more comprehensively on
2:191 and 2:193.
sahib and Naseer sahib,
you refute the following point?
hijrah [migration] to join its ranks, ISIS in its mouthpiece magazine ‘Dabiq’
writes, “Shaykhul-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullāh) said, “Islam in the end of
times will be more manifest in Shām. […] So the best of the people on the earth
in the end of times will be those who keep to the land of Ibrāhīm’s hijrah,
which is Shām” [Majmū’ul-Fatāwā]...” [Dabiq, 3rd issue, Hijrah To Sham
[Syria]...., p. 10]
Taymiyyah quoted by ISIS is followed by every class of Salafism/Wahabism/Ahle
know there are some nikat and different context in this fatwa of Ibn Taimiyyah
but this is the responsibility of Wahabi scholars to refute or explain or make
taaweel of this fatwa in order to curb the recruitment process. We know that only the individuals from among
the followers of Ibn Taymiyya go to join the ranks of ISIS. The argument of Ibn
Taymiyyah is very effective for such followers. So it is the responsibility of
Salafi scholars to curb this effect. Non-Wahabi scholars, according to Wahabi
scholars, are “bidatis” and “qabar-pujwa” and hence their “enlightening refutation”
won’t work for such followers.
order to refute the theological arguments of ISIS, I was reading its mouthpiece
magazine ‘Dabiq’. What I found shocked me and therefore needs to be refuted.
us read first what Isis in its magazine “Dabiq” 3rd issue writes,
US had killed women, children, and the elderly, during its direct occupation of
Iraq prior to its withdrawal. There are countless accounts of American soldiers
executing families and raping women under the sanctity of the US military and
Blackwater. Muslim families were killed under the broad definition of
“collateral damage,” which the US grants itself alone the right to apply. Therefore,
if a mujāhid kills a single man with a knife, it is the barbaric killing of the
“innocent.” However, if Americans kill thousands of Muslim families all over
the world by pressing missile fire buttons, it is merely “collateral damage.....”
(Dabiq, 3rd issue, Foreword, p.3)
reading the above passage, I think this argument of ISIS will also be working for
would request the commentators of newageislam.com to write down their comments on
this argument of ISIS.
are reports that the US soldiers committed wrong acts with the Muslim families
in Iraq in the name of ‘collateral damage’. I condemn this act.
are also reports which tell us that the ISIS brutally killed Muslims and
non-Muslims in Iraq and Syria in the name of ‘Jihad’. I also condemn this act.
an argument is repeatedly made by ISIS and its likes. Such an argument, if
supported by the wrong interpretation of the war-related verses, will help ISIS
increase its recruitment process. Therefore the global communities should
ensure the peace and security practically for civilians on every occasion, even
in the state of war against ISIS and its likes. There is no benefit to fight
against terrorism if any such fight kills the innocent civilians.
Abdul Rehman Hamza sahib,
The problem lies in your wahhabism which is destroying Islam, Muslims and non-Muslims.
The followers of these scholars that I quoted in my article never went to join Taliban or ISIS – the offshoot of wahabism. But the doctrines of wahhabism that you support have successfully brainwashed the youth from around the world. The King of Suadi Arabia has acknowledged this mistake of wahhabism. The former Imam of Makkah also accepted that ISIS is the true face of Salafism/wahhabism.
In your comment you accused me of adopting selective nature, whereas the fact is that your sectarian prejudiced made you look for any possibility for attacking my arguments. You could be true in your accusation, if i had done this job in the case of the verse 22:39—the topic of this article. My arguments are not selective in its scope and area of the verse 22:39. You quoted 2:193 to make my arguments selective, but you forgot that my entire commentary revolves around the verse 22:39.
In this series I will also write my enlightening commentary on 2:193, taking into account your arguments also. I will welcome if you present more arguments on your part.
Anyway I am here to refute the violent cultism and whatever comes as a barrier therein.
You say, “I am really shocked! I see no difference whatsoever between what these Barelvi Ulema are saying and what Maulana Maududi, Mufti Shafi Usmani, Ibn Katheer have written in their books of tafseer.”
Hamza Sahib, your comment makes me decide that your studies are limited, no matter whether you are professor or lecturer or whatsoever. There are huge methodological differences among these scholars.
Maudidi and Shafi Usmani Saheban differ from one another. Ibn Kathir and Maudidi sahiban differ from one another. Barelvi Ulema differ from these three scholars in doctrines as well as methodologies concerning laws.
The first major difference is that the followers of Barelvi Ulema are not going to join ISIS and its likes. But the followers of wahhabism/salafism are going to join the groups like ISIS.
ISIS in its magazine quotes Ibn Kathir and other wahhabi scholars. They do not quote Barelvi scholars.
ISIS and Wahhabis describe Barelvi ulema as “qabar-pujwa”, “bidatis”, “mushrik”, “kafir” and then “liable to be killed”. They commit suicide attacks at Barelvi/Sufi khanqahs, shrines; kill the Barelvi-Sufi sunni clerics. These wahhabi ISIS killed Usaidul haq – the Indian cleric a few years ago, they killed Shaikh Ramadan al-Bouti while he was delivering his lecture on tafsir in Syria, they killed the son of great Mufti of Syria.
There are so many differences among these scholars that you can’t count. The wahhabi violent players like ISIS know that it is Sufi-Sunni ulema [known in India as Barelvis] that can damage and curb their growth.
The followers of wahhabism in India and outside can’t do nothing but play politics, speaking that “The people of ISIS are not wahabis. They are yahudis/jews. It is the conspiracy of Jews.....etc”. whenever I call them to refute theology of ISIS, they discourage me on the ground that it is the conspiracy of Jews and Salafi has nothing to do with it. But I question if it had been true, why would the former Imam of Makka have admitted that the ISIS is the real face of wahhabism/salafism? They give no reply.
Some followers of wahhabism, especially those who are experts in wahabi theological and have acknowledged their doctrinal mistakes, have started showing that Sufis are also on the same path of wahhabism.
Once I quoted a couplet on newageislam.com fits well again on the part of such followers of wahhabism, “Hum to sanam dube, tumhe bhi le dubenge”.
No Muslim denies Jihad. But true Muslims including Barelvis will indeed deny the so-called ‘Jihad of ISIS’ which is waged to kill civilians including Muslims, non-Muslims, women and children.
“Commenting on the cause of
revelation (shane nuzul) of this verse (22:39), Mufti Naeemuddin Muradabi writes, “The
infidels were persecuting the Noble Companions in the sacred city of Makkah.
Every day the Noble Companions would come in the presence of the holy Prophet
(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) in a state where either someone’s
head was broken, or hand was badly damaged, or someone’s fool was bandaged.
They were trying to seek permission from the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him)
to retaliate but Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) would exhort them to
exercise patience as Allah Almighty had not as yet granted permission for
Jihad- to wage war against the infidels. After arrival in Madina, this verse
was revealed, after which permission was granted to the Noble Companions for
Irfan on Kanzul Iman-22:39)” - By Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqi, New Age Islam
Mr Ghulam Ghaus Siddiqui is
very selective in his approach to the concept and purpose of Islamic Jihad. He
has discussed, in the first part of his article, verse 2:190 in detail while conveniently
leaving the next two important verses 2:191 and 2:193. However I will focus on verse
2:193 only which shows the real purpose of jihad from which the terrorist
organizations derive justification for committing their acts of terrorism.
2:193: “ And Fight with them until there is no
mischief ( FITNAH) and be their worship of only one Allah. But if they desist, there should be no
hostility, except against the oppressors.” - Tafseer Noorul Irfan
This Tafseer Is written by the famous Barailvi A’lim Mufti Ahmad Yaar
Khan. A brief profile on Mufti Saheb says that, he came to India from Pakistan to study
unde Mufti Muhammad Naeemuddeen
at Jamia Naeemia, Muradabad. It further says that Mufti Ahmad Yaar Khan has
particularly summarized in his tafseer the contents of Tafseer Khazainul Irfan of Mufti
Mufti Ahmad Yaar Khan in his note on verse 2:193 writes:
“From this verse we learn that the purpose of Jihad is not the total
annihilation of the infidels, but to destroy the power of infidelity so that
they do not become an obstacle in the propagation of Islam. The might of infidels should be destroyed so
that the institution of worship of one true God can be established without any
teacher Mufti Naeemuddin
Muradabadi, in his tafseer ‘Khazainul Irfan’, (
refered to by Ghulam Ghaus Saheb above) has
also explained the word ‘fitnah’ in 2:193 as KUFR and SHIRK. He says,
while explaining the verse 2:191, (Aur kafiron ko jahan pao maro…………………. And
kill them (infidels) wherever you find them), “Jo jang ke qabil naheen hain
unse jang na karo, ya jin se tum ne ahed (agreement) kiya ho unse bghair dawat
(inviting to Islam) ke jang na karo kyonki tareeqa-e-shara (Islamic way) yeh
hai ki pahle kuffar ko Islam ki dawat dee jaye, agar who inkaar Karen to jizyah
talab kiya jaye, ab agar is se bhi inkaar Karen to to unse jang ki jaye. Is bina
par is aayat ka hukm baqi hai, mansookh nahin huwa hai. It further says,
explaining the word ‘fitnah’ that “fitnah (Fasa’d) se shirk’ (polytheism) murad
hai ya musalmanon ko makkah mukarramah mein dakhil hone se rokna”. Moreover,
commenting on the next verse 2:193 (phir agar who baaz aa jayen …
But if they
cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimin) “yani Agar kufr
aur shirk se baaz aa jayen (that is, if they desist from kufr (disbelief) and
shirk, idol-worship) …
Minhaj-ul-Quran by Dr Tahirul
2:193. “Aur unse jang karte raho hatta ki koi fitna baqi
na rahe aur deen yani zindagi aur bandgi ka nizam amalan Allah hi ke tabe ho
jaye, phir agar who baaz Aa jayen to sewai zaalimon ke kisi par zyadti rawa
In his note on the above verse 2:193 Dr Tahirul Qadri
says, “Jihad aur inqilabi jadd-o-jahad deeni fareeza hain. Aur fitna-e-batil ke
mukammal khatma aur qiyam-e-amn tak inqilabi jang jari rahni chaahiye. Ghalba
aur nifaz-e-deen (Islam’s domination
and the implementation of the Islamic Sharia- emphasis mine) Jihad aur
inqilabi jang ki aakhri manzil hai. Haan agar mukhalif quwwaten fitna parwari
se baaz aajayen to unpar sakhti na ki jaye.
Any person having sufficient knowledge of Islam and jihad
can easily understand what Dr Tahirul Qadri actually understands by the word
‘fitna’ in verse 2:193, though he has used carefully selected and sugar-quoted
words and phrases to hide the real purpose of offensive Jihad which, according
to his own statement is “the ultimate
domination of Islam and implementation of its Sharia all over the world.”
I am really shocked! I see no difference whatsoever between what
these Barelvi Ulema are saying and what Maulana Maududi, Mufti Shafi Usmani, Ibn
Katheer have written in their books of tafseer . They all agree that the purpose of
Jihad is to establish the Islamic domination all over the world after
destroying the powers of Kufr and Shirk where ever and whenever Muslims have
the power to do it. So we should not be surprised at what ISIS, Boko Haram,
Al-Shabab, Al-Qaeda, Lashkar -e-Taiba and Taliban are doing in their lands
under the guidance of their Ulema to carry out this DEENI FAREEZAH.